Hi All,
I have been trying out XFS given it is going to be the file system of
choice from upstream in el7. Starting with an Adaptec ASR71605 populated
with sixteen 4TB WD enterprise hard drives. The version of OS is 6.4
x86_64 and has 64G of RAM.
This next part was not well researched as I
On 2014-01-21, Steve Brooks ste...@mcs.st-and.ac.uk wrote:
mkfs.xfs -d su=512k,sw=14 /dev/sda
where 512k is the Stripe-unit size of the single logical device built on
the raid controller. 14 is from the total number of drives minus two
(raid 6 redundancy).
The usual advice on the XFS list
On Tue, 21 Jan 2014, Keith Keller wrote:
On 2014-01-21, Steve Brooks ste...@mcs.st-and.ac.uk wrote:
mkfs.xfs -d su=512k,sw=14 /dev/sda
where 512k is the Stripe-unit size of the single logical device built on
the raid controller. 14 is from the total number of drives minus two
(raid 6
Hi,
- Original Message -
|
| Hi All,
|
| I have been trying out XFS given it is going to be the file system of
| choice from upstream in el7. Starting with an Adaptec ASR71605
| populated
| with sixteen 4TB WD enterprise hard drives. The version of OS is 6.4
| x86_64 and has 64G of RAM.
On 2014-01-21, James A. Peltier jpelt...@sfu.ca wrote:
Changing to inode64 and back is no problem. Keep in mind that inode64 may
not work with clients running older operating systems. This bit us when we
had a mixture of Solaris 8/9 clients.
I assume you are referring to NFS specifically;
5 matches
Mail list logo