Re: [CentOS] fsck - and there was much rejoicing

2010-12-01 Thread m . roth
Lamar Owen wrote: > On Wednesday, December 01, 2010 02:01:35 pm m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: >> Looks like the fsck bug has been stomped! I did a 960G drive this >> morning, >> and I'm 90% of the way through a 1.4T drive, both of which have *lots* >> of >> files and hard links, and it has *not* hung at

Re: [CentOS] fsck - and there was much rejoicing

2010-12-01 Thread Lamar Owen
On Wednesday, December 01, 2010 02:01:35 pm m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: > Looks like the fsck bug has been stomped! I did a 960G drive this morning, > and I'm 90% of the way through a 1.4T drive, both of which have *lots* of > files and hard links, and it has *not* hung at 70.1%, and is running at > re

[CentOS] fsck - and there was much rejoicing

2010-12-01 Thread m . roth
Looks like the fsck bug has been stomped! I did a 960G drive this morning, and I'm 90% of the way through a 1.4T drive, both of which have *lots* of files and hard links, and it has *not* hung at 70.1%, and is running at reasonable speed. Thanks to the folks who got this one. I *really* needed to