On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 6:11 PM, John Jasen wrote:
> On 03/22/2017 03:26 PM, Matt Garman wrote:
>> Is anyone on the list using kerberized-nfs on any kind of scale?
>
> Not for a good many years.
>
> Are you using v3 or v4 NFS?
v4. I think you can only do kerberized
On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 3:19 PM, wrote:
> Matt Garman wrote:
>> (2) Permission denied issues. I have user Kerberos tickets
>> configured for 70 days. But there is clearly some kind of
>> undocumented kernel caching going on. Looking at the Kerberos server
>> logs, it
On 03/22/2017 03:26 PM, Matt Garman wrote:
> Is anyone on the list using kerberized-nfs on any kind of scale?
Not for a good many years.
Are you using v3 or v4 NFS?
Also, you can probably stuff the rpc.gss* and idmapd services into
verbose mode, which may give you a better ideas as to whats
Feel free to contact me offline if you wish. I'll just go on record as saying
that it's a bear
- On 22 Mar, 2017, at 12:26, Matt Garman matthew.gar...@gmail.com wrote:
| Is anyone on the list using kerberized-nfs on any kind of scale?
|
| I've been fighting with this for years. In
Matt Garman wrote:
> Is anyone on the list using kerberized-nfs on any kind of scale?
>
We use it here. I don't think I'm an expert - my manager is - but let me
think about your issues.
> Just to give a little insight into our issues: we have an
> in-house-developed compute job dispatching
Is anyone on the list using kerberized-nfs on any kind of scale?
I've been fighting with this for years. In general, when we have
issues with this system, they are random and/or not repeatable. I've
had very little luck with community support. I hope I don't offend by
saying that! Rather, my
6 matches
Mail list logo