Hello Les,
Wednesday, December 17, 2014, 3:54:36 PM, you wrote:
LM if the NAS offers nfs
It does, but I'm waiting for an answer from Zyxel as to why the data rate
is limited to about 3.5Mb/s as opposed to 60-70Mb/s to a CIFS share
--
Best regards,
Niamh
Hello Kahlil,
Tuesday, December 16, 2014, 11:19:11 PM, you wrote:
KH Indeed: the sequence of dots and letters before the name indicates why
KH rsync wants to update a file.
Ah, not time but owner and group are different, and not being changed on
the NAS.
Is this a CIFS thing?
--
Best
Hello Stuart,
Tuesday, December 16, 2014, 9:33:29 PM, you wrote:
SB If this is a CIFS or other DOSish filesystem you may also need --no-o
SB --no-p and/or --no-g to ignore other file attributes.
Looks like this may be the case to solve that problem.
--
Best regards,
Niamh
On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 3:21 AM, Niamh Holding ni...@fullbore.co.uk wrote:
KH Indeed: the sequence of dots and letters before the name indicates why
KH rsync wants to update a file.
Ah, not time but owner and group are different, and not being changed on
the NAS.
Is this a CIFS thing?
Hello Kahlil,
Monday, December 15, 2014, 11:25:35 PM, you wrote:
KH When you use --itemize-changes, does it indicate that the timestamps of the
KH directories have changed?
Not uless the sequence of dots and letters before the folder name indicates that
--
Best regards,
Niamh
On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 10:41 AM, Niamh Holding ni...@fullbore.co.uk wrote:
Hello Elias,
Monday, December 15, 2014, 4:13:20 PM, you wrote:
EP Sounds like it might be differences in precision of the timestamp.
Could be, thoght the NAS box has the sending system as it's NTP server so
their
Hello Les,
Tuesday, December 16, 2014, 4:09:43 PM, you wrote:
LM What happens if you use --modify-window=3601 to allow up to an hour of
LM difference? Your NAS may have windows-like behavior in terms of
LM storing timestamps in local time and fudging them for DST.
Exactly the same :(
--stats
On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 12:56 PM, Niamh Holding ni...@fullbore.co.uk wrote:
Hello Les,
Tuesday, December 16, 2014, 4:09:43 PM, you wrote:
LM What happens if you use --modify-window=3601 to allow up to an hour of
LM difference? Your NAS may have windows-like behavior in terms of
LM storing
On Mon, 15 Dec 2014 at 11:41 -, Niamh Holding wrote:
EP Sounds like it might be differences in precision of the timestamp.
Could be, thoght the NAS box has the sending system as it's NTP server so
their times should be in sync.
EP Check out the `--modify-window` option.
Doesn't seem
On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 7:39 PM, Niamh Holding ni...@fullbore.co.uk wrote:
KH When you use --itemize-changes, does it indicate that the timestamps
of the
KH directories have changed?
Not uless the sequence of dots and letters before the folder name
indicates that
--
Best regards,
Niamh
Hello Kahlil,
Sunday, December 14, 2014, 8:54:45 PM, you wrote:
KH -i, --itemize-changes output a change-summary for all updates
Lists every file here
--
Best regards,
Niamhmailto:ni...@fullbore.co.uk
pgpJGlzxqhA5z.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Hello Keith,
Sunday, December 14, 2014, 6:31:20 PM, you wrote:
KK That must have been a very long time ago, as rsync has been silent for
KK as long as I can remember (even back to CentOS 5 and possibly even 4).
I think we're going back to rsync 2.6.x for this very useful summary.
--
Best
Hello Les,
Sunday, December 14, 2014, 7:18:09 PM, you wrote:
LM Folders should only be listed if timestamps or permissions are different.
Further experimentation shows this to be the case IF the destination is
another local drive.
Unfortunately the required destination is a CIFS share, which
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2014-12-15 14:43, Niamh Holding wrote:
LM Folders should only be listed if timestamps or permissions are
LM different.
Further experimentation shows this to be the case IF the
destination is another local drive.
Unfortunately the
Hello Elias,
Monday, December 15, 2014, 4:13:20 PM, you wrote:
EP Sounds like it might be differences in precision of the timestamp.
Could be, thoght the NAS box has the sending system as it's NTP server so
their times should be in sync.
EP Check out the `--modify-window` option.
Doesn't seem
When you use --itemize-changes, does it indicate that the timestamps of the
directories have changed?
K
Kahlil (Kal) Hodgson GPG: C9A02289
Head of Technology (m) +61 (0) 4 2573 0382
DealMax Pty Ltd
___
Hello,
Many years ago, FC4 days, the following command run as a cron job would
result in a nice summary email as follows
/usr/bin/rsync -a --no-whole-file --delete /music /thecus-music/
--
building file list ... done
sent 351583 bytes received 20
On 2014-12-14, Niamh Holding ni...@fullbore.co.uk wrote:
Many years ago, FC4 days, the following command run as a cron job would
result in a nice summary email as follows
/usr/bin/rsync -a --no-whole-file --delete /music /thecus-music/
--
Hello Keith,
Sunday, December 14, 2014, 6:31:20 PM, you wrote:
KK Anyway, you want some combination of the -v and --progress switches.
KK Try each separately, and both together, and see which you like best.
Neither!
Both switches list the folders being checked even if the contents are
On Dec 14, 2014 11:01 AM, Niamh Holding ni...@fullbore.co.uk wrote:
Hello Keith,
Sunday, December 14, 2014, 6:31:20 PM, you wrote:
KK Anyway, you want some combination of the -v and --progress switches.
KK Try each separately, and both together, and see which you like best.
Neither!
rsync -h
...
-i, --itemize-changes output a change-summary for all updates
...
K
--
Kahlil (Kal) Hodgson GPG: C9A02289
Head of Technology (m) +61 (0) 4 2573 0382
DealMax Pty Ltd
___
CentOS mailing
21 matches
Mail list logo
