On Wed, 16 Oct 2019 at 03:53, Fabian Arrotin wrote:
>
> It seems EPEL doesn't use a repoclosure test when pushing from testing
> to stable.
> Let me just take one simple example : I recently asked a pkg to be built
> for epel 8 (see https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1755787)
>
Sadly
On 16/10/2019 09:07, Alessandro Baggi wrote:
> On 16/10/19 02:31, Ranbir wrote:
>> Hello Everyone,
>>
>> Has anyone tried to install BackupPC v4 on CentOS 8 from epel? I just
>> did and this happened:
>>
>> [root@resurrect ~]# dnf --enablerepo epel install BackupPC
>> Last metadata expiration
On 16/10/19 02:31, Ranbir wrote:
Hello Everyone,
Has anyone tried to install BackupPC v4 on CentOS 8 from epel? I just did and
this happened:
[root@resurrect ~]# dnf --enablerepo epel install BackupPC
Last metadata expiration check: 0:18:41 ago on Tue 15 Oct 2019 08:03:59 PM EDT.
Error:
> -Original Message-
> From: CentOS [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Kenneth
> Porter
> Sent: Sunday, January 15, 2017 12:28 PM
> To: centos@centos.org
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] BackupPC
>
> On 1/15/2017 8:28 AM, TE Dukes wrote:
> > I
On 1/15/2017 8:28 AM, TE Dukes wrote:
I found the cygwin-rsync package and in the process of setting that up.
I'll join that list and see if I can find it.
Here's the message of interest with links to zip and installer:
https://sourceforge.net/p/backuppc/mailman/message/3022/
---
This
> -Original Message-
> From: CentOS [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Kenneth
> Porter
> Sent: Sunday, January 15, 2017 10:43 AM
> To: centos@centos.org
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] BackupPC
>
> The BackupPC mailing list is pretty helpful:
>
>
The BackupPC mailing list is pretty helpful:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/backuppc-users
Like John R. Pierce, I use rsync to back up my Windows clients. There
was an updated cygwin rsync link posted to the BackupPC list not long
ago. It's pretty simple to set up.
---
This
On 1/14/2017 3:32 PM, TE Dukes wrote:
Been working on this for a couple days and I am stuck!
Followed the CentOS WIKI on BackupPC to the letter. It may be outdated, not
sure. I also looked at the tutorial on HowToForge.
I'm trying to get a windows client to backup via smb.
I created the user
Bowie Bailey wrote:
> On 9/18/2015 8:39 AM, Timothy Murphy wrote:
>> Incidentally, I've been running BackupPC on my CentOS-7 server
> The GUI config editor is just an alternative to hand editing. It uses
> the exact same files.
>
> Keep in mind that the config files are stored separately from
Bowie Bailey wrote:
> On 9/13/2015 10:58 AM, Timothy Murphy wrote:
>>
>> I take it then that there is no CLI method
>> of setting up and running BackupPC ?
>
> Sure there is. All of the configuration is stored in text config
> files. There is a main config file for global options and each host
On 9/18/2015 8:39 AM, Timothy Murphy wrote:
Bowie Bailey wrote:
On 9/13/2015 10:58 AM, Timothy Murphy wrote:
I take it then that there is no CLI method
of setting up and running BackupPC ?
Sure there is. All of the configuration is stored in text config
files. There is a main config file
On 9/13/2015 10:58 AM, Timothy Murphy wrote:
I take it then that there is no CLI method
of setting up and running BackupPC ?
Sure there is. All of the configuration is stored in text config
files. There is a main config file for global options and each host has
a config file in it's own
On 09/13/2015 03:48 PM, Timothy Murphy wrote:
Timothy Murphy wrote:
I thought I'd write a 1-page note to myself of the steps I took,
in preparation for CentOS-8...
I have a couple of questions that this raises.
1. Why exactly does backuppc want to ssh to root?
Is this just a way of running
kpolb...@olberg.name wrote:
>>> 2. The graphical interface seems to be treated as an extra,
>>> but what other way is there of accessing BackupPC?
>>> Is there a CLI approach?
>>> If so, where is the list of transfer requests kept?
> 2. You can do all operations through CLI, all of it is
On 09/15/2015 10:58 AM, Timothy Murphy wrote:
kpolb...@olberg.name wrote:
2. The graphical interface seems to be treated as an extra,
but what other way is there of accessing BackupPC?
Is there a CLI approach?
If so, where is the list of transfer requests kept?
2. You can do all
Timothy Murphy wrote:
> I thought I'd write a 1-page note to myself of the steps I took,
> in preparation for CentOS-8...
> I have a couple of questions that this raises.
>
> 1. Why exactly does backuppc want to ssh to root?
> Is this just a way of running BackupPC as root?
>
> 2. The graphical
On 09/13/2015 03:48 PM, Timothy Murphy wrote:
> I see that BackupPC starts 6 copies of httpd running,
> but so far only 2 have ever been used.
> Can this number (6) be changed?
Yes, in the configuration of you httpd.
regards
Ulf
___
CentOS mailing
On 09/13/2015 01:35 PM, Timothy Murphy wrote:
> I have a couple of questions that this raises.
>
> 1. Why exactly does backuppc want to ssh to root?
To enable access to all of the files on the client.
It is also possible to run the backup running the rsyncd- daemon on the
client.
> Is this
Ulf Volmer wrote:
Thanks for your response, which clarifies matters for me.
>> I have a couple of questions that this raises.
>> 1. Why exactly does backuppc want to ssh to root?
> To enable access to all of the files on the client.
>> Is this just a way of running BackupPC as root?
> Why do
On 9/13/2015 7:58 AM, Timothy Murphy wrote:
1. Why exactly does backuppc want to ssh to root?
>To enable access to all of the files on the client.
>>Is this just a way of running BackupPC as root?
>Why do you want this? It's not required to run backuppc as user root.
I don't want (or not
anax wrote:
> On 2015-09-08 12:18, Timothy Murphy wrote:
>> I recently moved BackupPC from CentOS-6 to CentOS-7.
>> But when I browse to localhost/BackupPC I'm told
>>Error: Wrong user: my userid is 48[apache], instead of 984(backuppc)
>>
>> As far as I can tell, the BackupPC settings are
Hi Tim
if you try with suexec?
suomi
On 2015-09-08 12:18, Timothy Murphy wrote:
I recently moved BackupPC from CentOS-6 to CentOS-7.
But when I browse to localhost/BackupPC I'm told
Error: Wrong user: my userid is 48[apache], instead of 984(backuppc)
As far as I can tell, the BackupPC
On 09/08/2015 05:18 AM, Timothy Murphy wrote:
> I recently moved BackupPC from CentOS-6 to CentOS-7.
> But when I browse to localhost/BackupPC I'm told
> Error: Wrong user: my userid is 48[apache], instead of 984(backuppc)
>
> As far as I can tell, the BackupPC settings are exactly the same
>
On 04/19/2014 05:03 PM, Derrik Walker v2.0 wrote:
On 04/19/2014 04:47 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
On Sat, Apr 19, 2014 at 10:40 AM, Derrik Walker v2.0 dwal...@doomd.net
wrote:
I've installed backuppc from the EPEL repository. It does backups just
fine, BUT, when the backups are done, the
On Sat, Apr 19, 2014 at 10:40 AM, Derrik Walker v2.0 dwal...@doomd.net wrote:
I've installed backuppc from the EPEL repository. It does backups just
fine, BUT, when the backups are done, the status on the web page says
there are no backups for any of my systems I'm backing up.
To be sure,
On 04/19/2014 04:47 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
On Sat, Apr 19, 2014 at 10:40 AM, Derrik Walker v2.0 dwal...@doomd.net
wrote:
I've installed backuppc from the EPEL repository. It does backups just
fine, BUT, when the backups are done, the status on the web page says
there are no backups for any
On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 10:33 PM, Emmett Culley emm...@webengineer.com wrote:
I have been using BackupPC via rsync daemons on the target machines and all
has been working well. At least until about the time rsync went to version
3.0.6.
Since then backups have been failing for some targets.
On 09/26/2012 11:05 AM, Les Mikesell wrote:
On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 10:33 PM, Emmett Culley emm...@webengineer.com
wrote:
I have been using BackupPC via rsync daemons on the target machines and all
has been working well. At least until about the time rsync went to version
3.0.6.
Since
On 09/25/2012 08:33 PM, Emmett Culley wrote:
Since then backups have been failing for some targets. The failure
is a TCP ZeroWindow issue. It looks like the server rsync process
cannot empty it's buffer soon enough and eventually the process
fails.
If the rsync server sends a TCP ZeroWindow
On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 4:11 PM, Tim Evans tkev...@tkevans.com wrote:
BackuPC host is CentOS 6.2. Just one windows XP client. SMB backups
appear to be working; there is data in the backup directory tree,
including a subdir named for the client, in which I can manually view
individual files
On 05/14/2012 05:17 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 4:11 PM, Tim Evanstkev...@tkevans.com wrote:
BackuPC host is CentOS 6.2. Just one windows XP client. SMB backups
appear to be working; there is data in the backup directory tree,
including a subdir named for the client, in
On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 4:28 PM, Tim Evans tkev...@tkevans.com wrote:
Are you logging in to the web interface as a configured admin user or
the owner of the host in question? Othewise you won't see much.
Thanks for the reply; this pointed me in the right direction. Not sure
which
on 2-25-2010 1:44 AM Sorin Srbu spake the following:
Hi all,
I installed BackupPC on one of my Centos 5.4-machines following the wiki at
http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/BackupPC#head-725ed151d366bcf182cea92f765c373900cfc9dc,
where BackupPC is installed from the c5-testing repo.
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf
Of Les Mikesell
Sent: Friday, February 26, 2010 5:53 PM
To: centos@centos.org
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Backuppc-updates on CentOS
All repositories are hard to use with other repositories. Yum
epel is the best large 3rd party repo in terms of avoiding conflicts
with the base.
Yeah, I noticed that with rpmforge. I was just under the impression that
epel was a bit dodgy as repos come. Never too late to be enlightened
though. ;-)
the following is my opinion, and nothing
On 2/26/2010 2:20 AM, John R Pierce wrote:
epel is the best large 3rd party repo in terms of avoiding conflicts
with the base.
Yeah, I noticed that with rpmforge. I was just under the impression that
epel was a bit dodgy as repos come. Never too late to be enlightened
though. ;-)
the
Sorin Srbu wrote on Thu, 25 Feb 2010 10:44:40 +0100:
Doing the same search for RHEL5 gave me two packages (one for i386 and one
for
x86_64); v3.1.0-5.
Not from Red Hat.
I thought all packages available from the prominent American upstream
provider
got a treatment from the CentOS
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf
Of Kai Schaetzl
Sent: Thursday, February 25, 2010 12:32 PM
To: centos@centos.org
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Backuppc-updates on CentOS
Sorin Srbu wrote on Thu, 25 Feb 2010 10:44:40 +0100:
Doing
Sorin Srbu wrote:
Sorin Srbu wrote on Thu, 25 Feb 2010 10:44:40 +0100:
Doing the same search for RHEL5 gave me two packages (one for i386 and
one for x86_64); v3.1.0-5.
Not from Red Hat.
No, from epel.
epel is just another third party repo.
I thought all packages available from the
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf
Of Nicolas Thierry-Mieg
Sent: Thursday, February 25, 2010 1:50 PM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Backuppc-updates on CentOS
[...]
3.1.0-5 from one repo is not necessarily better
Sorin, I've seen you posting on this list for a long time. There is no
excuse that you don't know the simplest FAQs about CentOS.
Kai
--
Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com
___
CentOS mailing list
On 2/25/2010 3:44 AM, Sorin Srbu wrote:
Hi all,
I installed BackupPC on one of my Centos 5.4-machines following the wiki at
http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/BackupPC#head-725ed151d366bcf182cea92f765c373900cfc9dc,
where BackupPC is installed from the c5-testing repo.
r...@mach012 ~/ [0]# rpm
On 2/25/2010 7:31 AM, Kai Schaetzl wrote:
Sorin, I've seen you posting on this list for a long time. There is no
excuse that you don't know the simplest FAQs about CentOS.
I'm not sure there is any reasonable way to understand the state of 3rd
party repositories. If there were, they'd
Les Mikesell wrote on Thu, 25 Feb 2010 10:06:11 -0600:
I'm not sure there is any reasonable way to understand the state of 3rd
party repositories. If there were, they'd probably fix their conflicts
and avoid them in the future...
This wasn't what I referred to. He seemed to be unaware
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf
Of Les Mikesell
Sent: Thursday, February 25, 2010 4:52 PM
To: centos@centos.org
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Backuppc-updates on CentOS
[...]
Looking more closely I saw that the RHEL5-packages
On Mon, 2008-12-22 at 17:18 +, Timothy Murphy wrote:
I see that the Falko tutorial at http://www.howtoforge.com/linux_backuppc
recommends (on page 3) that one should enter one's username,
falko in this case, as the user in /etc/BackupPC/hosts .
Other tutorials suggest one should use
Se??n O Sullivan wrote:
I found the BackupPC documentation excellent, not familiar with the
above howto.
Just shows how opinions can differ.
I found the documentation very bad,
at least for one with my needs -
a home network on a few computers
looking for a simple backup system.
I should say
Timothy Murphy wrote:
Just shows how opinions can differ.
I found the documentation very bad,
at least for one with my needs -
a home network on a few computers
looking for a simple backup system.
I should say that BackupPC _is_ a simple backup system
once it is installed and configured;
Max Hetrick wrote:
I just put a guide up on the CentOS wiki a week or so ago.
http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/BackupPC
The goal was to kind of put together all these bits and pieces into one
simple to follow tutorial. It concentrates on using rsync to other
Linux/CentOS clients, but
On Sun, 2008-12-21 at 14:02 +, Timothy Murphy wrote:
I'm running BackupPC under Centos-5.2.
1. Will BackupPC backup files in NFS-mounted directories?
If so, is there any simple way of preventing this?
Not sure I understand the question, but I assume you are talking about
backing up a
S.Tindall wrote:
1. Will BackupPC backup files in NFS-mounted directories?
If so, is there any simple way of preventing this?
Not sure I understand the question, but I assume you are talking about
backing up a remote system that has a nfs mount. Have not tried it, but
would guess that the
please be patient.
Kai
--
Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany
Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On Sun, 2008-12-21 at 22:04 +, Timothy Murphy wrote:
S.Tindall wrote:
2. I have seen it suggested that it is not a good idea
to backup onto a partition on the same drive
as the BackupPC server?
Is that true?
If so, is a partition on a separate drive on the same machine also bad?
S.Tindall wrote:
I'm running BackupPC on machine 1 (helen)
and would like to back up onto machine 2 (alfred).
As far as I can see, that means NFS-mounting alfred:/backup
on helen:/var/lib/backup .
But doesn't that mean alfred's backups will be on alfred? Hard drives
are cheap and BackupPC
On Monday, September 29, 2008 1:26 PM +0100 Timothy Murphy
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was a bit surprised to find that BackupPC
does not seem to be available on my CentOS-5.2 system.
I got it from the testing repo. I use it to back up Windows servers to my
Linux server.
What do people
On 2008-09-29 14:26, Timothy Murphy wrote:
I was a bit surprised to find that BackupPC
does not seem to be available on my CentOS-5.2 system.
What do people use to backup Centos systems?
Actually BackupPC does run on CentOS without any problem.
I use BackupPC hosted on a CentOS 5.2 server to
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of
Timothy Murphy
Sent: Monday, September 29, 2008 2:26 PM
To: centos@centos.org
Subject: [CentOS] BackupPC
I was a bit surprised to find that BackupPC
does not seem to be available on my CentOS-5.2 system.
Timothy Murphy wrote:
I was a bit surprised to find that BackupPC
does not seem to be available on my CentOS-5.2 system.
What do people use to backup Centos systems?
you can use rsync which uses ssh but is faster than scp because it only
transfers the change between two files.
partha chowdhury wrote:
I was a bit surprised to find that BackupPC
does not seem to be available on my CentOS-5.2 system.
What do people use to backup Centos systems?
you can use rsync which uses ssh but is faster than scp because it only
transfers the change between two files.
Rsync is
Aleksey Tsalolikhin wrote on Thu, 31 Jul 2008 17:23:40 -0700:
I don't know SE Linux
touch /.autorelabel, reboot and wait.
Kai
--
Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany
Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com
___
CentOS
Aleksey Tsalolikhin wrote:
Hi. I've installed BackupPC 3.1.0 from Testing repository, to Cent
OS 5.2 x86_64, and I am hitting an SE Linux denial - the httpd cannot
talk to the BackupPC socket:
type=AVC msg=audit(07/31/2008 17:18:53.623:410) : avc: denied {
connectto } for pid=11767
Johnny Hughes wrote:
Aleksey Tsalolikhin wrote:
Hi. I've installed BackupPC 3.1.0 from Testing repository, to Cent
OS 5.2 x86_64, and I am hitting an SE Linux denial - the httpd cannot
talk to the BackupPC socket:
type=AVC msg=audit(07/31/2008 17:18:53.623:410) : avc: denied {
connectto }
Johnny Hughes wrote:
Johnny Hughes wrote:
Aleksey Tsalolikhin wrote:
Hi. I've installed BackupPC 3.1.0 from Testing repository, to Cent
OS 5.2 x86_64, and I am hitting an SE Linux denial - the httpd cannot
talk to the BackupPC socket:
type=AVC msg=audit(07/31/2008 17:18:53.623:410) : avc:
Kenneth Porter wrote:
--On Friday, July 04, 2008 9:21 AM +1000 Ben
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For some time now i have been running BackupPC 3.1.0 on CentOS 5.1 x86_64
however after upgrading to CentOS 5.2 BackupPC will not start.
What RPM are you using for BackupPC?
We have a backuppc rpm
--On Friday, July 04, 2008 9:21 AM +1000 Ben
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For some time now i have been running BackupPC 3.1.0 on CentOS 5.1 x86_64
however after upgrading to CentOS 5.2 BackupPC will not start.
What RPM are you using for BackupPC?
dnk wrote:
Any one have a tutorial for setting up backup pc on centos 5? I already
have it all installed (centos test repo), but looking more so for
configuration steps that are CentOS centric.
Not a exactly a guide, however there is a README.centos in the
/usr/share/docs/backuppc-version
On 10-Jul-08, at 2:47 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
Not a exactly a guide, however there is a README.centos in the /usr/
share/docs/backuppc-version dir that should tell you how to make
it work :D
hey, that is a start
Thanks!
Dustin
___
I've used the guide on mantic.org before, worked well for me:
http://www.mantic.org/wiki/Installing_BackupPC
We use BackupPC extensively where I work, once you get it settled down
and in a steady state it is invaluable.
___
CentOS mailing list
Ben wrote:
Ben wrote:
For some time now i have been running BackupPC 3.1.0 on CentOS 5.1
x86_64 however after upgrading to CentOS 5.2 BackupPC will not start.
sudo /etc/init.d/backuppc start return OK but there is no BackupPC
processes.
This fails also.
# sudo -u backuppc /usr/bin/BackupPC
Johnny Hughes wrote:
Ben wrote:
Ben wrote:
For some time now i have been running BackupPC 3.1.0 on CentOS 5.1
x86_64 however after upgrading to CentOS 5.2 BackupPC will not start.
sudo /etc/init.d/backuppc start return OK but there is no BackupPC
processes.
This fails also.
# sudo -u
Ben wrote:
Johnny Hughes wrote:
Ben wrote:
Ben wrote:
For some time now i have been running BackupPC 3.1.0 on CentOS 5.1
x86_64 however after upgrading to CentOS 5.2 BackupPC will not start.
sudo /etc/init.d/backuppc start return OK but there is no BackupPC
processes.
This fails also.
#
Johnny Hughes wrote:
Ben wrote:
Johnny Hughes wrote:
Ben wrote:
Ben wrote:
For some time now i have been running BackupPC 3.1.0 on CentOS 5.1
x86_64 however after upgrading to CentOS 5.2 BackupPC will not start.
sudo /etc/init.d/backuppc start return OK but there is no
BackupPC processes.
Ben wrote:
For some time now i have been running BackupPC 3.1.0 on CentOS 5.1
x86_64 however after upgrading to CentOS 5.2 BackupPC will not start.
sudo /etc/init.d/backuppc start return OK but there is no BackupPC
processes.
This fails also.
# sudo -u backuppc /usr/bin/BackupPC -d
# echo
Ben wrote:
Johnny Hughes wrote:
Ben wrote:
For some time now i have been running BackupPC 3.1.0 on CentOS 5.1
x86_64 however after upgrading to CentOS 5.2 BackupPC will not start.
sudo /etc/init.d/backuppc start return OK but there is no BackupPC
processes.
This fails also.
# sudo -u
Ben wrote:
For some time now i have been running BackupPC 3.1.0 on CentOS 5.1
x86_64 however after upgrading to CentOS 5.2 BackupPC will not start.
sudo /etc/init.d/backuppc start return OK but there is no BackupPC
processes.
This fails also.
# sudo -u backuppc /usr/bin/BackupPC -d
# echo
Johnny Hughes wrote:
Ben wrote:
For some time now i have been running BackupPC 3.1.0 on CentOS 5.1
x86_64 however after upgrading to CentOS 5.2 BackupPC will not start.
sudo /etc/init.d/backuppc start return OK but there is no BackupPC
processes.
This fails also.
# sudo -u backuppc
76 matches
Mail list logo
