Am 14.09.09 19:23, schrieb Ned Slider:
> Do we need to decide what the official (or preferred) CentOS Way is for
> this? Or do we just present all the options without prejudice?
>
> There are (to my knowledge) the Nvidia binary installer, dkms driver
> from rpmforge, kmdl package from ATrpms, an
Am 14.09.09 17:07, schrieb Christoph Maser:
> Am Montag, den 14.09.2009, 16:37 +0200 schrieb Ralph Angenendt:
>> You know that you'd have to write a *complete* policy for containing
>> Nagios that way? Can nagios even be seen as its own application
>> deserving its own domain or isn't much of nagio
On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 10:15 AM, Scott Robbins wrote:
> Over the weekend, I played with the elrepo-testing version. It was
> pretty much (after having installed the nvidia drivers from NVidia)
>
> nvidia-uninstall
>
> to get rid of what I'd downloaded.
>
> Then
>
> yum --disablerepo=* --enabler
Phil Schaffner wrote:
> lostson wrote:
>> On Tue, 2009-08-18 at 23:39 -0400, JohnS wrote:
> ...
>>> [1] http://wiki.centos.org/HardwareList/Nvidia_Graphics
>>>
>>> JohnStanley
>>>
>> I was reading yours over today and yes they are very similar, hopefully
>> i can get edit permissions soon and we c
On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 01:09:43PM -0400, Phil Schaffner wrote:
> lostson wrote:
> > On Tue, 2009-08-18 at 23:39 -0400, JohnS wrote:
> ...
> >>
> >> [1] http://wiki.centos.org/HardwareList/Nvidia_Graphics
> >>
> >> JohnStanley
> >>
> > I was reading yours over today and yes they are very similar,
lostson wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-08-18 at 23:39 -0400, JohnS wrote:
...
>>
>> [1] http://wiki.centos.org/HardwareList/Nvidia_Graphics
>>
>> JohnStanley
>>
> I was reading yours over today and yes they are very similar, hopefully
> i can get edit permissions soon and we can get it all squared away.
M
From: Vitor Afonso Strabello, Friday, September 11, 2009 5:51 PM
>Also I got one link about this. I think that is better a checkou, not sure
>if this will be usefult:
>
>http://www.linux-mag.com/id/6747
>
>Have a nice weekend,
>
>Vitor
Yes, that is an excellent article. It has a a few things
Martin Boel, Silverbullet wrote:
> Hi
>
> I would like to contribute to the wiki.centos.org:
> username: boel
> subject: nagios incompatibility with centos 5.2
> location: http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/Nagios
> content: A security feature of centos 5.2 SELinux prevents the access
> from the apach
Am Montag, den 14.09.2009, 16:37 +0200 schrieb Ralph Angenendt:
> On Mon, 2009-09-14 at 16:24 +0200, Christoph Maser wrote:
> > Am Montag, den 14.09.2009, 16:15 +0200 schrieb Ralph Angenendt:
> > > On Mon, 2009-09-14 at 16:11 +0200, Martin Boel, Silverbullet wrote:
> > > > workaround is to execute
On Mon, 2009-09-14 at 16:24 +0200, Christoph Maser wrote:
> Am Montag, den 14.09.2009, 16:15 +0200 schrieb Ralph Angenendt:
> > On Mon, 2009-09-14 at 16:11 +0200, Martin Boel, Silverbullet wrote:
> > > workaround is to execute the command: chcon -R httpd_sys_content_t
> > > /var/nagios
> >
> > Is
Am Montag, den 14.09.2009, 16:15 +0200 schrieb Ralph Angenendt:
> On Mon, 2009-09-14 at 16:11 +0200, Martin Boel, Silverbullet wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > I would like to contribute to the wiki.centos.org:
> > username: boel
>
> Hmmm. We really do prefer FirstnameLastname.
>
> > subject: nagios incompati
On Mon, 2009-09-14 at 16:11 +0200, Martin Boel, Silverbullet wrote:
> Hi
>
> I would like to contribute to the wiki.centos.org:
> username: boel
Hmmm. We really do prefer FirstnameLastname.
> subject: nagios incompatibility with centos 5.2
> location: http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/Nagios
> cont
Hi
I would like to contribute to the wiki.centos.org:
username: boel
subject: nagios incompatibility with centos 5.2
location: http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/Nagios
content: A security feature of centos 5.2 SELinux prevents the access
from the apache httpd server to the needed /var/nagios files. T
13 matches
Mail list logo
