Hi all,
> I know that the nagios docs suck, and actually everything around nagios.
> But what does that have to do with centos? And why don't you contribute
> to the nagios docs?
>
> The nagios-wiki (http://wkiki.nagios.org) is totally orphaned also!
I personally agree on that. We have similar is
Am Mittwoch, den 16.09.2009, 20:36 +0200 schrieb Scott Robbins:
> On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 06:50:41PM +0200, Christoph Maser wrote:
>
>
> > > Done. I hope you incorporate The things Christoph Maser has mentioned
> > > and don't just add the one line from your first mail (which will
> > > break, when
Am Mittwoch, den 16.09.2009, 20:47 +0200 schrieb Scott Robbins:
> On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 07:58:20PM +0200, Christoph Maser wrote:
> > Am Mittwoch, den 16.09.2009, 19:34 +0200 schrieb Mathew S. McCarrell:
> >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > This one?
> > http://docs.cslabs.clarkson.edu/wiki/Install_Nagios_on
Am Mittwoch, den 16.09.2009, 20:45 +0200 schrieb Scott Robbins:
> On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 01:27:42PM -0400, Max Hetrick wrote:
> > Christoph Maser wrote:
> >
> > > Btw. i really consider the current nagios article on the wiki bad. Its
> > > totally outdated and covers way to much info how to config
Scott Robbins wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 07:58:20PM +0200, Christoph Maser wrote:
>
>> Am Mittwoch, den 16.09.2009, 19:34 +0200 schrieb Mathew S. McCarrell:
>>
>>
>>>
>>>
>> This one?
>> http://docs.cslabs.clarkson.edu/wiki/Install_Nagios_on_CentOS_5
>>
>> This is what i really
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 07:58:20PM +0200, Christoph Maser wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, den 16.09.2009, 19:34 +0200 schrieb Mathew S. McCarrell:
>
> >
> >
> >
> This one?
> http://docs.cslabs.clarkson.edu/wiki/Install_Nagios_on_CentOS_5
>
> This is what i really think it should like!
You're serious? Th
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 01:27:42PM -0400, Max Hetrick wrote:
> Christoph Maser wrote:
>
> > Btw. i really consider the current nagios article on the wiki bad. Its
> > totally outdated and covers way to much info how to configure nagios
> > itself. In my opinion this should be simply replaced by li
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 06:50:41PM +0200, Christoph Maser wrote:
> > Done. I hope you incorporate The things Christoph Maser has mentioned
> > and don't just add the one line from your first mail (which will
> > break, when the box is relabeled).
> >
> > Ralph
>
> Btw. i really consider the curr
Karanbir Singh wrote:
> How about splitting it up into 'Install Guide' and a 'Recommended first
> steps'.
>
> Having used Nagios ( or does Nagios use us ? ) I know there are a
> million different ways to set things up. And only a few people really
> need to get down and understand eveyrthing a
Am Mittwoch, den 16.09.2009, 20:05 +0200 schrieb Karanbir Singh:
> On 09/16/2009 06:44 PM, Max Hetrick wrote:
> > I've not read your guide, but perhaps both could be united to make one
> > that's current and suitable for everyone's needs. Just a thought too. :)
>
> How about splitting it up into 'I
On 09/16/2009 06:44 PM, Max Hetrick wrote:
> I've not read your guide, but perhaps both could be united to make one
> that's current and suitable for everyone's needs. Just a thought too. :)
How about splitting it up into 'Install Guide' and a 'Recommended first
steps'.
Having used Nagios ( or d
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 1:58 PM, Christoph Maser wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, den 16.09.2009, 19:34 +0200 schrieb Mathew S. McCarrell:
>
> >
> >
> > It might be simpler to just have a tutorial that uses the package that
> > is available from rpmforge. I have already written such a tutorial
> > and it r
Ha, I clearly looked at the article too quickly.
I'm also open to the idea of combining my guide with the CentOS wiki one.
Feel free to take a look at and use any part of the one that I've written,
which is available at
http://docs.cslabs.clarkson.edu/wiki/Install_Nagios_on_CentOS_5 . Its not
qui
Am Mittwoch, den 16.09.2009, 19:34 +0200 schrieb Mathew S. McCarrell:
>
>
> It might be simpler to just have a tutorial that uses the package that
> is available from rpmforge. I have already written such a tutorial
> and it receives several hundred hits each month. Its also the second
> result
Am Mittwoch, den 16.09.2009, 19:27 +0200 schrieb Max Hetrick:
> Christoph Maser wrote:
>
> > Btw. i really consider the current nagios article on the wiki bad. Its
> > totally outdated and covers way to much info how to configure nagios
> > itself. In my opinion this should be simply replaced by li
Mathew S. McCarrell wrote:
> It might be simpler to just have a tutorial that uses the package that
> is available from rpmforge. I have already written such a tutorial and
> it receives several hundred hits each month. Its also the second result
> in Google if you search for "install nagios
Mathew S. McCarrell wrote:
> It might be simpler to just have a tutorial that uses the package that
> is available from rpmforge. I have already written such a tutorial and
> it receives several hundred hits each month. Its also the second result
> in Google if you search for "install nagios
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 12:50 PM, Christoph Maser wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, den 16.09.2009, 15:19 +0200 schrieb Ralph Angenendt:
> > On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 9:13 AM, Martin Boel, Silverbullet
> > wrote:
> > > Hi
> > >
> > > username: MartinBoel
> > >
> > > Please grant me access.
> >
> > Done. I hop
Christoph Maser wrote:
> Btw. i really consider the current nagios article on the wiki bad. Its
> totally outdated and covers way to much info how to configure nagios
> itself. In my opinion this should be simply replaced by links to the
> official documentation since it is out of place and incomp
Am Mittwoch, den 16.09.2009, 15:19 +0200 schrieb Ralph Angenendt:
> On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 9:13 AM, Martin Boel, Silverbullet
> wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > username: MartinBoel
> >
> > Please grant me access.
>
> Done. I hope you incorporate The things Christoph Maser has mentioned
> and don't just add
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 9:13 AM, Martin Boel, Silverbullet
wrote:
> Hi
>
> username: MartinBoel
>
> Please grant me access.
Done. I hope you incorporate The things Christoph Maser has mentioned
and don't just add the one line from your first mail (which will
break, when the box is relabeled).
Ra
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 05:39:23AM -0400, JohnS wrote:
>
> Could those that are trying out the "kmod" driver please report what
> video card model you have. Would be nice to have a good list of the
> Legacy and Newer Cards.
For what it is worth, I'll take the lazy man's way out and just send it
lostson wrote on 09/16/2009 08:23 AM:
> On Wed, 2009-09-16 at 07:50 -0400, Phil Schaffner wrote:
...
> In the doc we have been toying with the finding the correct driver is
> in there.
Yes, I see it in the draft - just suggesting ideas to beef it up.
Phil
P.S. [soapbox]Trimming quotes to the mi
http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/Skype
Links to the Skype RPM are broken. Inserted a warning on the page.
Phil
--
Philip R. Schaffner, RTD/ESB Phone: (757)864-1809
NASA/Langley Research Center, MS 473 FAX: (757)864-7891
8 North Dryden Street, B1299, Room 109 WWW:
Hampton, VA 2
On Wed, 2009-09-16 at 07:50 -0400, Phil Schaffner wrote:
> Ned Slider wrote on 09/16/2009 06:12 AM:
> ...
> > That tends to change as the drivers move forward over time, older cards
> > become legacy and are no longer supported by the latest driver.
> >
> > For a list of cards supported by the l
Ned Slider wrote on 09/16/2009 06:12 AM:
...
> That tends to change as the drivers move forward over time, older cards
> become legacy and are no longer supported by the latest driver.
>
> For a list of cards supported by the latest driver, the user is better
> off referring to nvidia's document
JohnS wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-09-15 at 15:11 -0400, Scott Robbins wrote:
>> On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 08:51:23PM +0200, Dag Wieers wrote:
>>> On Tue, 15 Sep 2009, Akemi Yagi wrote:
>>>
>>> The only reason for me to keep maintaining the dkms packages, would be
>>> for those people not running supported
On Tue, 2009-09-15 at 15:11 -0400, Scott Robbins wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 08:51:23PM +0200, Dag Wieers wrote:
> > On Tue, 15 Sep 2009, Akemi Yagi wrote:
> >
> > The only reason for me to keep maintaining the dkms packages, would be
> > for those people not running supported kernels (recen
On Mon, 2009-09-14 at 19:45 +0200, Ralph Angenendt wrote:
> Am 14.09.09 19:23, schrieb Ned Slider:
> > Do we need to decide what the official (or preferred) CentOS Way is for
> > this? Or do we just present all the options without prejudice?
> >
> > There are (to my knowledge) the Nvidia binary
Hi
username: MartinBoel
Please grant me access.
Regards
Martin Boel
___
CentOS-docs mailing list
CentOS-docs@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs
30 matches
Mail list logo
