On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 7:05 PM, Ed Heron e...@heron-ent.com wrote:
From my point of view, the process wasn't onerous in itself. The only
issues I had/have are the sparse guidelines of acceptable content and the
voracity of the reaction, by some, to what they viewed as unacceptable
content.
From: Ralph Angenendt, Tuesday, October 06, 2009 7:22 AM
On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 7:05 PM, Ed Heron e...@heron-ent.com wrote:
From my point of view, the process wasn't onerous in itself. The only
issues I had/have are the sparse guidelines of acceptable content and the
voracity of the reaction,
On Tue, 6 Oct 2009, Ed Heron wrote:
It appears that the people who are preferring the more restricted content
guidelines are saying they will accept content separation. But having 2
separate content systems seems redundant. Is there a way to have a section
(directory) of the wiki that is
On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 2:53 PM, R P Herrold herr...@centos.org wrote:
On Tue, 6 Oct 2009, Ed Heron wrote:
It appears that the people who are preferring the more restricted content
guidelines are saying they will accept content separation. But having 2
separate content systems seems
