Re: [CentOS-docs] Docs strategy and tactics [RFC]

2015-03-16 Thread Shaun McCance
On Tue, 2015-03-17 at 01:54 +0530, kunaal jain wrote: On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 10:48 PM, Shaun McCance sha...@redhat.com wrote: I like putting focus on this. It provides people a resource for things they actually want to do. Nobody wants just an operating system. I also think it's a great

Re: [CentOS-docs] Docs strategy and tactics [RFC]

2015-03-16 Thread Pete Travis
On 03/12/2015 03:59 PM, Karsten Wade wrote: I've been thinking for a little while, and talking with people, about what would be a good documentation strategy for the CentOS Project. == tl;dnr aka Summary This is a proposal around creating new, short-format documentation about doing cool new

Re: [CentOS-docs] Docs strategy and tactics [RFC]

2015-03-16 Thread Karsten Wade
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 03/16/2015 02:12 PM, Jason Brooks wrote: Good info. Different strokes, etc., only way to judge is through results. Wikis are certainly a well-known sort of tool, if ppl don't realize they can make a change, they definitely won't. I've wondered

Re: [CentOS-docs] Docs strategy and tactics [RFC]

2015-03-16 Thread Karsten Wade
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 03/16/2015 04:05 PM, Pete Travis wrote: We've been having a very similar conversation in the Fedora Docs group. I have a crude plan for the tooling part, to extend buildbot to address this; the idea is that you feed it git repos containing

Re: [CentOS-docs] Docs strategy and tactics [RFC]

2015-03-16 Thread kunaal jain
On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 10:48 PM, Shaun McCance sha...@redhat.com wrote: I like putting focus on this. It provides people a resource for things they actually want to do. Nobody wants just an operating system. I also think it's a great avenue for getting community contributions. It's easy to

Re: [CentOS-docs] Docs strategy and tactics [RFC]

2015-03-16 Thread Shaun McCance
On Thu, 2015-03-12 at 14:59 -0700, Karsten Wade wrote: I've been thinking for a little while, and talking with people, about what would be a good documentation strategy for the CentOS Project. == tl;dnr aka Summary This is a proposal around creating new, short-format documentation about

Re: [CentOS-docs] Docs strategy and tactics [RFC]

2015-03-16 Thread Jason Brooks
- Original Message - From: Dave Neary dne...@redhat.com To: Mail list for wiki articles centos-docs@centos.org Sent: Monday, March 16, 2015 1:42:06 PM Subject: Re: [CentOS-docs] Docs strategy and tactics [RFC] Hi, On 03/16/2015 03:44 PM, Karsten Wade wrote: On 03/16/2015

Re: [CentOS-docs] Docs strategy and tactics [RFC]

2015-03-16 Thread Dave Neary
Hi, On 03/16/2015 03:44 PM, Karsten Wade wrote: On 03/16/2015 11:33 AM, Jim Perrin wrote: My only question is, how do we determine what goes in the wiki vs what goes in git? The flow/format between the two is a bit different. Or is this development the first step in the transition away from

Re: [CentOS-docs] Docs strategy and tactics [RFC]

2015-03-16 Thread Jim Perrin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 03/12/2015 04:59 PM, Karsten Wade wrote: much snipping That would allow for us to mirror content to github.com/CentOS and people could use Prose.io for editing and pull requests to submit content. We would sync all that back to

Re: [CentOS-docs] Docs strategy and tactics [RFC]

2015-03-16 Thread Karsten Wade
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 03/16/2015 11:33 AM, Jim Perrin wrote: My only question is, how do we determine what goes in the wiki vs what goes in git? The flow/format between the two is a bit different. Or is this development the first step in the transition away from the

Re: [CentOS-docs] Docs strategy and tactics [RFC]

2015-03-16 Thread Jason Brooks
- Original Message - From: Karsten Wade kw...@redhat.com To: centos-docs@centos.org Sent: Monday, March 16, 2015 12:44:47 PM Subject: Re: [CentOS-docs] Docs strategy and tactics [RFC] -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 03/16/2015 11:33 AM, Jim Perrin wrote: My