On 1 June 2015 at 18:24, Karsten Wade kw...@redhat.com wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 05/30/2015 09:19 AM, Dougal Matthews wrote:
An alternative approach would be to build the docs in CI and link
to the built version in a comment on both systems.
This is an
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 05/29/2015 12:33 PM, kunaal jain wrote:
Hi,
Over the last week, Lei and I have been researching about the
review platform where the content submitted can be reviewed,
commented, tagged and pushed. This will be an alternative to github
pull
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 05/30/2015 09:19 AM, Dougal Matthews wrote:
An alternative approach would be to build the docs in CI and link
to the built version in a comment on both systems.
This is an interesting idea. We'll end up wanting docs to build in the
CI anyway, so
Hi,
Over the last week, Lei and I have been researching about the review
platform where the content submitted can be reviewed, commented, tagged and
pushed. This will be an alternative to github pull requests interface, which
will thus reduce our dependency on Github in case Github
On 29 May 2015 at 20:33, kunaal jain kunaa...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Over the last week, Lei and I have been researching about the review
platform where the content submitted can be reviewed, commented, tagged and
pushed. This will be an alternative to github pull requests interface, which
Hi,
Over the last week, Lei and I have been researching about the review
platform where the content submitted can be reviewed, commented, tagged and
pushed. This will be an alternative to github pull requests interface,
which will thus reduce our dependency on Github in case Github changes its
