On Thu, 2008-05-01 at 21:14 +0100, Karanbir Singh wrote:
> John wrote:
> > Todays feedback for cobbler. On a fresh OS install all updates were done
> > first. Don yum install cobbler from testing and I get a makefile
> > problem. Here's the error...
> >
> > Transaction Check Error:
> > file /usr
John wrote:
Todays feedback for cobbler. On a fresh OS install all updates were done
first. Don yum install cobbler from testing and I get a makefile
problem. Here's the error...
Transaction Check Error:
file /usr/lib/python2.4/config/Makefile from install of
python-devel-2.4.3-19.el5 conflict
On Thu, 2008-05-01 at 16:37 +0100, Karanbir Singh wrote:
> cobbler 0.8.x is now in the testing repos, pending feedback it will move
> to the .centos.org repo's ( should not be more than a few weeks )
>
> - KB
Karan and Matt,
Todays feedback for cobbler. On a fresh OS install all updates were do
Karanbir Singh wrote:
John wrote:
Matt has offered to help us setup and then maintain the cobbler
packages ( along with the couple of deps that it needs ). So expect
some action on that front in the next few days. It will need to still
go via the whole testing -> stable route, but I will do my
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
John wrote:
>> Sure we can it is up to you if you want to put a link to it (you wrote
>> it). When I get the my Cobbler situation sorted out i'll let you know.
>> If I feel like I can do a good enough job of writing it (maybe with help
>> and extra p
On Mon, 2008-04-21 at 17:11 -0400, Max Hetrick wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> John wrote:
>
> > I think the best solution for right now is to take off the CentOS 5. In
> > the mean time I'll be testing Cobbler out from the Testing repo this
> > week. Perhaps maybe a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
John wrote:
> I think the best solution for right now is to take off the CentOS 5. In
> the mean time I'll be testing Cobbler out from the Testing repo this
> week. Perhaps maybe a section could be written on the Wiki for using
> cobbler and you could
> Let me know if you've been able to discover anything. I'm guessing this
> is too much of a PITA to do on 5 until RHEL gets the tools corrected,
> especially whenever you can easily get it working with 4.6 without much
> effort.
>
> Regards,
> Max
Max,
I think the best solution for right now is
John wrote:
Matt has offered to help us setup and then maintain the cobbler packages ( along
with the couple of deps that it needs ). So expect some action on that front in
the next few days. It will need to still go via the whole testing -> stable
route, but I will do my best to push it along.
On Fri, 2008-04-18 at 22:04 +0100, Karanbir Singh wrote:
> John wrote:
> > On Fri, 2008-04-18 at 00:35 +0100, Karanbir Singh wrote:
> >> John wrote:
> There will be no system-config-netboot in CentOS5. However, there were
> plans to get cobbler into the centos-extras's repo so that people
John wrote:
On Fri, 2008-04-18 at 00:35 +0100, Karanbir Singh wrote:
John wrote:
There will be no system-config-netboot in CentOS5. However, there were
plans to get cobbler into the centos-extras's repo so that people can
start using that instead.
Karan, do you know of a date in question it ma
On Fri, 2008-04-18 at 00:35 +0100, Karanbir Singh wrote:
> John wrote:
> >> There will be no system-config-netboot in CentOS5. However, there were
> >> plans to get cobbler into the centos-extras's repo so that people can
> >> start using that instead.
> >
> > Karan, do you know of a date in quest
John wrote:
There will be no system-config-netboot in CentOS5. However, there were
plans to get cobbler into the centos-extras's repo so that people can
start using that instead.
Karan, do you know of a date in question it may be in the extras-repo
for centos 5 and > and please all the deps req
On Thu, 2008-04-17 at 15:37 +0100, Karanbir Singh wrote:
> John wrote:
> >> This is not compatable with CentOS 5...
> >> # yum install system-config-netboot
> >> # system-config-netboot
> >
> There will be no system-config-netboot in CentOS5. However, there were
> plans to get cobbler into the cen
John wrote:
>> This is not compatable with CentOS 5...
>> # yum install system-config-netboot
>> # system-config-netboot
>
There will be no system-config-netboot in CentOS5. However, there were
plans to get cobbler into the centos-extras's repo so that people can
start using that instead.
Upstrea
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
John wrote:
>> Will. know something here in a few hours. If the Clients want boot then
>> I will try the patches as I *have* to have this to work on v5. Only
>> other option is Cobbler,which is prolly going to replace net-boot. It is
>> source only. I
On Wed, 2008-04-16 at 17:25 -0400, Max Hetrick wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Max Hetrick wrote:
>
> > I'll test it out and make the appropriate changes within the next few days.
>
> John,
>
> After getting things to work, I ran into a kernel panic problem when
> t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Max Hetrick wrote:
> I'll test it out and make the appropriate changes within the next few days.
John,
After getting things to work, I ran into a kernel panic problem when
trying to boot up.
I found this link that tried to get things taken care of
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
John wrote:
>> This is not compatable with CentOS 5...
>> # yum install system-config-netboot
>> # system-config-netboot
>
>> Do you have a workaround for it. IE:Manually? system config netboot is not
>> included in CentOS 5. There is a Bugzila repo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
John wrote:
>> When I get around to Veryfing it working i'll post my findings to here
>> in the docs list for you.It is your How To you can add the the
>> appropiate notes on it [my opinion]. You can leave it, should work with
>> 5 because you can ma
On Fri, 2008-04-11 at 20:44 -0400, Max Hetrick wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> John wrote:
>
> >> Do you have a workaround for it. IE:Manually? system config netboot is not
> >> included in CentOS 5. There is a Bugzila report on
> >> redhat that I was pointed to tha
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
John wrote:
>> Do you have a workaround for it. IE:Manually? system config netboot is not
>> included in CentOS 5. There is a Bugzila report on
>> redhat that I was pointed to that said it maybe released in another version
>> of RHEL v5. I on the o
On Fri, 2008-04-11 at 19:28 -0400, Max Hetrick wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Ralph Angenendt wrote:
>
> > Not really, go ahead (IMHO).
>
>
> Done.
Ignore that stupid question from the mail previously. I see it.
This is not compatable with CentOS 5...
# yum insta
On Fri, 2008-04-11 at 19:28 -0400, Max Hetrick wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Ralph Angenendt wrote:
>
> > Not really, go ahead (IMHO).
>
>
> Done.
May I see it please.
>
> Regards,
> Max
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ralph Angenendt wrote:
> Not really, go ahead (IMHO).
Done.
Regards,
Max
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFH//QbIXSX/6LmsXkRArdfAJ4/QcHtgBQGsI7p+llkWeEgiJObuwCdEJr7
txUv/3DkUhXr9wN6qlKr9kk=
=9SDv
-END PGP
Max Hetrick wrote:
> I wanted to ask before I created the main category "Diskless Clients"
> under the How To page. Any objections to that there? Or suggest a better
> title?
Not really, go ahead (IMHO).
Cheers,
Ralph
pgpTS9VjXWDv2.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
26 matches
Mail list logo
