Le 22/06/2011 23:12, R P Herrold a écrit :
On Thu, 23 Jun 2011, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
The problem with RHEL6/CentOS6 is that Redhat bought
Qumranet (the KVM company) and decided to only ship
KVM host support in RHEL6.
RHEL6/CentOS6 runs as Xen VM though, so you can use
RHEL5/CentOS5 Xen
On 06/22/2011 11:12 PM, R P Herrold wrote:
On Thu, 23 Jun 2011, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
The problem with RHEL6/CentOS6 is that Redhat bought
Qumranet (the KVM company) and decided to only ship
KVM host support in RHEL6.
RHEL6/CentOS6 runs as Xen VM though, so you can use
RHEL5/CentOS5 Xen
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 05:12:27PM -0400, R P Herrold wrote:
The sources that will become CentOS 6 will run xen.org
virtualization as a dom0, and KVM may be excluded
You said what?
Could one of the CentOS devs please confirm that you are going to
be breaking the binary/feature
Le 23/06/2011 17:16, R P Herrold a écrit :
I did not say the CentOS project was ** going to ship **
xen; I said:
The sources that will become CentOS 6 ** will run **
xen.org virtualization as a dom0, and KVM ** may be **
excluded
CentOS proper at the 6 level will ship KVM
On 06/23/2011 06:28 PM, Alain Péan wrote:
Le 23/06/2011 17:16, R P Herrold a écrit :
I did not say the CentOS project was ** going to ship **
xen; I said:
The sources that will become CentOS 6 ** will run **
xen.org virtualization as a dom0, and KVM ** may be **
excluded
On Thu, 23 Jun 2011, Alain Péan wrote:
I must say that the meaning of your message is not clear for me. What is
the difference for you between The sources that will become CentOS 6,
and CentOS proper ? What do you have in mind ? Why KVM may be excluded ?
for reasons out of scope here, CentOS
On Thu, 23 Jun 2011, Manuel Wolfshant wrote:
Without implying that I can read his mind, I guess he meant People with
enough skills will be able to tweak C6 to use xen as Dom0
Wolfie beat me to the post by eight seconds, it seems
Yes, it appears that he can read my mind
-- Russ herrold
Le 23/06/2011 17:49, R P Herrold a écrit :
On Thu, 23 Jun 2011, Alain Péan wrote:
I must say that the meaning of your message is not clear for me. What is
the difference for you between The sources that will become CentOS 6,
and CentOS proper ? What do you have in mind ? Why KVM may be
On 06/23/2011 06:54 PM, Tom Bishop wrote:
Russ if you have time can you elaborate more about why you are
continuing to go down the Xen path, I for one would love to hear the
why's and what for. I can understand the hardware requirements, and I
know xen is generally going to be faster but
Le 23/06/2011 18:04, Manuel Wolfshant a écrit :
I'll give you my reasons :
- existing infra, setup and knowledge
- RH gave up promoting xen because it was acquired by a competitor, not
because it was not good ( or worse ) than kvm
I think there was another very good reason why Red Hat chose
On Thu, 23 Jun 2011, Tom Bishop wrote:
Russ if you have time can you elaborate more about why you are continuing to
go down the Xen path, I for one would love to hear the why's and what for.
I can understand the hardware requirements, and I know xen is generally
going to be faster but my
On Thu, 23 Jun 2011, Alain Péan wrote:
I must add that, due to the fact Dom0 has been included in recent Kernel
3.0 tree, it will certainly be possible in future releases of RHEL, then
CentOS, to choose either Xen or KVM as virtualization solution.
perhaps, but this is in part a LKML
Thank You Russ and Manuel Wolfshant, I don't know you well enough to call
you wolfy ;), for your comments, greatly appreciated. I support my home
stuff and a small install at my church. Since Redhats' decision to go KVM
and since my install will be Centos I was/have been migrating over to
13 matches
Mail list logo
