On 01/07/2013 02:51 PM, Carl T. Miller wrote:
> On 01/07/2013 06:38 AM, Karanbir Singh wrote:
>> Select the repo you want / need, and use reposync. Remember that
>> anything on people.centos.org is just a personal build. Its not release,
>> and its not supported, and most likely will get no updates
On 01/07/2013 06:38 AM, Karanbir Singh wrote:
> Select the repo you want / need, and use reposync. Remember that
> anything on people.centos.org is just a personal build. Its not release,
> and its not supported, and most likely will get no updates security or
> otherwise.
I don't want to mirror e
On Mon, Jan 07, 2013 at 11:43:49AM +, Karanbir Singh wrote:
>
> Keep in mind that the public raindrops interface will have the ability
> for anyone to throw a kickstart at it, and have it deliver a working
> image to the AWS ID specified.
>
> Does that help answer your concern ?
>
Yes it d
On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 6:38 AM, Karanbir Singh wrote:
> On 01/05/2013 03:47 PM, Carl T. Miller wrote:
>> Is there an easy way to mirror people.centos.org?
>>
>> I tried "rsync people.centos.org::" and it gives some disclaimers
>> followed by a null list of available modules.
>
> Are you sure you w
On 12/20/2012 02:25 PM, Karl Ward wrote:
> I'd like to download the official CentOS AMI files for 6.3 x86_64, but
> that does not seem possible. The goal is to use the same image on both
> public and private clouds, to improve consistency. Are the AMI files
> available for download anywhere, or f
Hi Richard,
On 12/19/2012 05:37 PM, Richard Clark wrote:
> I've noticed that instance-backed AMIs no longer seem to exist for the
> 'official' CentOS images, though the EBS ones are fine..
>
> Looking at the wiki (http://wiki.centos.org/Cloud/AWS), the AMIs listed
> on marketplace are slightly new
On 01/05/2013 03:47 PM, Carl T. Miller wrote:
> Is there an easy way to mirror people.centos.org?
>
> I tried "rsync people.centos.org::" and it gives some disclaimers
> followed by a null list of available modules.
Are you sure you want to get 2.8 TiB of content ?
> I've got an ugly workaround u
