This is wrong.
A bridge does not need an ip address
itself to pass traffic from interface A
to interface C, so it could look like this:
hw interface a --- bridge b --- vm interface c
192.168.1.3 none192.168.1.4
Keep in mind that bridging takes place on layer 2:
On 06/16/2014 08:55 PM, Sven Kieske wrote:
A bridge does not need an ip address
itself to pass traffic from interface A
to interface C,
Correct, but...
so it could look like this:
hw interface a --- bridge b --- vm interface c
192.168.1.3 none192.168.1.4
Wrong. In the
On 06/10/2014 05:21 PM, Lars Kurth wrote:
== #4 Cloud Image from Cloud Image SIG ==
We could rely on pre-built cloud images from the Cloud Images SIG.
People could just download the cloud image once it's done and customize
it, rather than installing / building their own.
Advantages: seems
I had a supermicro server SuperServer 1027R-WRF4+ and a old Dell PowerEdge 2950.
In both machines I setup centos 6.5, which is running
3.10.34-11.el6.centos.alt.x86_64.
I follow Xen4Cen wiki to setup Xen, I had other servers running Centos
5.x without issues.
Now, once I build my vm's dom-u
On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 08:42:49AM -0700, Periko Support wrote:
I had a supermicro server SuperServer 1027R-WRF4+ and a old Dell PowerEdge
2950.
In both machines I setup centos 6.5, which is running
3.10.34-11.el6.centos.alt.x86_64.
I follow Xen4Cen wiki to setup Xen, I had other servers
---
So if I understand you correct - in 5.9 you did not see this, but
in 6.5 you do?
--
Yes, just with centos 6.5 dom-u.
But none of both vm's run.
On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 10:15 AM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
On Sat, Jun 14, 2014 at 09:07:51AM +0200, lee wrote:
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk konrad.w...@oracle.com writes:
Hm, xen kinda makes the cpus and their power management invisible, too:
root@heimdall:~# xenpm get-cpufreq-para
[CPU0] failed to get cpufreq parameter
[...]
root@heimdall:~#
On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 10:21:45AM -0700, Periko Support wrote:
---
So if I understand you correct - in 5.9 you did not see this, but
in 6.5 you do?
--
Yes, just with centos 6.5 dom-u.
But none of both vm's run.
On 06/16/2014 12:37 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 10:21:45AM -0700, Periko Support wrote:
---
So if I understand you correct - in 5.9 you did not see this, but
in 6.5 you do?
--
Yes, just with
On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 10:37 AM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
konrad.w...@oracle.com wrote:
On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 10:21:45AM -0700, Periko Support wrote:
---
So if I understand you correct - in 5.9 you did not see this, but
in 6.5 you do?
On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 10:46 AM, Periko Support
pheriko.supp...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 10:37 AM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
konrad.w...@oracle.com wrote:
On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 10:21:45AM -0700, Periko Support wrote:
---
So if I understand
On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 10:51:54AM -0700, Periko Support wrote:
On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 10:46 AM, Periko Support
pheriko.supp...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 10:37 AM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
konrad.w...@oracle.com wrote:
On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 10:21:45AM -0700, Periko Support
On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 10:55 AM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
konrad.w...@oracle.com wrote:
On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 10:51:54AM -0700, Periko Support wrote:
On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 10:46 AM, Periko Support
pheriko.supp...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 10:37 AM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 11:10 AM, Periko Support
pheriko.supp...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 10:55 AM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
konrad.w...@oracle.com wrote:
On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 10:51:54AM -0700, Periko Support wrote:
On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 10:46 AM, Periko Support
On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 11:34 AM, Periko Support
pheriko.supp...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 11:10 AM, Periko Support
pheriko.supp...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 10:55 AM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
konrad.w...@oracle.com wrote:
On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 10:51:54AM -0700,
15 matches
Mail list logo
