Good news/bad news testing the new kernel on CentOS7 with my now notoriously
finicky machines:
Good news: 4.9.23-26.el7 (grabbed today via yum update) isn't any worse than
4.9.13-22 was on my xen hosts (as far as I can tell so far at least)
Bad news: It isn't any better than 4.9.13 was for me
On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 12:32 PM, Richard Landsman - Rimote <
rich...@rimote.nl> wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> Anybody had the chance to test out this setup and reproduce the problem? I
> assumed it would be something that's used often these days and a solution
> would benefit a lot of users. If
Hi,
just pushed to testing a new build of qemu-kvm-ev, here's the ChangeLog:
* Thu Apr 20 2017 Sandro Bonazzola -
ev-2.6.0-28.el7_3.9.1
- Removing RH branding from package name
* Fri Mar 24 2017 Miroslav Rezanina -
rhev-2.6.0-28.el7_3.9
-
On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 1:03 AM, Lance Albertson wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We're using qemu-kvm-ev on ppc64le and I've noticed that it's included in
> the extras repo for ppc64le but in the qemu-kvm-ev repo for x86_64. I also
> noticed the version in ppc64le is lagging behind x86. I see
Hello everyone,
Anybody had the chance to test out this setup and reproduce the problem?
I assumed it would be something that's used often these days and a
solution would benefit a lot of users. If can be of any assistance
please contact me.
--
Met vriendelijke groet,
Richard Landsman
Hello CentOS Xen Heroes,
Yesterday, I have installed testing kernel 4.9.23-26.el6.x86_64 from
virt-xen-testing repo.
It crashed today morning.
Hardware is a pretty ancient, testing machine (CO6 PV guests only), but had no
problems yet. It was stable on 4.9*, including testing