On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 12:43:48PM +0100, Kris Buytaert wrote:
On Tue, 2009-11-10 at 16:26 +0200, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
Both Novell and Oracle having been deeply involved in Xen lately, both
are developing and supporting their own products based on Xen.
Given the fact that
On Tue, 2009-11-10 at 16:26 +0200, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
Both Novell and Oracle having been deeply involved in Xen lately, both
are developing and supporting their own products based on Xen.
Given the fact that Unbreakable is a source rebuild from RHEL, and
Oracle is putting a lot of
Hi,
Do you really think that RHEL6 will not include dom0 version ?
It seems that KVM will be the favorite for redhat virtualisation but i
think Xen is actually largely deployed.
We have here a cluster of ten Xen centos 5.4 dom0 and i'm asking what
it will become with RHEL6 if there is no more
Frederic SOULIER wrote:
Hi,
Do you really think that RHEL6 will not include dom0 version ?
Yes, Xen Dom0 will be never supported from RHEL6, onlu domU ...
It seems that KVM will be the favorite for redhat virtualisation but i
think Xen is actually largely deployed.
We have here a cluster
On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 10:11:24AM +0100, carlopmart wrote:
Frederic SOULIER wrote:
Hi,
Do you really think that RHEL6 will not include dom0 version ?
Yes, Xen Dom0 will be never supported from RHEL6, onlu domU ...
It seems that KVM will be the favorite for redhat virtualisation but i
Correct me if i'm wrong.
If rhel6 propose domU version that would say that a dom0 rhel5.X version
will be able to run rhel6 domU ?
Pasi Kärkkäinen a écrit :
On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 10:39:35AM +0100, carlopmart wrote:
Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 10:11:24AM +0100,
On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 11:27:57AM +0100, carlopmart wrote:
Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
Still it isn't official, but Citrix XenServer will disappears soon ... It
will be
integrated under Microsoft Hyper-V
Uhm.. I don't believe this. Where did you read that?
Citrix XenServer
Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 11:27:57AM +0100, carlopmart wrote:
Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
Still it isn't official, but Citrix XenServer will disappears soon ... It
will be
integrated under Microsoft Hyper-V
Uhm.. I don't believe this. Where did you read that?
On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 01:20:11PM +0100, carlopmart wrote:
Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 11:27:57AM +0100, carlopmart wrote:
Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
Still it isn't official, but Citrix XenServer will disappears soon ...
It will be
integrated under Microsoft Hyper-V
Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 01:20:11PM +0100, carlopmart wrote:
Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 11:27:57AM +0100, carlopmart wrote:
Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
Still it isn't official, but Citrix XenServer will disappears soon ...
It will be
integrated under
On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 4:36 AM, carlopmart carlopm...@gmail.com wrote:
Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 01:20:11PM +0100, carlopmart wrote:
Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 11:27:57AM +0100, carlopmart wrote:
Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
Still it isn't
On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 05:01:46AM -0800, Grant McWilliams wrote:
On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 4:36 AM, carlopmart [1]carlopm...@gmail.com
wrote:
Pasi KÀrkkÀinen wrote:
On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 01:20:11PM +0100, carlopmart wrote:
Pasi KÀrkkÀinen wrote:
On Tue,
On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 03:49:59PM +0100, Dennis J. wrote:
On 11/10/2009 03:35 PM, Grant McWilliams wrote:
Both Novell and Oracle having been deeply involved in Xen lately, both
are developing and supporting their own products based on Xen.
-- Pasi
___
I have
On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 05:12:50PM +0200, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 03:49:59PM +0100, Dennis J. wrote:
On 11/10/2009 03:35 PM, Grant McWilliams wrote:
Both Novell and Oracle having been deeply involved in Xen lately, both
are developing and supporting their
On 11/10/2009 04:13 PM, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 05:12:50PM +0200, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 03:49:59PM +0100, Dennis J. wrote:
On 11/10/2009 03:35 PM, Grant McWilliams wrote:
Both Novell and Oracle having been deeply involved in Xen lately,
Which I guess makes describing a guest as fully virtualized or
paravirtualized rather pointless given that there now is just a degree of
how paravirtualized a guest is depending on the drivers you use.
Regards,
Dennis
I disagree completely. KVM or Xen HVM are fully virtualized except
On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 07:49:01AM -0800, Grant McWilliams wrote:
Which I guess makes describing a guest as fully virtualized or
paravirtualized rather pointless given that there now is just a degree
of
how paravirtualized a guest is depending on the drivers you use.
On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 11:36:39PM +0200, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 01:52:36PM -0500, Scott McClanahan wrote:
Yeah.. Xen paravirtualized mmu is fast, and in some (many) cases beats
CPU hardware virtualized mmu.
KVM has 'pvmmu' aswell, but it's not as good, so
Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
Quotes:
So, KVM requires 66.93/52.85 = 26.6% more CPU to do the same amount of work.
If we normalize to CPU utilization, Xen is doing 20% more throughput.
KVM running Windows VMs uses 46% more CPU than the Other-Hypervisor
A different hypervisor was compared; KVM
Hi,
my local RH-salesman told me that rh6 will be based on a mix of Fedora 11/12 -
so I hope for the best.
At the moment I am stuck with SLES (currently 10) on our Dom0-servers, since it
has the newer XEN-version.
I would love to move to RH or CentOS with my Dom0s...
Kind regards
Nils
20 matches
Mail list logo
