Peter wrote:
On 12/22/2013 08:32 PM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
On Sun, Dec 22, 2013 at 1:30 AM, Peter pe...@pajamian.dhs.org wrote:
gcc is considered to be part of the standard build toolset and as such
is not required to be listed as a dependency in any spec file.
Part of a standard build
On 12/22/2013 08:32 PM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
On Sun, Dec 22, 2013 at 1:30 AM, Peter pe...@pajamian.dhs.org wrote:
gcc is considered to be part of the standard build toolset and as such
is not required to be listed as a dependency in any spec file.
Part of a standard build toolset or
My first thought on seeing this thread was Is there some reason to
compile from source, rather than from an SRPM, say those at
http://dev.centos.org/centos/6/xen-c6/SRPMS/ ?
I went ahead and grabbed RHEL 7 beta from
http://ftp.redhat.com/pub/redhat/rhel/beta/7/, where the actual
bootable iso's
On 12/22/2013 04:33 PM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
My first thought on seeing this thread was Is there some reason to
compile from source, rather than from an SRPM, say those at
http://dev.centos.org/centos/6/xen-c6/SRPMS/ ?
My thinking is that the sources from F19 would be better since RHEL7 is
On Sun, Dec 22, 2013 at 1:30 AM, Peter pe...@pajamian.dhs.org wrote:
On 12/22/2013 04:33 PM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
My first thought on seeing this thread was Is there some reason to
compile from source, rather than from an SRPM, say those at
http://dev.centos.org/centos/6/xen-c6/SRPMS/ ?
