This is wrong.
A bridge does not need an ip address
itself to pass traffic from interface A
to interface C, so it could look like this:
hw interface a --- bridge b --- vm interface c
192.168.1.3 none192.168.1.4
Keep in mind that bridging takes place on layer 2:
On 06/16/2014 08:55 PM, Sven Kieske wrote:
A bridge does not need an ip address
itself to pass traffic from interface A
to interface C,
Correct, but...
so it could look like this:
hw interface a --- bridge b --- vm interface c
192.168.1.3 none192.168.1.4
Wrong. In the
SilverTip257 silvertip...@gmail.com writes:
On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 8:42 AM, lee l...@yun.yagibdah.de wrote:
Peter pe...@pajamian.dhs.org writes:
On 06/12/2014 05:17 PM, lee wrote:
I knew before I started that network setup would be a PITA because years
ago, I set up a VM for someone
On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 8:42 AM, lee l...@yun.yagibdah.de wrote:
Peter pe...@pajamian.dhs.org writes:
On 06/12/2014 05:17 PM, lee wrote:
I knew before I started that network setup would be a PITA because years
ago, I set up a VM for someone who didn't have a 64bit system to compile
a
