On Sat, Mar 08, 2014 at 09:09:07AM -0600, PJ Welsh wrote:
No, I have not followed those instructions yet. These were production
servers that I had scheduled firmware updates late Sunday evening. The
first time I though the error was a fluke and only began to research it
after the
On Sun, Mar 09, 2014 at 11:28:07AM -0400, Digimer wrote:
Would you mind elaborating on this? If a snapshot is a point-in-time
image of a VM (or even normal FS), why would DB backups be at risk
(assuming things like fsync are used)?
I'm asking in general terms... no idea if this is
On Sun, Mar 9, 2014 at 11:28 AM, Digimer li...@alteeve.ca wrote:
Would you mind elaborating on this? If a snapshot is a point-in-time
image of a VM (or even normal FS), why would DB backups be at risk
(assuming things like fsync are used)?
I'm asking in general terms... no idea if this is
On 09/03/14 11:52 AM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
On Sun, Mar 9, 2014 at 11:28 AM, Digimer li...@alteeve.ca wrote:
Would you mind elaborating on this? If a snapshot is a point-in-time
image of a VM (or even normal FS), why would DB backups be at risk
(assuming things like fsync are used)?
I'm
On 09/03/14 11:43 AM, Stephen Harris wrote:
On Sun, Mar 09, 2014 at 11:28:07AM -0400, Digimer wrote:
Would you mind elaborating on this? If a snapshot is a point-in-time
image of a VM (or even normal FS), why would DB backups be at risk
(assuming things like fsync are used)?
I'm asking in
