On Tue, Jul 7, 2015 at 10:12 PM, T.Weyergraf wrote:
>
>
> On 06/17/2015 04:24 PM, George Dunlap wrote:
>>
>> At long last, I'd like to announce beta packages for CentOS 7,
>> available from the community build system.
>>
> Great to see Xen coming to CentOS 7 !
>
> I
On 09/08/2015 06:41 AM, George Dunlap wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 7, 2015 at 11:40 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
>> What we really need is to make the REAL xen RPMs .. the ones produced in
>> this SIG .. work with systemd. These RPMs are produced by Citrix, so we
>> need to get the right.
On Mon, Sep 7, 2015 at 11:40 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> What we really need is to make the REAL xen RPMs .. the ones produced in
> this SIG .. work with systemd. These RPMs are produced by Citrix, so we
> need to get the right.
Just to be clear -- RPMs are produced by the
On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 12:12 PM, Always Learning wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2015-09-08 at 12:02 +0100, George Dunlap wrote:
>
>> Then I got married and went on holiday for 3 weeks in August,
>
> Congratulations. Its nicer cuddling a real person rather than a
> computer.
>
>> The Virt
On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 7:02 AM, George Dunlap wrote:
> * Apparent lack of testing by the community. About a month after the
> C7 "beta", I was about to announce an actual release, when I happened
> to discover that HVM guests wouldn't boot -- not under any
> configuration.
On Mon, Sep 7, 2015 at 11:02 PM, T.Weyergraf wrote:
> First of all, I fully agree, that forked repos are undesirable. However, to
> the casual observer (like me), there are hardly any ressources for Xen on
> CentOS 7. There are some beta packages, as announced in the
On Tue, 2015-09-08 at 12:02 +0100, George Dunlap wrote:
> Then I got married and went on holiday for 3 weeks in August,
Congratulations. Its nicer cuddling a real person rather than a
computer.
> The Virt SIG has IRC meetings on freenode channel #centos-devel every
> two weeks -- the next one
Hi
I gave the new Xen-4.6rc2 a spin on a CentOS 7 virtualisation guest
(nested-xen). I haven't yet started testing guests, but rather looked at
the install itself.
One issue, I found, was with xenstored.service and the corresponding
unit-file:
[root@xencen7ws ~]# systemctl status
On Tue, Sep 08, 2015 at 11:22:58AM -0400, Alvin Starr wrote:
> On 09/08/2015 10:58 AM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 08, 2015 at 10:50:57AM -0400, Alvin Starr wrote:
> >> FIrstly Centos is primarily a RHEL clone.
> >> This means that the primary design decisions are to be as RHEL
On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 2:02 PM, Itamar Reis Peixoto
wrote:
>
>> not fragment to a bunch of different individual people making a bunch of
>> different RPM sets that the community does not know who produces, etc.
>>
>
> what you're doing its a complete crap, what you said
On 09/08/2015 08:02 AM, Itamar Reis Peixoto wrote:
>
>> not fragment to a bunch of different individual people making a bunch of
>> different RPM sets that the community does not know who produces, etc.
>>
>
> what you're doing its a complete crap, what you said is different from
> what you did,
On Tue, Sep 08, 2015 at 10:02:50AM -0300, Itamar Reis Peixoto wrote:
>
> what you're doing its a complete crap, what you said is different from what
> you did, why you' (centos virt sig) not contributed to the work of fedora
> guys instead of reinventing the wheel ?
If you're that unhappy with
Folks,
I had some problems with my calendar entry. Today's VIRT SIG meeting is on. All
I have done is delete the 4-weekly invite for a conf call, and made the meeting
invite for the IRC meeting bi-weekly. Sorry for any confusion caused
Regards
Lars
> not fragment to a bunch of different individual people making a bunch of
> different RPM sets that the community does not know who produces, etc.
>
what you're doing its a complete crap, what you said is different from what
you did, why you' (centos virt sig) not contributed to the work of
On 09/08/2015 10:58 AM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 08, 2015 at 10:50:57AM -0400, Alvin Starr wrote:
>> FIrstly Centos is primarily a RHEL clone.
>> This means that the primary design decisions are to be as RHEL like as
>> possible.
>> After that there are additions and upgrades.
>>
So first of all, if you've used the CBS before, please note the name
change -- it's no longer virt6-testing, but virt6-xen-44-testing.
Easiest way to install:
rpm -ivh
http://cbs.centos.org/repos/virt6-xen-44-testing/x86_64/os/Packages/centos-release-xen-7-7.el6.x86_64.rpm
This will set up yum
FIrstly Centos is primarily a RHEL clone.
This means that the primary design decisions are to be as RHEL like as
possible.
After that there are additions and upgrades.
Secondly Fedora does not actively support Xen.
As a long time Xen and RH/Fedora user I have spent lots of time
On Tue, Sep 08, 2015 at 10:50:57AM -0400, Alvin Starr wrote:
> FIrstly Centos is primarily a RHEL clone.
> This means that the primary design decisions are to be as RHEL like as
> possible.
> After that there are additions and upgrades.
>
> Secondly Fedora does not actively support Xen.
George,
Just an FYI - I tried to run the rpm command and none of the repos showed
up enabled by default.
I tried enabling them manually, but I get this error:
One of the configured repositories failed (CentOS-7 - xen),
and yum doesn't have enough cached data to continue. At this point the
On 09/08/2015 01:02 PM, George Dunlap wrote:
On Mon, Sep 7, 2015 at 11:02 PM, T.Weyergraf wrote:
First of all, I fully agree, that forked repos are undesirable. However, to
the casual observer (like me), there are hardly any ressources for Xen on
CentOS 7. There
George,
Never mind - I had an old Xen repo I was trying to use some time ago...
This was me.
Sorry!
Flossy
On Tue, 8 Sep 2015, Scot P. Floess wrote:
George,
Just an FYI - I tried to run the rpm command and none of the repos showed up
enabled by default.
I tried enabling them
21 matches
Mail list logo