Re: [CentOS-virt] OS-level virtualization using LXC and systemd-nspawn containers

2021-01-27 Thread Dmitry Melekhov
26.01.2021 22:09, Gena Makhomed пишет: On 26.01.2021 18:41, Scott Dowdle wrote: Have you tried LXD? Not yet. My first post on this mailing list asked if anyone was using LXC in production: Does anyone use LXC and/or systemd-nspawn containers on RHEL 8 / CentOS 8 for production? Well, I

Re: [CentOS-virt] OS-level virtualization using LXC and systemd-nspawn containers

2021-01-26 Thread Gena Makhomed
On 26.01.2021 20:24, Scott Dowdle wrote: Ok, so you are turning off SELinux and using ZFS too? And you still want to stay with EL? Why? RHEL is more stable than Ubuntu, it has 10 year support and rpm installs silently without additional questions and dialogues, as it in deb world. dnf / yum

Re: [CentOS-virt] OS-level virtualization using LXC and systemd-nspawn containers

2021-01-26 Thread Scott Dowdle
Greetings, - Original Message - > Can you share your experience with LXC and/or systemd-nspawn > for RHEL 8 / CentOS 8 operating system on the hardware node? > I can't use host network for [system] containers. > Each container must have its own private network. In that case, perhaps

Re: [CentOS-virt] OS-level virtualization using LXC and systemd-nspawn containers

2021-01-26 Thread Gena Makhomed
On 26.01.2021 18:41, Scott Dowdle wrote: Have you tried LXD? Not yet. My first post on this mailing list asked if anyone was using LXC in production: Does anyone use LXC and/or systemd-nspawn containers on RHEL 8 / CentOS 8 for production? What are advantages and disadvantages of each of

Re: [CentOS-virt] OS-level virtualization using LXC and systemd-nspawn containers

2021-01-26 Thread Scott Dowdle
Greetings, - Original Message - > > LXD is a management layer on top of it which provides for easy > > clustering and even managing VMs. I think it is the closest thing > > to vzctl/prlctl from OpenVZ. > > "Yes, you could use LXC without LXD. But you probably would not want to. > On its

Re: [CentOS-virt] OS-level virtualization using LXC and systemd-nspawn containers

2021-01-26 Thread Gena Makhomed
On 26.01.2021 0:05, Scott Dowdle wrote: OpenVZ 7 has no updates, and therefore is not suitable for production. The free updates lag behind the paid Virtuozzo 7 version and plenty of people are using it in production. I'm not one of those. See all released OpenVZ 7 updates:

Re: [CentOS-virt] OS-level virtualization using LXC and systemd-nspawn containers

2021-01-25 Thread Scott Dowdle
Greetings, - Original Message - > OpenVZ 7 has no updates, and therefore is not suitable for > production. The free updates lag behind the paid Virtuozzo 7 version and plenty of people are using it in production. I'm not one of those. > LXC/LXD is the same technology, as I understand

Re: [CentOS-virt] OS-level virtualization using LXC and systemd-nspawn containers

2021-01-25 Thread Gena Makhomed
On 25.01.2021 22:24, Scott Dowdle wrote: I found only two possible free/open source alternatives for OpenVZ 6: - LXC - systemd-nspawn Some you seem to have overlooked?!? 1) OpenVZ 7 2) LXD from Canonical that is part of Ubuntu 3) podman containers with systemd installed (set /sbin/init as

Re: [CentOS-virt] OS-level virtualization using LXC and systemd-nspawn containers

2021-01-25 Thread Scott Dowdle
Greetings, - Original Message - > I found only two possible free/open source alternatives for OpenVZ 6: > > - LXC > - systemd-nspawn Some you seem to have overlooked?!? 1) OpenVZ 7 2) LXD from Canonical that is part of Ubuntu 3) podman containers with systemd installed (set /sbin/init