Le 05/04/2011 02:24, Brian Mathis a écrit :
On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 8:10 PM, Rudi Ahlersr...@softdux.com wrote:
On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 1:56 AM, Brian Mathis
brian.mathis+cen...@betteradmin.com wrote:
Rudi,
Cut the crap. You're intentionally changing the context of the
discussion, so
On 4/2/2011 2:54 PM, Dawid Horacio Golebiewski wrote:
You might be asking why I didn't choose to make a ~19 TB RAID-5 volume
for the native 3ware RAID test
That is really a no-brainer.
In the time it takes to re-build such a RAID, another disk might just
fail and the R in RAID goes down the
Karanbir Singh wrote:
On 04/04/2011 08:23 PM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
And I was the only one to compile Skype 2.1.0.81 rpm for CentOS/RHEL 5.x
(as far as I know).
thats interesting. Care to point us at the source for skype ?
- KB
rpm is here:
On Tue, 5 Apr 2011, rrich...@blythe.org wrote:
1) Move sshd to another
port, one higher than 5000
I'd have mixed feelings about the Wisdom of running on a non-reserved port.
jh
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
On Tue, 5 Apr 2011, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
rpm is here:
http://rpms.plnet.rs/centos5-i386/RPMS.plnet/skype-2.1.0.81-1.el5.noarch.rpm
source rpm is now currently publicly available since I rearranged my
repository links/path but haven't finished.
Since when did skype become noarch?
I'm
On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 10:17 AM, John Hodrien j.h.hodr...@leeds.ac.uk wrote:
On Tue, 5 Apr 2011, rrich...@blythe.org wrote:
1) Move sshd to another
port, one higher than 5000
I'd have mixed feelings about the Wisdom of running on a non-reserved port.
Why,
We've been running SSH on
On Tue, 5 Apr 2011, Rudi Ahlers wrote:
Why,
We've been running SSH on hundreds of servers on a port higher than
5000 for year now and no problems at all.
I always feel slightly ickie about running services on ports normal users can
run on (this obviously depends a lot on who can run
On Tuesday 05 April 2011 11:27:49 Rudi Ahlers wrote:
On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 10:17 AM, John Hodrien j.h.hodr...@leeds.ac.uk
wrote:
On Tue, 5 Apr 2011, rrich...@blythe.org wrote:
1) Move sshd to another
port, one higher than 5000
I'd have mixed feelings about the Wisdom of running on a
On Mon, 2011-04-04 at 18:03 +0100, Marko Vojinovic wrote:
On Monday 04 April 2011 12:25:06 Mister IT Guru wrote:
The one thing I would love to be able to contribute my time to is
helping test new code, and get it out the door so guys on the street can
test it out.
Before you get
Dear Centos Developers,
Thank you.
I am grateful for all your hard work in providing an enterprise-level OS for my
small business.
I desire 6.0 for it's ext4/NFS4 support but beggars can't be choosers (Red Hat
costs way out of my league).
I have joined the Centos Announce list and will just
On 4 April 2011 23:11, David Brian Chait dch...@invenda.com wrote:
I have to provide a reliable and scalable infrastructure, and that requires a
reliable provider / updates. While I do not need Centos 6 today, this
development cycle has certainly raised questions as to whether the
+100
Kai
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
I personally am happy with my CentOS 5.x, and a waiting patiently for the
future release. However, in our FOSS world, the community
is helping on a regular basis, for everything : coding, documentation, QA,
support - maybe somebody from the community should step
in, get in touch with the devs
centos-boun...@centos.org wrote:
On Mon, 4 Apr 2011, Digimer wrote:
As an aside, does the CentOS build environment (understanding that it
needs to be built, too), able to tweet something like last build; X
packages OK, Y packages failed?
This was done on a trailling basis for a couple
On Thu, 2011-03-31 at 05:41 -0700, Benjamin Franz wrote:
I haven't tried it, but in theory you could take a clonezilla image of
the physical machine and restore it to a KVM disk image: Just create the
initial virtual drives at least as large as the originals, boot
clonezilla in the VM
Yes, I know 3.5 is old. However in this case it's required for a legacy
app.
a fresh install get's me:
kmod: failed to exec /sbin/modprobe -s -k block-major-104, errno = 2
followed by:
VFS: Cannot open root device cciss/c0d0p2 or 68:02
The system is an HP DL380 G4. any thought on what
centos-boun...@centos.org wrote:
Yes, I know 3.5 is old. However in this case it's required
for a legacy
app.
a fresh install get's me:
kmod: failed to exec /sbin/modprobe -s -k block-major-104, errno = 2
The system is an HP DL380 G4. any thought on what could cause this?
errno =2 =
Yes, I know 3.5 is old. However in this case it's required for a legacy
app.
a fresh install get's me:
kmod: failed to exec /sbin/modprobe -s -k block-major-104, errno = 2
followed by:
VFS: Cannot open root device cciss/c0d0p2 or 68:02
The system is an HP DL380 G4. any thought on
2011/4/5 Bruce Ferrell bferr...@baywinds.org:
Yes, I know 3.5 is old. However in this case it's required for a legacy
app.
What legacy app? You should install centos 5.5 and run legacy app
under virtual machine running centos 3.5 ..
--
Eero
___
Quoting Michael Simpson mikie.simp...@gmail.com:
see my remarks below
On 4 April 2011 23:11, David Brian Chait dch...@invenda.com wrote:
I have to provide a reliable and scalable infrastructure, and that
requires a reliable provider / updates. While I do not need Centos
6 today, this
Hi all
We require some packages installed through pecl (apc and memcache)
which we have done on CentOS 5.5 by installing php 5.2 from testing
and also installing php-devel and php-pear to much success! We would
like to move to php 5.3 after 5.6 comes out but I note that there is
no specific
Jussi Hirvi wrote:
On Thu, 2011-03-31 at 05:41 -0700, Benjamin Franz wrote:
I haven't tried it, but in theory you could take a clonezilla image of
the physical machine and restore it to a KVM disk image: Just create the
initial virtual drives at least as large as the originals, boot
centos-boun...@centos.org wrote:
Hi all
will there be an official php53-pear rpm available through
centos.org?
I'm sorry if this has been answered before but my google-fu seems to
be letting me down.
GoogleTau asserts that CentOS 5.6 and 6.0 will be version-for-version
identical to
Introducing a Hawk helped us a lot. Tools like Hawk and
fail2ban are quite
useful, actually only thinks like that have
good impact on the bruteforce
attempts.
Indeed! I run
Fail2Ban not only against SSH, but against SMTP/AUTH and IMAPS/POP3S (the
only client mail protocols we support). It's
On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 5:51 PM, rrich...@blythe.org wrote:
Introducing a Hawk helped us a lot. Tools like Hawk and
fail2ban are quite
useful, actually only thinks like that have
good impact on the bruteforce
attempts.
Indeed! I run
Fail2Ban not only against SSH, but against SMTP/AUTH
On Monday, April 04, 2011 11:09:29 PM Warren Young wrote:
I did this test with Bonnie++ on a 3ware/LSI 9750-8i controller, with
eight WD 3 TB disks attached. Both tests were done with XFS on CentOS
5.5, 32-bit. (Yes, 32-bit. Hard requirement for this application.)
[snip]
For the RAID-6
On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 10:21 AM, Lamar Owen lo...@pari.edu wrote:
You really, really, really don't want to do this. Not on 32-bit. When you
roll one byte over 16TB you will lose access to your filesystem, silently,
and it will not remount on a 32-bit kernel. XFS works best on a 64-bit
rrich...@blythe.org wrote:
Indeed! I run
Fail2Ban not only against SSH, but against SMTP/AUTH and IMAPS/POP3S (the
only client mail protocols we support). It's amazing how many dictionary
attacks take place against SMTP by persistent spamers! Besides the effect
against dictionary attacks, it
On 04/05/2011 09:00 AM, John R Pierce wrote:
AFAIK, no standard raid modes verify parity on reads, as this would
require reading the whole slice for every random read. Only raid
systems like ZFS that use block checksuming can verify data on reads.
parity (or mirrors) are verified by doing
On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 4:01 AM, Rajan Dahal rajan.da...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello friends,
I have downloaded wine-1.3.13.tar.bz2
How to install it ?
I have no internet connection. so I want to install it manually.
I installed WINE, probably several months ago, or more, on this CentOS
5.5 32 bit
This isn't specifically about cent os, but I am running cent os on
this machine. I've got a Dell Dimension 2400 desktop pc. I've tried on a
number of occasions to put a second hard drive in the machine, but I
can't get the machine to recognize the second drive in BIOS. I'm going
to try and
Hello,
Sorry if this is somewhat naive, but I'm a little confused as to what the
criteria is for that which will get upgraded automatically by yum and what will
not.
I see in our logwatch messages from time to time that yum upgraded a bunch of
stuff, but I also notice that yum will not
2011/4/5 Jimmy Bradley bmobil...@ocellaris.net:
This isn't specifically about cent os, but I am running cent os on
this machine. I've got a Dell Dimension 2400 desktop pc. I've tried on a
number of occasions to put a second hard drive in the machine, but I
can't get the machine to
Jimmy Bradley wrote:
This isn't specifically about cent os, but I am running cent os on
this machine. I've got a Dell Dimension 2400 desktop pc. I've tried on a
number of occasions to put a second hard drive in the machine, but I
can't get the machine to recognize the second drive in
centos-boun...@centos.org wrote:
This isn't specifically about cent os,
snip
Anyone have any ideas?
http://support.dell.com/
Don't contact Dell with your CentOS questions, nor bring your Dell
questions here ...
... You should either drink much more, or much less.
Insert spiffy .sig
2011/4/5 Brunner, Brian T. bbrun...@gai-tronics.com:
centos-boun...@centos.org wrote:
This isn't specifically about cent os,
snip
Anyone have any ideas?
http://support.dell.com/
Don't contact Dell with your CentOS questions, nor bring your Dell
questions here ...
... You should
Direct comparisons between the two were difficult to judge, but the
general result was that the Host was between 2:1 and 3:1 better than the
Guest, which seems to be a rather large performance gap. Latency
differences were all over the map, which I find puzzling. The Host is
64-bit and the
On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 8:44 PM, Brunner, Brian T.
bbrun...@gai-tronics.com wrote:
... You should either drink much more, or much less.
Was that comment really necessary? Maybe you should lay-off the pot a bit!
--
Kind Regards
Rudi Ahlers
SoftDux
Website: http://www.SoftDux.com
Technical
Rudi Ahlers wrote:
On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 8:44 PM, Brunner, Brian T.
bbrun...@gai-tronics.com wrote:
... You should either drink much more, or much less.
Was that comment really necessary? Maybe you should lay-off the pot a bit!
Hey, everyone needs to believe in something.
I believe I'll
On 04/05/11 11:37 AM, Jimmy Bradley wrote:
This isn't specifically about cent os, but I am running cent os on
this machine. I've got a Dell Dimension 2400 desktop pc. I've tried on a
number of occasions to put a second hard drive in the machine, but I
can't get the machine to recognize
Well, today, I feel like a real, old time sysadmin. Now, I didn't have to
write a driver in assembly for the printer, but
We got this huge, 44 HP Designjet z3200ps printer. Only supports Win and
Mac. Fine, I hang it off of one of our servers on a subnet (at $0.96/foot
paper, we're the only
On 04/05/2011 09:00 AM, rai...@ultra-secure.de wrote:
That is really a no-brainer.
In the time it takes to re-build such a RAID, another disk might just
fail and the R in RAID goes down the toilet. Your 19-disk RAID5 just
got turned into 25kg of scrap-metal.
As for ZFS - we're using it
Hi - under CentOS 5, has anyone be able to get the vertically splitting
under screen to work?
I downloaded the latest screen-4.0.3 and the
wrp_vertical_split_0.3_4.0.2.diff.bz2
patch for vertical splitting and I still can't get it work.
^A | doesn't do anything.
Horizontal splitting works
On Tue, 2011-04-05 at 12:14 -0700, John R Pierce wrote:
On 04/05/11 11:37 AM, Jimmy Bradley wrote:
This isn't specifically about cent os, but I am running cent os on
this machine. I've got a Dell Dimension 2400 desktop pc. I've tried on a
number of occasions to put a second hard drive
On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 16:05, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Well, today, I feel like a real, old time sysadmin. Now, I didn't have to
write a driver in assembly for the printer, but
Anyone needs any info about hacking a .ppd, feel free to email me; if you
have a beast of a z3200ps, I'll be
But ...
I've been reading about some of the issues with ZFS performance and have
discovered that it needs a *lot* of RAM to support decent caching ...
the recommendation is for a GByte of RAM per TByte of storage just for
the metadata, which can add up. Maybe cache memory starvation is one
Eduardo Grosclaude wrote:
On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 16:05, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Well, today, I feel like a real, old time sysadmin. Now, I didn't have
to write a driver in assembly for the printer, but
Anyone needs any info about hacking a .ppd, feel free to email me; if
you have a
On Tue, Apr 05, 2011 at 12:57:03PM -0700, Agile Aspect wrote:
Hi - under CentOS 5, has anyone be able to get the vertically splitting
under screen to work?
I downloaded the latest screen-4.0.3 and the
wrp_vertical_split_0.3_4.0.2.diff.bz2
patch for vertical splitting and I still
On Tue, Apr 05, 2011 at 04:29:42PM -0400, Scott Robbins wrote:
I like tmux. Available from rpmforge.
I should have mentioned that it does do splitting both ways by default.
--
Scott Robbins
PGP keyID EB3467D6
( 1B48 077D 66F6 9DB0 FDC2 A409 FA54 EB34 67D6 )
gpg --keyserver
- Original Message -
From:Kai Schaetzl mailli...@conactive.com
To:centos@centos.org
Cc:
Sent:Tuesday, 5 April 2011, 13:21
Subject:Re: [CentOS] KILL THIS THREAD ( Centos 6 Update?)
+100
Kai
Anybody that thinks this thread can be killed is so badly mis-understanding
Sorry if this is somewhat naive, but I'm a little confused as to what the
criteria is for that which will get upgraded automatically by yum and what
will
not.
I see in our logwatch messages from time to time that yum upgraded a bunch
of
stuff, but I also notice that yum
Simple answer: yum update will update *all* packages in the repo's that
are *enabled*.
Kai
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
email builder wrote:
Hello,
Sorry if this is somewhat naive, but I'm a little confused as to what the
criteria is for that which will get upgraded automatically by yum and what
will
not.
I see in our logwatch messages from time to time that yum upgraded a bunch
of
stuff, but
Ian Murray wrote on Tue, 5 Apr 2011 22:49:54 +0100 (BST):
This thread or others like it will continue
wrong. It will continue as long people bite. Stop biting the bait!
Kai
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
Thank you!
If forcing it to stop system-wide is not possible, is there any way of
forcing IPv4 lookups to occur first then?
On 4/4/2011 5:34 PM, Tom H wrote:
On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 10:51 AM, Russell Jonesrjo...@eggycrew.com wrote:
I am having a strange issue with CentOS 5.4 that I cannot
On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 6:14 PM, email builder emailbuilde...@yahoo.com wrote:
Sorry if this is somewhat naive, but I'm a little confused as to what the
criteria is for that which will get upgraded automatically by yum and what
will not.
I see in our logwatch messages from time to time that
On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 11:33 AM, Timothy Murphy gayle...@eircom.net wrote:
According to http://wiki.centos.org/Manuals/ReleaseNotes/CentOSLiveCD5.5
There is a Network Install option on the Live CD
that is the same as our CentOS-5.5-i386-netinstall ISO.
I've looked quite carefully at my
Sorry if this is somewhat naive, but I'm a little confused as to what the
criteria is for that which will get upgraded automatically by yum and
what
will not.
I see in our logwatch messages from time to time that yum upgraded
a bunch of stuff, but I also notice that yum will
On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 6:52 PM, Russell Jones rjo...@eggycrew.com wrote:
Thank you!
If forcing it to stop system-wide is not possible, is there any way of
forcing IPv4 lookups to occur first then?
You're welcome.
In the case of traceroute, there shouldn't be any DNS requests
when
Sorry if this is somewhat naive, but I'm a little confused as to what
the
criteria is for that which will get upgraded automatically by yum and what
will
not.
I see in our logwatch messages from time to time that yum upgraded a
bunch
of
stuff, but I also notice
On Tue, Apr 05, 2011 at 07:46:32PM -0400, Tom H wrote:
In the case of traceroute, there shouldn't be any DNS requests
when specifying ipv4 transport (-4).
Umm, no. The transport protocol is irrelevant to the query. You can
make queries over IPv4. Indeed I do that all the time.
--
On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 7:50 PM, Stephen Harris li...@spuddy.org wrote:
On Tue, Apr 05, 2011 at 07:46:32PM -0400, Tom H wrote:
In the case of traceroute, there shouldn't be any DNS requests
when specifying ipv4 transport (-4).
Umm, no. The transport protocol is irrelevant to the query.
on 15:05 Tue 05 Apr, m.r...@5-cent.us (m.r...@5-cent.us) wrote:
Well, today, I feel like a real, old time sysadmin. Now, I didn't have to
write a driver in assembly for the printer, but
We got this huge, 44 HP Designjet z3200ps printer. Only supports Win and
Mac. Fine, I hang it off of
On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 7:40 PM, email builder emailbuilde...@yahoo.com wrote:
Sorry if this is somewhat naive, but I'm a little confused as to what
the
criteria is for that which will get upgraded automatically by yum and
what
will not.
I see in our logwatch messages from time
Friends I have a good ftp server working with authentication of users,
but I want to put a folder with general information for everyone can
read without having to log in, that is to be seen both registered users
and guests too.
--
Fidel Dominguez-Valero
Linux User: 433411
Website:
On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 11:49 AM, compdoc comp...@hotrodpc.com wrote:
I've been working with VMs for a while now and have tried various ways to
set up guests. Block devices can be done with or without LVM, although I've
stopped using LVM on my systems these days.
Just curious, why have you
Just curious, why have you stopped using LVM?
Simply for ease of maintenance: some recovery and backup utilities like
clonezilla can't work with LVM. And because the same names for volume groups
are used for each centos install, so trying to attach a drive or volume to a
new system for
On 04/05/11 6:45 PM, Fidel Dominguez-Valero wrote:
Friends I have a good ftp server working with authentication of users,
but I want to put a folder with general information for everyone can
read without having to log in, that is to be seen both registered users
and guests too.
all FTP users
Need more information.
- Are you using vsftpd? Proftpd?
- Are your users separate local user accounts that all have their own
home directories?
- Have you already looked at the anonymous FTP configuration for the FTP
server software you are wanting to use?
- Have you already looked at the
Sorry if this is somewhat naive, but I'm a little confused as to
what
the
criteria is for that which will get upgraded automatically by yum and
what
will not.
I see in our logwatch messages from time to time that yum upgraded
a bunch of stuff, but I also
--
Fidel Dominguez-Valero
Linux User: 433411
Website: http://www.valerofix.ryanhost.net
On Tue, 2011-04-05 at 21:43 -0500, Russell Jones wrote:
Need more information.
- Are you using vsftpd? Proftpd?
I'm using vsftpd
I have some users that they can log in in the server but I need to
On Tue, Apr 05, 2011 at 08:22:08PM -0600, compdoc wrote:
Just curious, why have you stopped using LVM?
Simply for ease of maintenance: some recovery and backup utilities like
clonezilla can't work with LVM. And because the same names for volume groups
are used for each centos install, so
On Apr 5, 2011, at 11:46 PM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
rrich...@blythe.org wrote:
Indeed! I run
Fail2Ban not only against SSH, but against SMTP/AUTH and IMAPS/POP3S (the
only client mail protocols we support). It's amazing how many dictionary
attacks take place against SMTP by persistent
With reference to the Donate page [1], I see that the very first
sentence reads --
[quote]
The CentOS Project is based a foundation of the efforts of volunteers.
[/quote]
On two separate occasions I have come across those words and thought
Huh?. Granted I can change them but, not knowing the
On Tue, 5 Apr 2011, Alan Bartlett wrote:
As I've finally got around to mentioning the above, I look west to the
US of A, wave at the ORC and ask if Russ would please make an
appropriate adjustment.
I am not the project's attorney and disclaim any such role
---start
On 5 April 2011 17:54, R P Herrold herr...@centos.org wrote:
On Tue, 5 Apr 2011, Alan Bartlett wrote:
As I've finally got around to mentioning the above, I look west to the
US of A, wave at the ORC and ask if Russ would please make an
appropriate adjustment.
I am not the project's attorney
I need permission to edit the CentOS Wiki and add in my Thinkpad L412 to
the Laptops Running CentOS.
username: johnrdavisjr
Thank you.
___
CentOS-docs mailing list
CentOS-docs@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs
john.r.davis...@gmail.com wrote on 04/05/2011 03:29 PM:
I need permission to edit the CentOS Wiki and add in my Thinkpad L412 to
the Laptops Running CentOS.
username: johnrdavisjr
The WikiName convention is FirstLast; for example, mine is PhilSchaffner.
Phil
Dejo los archivos de confiuracion de drbd y el log de
/var/log/messages:
/var/log/messages:
Apr 5 09:02:58 nodo1 kernel:
block drbd0: conn( StandAlone - Unconnected )
Apr 5 09:02:58 nodo1
kernel: block drbd0: Starting receiver thread (from drbd0_worker
[2472])
Apr 5 09:02:58 nodo1 kernel:
Hola,
2011/4/5 Ramón Macías Zamora ramon.mac...@raykasolutions.com:
No veo nada raro,
en /etc/squid/squid.conf debe estar puesto:
http_port 3128 transparent
la palabra *transparent* es imprescindible
¿Has probado con un script de firewall más sencillo? Para ver que
funciona correctamente
Creo que he encontrado la solución a mi problema...Ahora al bootear
se ponen bien como primary/primary, encontré esto e una página:
Dejo
el enlace:
http://realtechtalk.com/DRBD_WFConnection_ProblemSolution-1042-articles
Básicamente explica que a veces el cortafuegos de iptables que viene
si así esta aun así no hace el redireccionamiento entre eth1 y eth2 y la
maquina cliente que tengo no obtiene navegación a internet ago ping a las
dos tarjetas desde mi maquina cliente y responden las dos interfaces el
servidor si tiene navegación sin problemas, la verdad ya no se ni por donde
al intentar reinisiar mi servicio squid ejeccuta este error pero la verdad
no se que sea
2011/04/04 21:38:45| squid.conf line 757: http_access rules
2011/04/04 21:38:45| aclParseAccessLine: expecting 'allow' or 'deny',
got 'rules'.
2011/04/04 21:38:45| aclParseIpData: WARNING: Netmask masks away
/etc/drbd.conf:
global {
usage-count yes;
}
common
{
syncer {
rate 100M;
al-extents 257;
}
}
resource r0 {
protocol
C;
startup {
become-primary-on both; ### For Primary/Primary ###
degr-wfc-timeout 60;
wfc-timeout 30;
}
Te falta la política para
de ser eso, el problema esta a la hora de definir tu red, debe ser 10.0.0.0/24
y no como lo estas haciendo.
César D. Cruz Arrunátegui
- Mensaje original -
De: Mario Villela Larraza mario.villelalarr...@gmail.com
Para: centos-es@centos.org
Enviados: Lunes, 4 de Abril 2011 21:44:41 GMT
On Lun 04 Abr 2011 23:44:41 Mario Villela Larraza escribió:
al intentar reinisiar mi servicio squid ejeccuta este error pero la verdad
no se que sea
2011/04/04 21:38:45| squid.conf line 757: http_access rules
2011/04/04 21:38:45| aclParseAccessLine: expecting 'allow' or 'deny',
got 'rules'.
podrías enviar el contenido de /etc/squid/squid.conf ?
--
Ramón Macías Zamora
Tecnología, Investigación y Desarrollo
Guayaquil - Ecuador
msn:ramon_mac...@hotmail.com
skype: ramon_macias
UserLinux# 180926 (http://counter.li.org)
Cel:593-8-0192238
Tel:593 4 6044566
Amigos tengo un servidor ftp funcionando bien con autentificacion de
usuarios, pero quiero poner una carpeta con una informacion general que
todos puedan leer sin tener que logearse,es decir que la vean tanto los
usuarios registrados y los invitados tambien.
Gracias de antemano
--
Fidel
Usas postfix ?
Otra seria agregar en el submit.cf un relay en DS (DS relay.com)
El 21/03/11 12:07, Antonio Manogue escribió:
GRACIAS a ambos.
Este es el contenido de mi /etc/mail/access
[root@server scripts]# grep -v # /etc/mail/access
Connect:localhost.localdomain RELAY
Gracias a todos los que habéis colaborado.
Al final envío los log por SCP a la máquina de la plataforma de correo en la
que si se está ejecutando sendmail y desde allí ya lanzo los informes
correspondientes.
Un saludo.
- Mensaje original -
| Usas postfix ?
|
| Otra seria
90 matches
Mail list logo
