Johnny Hughes wrote:
On 01/07/2012 12:50 PM, email builder wrote:
I don't know what is causing your specific issue ... whether you
are
getting something newer in sa-update than is designed to work with
CentOS (sa-update bypasses the normal rpm type updates and does updates
from
On 01/08/2012 08:40 PM, email builder wrote:
So maybe I *do* need to open a bug report? Where do I do that?
can you try to disable ipv6, then reboot and see if you still get the
error message?
Sorry, it's a production machine, I'd rather not do that. I can
make small
changes but a
On Sunday 08 January 2012 23:19:39 Bennett Haselton wrote:
On 1/8/2012 7:28 AM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
On 01/08/2012 03:15 PM, Bennett Haselton wrote:
It's a file created by one of my CGI scripts. (The web server
is accessed by several hostnames which are dynamically assigned
to it,
On 1/9/2012 3:41 AM, Tony Molloy wrote:
On Sunday 08 January 2012 23:19:39 Bennett Haselton wrote:
On 1/8/2012 7:28 AM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
On 01/08/2012 03:15 PM, Bennett Haselton wrote:
It's a file created by one of my CGI scripts. (The web server
is accessed by several hostnames
On Monday 09 January 2012 12:06:04 Bennett Haselton wrote:
On 1/9/2012 3:41 AM, Tony Molloy wrote:
First I'm no SELinux expert ;-( but I've ben following this
thread with interest. It apears to be going around in circles.
The only time I've come across a file_t type is when I have
From: m.r...@5-cent.us m.r...@5-cent.us
I tried to boot from my 6.0 USB key, no joy. Updated it to 6.2. Still no
joy: it gets started, I do the disk layout, it formats the drives, and
then fails, saying that it can't find image# 1.
Works fine here...
On some PCs/servers the key is sdb...
John Doe wrote:
From: m.r...@5-cent.us m.r...@5-cent.us
I tried to boot from my 6.0 USB key, no joy. Updated it to 6.2. Still no
joy: it gets started, I do the disk layout, it formats the drives, and
then fails, saying that it can't find image# 1.
Works fine here...
On some PCs/servers the
Under gnome control panel, all seems ok: under sound preferences, sound
output is configured to use HDMI channel.
I am using nvidia drivers from elrepo.org (nvidia-x11-drv-290.10
and kmod-nvidia-290.10). Somebody knows where can I find some doc to
resolve this? Any idea?
I recall doing
http://taiter.com/techlog/2010/07/nvidia-gt210---hdmi-audio.html
My mistake, the correct link is here:
http://blog.taiter.com/tech/2010/07/nvidia-gt210---hdmi-audio.html
Forgot I was testing my redesign and had the wrong server in my host
file :)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
SELinux has no idea what the labels are in /tmp, so restorecon will
not change the labels. It would be best to just remove the content
from /tmp and allow new content to be created. If you want the
content to be accessible from apache, you could
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/07/2012 09:21 PM, Gordon Messmer wrote:
On 01/05/2012 01:36 PM, Bennett Haselton wrote:
http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/SELinux says: Access is only
allowed between similar types, so Apache running as httpd_t can
read /var/www/html/index.html
I haven't gotten anything from the list since my email of 09:34 EST. Do I
have a problem, or is the list quiet?
Please cc me offlist, if this goes through.
mark
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
On Mon, Jan 09, 2012 at 12:49:31PM -0500, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
I haven't gotten anything from the list since my email of 09:34 EST. Do I
have a problem, or is the list quiet?
Please cc me offlist, if this goes through.
I hope you get 20,000 replies :)
In the headers of all list traffic
That sounds good.
Would you share the munin plugin later pls?
I'm interested too.
Sure will. This is not a top priority for me so I won't likely get to it
for another week or two, but once it is done I will share.
--
“Don't eat anything you've ever seen advertised on TV”
-
On 01/09/2012 09:08 AM, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
man sesearch
sesearch -A -s httpd_t -C
WIll show you all the allow rules for the apache service.
Thanks, Dan. I appreciate the clarification.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
On 01/09/12 6:09 AM, John Doe wrote:
Works fine here...
On some PCs/servers the key is sdb...
the days of relying on /dev/sd? are long past.
'scsi' devices renumber themselves on every boot. case in point,
server I'm configuring now... has a LSI mptsas card with 2 disks
mirrored for the
I *loathe* dnsorbs Maybe this one will get through its crap. Maybe if
I add a few more words
John R. Dennison wrote:
On Mon, Jan 09, 2012 at 12:49:31PM -0500, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
I haven't gotten anything from the list since my email of 09:34 EST. Do
I have a problem, or is the list
John R Pierce wrote:
On 01/09/12 6:09 AM, John Doe wrote:
Works fine here...
On some PCs/servers the key is sdb...
the days of relying on /dev/sd? are long past.
Heh. See the point of a related thread, where mkswap -L did. not. work. No
label...
'scsi' devices renumber themselves on every
John R Pierce wrote:
I have a large raid (lsi megaraid sas2 9261-8i card) and when I use
parted to initialize it as the one big partition I want, it gives me a
warning.
snip
# parted -a optimal /dev/sda mkpart primary 128s -1s
Warning: You requested a partition from 65.5kB to
On 01/09/2012 07:31 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
I *loathe* dnsorbs Maybe this one will get through its crap. Maybe if
I add a few more words
John R. Dennison wrote:
On Mon, Jan 09, 2012 at 12:49:31PM -0500, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
I haven't gotten anything from the list since my
Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
On 01/09/2012 07:31 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
I *loathe* dnsorbs Maybe this one will get through its crap. Maybe
if I add a few more words
John R. Dennison wrote:
On Mon, Jan 09, 2012 at 12:49:31PM -0500, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
I haven't gotten anything
On 01/09/12 10:33 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
So we use labels. I*loathe* UUIDs. Quick, tell my yours on one system
without looking (as would be the case if the drive crashed).
from my rescue environment, I'd use: xfs_admin -u /dev/
(or the somewhat messier ext? equiv)
labels get messy
On 01/09/12 10:37 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
If*anyone* has the answer to this, I want to know. Or maybe we should
just file a bug against parted, which ABSOLUTELY, POSITIVELY does*not*
want to a) align it for best performance, or b)*TELL* you what you need
to align it.
Is there another
John R Pierce wrote:
On 01/09/12 10:33 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
So we use labels. I*loathe* UUIDs. Quick, tell my yours on one system
without looking (as would be the case if the drive crashed).
from my rescue environment, I'd use: xfs_admin -u /dev/
(or the somewhat messier ext?
On Jan 8, 2012, at 3:32 AM, Александр Кириллов wrote:
With all of the discussions regarding getting p3wned, I am feeling
paranoid and can't seem to figure out how to suppress this...
telnet $SOME_CENTOS_5_SERVER 22
Trying $SOME_IP_ADDRESS...
Connected to $SOME_CENTOS_5_SERVER.
Escape
On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 1:11 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
labels get messy too, when you have 27 systems and a half dozen file
systems each. you want your labels globally unique so if you plug a
volume into another system for repair there's no collisions. our
They are? I dunno - ours are
On 01/09/12 11:11 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
They are? I dunno - ours are labelled where they're intended to be
mounted, like / or /boot
don't plug one of those into a different system for repair or you'll
have all kinda grief. $HOSTNAME_root would be the sane way to do it...
hostnames
On Monday 09 January 2012 11:45:26 Daniel J Walsh wrote:
SELinux has no idea what the labels are in /tmp, so restorecon will
not change the labels. It would be best to just remove the content
from /tmp and allow new content to be created. If you want the
content to be accessible from apache,
Les Mikesell wrote:
On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 1:11 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
labels get messy too, when you have 27 systems and a half dozen file
systems each. you want your labels globally unique so if you plug a
volume into another system for repair there's no collisions. our
They are?
John R Pierce wrote:
On 01/09/12 11:11 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
They are? I dunno - ours are labelled where they're intended to be
mounted, like / or /boot
don't plug one of those into a different system for repair or you'll
have all kinda grief. $HOSTNAME_root would be the sane way to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/09/2012 03:00 PM, Marko Vojinovic wrote:
On Monday 09 January 2012 11:45:26 Daniel J Walsh wrote:
SELinux has no idea what the labels are in /tmp, so restorecon
will not change the labels. It would be best to just remove the
content from
On Monday 09 January 2012 20:00:29 Marko Vojinovic wrote:
On Monday 09 January 2012 11:45:26 Daniel J Walsh wrote:
SELinux has no idea what the labels are in /tmp, so restorecon
will not change the labels. It would be best to just remove the
content from /tmp and allow new content to be
On 01/09/12 12:05 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
John R Pierce wrote:
On 01/09/12 11:11 AM,m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
They are? I dunno - ours are labelled where they're intended to be
mounted, like / or /boot
don't plug one of those into a different system for repair or you'll
have
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/09/2012 03:24 PM, Tony Molloy wrote:
On Monday 09 January 2012 20:00:29 Marko Vojinovic wrote:
On Monday 09 January 2012 11:45:26 Daniel J Walsh wrote:
SELinux has no idea what the labels are in /tmp, so restorecon
will not change the
Again, I *HATE* dnsorbs This was bounced, which makes twice today.
snip more text, add a few more words, we'll see if this makes it.
John R Pierce wrote:
On 01/09/12 12:05 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
John R Pierce wrote:
On 01/09/12 11:11 AM,m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
They are? I dunno
So maybe I *do* need to open a bug report? Where do I do
that?
can you try to disable ipv6, then reboot and see if you still
get the
error message?
Sorry, it's a production machine, I'd rather not do that.
I can
make small
changes but a reboot-- Beside, if this is
On 01/09/2012 07:43 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
On 01/09/2012 07:31 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
I *loathe* dnsorbs Maybe this one will get through its crap. Maybe
if I add a few more words
John R. Dennison wrote:
On Mon, Jan 09, 2012 at 12:49:31PM -0500,
On 01/09/2012 09:56 PM, email builder wrote:
Is there somewhere at RepoForge I could notify them about this?
users mailing list:
us...@lists.repoforge.org
http://lists.repoforge.org/mailman/listinfo/users
--
Ljubomir Ljubojevic
(Love is in the Air)
PL Computers
Serbia, Europe
Google is the
On 01/09/12 12:31 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Again, I*HATE* dnsorbs This was bounced, which makes twice today.
snip more text, add a few more words, we'll see if this makes it.
your email is being relayed through 66.147.249.253
(oproxy4-pub.bluehost.com) which appears on several spam
Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
On 01/09/2012 07:43 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
John R. Dennison wrote:
On Mon, Jan 09, 2012 at 12:49:31PM -0500, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
I haven't gotten anything from the list since my email of 09:34 EST.
Do I have a problem, or is the
John R Pierce wrote:
On 01/09/12 12:31 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Again, I*HATE* dnsorbs This was bounced, which makes twice today.
snip more text, add a few more words, we'll see if this makes it.
your email is being relayed through 66.147.249.253
(oproxy4-pub.bluehost.com) which
On 01/09/12 1:13 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Let's go through this again - we did it months ago. My site is hosted by
hostmonster, which also operates as bluehost. They are a*large* provider,
with hundreds of thousands of domains, and the email from all of them go
through their (few) email
On 01/09/2012 10:13 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
John R Pierce wrote:
On 01/09/12 12:31 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Again, I*HATE* dnsorbs This was bounced, which makes twice today.
snip more text, add a few more words, we'll see if this makes it.
your email is being relayed through
On 01/09/12 1:30 PM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
I own my own domain/server/subnet. My WISP customers can only send mail
via my server, with all the prevention's I could think of. I have never
been hit with this (but I do have small customer base), but I have had
regular domains (like one local
On Mon, Jan 09, 2012 at 01:29:24PM -0800, John R Pierce wrote:
Thats a BS excuse. gmail has MILLIONS more users than bluehost, yet
doesn't seem to ever be used to relay spam. Why? they are proactive
*giggle* *giggle* *laugh* *guffaw* BWAAHAHAHAHHH!
No spam via gmail? Wow... Funniest
John R Pierce wrote:
On 01/09/12 1:13 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Let's go through this again - we did it months ago. My site is hosted by
hostmonster, which also operates as bluehost. They are a*large*
provider,
with hundreds of thousands of domains, and the email from all of them go
Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
On 01/09/2012 10:13 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
snip
Who here is *not* using a work email? Who here posts from their own
hosting site? Has this ever happened to you?
I own my own domain/server/subnet. My WISP customers can only send mail
via my server, with all the
On 01/09/12 1:39 PM, Stephen Harris wrote:
*giggle* *giggle* *laugh* *guffaw* BWAAHAHAHAHHH!
No spam via gmail? Wow... Funniest thing I've heard all day!
none of it that I've seen came through gmail servers... lots of spam
from anonymous open relays with forged @gmail.com from
On 01/09/2012 10:43 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
On 01/09/2012 10:13 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
snip
Who here is *not* using a work email? Who here posts from their own
hosting site? Has this ever happened to you?
I own my own domain/server/subnet. My WISP
On Mon, Jan 09, 2012 at 01:44:54PM -0800, John R Pierce wrote:
On 01/09/12 1:39 PM, Stephen Harris wrote:
*giggle* *giggle* *laugh* *guffaw* BWAAHAHAHAHHH!
No spam via gmail? Wow... Funniest thing I've heard all day!
none of it that I've seen came through gmail servers... lots
I've changed the subject line. It has nothing to do with my question with
my original post, that no one seems to have any answer to, what file
image# 1 is looking for.
This bloody email has now been blocked *twice*.
Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
On 01/09/2012 10:43 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Anyone here using a SOCKS server? I'm using ss5 but there seems to be a
strange disconnect issue with it and openvpn. While I'm trying to figure
out whether ss5 is at fault, or openvpn, I'd like to try a different
SOCKS server. Could you recommend one that works well on CentOS?
Thanks.
--
Anyone here using a SOCKS server? I'm using ss5 but there seems to be a
strange disconnect issue with it and openvpn. While I'm trying to figure
out whether ss5 is at fault, or openvpn, I'd like to try a different
SOCKS server. Could you recommend one that works well on CentOS?
If you can
Is there somewhere at RepoForge I could notify them about this?
users mailing list:
us...@lists.repoforge.org
http://lists.repoforge.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Thank you. I am reporting it now
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
On Jan 9, 2012, at 3:05 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
I've changed the subject line. It has nothing to do with my question with
my original post, that no one seems to have any answer to, what file
image# 1 is looking for.
This bloody email has now been blocked *twice*.
quite simply,
Craig White wrote:
On Jan 9, 2012, at 3:05 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
I've changed the subject line. It has nothing to do with my question
with my original post, that no one seems to have any answer to, what file
image# 1 is looking for.
This bloody email has now been blocked *twice*.
On Jan 9, 2012, at 3:39 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
I am *NOT* going to jump hosting providers
every time this happens.
fine, you've made your choice - you should spare us the grief of your own
choices.
--
Craig White ~ craig.wh...@ttiltd.com
On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 4:49 PM, Craig White craig.wh...@ttiltd.com wrote:
I am *NOT* going to jump hosting providers
every time this happens.
fine, you've made your choice - you should spare us the grief of your own
choices.
It's pretty hard to beat a free gmail account for mail
On 01/09/12 2:39 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
I've argued before that blocks should be by source - actual source, the
oldest Received-From, not from the last mailer.
Those are far too easily forged, and in fact a majority of spam has
forged Recieved headers, you can only trust the one YOUR mail
On 01/09/2012 02:24 PM, Stephen Harris wrote:
Anyone here using a SOCKS server? I'm using ss5 but there seems to be a
strange disconnect issue with it and openvpn. While I'm trying to figure
out whether ss5 is at fault, or openvpn, I'd like to try a different
SOCKS server. Could you recommend
On 01/09/12 4:34 PM, Florin Andrei wrote:
OpenVPN normally uses UDP.
it does? I thought OpenVPN used ssl/tls as the transport, which is most
decidedly TCP. I'll admit I haven't used it in quite a long time
--
john r pierceN 37, W 122
santa cruz ca
\
Is there somewhere at RepoForge I could notify them about this?
users mailing list:
us...@lists.repoforge.org
http://lists.repoforge.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Thank you. I am reporting it now
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 6:51 PM, John R Pierce pie...@hogranch.com wrote:
On 01/09/12 4:34 PM, Florin Andrei wrote:
OpenVPN normally uses UDP.
it does? I thought OpenVPN used ssl/tls as the transport, which is most
decidedly TCP. I'll admit I haven't used it in quite a long time
OpenVPN
On 01/09/2012 04:51 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
On 01/09/12 4:34 PM, Florin Andrei wrote:
OpenVPN normally uses UDP.
it does? I thought OpenVPN used ssl/tls as the transport, which is most
decidedly TCP. I'll admit I haven't used it in quite a long time
openssl is used for encryption, but the
Gregory P. Ennis wrote:
I have three e-mail servers and the error is on all three.
[root@MailIn ~]# service spamassassin restart
Stopping spamd:[ OK ]
Starting spamd: Subroutine Net::DNS::Resolver::Base::AF_INET6 redefined at
On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 7:11 PM, Florin Andrei flo...@andrei.myip.org wrote:
On 01/09/2012 04:51 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
On 01/09/12 4:34 PM, Florin Andrei wrote:
OpenVPN normally uses UDP.
it does? I thought OpenVPN used ssl/tls as the transport, which is most
decidedly TCP. I'll admit I
On 01/09/2012 05:20 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
If it is your server you could just route the udp packets (using
iptables to NAT if needed), unless you need access control or logging
from the socks service.
The exit point is a few hops away, it's different from the default exit
point, and I
Gregory P. Ennis wrote:
I have three e-mail servers and the error is on all three.
[root@MailIn ~]# service spamassassin restart
Stopping spamd:[ OK ]
Starting spamd: Subroutine Net::DNS::Resolver::Base::AF_INET6 redefined at
I have three e-mail servers and the error is on all three.
[root@MailIn ~]# service spamassassin restart
Stopping spamd: [ OK ]
Starting spamd: Subroutine Net::DNS::Resolver::Base::AF_INET6 redefined at
/usr/lib/perl5/5.8.8/Exporter.pm line
After solving my problem by downgrading perl-NetAddr-IP to the CentOS
repo's version, yum is of course telling me perl-NetAddr-IP is out of date
and needs to be updated (back to the buggy one in RepoForge).
So looks like yum-priorities is in order (ha! the pun!), but I have a question
Hmm, OK,
On 2012-01-10 14:13, email builder wrote:
...
snip
...
If I already have a bunch of packages from RepoForge, some of which
might also be in the CentOS repo (some presumably with lower version
numbers), what happens after installing and configuring
yum-priorities?
Do those packages
On Monday 09 January 2012 15:29:59 Daniel J Walsh wrote:
file_t means the file has no label, so the only way to create this
type of file would be to remove the security attributes on the file.
On an SELinux system, file_t should never be created, they are only
created on a disabled SELinux
On 2012-01-10 08:44, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
...snip...
And then there's google+. I'm *REALLY* tired of Poredsky (or however
his
name's spelled), sending me spam in Russian
I hear you. I recently created an SPF record and added the necessary
SMF-SPF milter on my mail server just to
On 01/09/2012 09:59 PM, Anthony wrote:
On 2012-01-10 14:13, email builder wrote:
...
snip
...
If I already have a bunch of packages from RepoForge, some of which
might also be in the CentOS repo (some presumably with lower version
numbers), what happens after installing and configuring
On 09/01/12 15:43, Tait Clarridge wrote:
http://taiter.com/techlog/2010/07/nvidia-gt210---hdmi-audio.html
My mistake, the correct link is here:
http://blog.taiter.com/tech/2010/07/nvidia-gt210---hdmi-audio.html
Forgot I was testing my redesign and had the wrong server in my host
file :)
Hi All,
Question:
What (how, where) I need to set (configure) to make 'middle' button on
the touch pad acting as a '__paste__' button when I run LINUX (CentOS
6.2) as guest on MS Windows 7 Home premium ?
Details:
LENOVO T520 laptop
touch pad with 3 buttons
pointing device (red small
Sorry for the top post but I think it's appropriate here. The message
below was posted 20th of December last year with no response. I've now
hit the same problem.
I have CentOS 5.7 and and trying to install an F16 domU PV guest. It
seems that pygrub is failing to read the grub2 setup.
It also
On Mon, Jan 09, 2012 at 07:20:05PM -0500, S.Tindall wrote:
On Mon, 2012-01-09 at 18:56 -0500, R P Herrold wrote:
On Tue, 10 Jan 2012, Norman Gaywood wrote:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=746602
(pygrub cannot start F16 PV guests (GPT partition) under Xen 4.1.1)
why would
El 07/01/2012 02:54 a.m., Carlos Sura escribió:
Tengo CentOS instalado con postfix y 5 IP's rotando en cada correo que
envio (nunca es la misma).
puedo enviar mensajes, pero cuando es de recibir, es decir mando de esta
dirección a una dirección de correo del servidor @dominio.com me dice el
79 matches
Mail list logo
