Leo,
>> I would like to obtain an ssl certificate, so I can run my own imap server
>> on a machine in my office.
>> I am assuming I'll need to pay a CA to generate what I need, but
>> I'm confused about what I need. I am running dovecot at teh moment,
>> but my clients (iphone, windows laptops)
At Fri, 31 Aug 2018 21:38:13 +0200 CentOS mailing list
wrote:
>
> On 31.08.2018 21:31, Michael Schumacher wrote:
>
> > certbot works only with ports 80 or 443? Can lego work with with IMAP
> > ports like 143 or 993? The documentation is not very clear.
>
> basically - independent of the
Le 31/08/2018 à 16:29, Gary Stainburn a écrit :
> Can anyone recommend a Dist that would work on it?
I'd say whatever bone-headed distro you're comfortable with.
Personally, I'd use 32-bit Slackware 14.2 without even giving it a
second thought.
Cheers,
Niki
--
Microlinux - Solutions
On 08/31/2018 01:47 PM, Chuck Campbell wrote:
I am getting myself confused, and need someone who fully understands
this process to help me out a bot.
I would like to obtain an ssl certificate, so I can run my own imap
server on a machine in my office.
My domain is hosted by
My recommendation, take it for what its worth:
32-bit distros to me are a short lived proposition IMO.
Example: I'm running Centos 6, 32-bit version. I recently ran into an issue
where a package
(clamav) started using a 64-bit library for decompression of files. End result,
end of scanning
for
Folks
I've started to use "vdo" instead of zfs in Centos 7. I hope this is
a wise decision. However, I'm a bit mystified in decoding the
"vdostats" output.
I'd like to figure out how well deduplication is working. One
measure would be to find two numbers:
L = How many bocks are in use
31 aug 2018 kl. 21:31 skrev Michael Schumacher :
> Leo,
>
>>> I would like to obtain an ssl certificate, so I can run my own imap server
>>> on a machine in my office.
>>> I am assuming I'll need to pay a CA to generate what I need, but
>>> I'm confused about what I need. I am running dovecot
J Martin Rushton via CentOS wrote:
> On 31/08/18 16:47, Yves Bellefeuille wrote:
>> Gary Stainburn wrote:
>>
>
>
>> "Old Pentium" isn't very precise; the first Pentiums were in 1993!
>
> They were the ones nicknamed "i586.01" see
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pentium_FDIV_bug
>
Which a lot of
On 31.08.2018 21:31, Michael Schumacher wrote:
> certbot works only with ports 80 or 443? Can lego work with with IMAP
> ports like 143 or 993? The documentation is not very clear.
basically - independent of the client - letsencrypt will only support
http/https or dns based challenges.
so - if
31 aug 2018 kl. 21:38 skrev Ulf Volmer :
> On 31.08.2018 21:31, Michael Schumacher wrote:
>
>> certbot works only with ports 80 or 443? Can lego work with with IMAP
>> ports like 143 or 993? The documentation is not very clear.
>
> basically - independent of the client - letsencrypt will only
Warren Young wrote:
> On Aug 31, 2018, at 8:29 AM, Gary Stainburn wrote:
>
>>
>> I've got a very small footprint rack server with a 4TB drive in that I
>> wish to be a Bacula storeage device. However, it's got an old board /
>> processor in it.
>
> You’re giving two very mixed signals here.
>
>
Letsencrypt.org has one other thing you should know about, not a biggie,
the certificate is only good for 90 days at a time. Then you need to
renew. But they though about that too, you can automate the renewal, so
that each time the certificate expires and new one is generated and
installed.
Gary Stainburn wrote:
> I've got a very small footprint rack server with a 4TB drive in that I
> wish to be a Bacula storeage device. However, it's got an old board /
> processor in it.
"Old Pentium" isn't very precise; the first Pentiums were in 1993!
The least demanding distributions I know
On 31/08/18 16:47, Yves Bellefeuille wrote:
> Gary Stainburn wrote:
> "Old Pentium" isn't very precise; the first Pentiums were in 1993!
They were the ones nicknamed "i586.01" see
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pentium_FDIV_bug
--
J Martin Rushton MBCS
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP
On Aug 31, 2018, at 8:29 AM, Gary Stainburn wrote:
>
> I've got a very small footprint rack server with a 4TB drive in that I wish
> to
> be a Bacula storeage device. However, it's got an old board / processor in
> it.
You’re giving two very mixed signals here.
“Old Pentium,” as someone
On 08/31/2018 05:54 PM, John R. Dennison wrote:
On Fri, Aug 31, 2018 at 05:30:53PM -0400, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
Letsencrypt is a very important development, but it has (IMHO) a shaking
foundation. I would not build a production system around it. But then I
have lived in aspects of PKI
On Fri, Aug 31, 2018 at 05:30:53PM -0400, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
>
> Letsencrypt is a very important development, but it has (IMHO) a shaking
> foundation. I would not build a production system around it. But then I
> have lived in aspects of PKI since '95...
I presume you meant "shaky
On Aug 31, 2018, at 4:42 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
>
> [Let’s Encrypt] is designed for getting web servers quickly into TLS
Yes.
> ...and then to a more stable provider.
[citation wanted]
> If your content is short information, your contacts will never notice that
> you go to a new cert
1 sep 2018 kl. 00:42 skrev Robert Moskowitz :
> On 08/31/2018 05:54 PM, John R. Dennison wrote:
>> On Fri, Aug 31, 2018 at 05:30:53PM -0400, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
>>> Letsencrypt is a very important development, but it has (IMHO) a shaking
>>> foundation. I would not build a production system
Hello Gordon,
On Thu, 30 Aug 2018 15:00:41 -0700 Gordon Messmer
wrote:
> On 08/30/2018 01:11 AM, wwp wrote:
> > I well know that to match "1.foo-named", I should use `ls*foo*`
> > (trailing *) and I'm sure that you know that `ls *foo` matches
> > 1.foo.
>
>
> I didn't. Given a better
I've got a very small footprint rack server with a 4TB drive in that I wish to
be a Bacula storeage device. However, it's got an old board / processor in
it.
Can anyone recommend a Dist that would work on it?
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
On 8/31/18 10:12 AM, Bee.Lists wrote:
I’m fresh out of FreeBSD world. Depending on the port, it can be easy and
predictable, or an absolute confusion-fest.
FreeBSD ports should not be confused with FreeBSD system. Each of ports
is maintained by different maintainer(s), some of them get
On 8/31/18 12:09 PM, Leon Fauster via CentOS wrote:
Am 31.08.2018 um 16:29 schrieb Gary Stainburn :
I've got a very small footprint rack server with a 4TB drive in that I wish to
be a Bacula storeage device. However, it's got an old board / processor in
it.
We use mysql as database
Gary Stainburn wrote:
> I've got a very small footprint rack server with a 4TB drive in that I
> wish to be a Bacula storeage device. However, it's got an old board /
> processor in it.
>
> Can anyone recommend a Dist that would work on it?
CentOS will work, but you might start with minimal (but
On Friday 31 August 2018 16:35:54 mark wrote:
> Gary Stainburn wrote:
> > I've got a very small footprint rack server with a 4TB drive in that I
> > wish to be a Bacula storeage device. However, it's got an old board /
> > processor in it.
> >
> > Can anyone recommend a Dist that would work on it?
On 8/31/18 10:47 AM, John Hodrien wrote:
On Fri, 31 Aug 2018, mark wrote:
CentOS will work, but you might start with minimal (but make sure it
includes networking).
Please note that I installed CentOS 6, just a few months ago, on an HP
Netbook from '09, and it runs perfectly well.
> Am 31.08.2018 um 16:29 schrieb Gary Stainburn :
>
> I've got a very small footprint rack server with a 4TB drive in that I wish
> to
> be a Bacula storeage device. However, it's got an old board / processor in
> it.
We use mysql as database backend for bacula, and it becomes heavy loaded,
On Fri, 31 Aug 2018, mark wrote:
CentOS will work, but you might start with minimal (but make sure it
includes networking).
Please note that I installed CentOS 6, just a few months ago, on an HP
Netbook from '09, and it runs perfectly well.
mark "see? I didn't say anything about
I’ve been using it for years. I know the difference. You run FreeBSD and you
install ports. The two come hand-in-hand.
There’s no confusion. The maintainers, the admins, are far and few between on
FreeBSD. The very reason I’m here is due to to just that. That, cannot be
said of the
I am getting myself confused, and need someone who fully understands
this process to help me out a bot.
I would like to obtain an ssl certificate, so I can run my own imap
server on a machine in my office.
My domain is hosted by networksolutions, but I don't run my imap server
there.
I
I’m fresh out of FreeBSD world. Depending on the port, it can be easy and
predictable, or an absolute confusion-fest.
> On Aug 31, 2018, at 10:52 AM, Gary Stainburn wrote:
>
> Thanks for this. I haven't looked at FreeBSD since the 1990's or there
> abouts,
> but I'll give it a look.
31 aug 2018 kl. 19:47 skrev Chuck Campbell :
> I am getting myself confused, and need someone who fully understands this
> process to help me out a bot.
>
> I would like to obtain an ssl certificate, so I can run my own imap server on
> a machine in my office.
>
> My domain is hosted by
On 8/31/18 9:29 AM, Gary Stainburn wrote:
I've got a very small footprint rack server with a 4TB drive in that I wish to
be a Bacula storeage device. However, it's got an old board / processor in
it.
Can anyone recommend a Dist that would work on it?
I would use FreeBSD (and I do use
On Friday 31 August 2018 15:44:53 Valeri Galtsev wrote:
>
> I would use FreeBSD (and I do use FreeBSD for bacula, now bareos backup
> server and storage hosts), it has really small "footprint", and it is
> quite widespread.
>
> Incidentally, I was using bacula for very long time, but recently I
>
On 8/31/18 9:52 AM, Gary Stainburn wrote:
On Friday 31 August 2018 15:44:53 Valeri Galtsev wrote:
I would use FreeBSD (and I do use FreeBSD for bacula, now bareos backup
server and storage hosts), it has really small "footprint", and it is
quite widespread.
Incidentally, I was using bacula
On onsdag 29 augusti 2018 kl. 15:46:54 EEST Dag Nygren wrote:
> On onsdag 29 augusti 2018 kl. 15:37:47 EEST Alvin Starr wrote:
> > You could try using Xen.
> > A quick search implies that Xen from 4.3 onward will virtualize TPM.
> > I am not sure if the libvirt drivers for xen will support the
Más que nada me baso en Zimbra, nunca lo he usado y no creo que lo use;
peor me dicen que es un sistema completa que incluye controlador de dominio
y que los usuarios se crean una sola vez.
Saludos,
David
El mar., 28 ago. 2018 a las 22:09, SERGIO ANDRES AGUIRRE BARRAGAN (<
37 matches
Mail list logo
