This line in /etc/yum.repos.d/CentOS-Debuginfo.repo
baseurl=http://debuginfo.centos.org/$releasever/$basearch/
…causes commands like “yum search --enablerepo=* foo” to fail with the obscure
error
Error: Failed to synchronize cache for repo 'base-debuginfo'
Apparently this is because
All,
I use a code which has a python (I use python36) wrapper loading shared
libraries. The code worked fine in RHEL 7 but as I was testing it on
Centos 8, python cannot import the shared library (the import is done via
dlopen with flags set as
sys.setdlopenflags(os.RTLD_LAZY |
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to
centos-annou...@centos.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
Due to a hardware/DC relocate operation, we'll have to move the
existing CentOS forums instance (hosted on
https://www.centos.org/forums) to a new node.
Migration is scheduled for Monday December 16th, 8:00 am UTC time.
You can convert to local time with $(date -d '2019-12-16 8:00 UTC')
> -Original Message-
> From: CentOS [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Akemi Yagi
> Sent: Thursday, December 12, 2019 11:59 AM
> To: CentOS mailing list
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] CentOS 7 Plus Kernel Update Missing?
> > > Along with the recent kernel update
On Sun, Dec 8, 2019 at 8:34 AM Akemi Yagi wrote:
>
> On Sun, Dec 8, 2019 at 5:50 AM Albert McCann
> wrote:
> >
> > Along with the recent kernel update (3.10.0-1062.9.1.el7), the CentOS 7
> > plus kernel was likewise updated. The plus kernel though hasn't shown up in
> > the mirrors yet, while
According to the RHEL docs, package log4j was replaced with package
log4j12 in RHEL 8.0. However, when I attempt to install the package in
CentOS 8, dnf cannot find it. I have the Base, AppStream, Extras and
PowerTools repos enabled. What am I doing wrong?
Thanks!
On 2019-12-13 04:54, Kevin Stange wrote:
I don't want to burden Steven Haigh any, but I wonder if there's a way
we could combine some of our efforts to make both "Xen made easy!" and
the Virt SIG Xen easier to manage.
I've been thinking about this for a while. The problem has been the
On Mon, Dec 2, 2019 at 5:08 PM Kevin Stange wrote:
> By supporting only even numbered releases as is the case now, it has not
> been possible to do hot migration based upgrades which means that we
> have to do full reboots of our entire environment every so often. Right
> now we're running on
On Thu, Nov 28, 2019 at 6:12 PM George Dunlap wrote:
>
> Hey all,
>
> This mail has been a long time in coming, but with the upcoming
> expiration of security support for Xen 4.8, it's time to start thinking
> about what our update policy will be for the Xen packages in general.
>
> Citrix is
On 12/12/19 8:25 AM, George Dunlap wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 2, 2019 at 5:08 PM Kevin Stange wrote:
>> I don't really think we should drop a release before its security
>> support ends, unless we have *really clear* communication to repo users
>> as to the life cycles of these builds in advance.
>
>
11 matches
Mail list logo
