2010/12/9 masatheesh masathe...@gmail.com:
Hi,
I have CentOS 5.0 installed my system.It shows kernel panic - not
syncing : fatal exception error during boot process.Can any one please
suggest to resolve this kernel panic? I am very eager to solve this without
upgrade the version for
2011/2/14 robert mena robert.m...@gmail.com:
Hi,
Despite the mailing list and twitter I did not find any updated info on
either versions regarding the current status.
So, what is the current status of both versions? (like 60%)
I wonder for a long time why there is no detailed information
2011/2/16 Johnny Hughes joh...@centos.org:
Oracle has supposedly released their EL 6 build (last Friday) ... but
they have not released their sources as of this post.
http://oss.oracle.com/el5/ === EL 5 Sources
http://oss.oracle.com/el6/ === 404 Error
No, the sources are here:
2011/2/16 David Sommerseth d...@users.sourceforge.net:
That Red Hat keeps their work schedule private is not directly comparable
to a CentOS community effort, how I see it.
Red Hat is also a big financial organisation, which CentOS is not. In that
context, Red Hat is much more responsible
2011/2/16 Karanbir Singh mail-li...@karan.org:
On 02/16/2011 02:22 PM, Morten P.D. Stevens wrote:
The best example is Scientific Linux. There are schedules and an open
development process.
What is the reason for the closed development process in CentOS?
Its funny you say that Morten, since
2011/5/23 Johnny Hughes joh...@centos.org:
I have said this a million times ... but you are flat out wrong.
The community does many, many things for CentOS.
It is the community that makes the CentOS Fora one of the best place to
get information.
The community does all the articles on the
On Fri, 22 Jul 2011 11:33:11 -0700, Florin Andrei wrote:
Anyone packaging the new kernel for RH / CentOS?
You need a new version of module-init-tools that is compatible with
Linux 3.x series.
See: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=245705
- Fix handling of Linux 3.x series
Hi,
I get the following error while installing the newest centos patches.
[r...@gateway ~]# yum update
Loaded plugins: fastestmirror
Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile
* addons: centos.intergenia.de
* base: centos.intergenia.de
* extras: centos.intergenia.de
* updates:
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Yes, you see you have Perl 64-bit and 32-bit installed. You really need
it as an i386 package?
I have no problem updating x86_64 packages only.
Hi Alexander,
thank you. I removed perl.i386 and the yum update process is
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf Of mattias jonsson
Can i downgrade from centos 5.5 to 5.0
This is a big security risk because the CentOS team is only supporting the
latest CentOS version. (5.5, 4.8 and so on)
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf Of b.j. mcclure
Sent: Wednesday, June 30, 2010 4:49 PM
To: centos@centos.org
Subject: [CentOS] RHEL 6b2 Release
For those who might be interested, RHEL 6b2 has just been announced.
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf Of Morten P.D. Stevens
Sent: Wednesday, June 30, 2010 5:13 PM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] RHEL 6b2 Release
Hi,
And here are the Release Notes for RHEL 6 Beta 2
Hi CentOS Mailinglist,
we are using amavisd-new (with all dependencies) from Fedora/Redhat EPEL repo.
Some packages from EPEL repo are very old. (amavisd-new, clamav, spamassassin)
What's the best way to remove all amavisd-new packages (and it's dependencies)
from EPEL repo and reinstall it
On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 3:19 PM, Phil Schaffner wrote:
To see the packages from a
particular Vendor, for example EPEL:[code]
rpm -qa --qf %{NAME} %{VENDOR} \n | grep Fedora Project | cut -d ' '
-f 1 | sort
[/code]
The result should be a list of EPEL packages.
Hi Phil,
This command is
Hi,
I have a small question with sendmail and tls verification.
The tls verify fails on our internal/external sendmail servers.
For example:
STARTTLS=server, relay=mx1.imt-systems.com [89.146.219.60],
version=TLSv1/SSLv3, verify=FAIL, cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA, bits=256/256
STARTTLS=server,
...@centos.org] On
Behalf Of Alexander Dalloz
Sent: Tuesday, September 21, 2010 9:55 AM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Sendmail TLS verify=fail
Am 21.09.2010 01:28, schrieb Morten P.D. Stevens:
Hi,
I have a small question with sendmail and tls verification.
The tls verify fails
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 12:44 PM, Karanbir Singh mail-li...@karan.org wrote:
All centos-5 kernels are affected.
- KB
Here is the updated kernel source from upstream:
kernel-2.6.18-194.11.4.el5.src.rpm
https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2010-0704.html
Best regards,
Morten
On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 12:02 AM, Miguel Medalha miguelmeda...@sapo.pt wrote:
I was just a little worried at the response from Brent earlier quote
Don't play Russian Roulette and use ext4. .
Maybe he was referring to some old information dating back to the
development period.
ext4 has been
On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 2:30 PM, sync jian...@gmail.com wrote:
I have the same problem on it . Isn't the CentOS very safe?
CentOS (RHEL 5) is one of the most secure operating systems worldwide.
Best regards,
Morten
___
CentOS mailing list
On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 9:11 AM, Alexander Dalloz ad+li...@uni-x.org wrote:
What is the rationale behind deactivating Sendmail. Just curious. Or is it
the typical rant Sendmail is insecure, see its history?
I don't understand why many people calling sendmail insecure.
Sendmail is the default
2010/11/9 Scott Robbins scot...@nyc.rr.com:
https://www.redhat.com/archives/rhelv5-announce/2010-November/msg0.html
So, now we can all start saying, when will 5.6 be ready. :)
Hi,
RHEL 5.6 Beta:
- bind 9.7 - improved DNSsec support
- PHP 5.3 - support for namespaces
That sounds
2010/11/9 Robert Moskowitz r...@htt-consult.com:
My DNS server has been running Centos for some time.
I am in the process of upgrading it to Centos 5.5 (long overdue, I know).
Since we now have .com signed I want to get my domain signed as well,
but I see that Centos 5.5 is running BIND
2010/11/10 Juergen Gotteswinter j...@internetx.de:
oh nice, seems that they upgraded php to 5.3? no more 5.1
No, that are additional packages. (called bind97 and php53)
For example:
yum install bind97-utils or
yum install php53-mysql
The old versions continue to be supported by Red Hat.
2010/11/10 Digimer li...@alteeve.com:
I expect that 5.6 will get the first priority, if for no other reason
than it was out first, and thus probably already being worked on.
RHEL 5.6 isn´t released yet. Only the beta of RHEL 5.6 was released yesterday.
Best regards,
Morten
2010/11/10 mattias m...@mjw.se:
sound intrested
ddownload link?
The beta of RHEL 5.6 is only available via the Red Hat Network. (RHN)
Best regards,
Morten
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
2010/11/11 Steve Thompson s...@vgersoft.com:
Having done several upgrades from CentOS 4 to CentOS 5, my recommendation
would be to not even try it. There is all kinds of ugliness left over that
has to be cleaned up; I did it in the end, but it took a lot longer than
doing a clean install.
2010/11/16 Dave Stevens g...@uniserve.com:
I am curious what is the best way to upgrade my dom0 and domUs to V.6
(currently 5) when it releases. Any experience or docs on this?
Hi,
take a look at here:
2010/11/22 Dave Stevens g...@uniserve.com:
Hi,
I'm using CentOS on a box that, among other things, offers mailman
mailing lists, currently mailman 2.1.9. Version 2.1.14 is avilable
from the developers but integrating it into the system promises to be
tedious. I looked at RHEL 6 and don't
2010/11/30 Akemi Yagi amy...@gmail.com:
On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 12:12 PM, Pascal Robert prob...@macti.ca wrote:
[r...@hylafax SPECS]# rpmbuild -ba --target x86_64 kernel-2.6.spec
You are building as root. This is a bad practice. When building a
CentOS custom kernel, please try following
29 matches
Mail list logo
