[CentOS] centos6 filesystem size limit

was that the user space formatting tools (mkfs.ext4) only support 32bit filesystems (not 48bits). I'm surprised about this, I thought people would be waiting for 16TB support in rhel6. Does anyone know if this is going to change in point releases of rhel/centos6? Happy New Year -- Robert Arkiletian Eric

[CentOS] Need help transfering CentOS5 from desktop to laptop

-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1805620 Aug 5 05:05 vmlinuz-2.6.18-92.1.10.el5 -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1805556 Jun 25 11:13 vmlinuz-2.6.18-92.1.6.el5 -- Robert Arkiletian Eric Hamber Secondary, Vancouver, Canada Fl_TeacherTool http://www3.telus.net/public/robark/Fl_TeacherTool/ C++ GUI tutorial http

[CentOS] Re: Need help transfering CentOS5 from desktop to laptop

I gave up. I tried everything. Don't know what the problem was (buggy bios/corrupt fs ) and don't care now. Taking too much time to simply re-install grub (6hrs). I'm doing a complete re-install on the laptop. -- Robert Arkiletian Eric Hamber Secondary, Vancouver, Canada Fl_TeacherTool http

Re: [CentOS] question about software Raid 1

but if this http://linas.org/linux/raid.html is correct then I think the kernel maintainers should address this issue. I don't think it would be hard to implement. -- Robert Arkiletian Eric Hamber Secondary, Vancouver, Canada Fl_TeacherTool http://www3.telus.net/public/robark/Fl_TeacherTool/ C++ GUI

[CentOS] OT: need advice on drive controller

on this drive controller? -- Robert Arkiletian ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[CentOS] Determine high i/o reads/write directories

and/or writes? Any tools to measure i/o per directory? Thanks -- Robert Arkiletian Eric Hamber Secondary, Vancouver, Canada ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[CentOS] UPS issues with PFC PSU

by CyberPower, model CP1500PFCLCD, which has a pure sine wave output. Wondering if anyone has experience with CyberPower UPS's. Are they any good? Any problems with pwrstatd ? -- Robert Arkiletian Eric Hamber Secondary, Vancouver, Canada ___ CentOS mailing list

Re: [CentOS] UPS issues with PFC PSU

many threads about hardware recommendations as there are many sys admins on this list. It IS for a CentOS box if that makes it more on topic. Maybe I should have put an 'OT' in front of the subject. Anyway, have you anything experience with CyberPower UPS's? Thanks -- Robert Arkiletian Eric Hamber

Re: [CentOS] UPS issues with PFC PSU

off topic. It's just that I have only ever used APC and apcupsd. I've never used CyberPower and wondered if other CentOS people were using it with success/reliability. If that's off topic then I've learned something. -- Robert Arkiletian Eric Hamber Secondary, Vancouver, Canada

[CentOS] Dual personality Server (network pass through)

network cables each time. Thanks -- Robert Arkiletian Eric Hamber Secondary, Vancouver, Canada ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Dual personality Server (network pass through)

On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 4:13 PM, Alan Hodgson ahodg...@simkin.ca wrote: On Monday, June 14, 2010, Robert Arkiletian rob...@gmail.com wrote: I have 3 nics in a NATed gateway file server. Two nics (eth1, eth2) Is it possible to disable the NATing, nfs, dhcp and just somehow bridge the external

[CentOS] Resize all partitions bigger

partitions. Then restore images with Clonezilla. But I know UUID's will be wrong and I don't feel like creating new ones. I just want to use /dev/sdx Am I correct in assuming I only need to edit /etc/fstab and /etc/grub.conf or is there anything else I need to edit? Thanks -- Robert Arkiletian Eric

Re: [CentOS] Resize all partitions bigger

On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 6:44 AM, Jerry McAllister jerr...@msu.edu wrote: On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 11:05:52PM -0700, Robert Arkiletian wrote: I effectively have 1 drive /dev/sda  (it's actually a hardware raid 10 array) I have lots of free sapce. I want to resize my partitions (boot, home

[CentOS] ip aliasing on bonded interface possible?

Has anyone successfully created a bonded interface (bond0) with say two nics AND also then aliased that interface to get bond0 and bond0:1 (for an alias ip) I just want to know if it's possible and reliable Thanks -- Robert Arkiletian Eric Hamber Secondary, Vancouver, Canada

Re: [CentOS] ip aliasing on bonded interface possible?

On Sun, Sep 5, 2010 at 10:33 AM, Robert Arkiletian rob...@gmail.com wrote: Has anyone successfully created a bonded interface (bond0) with say two nics AND also then aliased that interface to get bond0 and bond0:1 (for an alias ip) I just want to know if it's possible and reliable Thanks

Re: [CentOS] ip aliasing on bonded interface possible?

On Mon, Sep 6, 2010 at 1:14 AM, Gabriel Tabares gabriel.taba...@roboreus.com wrote:  On 05/09/2010 18:33, Robert Arkiletian wrote: Has anyone successfully created a bonded interface (bond0) with say two nics AND also then aliased that interface to get bond0 and bond0:1 (for an alias ip) I

Re: [CentOS] Torrent: reminder to use it folks!

5.0 DVD to the 5.1 version and do an rsync it will save lots of bandwidth. -- Robert Arkiletian Eric Hamber Secondary, Vancouver, Canada Fl_TeacherTool http://www3.telus.net/public/robark/Fl_TeacherTool/ C++ GUI tutorial http://www3.telus.net/public/robark

Re: [CentOS] Torrent: reminder to use it folks!

On 12/17/07, Von [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Dec 17, 2007, at 10:05 PM, Robert Arkiletian wrote: Also don't forget that many mirrors offer rsync. If you rename your 5.0 DVD to the 5.1 version and do an rsync it will save lots of bandwidth. I could be tired, but could you please

Re: [CentOS] Recommendations for a “real RAID 1 card on Centos box

On 3/10/08, nate [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: You can turn on write back caching if you have a UPS as well (provided your UPS is wired into your system for a graceful shutdown) Hopefully you have a redundant PS unit. Having a UPS is not going to help if your PS fails. -- Robert Arkiletian Eric

[CentOS] Gnash 0.8.2 rpm for CentOS 4?

Does anyone know if there is a Gnash rpm available for CentOS 4? I have tried compiling it myself but run into dependency problems. I looked here http://dag.wieers.com/rpm/packages/gnash/ but there is only 0.8.2 for el5 not el4. -- Robert Arkiletian Eric Hamber Secondary, Vancouver, Canada

Re: [CentOS] Gnash 0.8.2 rpm for CentOS 4?

On Sat, Mar 15, 2008 at 3:16 PM, William L. Maltby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sat, 2008-03-15 at 14:23 -0700, Robert Arkiletian wrote: Does anyone know if there is a Gnash rpm available for CentOS 4? I have tried compiling it myself but run into dependency problems. I looked here

Re: [CentOS] Gnash 0.8.2 rpm for CentOS 4?

, and anobject system. This package provides version 2 of GLib. -- Robert Arkiletian Eric Hamber Secondary, Vancouver, Canada Fl_TeacherTool http://www3.telus.net/public/robark/Fl_TeacherTool/ C++ GUI tutorial http://www3.telus.net/public/robark/ ___ CentOS

[CentOS] gdm login keyboard layout selector missing

How do I get the keyboard layout selector in gdm login for 6.3? I have language selector but no keyboard layout selector. -- Robert Arkiletian Eric Hamber Secondary, Vancouver, Canada ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org

Re: [CentOS] gdm login keyboard layout selector missing

On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 11:45 PM, Robert Arkiletian rob...@gmail.com wrote: How do I get the keyboard layout selector in gdm login for 6.3? I have language selector but no keyboard layout selector. There *must* be others who use different keyboard layouts. -- Robert Arkiletian Eric Hamber

[CentOS] Partition # does not end on cylinder boundary.

any warnings. Should I reinstall? (performance hit?) -- Robert Arkiletian Eric Hamber Secondary, Vancouver, Canada ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[CentOS] No more support for chrome/chromium on rhel6

was planning on using C6 for a long time. Does anyone know of a repo that intends to keep Chromium working for C6? -- Robert Arkiletian Eric Hamber Secondary, Vancouver, Canada ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo

Re: [CentOS] No more support for chrome/chromium on rhel6

On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 5:14 PM, Robert Arkiletian rob...@gmail.com wrote: https://plus.google.com/u/0/100132233764003563318/posts/Y1s6T44Soby Not 100% this is true but the problem apparently is that rhel6 uses an old version of gtk2. Update, I just read the issue is also C++11 and gcc 4.6

Re: [CentOS] No more support for chrome/chromium on rhel6

of the regular ones. Just discovered that RH has provided a new developer toolchain a few weeks ago. GCC 4.7.2. http://red.ht/Uo9wej But it requires a developer subscription. Wondering if this might help the situation. -- Robert Arkiletian Eric Hamber Secondary, Vancouver, Canada

Re: [CentOS] No more support for chrome/chromium on rhel6

mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos -- Robert Arkiletian Eric Hamber Secondary, Vancouver, Canada ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] No more support for chrome/chromium on rhel6

we won't be able to support it though. https://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=224389 -- Robert Arkiletian Eric Hamber Secondary, Vancouver, Canada ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] No more support for chrome/chromium on rhel6

to the official build instructions at chromium.org. -- Robert Arkiletian Eric Hamber Secondary, Vancouver, Canada ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] No more support for chrome/chromium on rhel6

Johnny, there is someone here https://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=227320 who is willing and able to help. On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 3:48 PM, Johnny Hughes joh...@centos.org wrote: On 04/15/2013 01:26 AM, Robert Arkiletian wrote: Is there any chance CentOS might add Chromium

[CentOS] Red Hat CEO: Go Ahead, Copy Our Software

http://www.businessinsider.com/red-hat-ceo-go-ahead-copy-our-software-2013-8 Title says is all. Nice to know RH understands and accepts the relationship between CentOS and RHEL. Although it is complex. After all, if too many choose CentOS, there may no longer be a CentOS. However, I don't think

[CentOS] chromium-el6

Wondering if others are experiencing less stability with chromium-el6 28. I'm getting a lot of Aw-Snap :( messages. Anyone else experiencing this? ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[CentOS] problem with WOL

Running CentOS 6.4. Hi I have a bunch of Intel systems. Ivy Bridge Q77 chipset with 82579LM nics. I can't seem to wake them up with ether-wake. The nic driver is the intel e1000e. #ether-wake -i ethX mac-addr Once up (manually) ethtool reports Supports Wake-on: pumbg Wake-on: g I'm sure I've

Re: [CentOS] problem with WOL

Solved: Disable Deep sleep mode for S4/S5 in bios. WOL works. On Thu, Sep 5, 2013 at 11:15 AM, Robert Arkiletian rob...@gmail.com wrote: Running CentOS 6.4. Hi I have a bunch of Intel systems. Ivy Bridge Q77 chipset with 82579LM nics. I can't seem to wake them up with ether-wake. The nic

[CentOS] Chromium update

Latest chromium-el6 at http://people.centos.org/hughesjr/chromium/6/x86_64/RPMS/ is chromium-28.0.1500.95-213514.x86_64.rpm but latest chromium stable is 29.0.1547.xx wondering if there are any problems building version 29? ___ CentOS mailing list

Re: [CentOS] Chromium update

I'm skeptical about a long term solution involving a script that copies binaries from Fedora distribution. I would prefer a solution which incorporates the newer devtools from Tru. On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 2:19 PM, Kwan Lowe kwan.l...@gmail.com wrote: If you keep on canceling the auth dialog it

Re: [CentOS] Chromium update

What about Midori browser? http://midori-browser.org/ it's also a webkit based browser. Does anyone have experience with Midori? On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 4:10 PM, Robert Arkiletian rob...@gmail.com wrote: I'm skeptical about a long term solution involving a script that copies binaries from

[CentOS] And then there was one (browser)

About 6 months has passed since the last working version of Opera (12.16) for Linux was released. Opera 18 (Win+Mac only) is now based on Chromium so I'm not holding my breath for it to work with C6 even if it is ever released. Chrome/Chromium is pretty much history too (libs too old). So Firefox

Re: [CentOS] And then there was one (browser)

That script by Richard Lloyd is not a good idea. I think it's using libs from other distros (maybe even EOL distros) . I'd be surprised if that works stable for any length of time. On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 9:51 AM, Scot P. Floess sflo...@nc.rr.com wrote: All, I don't know if this will help

Re: [CentOS] And then there was one (browser)

new potential remote code exploit in Chromium flash. http://googlechromereleases.blogspot.ca/2014/02/stable-channel-update.html Doesn't look like these repos are being updated. http://people.redhat.com/tpopela/rpms/ http://people.centos.org/hughesjr/chromium/6/ Any info on this issue would be

Re: [CentOS] And then there was one (browser)

On Sat, Feb 8, 2014 at 2:41 PM, Johnny Hughes joh...@centos.org wrote: Sure, we talked to them (redhat). That does not make the code actually build any faster. The code does not build (as is) on EL6 and each build needs to be troubleshot and error corrected to make it work. Currently

Re: [CentOS] And then there was one (browser)

Sorry for this being off topic but I feel it emphasizes the need for long term support for desktop browsers on Linux. Went hunting for any info on Opera for Linux. My assumptions seem to be correct about Opera. I have no proof this is a legit post but it sounds like the truth: At my previous

Re: [CentOS] And then there was one (browser)

On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 3:22 AM, Johnny Hughes joh...@centos.org wrote: Why do you need Firefox 27 ... CentOS has the latest ESR version of Firefox (24.3.0) that gets security updates and it will always be the ESR version, so it will always get security updates and always move forward. So,

Re: [CentOS] Chromium 31.0.1650.63-2.el6 for CentOS 6

On Sun, Feb 16, 2014 at 2:56 AM, Johnny Hughes joh...@centos.org wrote: ... Personally, even though I like chromium, if google can't be bothered to support EL6, then I say that is their loss and I'll just use firefox. +1 But Me: Hey students, we are using a premier LTS Linux distro, look at all

Re: [CentOS] CVE-2014-0160 CentOS 6 openssl heartbleed workaround

On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 6:23 AM, Leon Fauster leonfaus...@googlemail.com wrote: Am 08.04.2014 um 15:02 schrieb James Hogarth james.hoga...@gmail.com: On 8 April 2014 12:08, Steven Tardy sjt5a...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 2:56 AM, Keith Keller kkel...@wombat.san-francisco.ca.us

Re: [CentOS] [OT] PXE Boot / image server for non-profit's computers

On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 12:08 PM, Jason Pyeron jpye...@pdinc.us wrote: This is the best collection of minds I can think of on this topic, that's why it is on this list. I think it is too subjective for stackoverflow. So here is the problem: The community center has multiple computers for

Re: [CentOS] CVE-2014-0160 CentOS 6 openssl heartbleed workaround

On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 2:08 PM, Keith Keller kkel...@wombat.san-francisco.ca.us wrote: On 2014-04-08, Robert Arkiletian rob...@gmail.com wrote: if you include libcrypto in the grep then sshd is affected. That's unfortunate. :( Is the bug in libssl, libcrypto, or both? Since sshd

[CentOS] Need Python3 for C6

I need Python 3.4 (latest) on CentOS 6 for development purposes (teaching programming). Need advice for best method to do this. I am concerned about not breaking the internal plumbing of C6. I was thinking about installing it into /opt. I noticed

Re: [CentOS] Getting yum to install to python 2.7 dir

On Sun, Apr 27, 2014 at 1:58 PM, Larry Martell larry.mart...@gmail.com wrote: I am running CentOS 6.5, which has python 2.6. I need python 2.7 so I installed that and it works and is my default python. But yum does not work with that, so I changed the shebang line for yum to /usr/bin/python2.6

[CentOS] Will Devtools-1.1 or later become part of SCL?

I've already installed devtools-1.1 from Tru Huynh. http://people.centos.org/tru/devtools-1.1/ Thank You Tru. gcc 4.7.2 is so much newer than stock 4.4.7. (much better C++11 support) Why is devtools-1.1 not officially part of CentOS SCL? I know devtools-2.0 still has issues but 1.1 would bring

Re: [CentOS] Need Python3 for C6

On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 10:58 AM, Elias Persson delre...@takeit.se wrote: On 2014-04-25 19:27, Robert Arkiletian wrote: I need Python 3.4 (latest) on CentOS 6 for development purposes (teaching programming). Need advice for best method to do this. I am concerned about not breaking

Re: [CentOS] Systemd Adding Its Own Console To Linux Systems

On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 10:08 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: Jonathan Billings wrote: On Wed, Oct 08, 2014 at 11:04:11AM -0400, Steve Clark wrote: Anybody see this article on /. I'd avoid slashdot entirely and read the phoronix article:

[CentOS] Chromium browser for C6

I found this bug fix report http://lwn.net/Articles/616130/ I thought we were not able to get Chromium for C6. Apparently it looks like the work has been already done. Is it possible we (hi Johnny) can get this package into C6? This would be a wonderful addition to CentOS 6. Please and thank

[CentOS] cr repo firefox el6.6 crashes on 6.5

Noticed firefox is one of the only critical sec. updates from 6.6. So I manually downloaded the rpm from cr repo and rpm -Uvh firefox-31.2.0-3.el6.centos.x86_64.rpm but it crashes with /usr/lib64/firefox/firefox: symbol lookup error: /usr/lib64/firefox/libxul.so: undefined symbol:

Re: [CentOS] cr repo firefox el6.6 crashes on 6.5

On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 12:13 PM, Phil Wyett philwy...@aura-tech-systems.co.uk wrote: See: https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-US/Red_Hat_Enterprise_Linux/6/html/6.6_Release_Notes/bh-chap-desktop_and_graphics.html You will need to install the new gdk-pixbuf2 package(s). I have the

Re: [CentOS] Chromium browser for C6

On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 6:17 AM, Leon Fauster leonfaus...@googlemail.com wrote: BTW: http://install.linux.ncsu.edu/pub/yum/itecs/public/chromium/rhel6/x86_64/ Are there any differences between how these rpms were built vs the official supplementary ones from RH? In other words, were they

Re: [CentOS] Chromium browser for C6

On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 2:11 PM, Johnny Hughes joh...@centos.org wrote: On 11/06/2014 02:30 PM, Phelps, Matthew wrote: On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 3:00 PM, Robert Arkiletian rob...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 6:17 AM, Leon Fauster leonfaus...@googlemail.com wrote: BTW

Re: [CentOS] Chromium browser for C6

On Sat, Nov 8, 2014 at 5:52 AM, Johnny Hughes joh...@centos.org wrote: On 11/07/2014 02:41 PM, Greg Bailey wrote: On 11/07/2014 01:20 PM, Robert Arkiletian wrote: On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 2:11 PM, Johnny Hughes joh...@centos.org wrote: On 11/06/2014 02:30 PM, Phelps, Matthew wrote

Re: [CentOS] Chromium browser for C6

On Sun, Nov 16, 2014 at 9:01 AM, Leon Fauster leonfaus...@googlemail.com wrote: I noticed that before chromium-browser-38 (e.g. chromium-31), the browser was able to find the external flash plugin (/usr/lib64/flash-plugin/...). I didn't have followed the development but I presume that such

Re: [CentOS] Chromium browser for C6

On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 12:24 PM, Johnny Hughes joh...@centos.org wrote: On 01/19/2015 12:23 PM, Phelps, Matthew wrote: On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 6:22 PM, Robert Arkiletian rob...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 1:13 PM, Robert Arkiletian rob...@gmail.com wrote: Johnny

Re: [CentOS] Chromium browser for C6

On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 1:13 PM, Robert Arkiletian rob...@gmail.com wrote: Johnny, Any ETA on version 39.0.2171.95 cheers bump ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Chromium browser for C6

Johnny, Any ETA on version 39.0.2171.95 cheers On Sat, Nov 15, 2014 at 8:55 AM, Johnny Hughes joh...@centos.org wrote: On 11/14/2014 10:48 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote: On 11/12/2014 03:09 PM, Phelps, Matthew wrote: I concur. Enter key, ^M, etc. has no effect in the browser. Same for number

Re: [CentOS] OT: AF 4k sector drives with 512 emulation

On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 2:59 PM, Chris Murphy li...@colorremedies.com wrote: On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 1:53 PM, Robert Arkiletian rob...@gmail.com wrote: Still have good quality older sata hardware raid cards that require 512 bytes/sector. As far as I know HD manufacturers are not making

[CentOS] OT: AF 4k sector drives with 512 emulation

Still have good quality older sata hardware raid cards that require 512 bytes/sector. As far as I know HD manufacturers are not making native 512 bytes/sector drives any more. Some have better 512e emulation than others. Looking for some advice on which to avoid and which are recommended. Thanks.

Re: [CentOS] Chromium browser for C6

On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 6:47 AM, Leon Fauster leonfaus...@googlemail.com wrote: Am 20.02.2015 um 13:53 schrieb Phelps, Matthew mphe...@cfa.harvard.edu : Any new information here? maybe some cooperation with the fedora community would help to share the effort. Tom Callaway (aka spot) is

Re: [CentOS] C6 firefox esr h.264 support on youtube

ep 8, 2015 at 3:11 PM, Richard <lists-cen...@listmail.innovate.net> wrote: > > > Original Message > > Date: Tuesday, September 08, 2015 14:57:22 -0700 > > From: Robert Arkiletian <rob...@gmail.com> > > > > I was able to get h.264

[CentOS] C6 firefox esr h.264 support on youtube

I was able to get h.264 support on www.youtube.com/html5 on fedora 21 by installing gstreamer1-libav but that package does not exist in C6 (or it's popular third party repos) What is the name of the package which adds h.264 to firefox on youtube/html5 in C6?

Re: [CentOS] C6 firefox esr h.264 support on youtube

On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 3:38 AM, John Hodrien <j.h.hodr...@leeds.ac.uk> wrote: > On Fri, 11 Sep 2015, Robert Arkiletian wrote: > > does anyone running C6 have h.264 check box on www.youtube.com/html5 ? >> >> if yes, can you please post the output of >> > > M

Re: [CentOS] C6 firefox esr h.264 support on youtube

On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 6:18 AM, John Hodrien wrote: > On Fri, 11 Sep 2015, Denniston, Todd A CIV NAVSURFWARCENDIV Crane wrote: > > If anyone has clues on how to build and add just a portion of >> gst-plugins-bad into the existing EL OS set of gstreamer plugins, please

Re: [CentOS] C6 firefox esr h.264 support on youtube

On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 2:36 AM, Nicolas Thierry-Mieg < nicolas.thierry-m...@imag.fr> wrote: > On 09/11/2015 08:11 AM, Robert Arkiletian wrote: > >> On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 3:46 PM, Richard < >> lists-cen...@listmail.innovate.net> >> wrote: >> > >

Re: [CentOS] C6 firefox esr h.264 support on youtube

On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 3:46 PM, Richard <lists-cen...@listmail.innovate.net> wrote: > > > > Date: Tuesday, September 08, 2015 15:24:50 -0700 > > From: Robert Arkiletian <rob...@gmail.com> > > > >> On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 3:11 PM, Richard wrote: > >

[CentOS] Virtualbox 5.0.20 fails to build module on latest C6.8 kernel

Notice: The kernel modules for Virtualbox 5.0.20 will not compile on the latest C6.8 kernel 2.6.32-642.el6.x86_64 It's a known issue. https://www.virtualbox.org/ticket/14866 Fix is coming out with Virtualbox 5.0.22 version (hopefully soon). ___ CentOS

[CentOS] verify clean umount

This is on a C6 systems. How can I verify that an ext4 data partition is being unmounted properly at (reboot/shutdown) on a sysV init system. I've looked at S01reboot and S01halt scripts in etc but what I'm concerned about is that I mounted my partition on a tmpfs dir mount point. So if those S01

[CentOS] C6 Firefox 45.1 segmentation faults

on updated C6 x86_64 Firefox ESR 45.1.0 is seg faulting on various sites, mainly media sites. Tried uninstalling flash-plugin 11.2.202.616 but problem persists. Work around: installed Seamonkey from epel repo Anyone else experiencing unstable behaviour of FF 45.1 on C6?

Re: [CentOS] C6 Firefox 45.1 segmentation faults

nology! > > > > Nux! > > www.nux.ro > > > > - Original Message - > >> From: "John Hodrien" <j.h.hodr...@leeds.ac.uk> > >> To: "CentOS mailing list" <centos@centos.org> > >> Sent: Monday, 2 May, 2016 20:36:3

Re: [CentOS] C6 Firefox 45.1 segmentation faults

On Mon, May 2, 2016 at 1:18 PM, John R Pierce <pie...@hogranch.com> wrote: > On 5/2/2016 1:13 PM, Robert Arkiletian wrote: > >> I think this site is always failing. It has an embedded video. >> >> >> http://www.sportsnet.ca/basketball/nba/free-association-pod

Re: [CentOS] C6 Firefox 45.1 segmentation faults

On Wed, May 4, 2016 at 7:38 AM, Nux! wrote: > Ok, managed to rebuild most the stuff; had to retire gstreamer-vaapi though. > > yum --enablerepo=nux-dextop-testing update > > Should fix the Firefox issue, let me know if it causes any problems or other > requests. > Any ETA when

Re: [CentOS] C6 Firefox 45.1 segmentation faults

elta quadrant using Borg technology! > > Nux! > www.nux.ro > > - Original Message - >> From: "Robert Arkiletian" <rob...@gmail.com> >> To: "CentOS mailing list" <centos@centos.org> >> Sent: Monday, 9 May, 2016 17:29:07 >> Subject

[CentOS] OT: Areca ARC-1220 compatible with SATA III (6Gb/s) drives?

Running C6 fileserver. Want to replace 7 year old HDs connected to an Areca ARC-1220 raid sata II (3Gb/s) controller. Has anyone used this controller with newer 2TB SATA III (6Gb/s) WD Re drives like the WD2000FYYZ or the WD2004FBYZ? ___ CentOS mailing

Re: [CentOS] Firefox 45.4.0-1 for CentOS-6 and CentOS-7

On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 7:48 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote: > The Red Hat engineers disabled the ffmpeg capability of firefox a couple > releases back due to stability issues. CentOS also has removed it as > for our main repositories, we build the source code for RHEL with as few >

Re: [CentOS] SCL devtoolset-3 or 4 without eclipse?

On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 11:32 AM, Walter Dnes <waltd...@waltdnes.org> wrote: > On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 09:47:29AM -0800, Robert Arkiletian wrote > > Is there a way to install devtoolset packages without the bloat of > eclipse? > > > > I just want the new compile

[CentOS] SCL devtoolset-3 or 4 without eclipse?

Is there a way to install devtoolset packages without the bloat of eclipse? I just want the new compiler and toolchain, not a big IDE. BTW devtoolset-3 dependencies are broken in yum with C6 yum install devtoolset-3 ... ---> Package devtoolset-3-perftools.x86_64 0:3.1-12.el6 will be

Re: [CentOS] [OT] Bash help

On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 9:41 AM, Mark Haney <mark.ha...@neonova.net> wrote: > On 10/25/2017 12:33 PM, Robert Arkiletian wrote: >> >> here is a python solution >> #!/usr/bin/python >> #python 2 (did not check if it works) >> f=open('yourfilename') >

Re: [CentOS] [OT] Bash help

On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 9:02 AM, Mark Haney wrote: > I know this is for CentOS stuff, but I'm at a loss on how to build a script > that does what I need it to do. It's probably really logically simple, I'm > just not seeing it. Hopefully someone will take pity on me and

Re: [CentOS] [OT] Bash help

On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 9:59 AM, Robert Arkiletian <rob...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 9:41 AM, Mark Haney <mark.ha...@neonova.net> wrote: >> On 10/25/2017 12:33 PM, Robert Arkiletian wrote: >>> >>> here is a python solution >>>

Re: [CentOS] [OT] Bash help

On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 12:08 PM, Robert Arkiletian <rob...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 9:59 AM, Robert Arkiletian <rob...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 9:41 AM, Mark Haney <mark.ha...@neonova.net> wrote: >>> On 10/25/20

[CentOS] C6 KPTI cpuinfo flag?

Noticed C6 had a kernel update on Friday. 2.6.32-696.18.7.el6.x86_64 What is the flag in /proc/cpuinfo that indicates the KPTI patch for Meltdown CVE-2017-5754 for C6? Some distros are using "kaiser" some like Fedora are using "pti". Also noticed some (like Fedora) are displaying "cpu_insecure"

Re: [CentOS] /lib/firmware/microcode.dat update on CentOS 6

On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 4:41 PM, Leon Fauster wrote: ... > > Comparing microcode-20171117 with microcode-20180108 shows that > from the 94 ucode files only 19 where updated > > $ diff -r --brief microcode-20171117 microcode-20180108 > Files

Re: [CentOS] /lib/firmware/microcode.dat update on CentOS 6

There is a new guidance document from Intel here https://newsroom.intel.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/11/2018/04/microcode-update-guidance.pdf Changes since the previous release are highlighted in yellow. Unfortunately, the latest microcode here

Re: [CentOS] Red Hat is Planning To Deprecate KDE on RHEL By 2024

On Sat, Nov 3, 2018 at 3:19 AM Pete Biggs wrote: > >"A future major release of Red Hat Enterprise Linux will no longer >support using KDE instead of the default GNOME desktop environment." > > The next major release is RHEL 8 - it won't support KDE. It doesn't > mean KDE won't run on it,