I did the upgrade dance with yum once when going from Fedora 5 to 7. It
worked, but took a lot of time and left a helluva' lot of obscure lib-failures
and stuff. I eventually got it working but I never felt sure it wouldn't fail
on me whenever. After running the upgraded system for a month or so
4.6 - 5.1 upgrade path
On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 8:16 AM, Sorin Srbu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I did the upgrade dance with yum once when going from Fedora 5 to 7. It
worked, but took a lot of time and left a helluva' lot of obscure
lib-failures
and stuff. I eventually got it working but I never
Something just occured to me on this this...
Suppose I have an old Amd 486DX2/40, could this oldie be setup so that it
boots a minimal (blocky) GUI over NFS to be able to run xmms or something like
that? Has anybody tried (something similar like) this?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL
I realise linux distros are rather a religious matter where each
individual/user/sysadmin/whatever think that their particular distro is the
best. 8-)
With that said, in my case, chosing CentOS was actually a no-brainer, as our
department had already settled with RHEL3/4 for application
Everything was orangy, yellow or weird green in the 70s... ;-)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of John R Pierce
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2008 7:11 PM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [Fwd: Re: [CentOS] School Server Setup]
MHR wrote:
I used Azureus. Worked fine. The image'll be used for new installs, for
already installed machines yum update works faster.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Jerry Geis
Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2008 6:58 PM
To: CentOS ML
Subject: [CentOS]
I got mine down at 10-12Mbps at work, and nearly as fast at home. And that was
yesterday when supposedly everybody and their dogs were downloading 5.2. OTOH,
that might be why it went so fast... 8-)
Are you sure your ISP doesn't cap/stop/whatever p2p generally? If you are,
what kind of settings
But... That's what the checksums are for. Don't you trust them?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Rudi Ahlers
Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2008 4:32 PM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] What torrent are y'all using?
Michael A.
Why don't you clone your machine, or use Vmware or something, and do an test
before you do it with your production-machine? Asking this sort of question is,
well, rather meaningless IMO. Your setup is unique considering what tweaks you
might've done to it. YMMV as they say. What works for me,
Ok, any particular reason why not?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Karanbir Singh
Sent: Friday, June 27, 2008 4:54 PM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Automatic site selection for dowload
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There is no
What is this?? OOO-replies?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 27, 2008 7:44 PM
To: centos@centos.org
Subject: Yogunluk: Yogunluk: Yogunluk: Yogunluk: [CentOS] Clamd not working
Yogunlugumuza gore
PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Sorin Srbu
Sent: Friday, June 27, 2008 1:26 PM
To: 'CentOS mailing list'
Subject: RE: [CentOS] Yogunluk
-Original Message-
If I send him a message directly, and put him in the CC line
too, will
it start a loop of auto-replies...?
How about I set up an account
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of
Karanbir Singh
Sent: Saturday, June 28, 2008 12:34 AM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Automatic site selection for dowload
Sorin Srbu wrote:
Ok, any particular reason why not?
-Original
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of
AnneWilson
Sent: Sunday, June 29, 2008 11:21 AM
To: centos@centos.org
Subject: [CentOS] Copy of own messages
For some reason I'm no longer seeing copies of my own messages. I've checked
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of
Jacques B.
Sent: Sunday, June 29, 2008 11:47 AM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Copy of own messages
On Sun, Jun 29, 2008 at 5:20 AM, AnneWilson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
For some reason I'm no
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of
Johnny Hughes
Sent: Sunday, June 29, 2008 3:45 PM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Copy of own messages
Sorin Srbu wrote:
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL
-Original Message-
Actually, the calculation is that it needs a GB of RAM for every TB of
managed data.
How do you reckon this? Ie, what's the basic assumption(s) for the statement?
Parity calculations for stripes or what? I don't follow.
I can't say I've ever heard any such like, so
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of
Steve Thompson
Sent: Sunday, June 29, 2008 8:39 PM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] settings up cheap a NAS / SAN server, is it possible?
A cheap server: there are many different values of
-Original Message-
A cheap server: there are many different values of cheap; it all depends
on what you need it for.
Yupp, break down the requirements into the following three options:
* Good
* Fast
* Cheap
Pick any *two*. You can never ever have all three. It's a natural law or
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of
Rainer Duffner
Sent: Monday, June 30, 2008 12:27 AM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] settings up cheap a NAS / SAN server, is it possible?
Actually, the calculation is that it needs a GB of RAM
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of
MHR
Sent: Tuesday, July 01, 2008 3:14 AM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5.2 kernel [2.6.18-92.1.1.el5] crashes on
dual-PIII
Compaq ProLiant 3000
I have an Athlon 64 X2 4200+, and that
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of
nate
Sent: Tuesday, July 01, 2008 7:12 AM
To: centos@centos.org
Subject: Re: [CentOS] settings up cheap a NAS / SAN server, is it possible?
Rudi Ahlers wrote:
Grow data online, convert between RAID levels
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of
Matt Hyclak
Sent: Tuesday, July 01, 2008 4:01 PM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Rebuild of kernel 2.6.9-67.0.20.EL failure
When I read the first part of the message, I had to check the sender
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Akemi Yagi
Sent: Tuesday, July 01, 2008 7:30 PM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Rebuild of kernel 2.6.9-67.0.20.EL failure
And who might this revered Jim Perrin be? Obviously he seems to be
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of
Ross S. W. Walker
Sent: Tuesday, July 01, 2008 7:52 PM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: RE: [CentOS] Rebuild of kernel 2.6.9-67.0.20.EL failure
Akemi Yagi wrote:
On Tue, Jul 1, 2008 at 9:59 AM, Sorin Srbu
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of
John R Pierce
Sent: Tuesday, July 01, 2008 10:59 PM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Rebuild of kernel 2.6.9-67.0.20.EL failure
Sorin Srbu wrote:
And who might this revered Jim Perrin
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of
Jim Perrin
Sent: Tuesday, July 01, 2008 11:02 PM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Floorsweepers (Was: Rebuild of kernel 2.6.9-67.0.20.EL
failure)
On Tue, Jul 1, 2008 at 4:47 PM, Sorin Srbu
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of
Les Mikesell
Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2008 3:32 AM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] settings up cheap a NAS / SAN server, is it possible?
Sorin Srbu wrote:
Rudi Ahlers wrote:
Grow data
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
MHR
Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2008 5:56 AM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: [CentOS] Widescreen monitor won't configure to a wide screen
[Lots removed]
What am I missing?
Did you get the latest drivers for
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of
MJT
Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2008 7:57 AM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Widescreen monitor won't configure to a wide screen
On Tuesday 29 July 2008 9:55:50 pm MHR wrote:
I just put a
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of
MHR
Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2008 10:55 AM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Widescreen monitor won't configure to a wide screen
I used to be able to fool s-c-d into using a generic CRT, but
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of
Shawn Everett
Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2008 4:07 PM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: [CentOS] Modem network card conflict
If I flush the firewall rules: iptables -F
Bring down the eth0 interface: ifconfig
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of
MHR
Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2008 4:36 PM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Widescreen monitor won't configure to a wide screen
About that generic CRT, have you by any chance tried generic lcd
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
MHR
Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2008 4:59 PM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Widescreen monitor won't configure to a wide screen
On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 3:41 AM, Alfred von Campe [EMAIL
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of
MHR
Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2008 7:06 PM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Widescreen monitor won't configure to a wide screen
On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 9:35 AM, Sorin Srbu [EMAIL PROTECTED
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
MHR
Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2008 7:08 PM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Widescreen monitor won't configure to a wide screen
Also, do you have a way to connect the monitor to a computer
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
MHR
Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2008 5:05 AM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: [CentOS] Widescreen monitor won't configure to a wide screen - SOLVED
Thanks to Ritesh Khadgaray:
Is there anything I'm missing?
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Noob Centos Admin
Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2008 5:31 PM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Help: Server security compromised?
Thanks Steward and Robert for those suggestions, they make plenty of sense!.
About the
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Toshaan Bharvani
Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2008 4:24 PM
To: centos@centos.org
Subject: Re: [CentOS] wireless laptop configuration
On Aug 19, 2008, at 5:04 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm using a 3Com 3CRWE154G72 IIRC, which
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Toshaan Bharvani
Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2008 4:24 PM
To: centos@centos.org
Subject: Re: [CentOS] wireless laptop configuration
Sorin Srbu wrote:
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Toshaan Bharvani
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf Of Joshua Baker-LePain
Sent: Wednesday, January 19, 2011 8:47 PM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] How to disable screen locking system-wide?
By default, CentOS v5 requires a
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf Of Rudi Ahlers
Sent: Thursday, January 20, 2011 9:55 AM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] How to disable screen locking system-wide?
By default, CentOS v5 requires a user's
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf Of Tom H
Sent: Thursday, January 20, 2011 1:03 PM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] How to disable screen locking system-wide?
In our environment, leaving your desk without locking
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf Of John Hodrien
Sent: Thursday, January 20, 2011 2:02 PM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] How to disable screen locking system-wide?
I don't know the exact path but you can use
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf Of Ross Walker
Sent: Thursday, January 20, 2011 3:27 PM
To: CentOS mailing list
Cc: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] How to disable screen locking system-wide?
I wonder if there is an
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf Of Joshua Baker-LePain
Sent: Thursday, January 20, 2011 4:49 PM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] How to disable screen locking system-wide?
I was going to leave this alone, but I
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf Of Mike McCarty
Sent: Thursday, January 20, 2011 9:08 PM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] How to disable screen locking system-wide?
OTOH, I have cats :-)
Funny you should mention
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf Of m.r...@5-cent.us
Sent: Tuesday, January 25, 2011 7:00 PM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Recommendation for a Linux alternative to Centos -
ATH9K disaster
About 5 years ago, I
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf Of Brian Mathis
Sent: Tuesday, January 25, 2011 7:03 PM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Recommendation for a Linux alternative to Centos -
ATH9K disaster
CentOS is great for
---
# Sorin Srbu[Sysadmin, Systems Engineer]
# Dept of Medicinal Chemistry, Phone: +46 (0)18-4714482 3 signals GSM
# Div of Org Pharm Chem,Mobile: +46 (0)701-718023
# Box 574, Uppsala University, Fax: +46 (0)18-4714482
# SE-751
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf Of compdoc
Sent: Thursday, January 27, 2011 5:09 PM
To: 'CentOS mailing list'
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Ext4 on CentOS 5.5 x64
For those of you that have been using the ext4 technology preview on
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf Of cpol...@surewest.net
Sent: Friday, January 28, 2011 5:02 PM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Ext4 on CentOS 5.5 x64
Sorin Srbu wrote:
snip
Anyway, I get a bad block
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf
Of Tom H
Sent: Thursday, March 03, 2011 6:26 AM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Centos 6
You have my permission to use something else. Does that help?
Good answer!
Me too!
I
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf
Of Alain Péan
Sent: Thursday, March 17, 2011 4:09 PM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] security updates?
May I ask the develloppers if we can have some update about the status
of
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf
Of m.r...@5-cent.us
Sent: Thursday, March 17, 2011 4:25 PM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] security updates?
You beat me to it: *PLEASE* don't start this up again
I got
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf
Of Alain Péan
Sent: Thursday, March 17, 2011 4:34 PM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] security updates?
With all due respect, the release was announced to be ready last week,
and
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf
Of Timothy Murphy
Sent: Friday, March 18, 2011 1:33 AM
To: centos@centos.org
Subject: Re: [CentOS] security updates?
However, I don't think people who ask reasonable questions politely
should
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf
Of Robert Heller
Sent: Monday, April 04, 2011 3:25 AM
To: CentOS mailing list
Cc: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] interview request for ppl who have Shockwave/.Firefox
working
I'm
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf
Of ken
Sent: Monday, April 04, 2011 2:02 PM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: [CentOS] about:plugins -Re: interview request for ppl who have
Shockwave/.Firefox working
Under Tools... I have
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf
Of Yves Bellefeuille
Sent: Monday, April 04, 2011 2:38 PM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] interview request for ppl who have Shockwave/.Firefox
working
Anyway, did you download
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf
Of Gilbert Sebenste
Sent: Wednesday, April 06, 2011 4:03 PM
To: centos@centos.org
Subject: [CentOS] CentOS 5.6 will not install due to Firefox error
Any ideas? All the packages seem to be
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf
Of Ed Westphal
Sent: Saturday, April 09, 2011 2:24 PM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: [CentOS] 5.6 update experience - EXCELLENT!
Just updated 98 packages on this ole hardware raid 10 box -
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf
Of Mathieu Baudier
Sent: Saturday, April 09, 2011 5:22 PM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5.6
(especially for focusing on 5.6 before 6.0)
Hear-here!
--
/Sorin
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf
Of Phil Schaffner
Sent: Monday, April 11, 2011 3:55 AM
To: centos@centos.org
Subject: Re: [CentOS] ext4 support in anaconda?
S.Tindall wrote on 04/10/2011 01:46 PM:
Just boot the installer
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf
Of Phil Schaffner
Sent: Monday, April 11, 2011 3:55 AM
To: centos@centos.org
Subject: Re: [CentOS] ext4 support in anaconda?
S.Tindall wrote on 04/10/2011 01:46 PM:
Just boot the installer
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf
Of m.r...@5-cent.us
Sent: Monday, April 11, 2011 4:52 PM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5.6
(In addition to the update, NO MORE WHEN WILL 5.6 COME OUT?!?!?!?!?!!!
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf
Of Torres, Giovanni (NIH/NINDS) [C]
Sent: Tuesday, April 12, 2011 2:34 PM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] 40TB File System Recommendations
On Apr 12, 2011, at 3:23 AM, Matthew
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf
Of Lars Hecking
Sent: Tuesday, April 12, 2011 3:11 PM
To: centos@centos.org
Subject: Re: [CentOS] 40TB File System Recommendations
OTOH, gparted doesn't see my software raid array either.
Hi all,
Almost wish I had something more exciting to say regarding the 5.6 to 5.7
upgrade, but it just worked flawlessly. Physical as well as virtual
machines.
Thanks CentOS-team for your good work!
--
BW,
Sorin
---
# Sorin Srbu
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf
Of m.r...@5-cent.us
Sent: Thursday, September 15, 2011 4:04 PM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] CentOS 5.6 to 5.7 upgrade
For us, it's breaking an ssh-restrict script we use with
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf
Of William Hooper
Sent: den 17 januari 2012 22:41
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] anyone doing automatic yum updates via yum-updatesd on
production servers?
I would like to
AM, Sorin Srbu wrote:
I would like to expand on this a little. Once you get a certain
number of machine it probably makes sense to have your own internal
mirror.
Is there any particular approximate number of machines you'd say this would
apply to?
based on personal experience, I'd say
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf
Of Karanbir Singh
Sent: den 18 januari 2012 11:14
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] anyone doing automatic yum updates via yum-updatesd on
production servers?
On 01/18/2012 01:01
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of
Karanbir Singh
Sent: den 18 januari 2012 12:16
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] anyone doing automatic yum updates via yum-updatesd on
production servers?
On 01/18/2012 11:00
AM, Sorin Srbu wrote:
ideally a large number of machines, and a reasonable local connection
with the ability to schedule and manage updates being applied on the
machines ( so, rules out hosting setups )
I might be interested, it depends a bit on how complex it is to set up. 8-)
We have around
/newbb/viewtopic.php?topic_id=22483, where
it's suggested one use yum-updatesd instead.
Is this still true? Should one avoid yum-cron if using CentOS 5?
--
BW,
Sorin
---
# Sorin Srbu[Sysadmin, Systems Engineer]
# Dept
Another smooth update. Thanks CentOS-team!
--
BW,
Sorin
---
# Sorin Srbu[Sysadmin, Systems Engineer]
# Dept of Medicinal Chemistry, Phone: +46 (0)18-4714482 3 signals GSM
# Div of Org Pharm Chem,Mobile: +46 (0
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf
Of Toralf Lund
Sent: den 8 mars 2012 11:36
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: [CentOS] Thunderbird and Firefox 10 font rendering
Does anyone else experience this? Any idea how to fix it (besides
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf
Of Toralf Lund
Sent: den 8 mars 2012 12:40
To: centos@centos.org
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Thunderbird and Firefox 10 font rendering
BTW, besides the bluryness, the fonts also look thinner somehow;
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf
Of fred smith
Sent: den 9 mars 2012 07:17
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] HT (Hyper Threading) on CentOS 5.5
On Fri, Mar 09, 2012 at 11:15:29AM +0530, Kaushal Shriyan wrote:
Hi,
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf
Of John R Pierce
Sent: den 9 mars 2012 08:54
To: centos@centos.org
Subject: Re: [CentOS] HT (Hyper Threading) on CentOS 5.5
On 03/08/12 11:44 PM, Sorin Srbu wrote:
I know there might be some
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf
Of John R Pierce
Sent: den 9 mars 2012 10:17
To: centos@centos.org
Subject: Re: [CentOS] HT (Hyper Threading) on CentOS 5.5
mostly, numerical scientific processing, and various sorts of
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf
Of John R Pierce
Sent: den 9 mars 2012 10:34
To: centos@centos.org
Subject: Re: [CentOS] HT (Hyper Threading) on CentOS 5.5
On 03/09/12 1:28 AM, Sorin Srbu wrote:
3D animation rendering
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf
Of Peter Kjellström
Sent: den 9 mars 2012 11:05
To: centos@centos.org
Subject: Re: [CentOS] HT (Hyper Threading) on CentOS 5.5
I know there might be some negative performance issues with
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of
Toshaan Bharvani
Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2008 1:42 AM
To: centos@centos.org
Subject: Re: [CentOS] wireless laptop configuration
Sorin Srbu wrote:
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Anne Wilson
Sent: Friday, September 05, 2008 11:16 AM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] OT Spammer Mark Kabore on this list
On Friday 05 September 2008 09:45:32 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Lanny
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Romeo Ninov
Sent: Friday, September 05, 2008 11:24 AM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] OT Spammer Mark Kabore on this list
You have been approved for payment the sum of ?1,000,000:00 (One
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Anne Wilson
Sent: Friday, September 05, 2008 2:49 PM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] OT Spammer Mark Kabore on this list
You have been approved for payment the sum of ?1,000,000:00 (One
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of
Timothy Murphy
Sent: Monday, September 29, 2008 2:26 PM
To: centos@centos.org
Subject: [CentOS] BackupPC
I was a bit surprised to find that BackupPC
does not seem to be available on my CentOS-5.2 system.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Scott Silva
Sent: Wednesday, October 01, 2008 5:35 PM
To: centos@centos.org
Subject: [CentOS] Re: Faking RHEL with CentOS
No amount of faking will make software for RHEL3 or 4 install on CentOS 5.
You can
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
mcclnx mcc
Sent: Wednesday, October 01, 2008 4:47 PM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: RE： [CentOS] Faking RHEL with CentOS
Yes. it will work on some softwares. I have been use this way several times
and
Tru Huynh scribbled on Friday, October 03, 2008 11:15 AM:
On Fri, Oct 03, 2008 at 10:23:46AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
I got the previously mentioned Dell Poweredge 2850 with 4GB RAM and Perc4e
raid controller. Installation went well and the raid is pretty fast even
with
Tru Huynh scribbled on Friday, October 03, 2008 11:48 AM:
does your bios see 4GB? try also memtest to make sure the 4GB are there.
cat /proc/meminfo and the boot lines of /var/log/messages
Yupp, pressing F2 at boot and checking in bios says it's 4GB DDR2 ECC IIRC.
Is memtest available at
Sorin Srbu scribbled on Friday, October 03, 2008 11:36 AM:
does your bios see 4GB? try also memtest to make sure the 4GB are there.
cat /proc/meminfo and the boot lines of /var/log/messages
Will be back shortly with /proc/meminfo and boot-messages from /var/log.
Meminfo:
MemTotal
Sorin Srbu mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] scribbled on Friday, October 03,
2008 12:14 PM:
However I have another problem now... CentOS 5.2 only sees 256MB RAM.
Is OS install mode set to On in the BIOS? I seem to remember this
sets the memory limit to 256Mb
It is in fact. Lemme' check. BRB.
Hot
Daniel Bird scribbled on Friday, October 03, 2008 11:57 AM:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
However I have another problem now... CentOS 5.2 only sees 256MB RAM.
Is OS install mode set to On in the BIOS? I seem to remember this
sets the memory limit to 256Mb
It is in fact. Lemme' check. BRB.
BTW,
Sorin Srbu scribbled on Friday, October 03, 2008 12:22 PM:
However I have another problem now... CentOS 5.2 only sees 256MB RAM.
Is OS install mode set to On in the BIOS? I seem to remember this
sets the memory limit to 256Mb
It is in fact. Lemme' check. BRB.
Hot diggety, that did
Sorin Srbu mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] scribbled on Friday, October 03,
2008 12:32 PM:
However I have another problem now... CentOS 5.2 only sees 256MB RAM.
Is OS install mode set to On in the BIOS? I seem to remember this
sets the memory limit to 256Mb
It is in fact. Lemme' check. BRB.
Hot
, possibly forgetting something really trivial... Obviously some keys seem
to be missing on the former machine, but which and why?
TIA.
--
BW,
Sorin
---
# Sorin Srbu[Sysadmin, Systems Engineer]
# Dept
Kai Schaetzl scribbled on Wednesday, October 08, 2008 1:36 PM:
First: please do not hijack threads. If you want to send a new question
then hit new message and not reply!
Sorry, didn't realise. Won't happen again.
Second: This can occur if you use a non-default repo and yum wants to use
1 - 100 of 630 matches
Mail list logo
