[CentOS] (no subject)

[Mario Santi Bellipanni]

What are you doing here?  How do you help LGBT people?  You have put the
sections in Dutch, English, French, German, Portuguese and Japanese but you
have not put a page in Italian.  Italy ranks 33 out of 49 of European
nations that violate the rights of LGBT people.  Portugal ranks # 10.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[CentOS] (no subject)

[Thusitha Kumara]

FO

Sent from Mobile App

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[CentOS] (no subject)

[Ramon Thomas]

Hey
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[CentOS] (no subject)

[centos]

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] email subject length issue

[Bowie Bailey]

On 4/12/2017 4:17 PM, Jerry Geis wrote:

Oh I understand now what is happening. The subject is coming in as three
lines.

Subject: Tornado Monday, 03/27/2017 at 20:27:02. The Point BB.OBSURGRH is
  in Alarm at PRI3 with a value of 63.4 %.Informational Text: OB SURGERY
  HUMIDITY ALARM

I'm not getting the second two lines.

How "should" one correctly get the subject ???

What I did was in my .procmailrc file
SUBJECT=`cat | grep Subject:`

So this resulted in only the first line and not grabbing the additional 2
lines.

Is there a way to correctly get the subject that I have not found?


You'll need to grab the line that starts with "Subject:" and then 
continue grabbing lines until you find one that doesn't start with 
whitespace.  I don't think you can do this with grep, but you should be 
able to do it with perl, sed, or awk.


--
Bowie
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] email subject length issue

[Kenneth Porter]

--On Wednesday, April 12, 2017 1:43 PM -0700 John R Pierce 
 wrote:



procmail: Assigning "SUBJECT= Tornado Monday, 03/27/2017 at 20:27:02. The
Point BB.OBSURGRH is"


sounds like your issue is procmail then...  I just used your exact
command to send myself a message form a bone stock C6 system (sendmail as
the email server) and recieved...


Procmail unfolds headers. Could it be the logging that's truncating the 
subject? Where is that "Assigning" output coming from? You could dump the 
SUBJECT variable to a file to see what it really thinks is in there.









---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] email subject length issue

[Alexander Dalloz]

Am 12.04.2017 um 22:24 schrieb Richard:

[ ... ]


There's supposed to be a "null" line between the structured (header)
text lines and the rest of the body. The "Subject:" is generally the
last of the structured text lines, so you should be able to start
your read with the "Subject:" tag and continue reading until you hit
the "null" line.


No, there is simply no rule nor evidence that the subject header line is 
or should be the last of all header lines. Typically you see it 
somewhere within the mail's header.


Alexander


___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] email subject length issue

[Alexander Dalloz]

Am 12.04.2017 um 22:03 schrieb Richard:

[ ... ]


A "Subject:" line is just a structured text line in the message body
and MTAs (e.g., sendmail) don't do anything differently with it than
any other line in a message body. The max length is 998 "characters".


No, the subject of a mail message is a defined field and part of the 
message header, not the body of the message. Just see RFC 5322. Message 
header and (optional) body are separated by an empty line. While there 
are specific rules for message header fields there are (nearly) none for 
the character flow of the mail body (MIME RFCs aside). The 998 character 
limit per line applies for both the header and the body.



I suspect that your MUA or more likely procmail is where the
truncation is taking place. I just did:

   /bin/mailx -s"... 200+ character subject ..."

on a C6/sendmail machine and it worked fine.


That turned out to be the case as the OP didn't cover folding of long 
header fields (RFC 5322 2.2.3).


Alexander

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] email subject length issue

[Fred Smith]

On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 04:17:38PM -0400, Jerry Geis wrote:
> Oh I understand now what is happening. The subject is coming in as three
> lines.
> 
> Subject: Tornado Monday, 03/27/2017 at 20:27:02. The Point BB.OBSURGRH is
>  in Alarm at PRI3 with a value of 63.4 %.Informational Text: OB SURGERY
>  HUMIDITY ALARM
> 
> I'm not getting the second two lines.
> 
> How "should" one correctly get the subject ???
> 
> What I did was in my .procmailrc file
> SUBJECT=`cat | grep Subject:`
> 
> So this resulted in only the first line and not grabbing the additional 2
> lines.

are you saying the subject is 3 lines (not one long line that wraps
over 3) before you try to send it as email?

if so you need to strip out the newlines (or CR/LF) or whatever is
there as linebreaks.

Have a look at the "tr" command, possibly the -d option.

echo "now  
is  
the  
time" | tr -d "\12\15"

prints "now is the time" but note that there is no newline at
the end of the string, so you'd need to add one back.

if you do this, you get the trailing newline, though this looks
pretty weird:

/usr/bin/echo -e  `echo "now 
is 
the 
time" | tr -d "\12\15"` 

good luck!



-- 
 Fred Smith -- fre...@fcshome.stoneham.ma.us -
 God made him who had no sin
  to be sin for us, so that in him
 we might become the righteousness of God."
--- Corinthians 5:21 -
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] email subject length issue

[Richard]

> Date: Wednesday, April 12, 2017 16:17:38 -0400
> From: Jerry Geis 
>
> Oh I understand now what is happening. The subject is coming in as
> three lines.
> 
> Subject: Tornado Monday, 03/27/2017 at 20:27:02. The Point
> BB.OBSURGRH is  in Alarm at PRI3 with a value of 63.4
> %.Informational Text: OB SURGERY  HUMIDITY ALARM
> 
> I'm not getting the second two lines.
> 
> How "should" one correctly get the subject ???
> 
> What I did was in my .procmailrc file
> SUBJECT=`cat | grep Subject:`
> 
> So this resulted in only the first line and not grabbing the
> additional 2 lines.
> Is there a way to correctly get the subject that I have not found?
> 
> Thanks for the tips. It led me to the above.
> 
> Jerry

There's supposed to be a "null" line between the structured (header)
text lines and the rest of the body. The "Subject:" is generally the
last of the structured text lines, so you should be able to start
your read with the "Subject:" tag and continue reading until you hit
the "null" line.

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] email subject length issue

[Jerry Geis]

Oh I understand now what is happening. The subject is coming in as three
lines.

Subject: Tornado Monday, 03/27/2017 at 20:27:02. The Point BB.OBSURGRH is
 in Alarm at PRI3 with a value of 63.4 %.Informational Text: OB SURGERY
 HUMIDITY ALARM

I'm not getting the second two lines.

How "should" one correctly get the subject ???

What I did was in my .procmailrc file
SUBJECT=`cat | grep Subject:`

So this resulted in only the first line and not grabbing the additional 2
lines.

Is there a way to correctly get the subject that I have not found?

Thanks for the tips. It led me to the above.

Jerry
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] email subject length issue

[John R Pierce]

On 4/12/2017 12:48 PM, Jerry Geis wrote:

So I am using sendmail on C7.



ok, wait, I do have a c7 test VM...


[piercej@c7test ~]$ echo "" |mail -s "Tornado Monday, 03/27/2017 at 
20:27:02. The Point BB.OBSURGRH is in Alarm at PRI3 with a value of 63.4 
%.Informational Text:OB SURGERY HUMIDITY ALARM" piercej

[piercej@c7test ~]$ mail
Heirloom Mail version 12.5 7/5/10.  Type ? for help.
"/var/spool/mail/piercej": 1 message 1 new
>N  1 John R Pierce Wed Apr 12 13:06  20/888   "Tornado Monday, 
03/27/2017 at 20:27:02. The Point BB.OBSURGRH is in Alarm at PRI3 with a 
value of 63.4 %.I"

& 1
Message  1:
From pier...@c7test.xxx.com  Wed Apr 12 13:06:22 2017
Return-Path: 
X-Original-To: piercej
Delivered-To: pier...@c7test.xxx.com
Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2017 13:06:22 -0700
To: pier...@c7test.xxx.com
Subject: Tornado Monday, 03/27/2017 at 20:27:02. The Point BB.OBSURGRH is
 in Alarm at PRI3 with a value of 63.4 %.Informational Text:OB SURGERY
 HUMIDITY ALARM
User-Agent: Heirloom mailx 12.5 7/5/10
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
From: pier...@c7test.xxx.com (John R Pierce)
Status: R

&


so, your issue is something specific on your configuration. hmm, c7's 
default email service is postfix, not sendmail, for what /thats/ worth.



--
john r pierce, recycling bits in santa cruz

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] email subject length issue

[John R Pierce]

On 4/12/2017 12:48 PM, Jerry Geis wrote:

So I am using sendmail on C7.

I added to the .procmailrc file VERBOSE and a log file.

procmail: Assigning "SUBJECT= Tornado Monday, 03/27/2017 at 20:27:02. The
Point BB.OBSURGRH is"

This command:
echo "" | mail -s "Tornado Monday, 03/27/2017 at 20:27:02. The Point
BB.OBSURGRH is in Alarm at PRI3 with a value of 63.4 %.Informational Text:
OB SURGERY HUMIDITY ALARM" email_test

With email_test being a local account... clearly my subject is truncated.
Is there a way to expand that?


still on C6...   (don't have a c7 server configured with an email service).


[pierce@new ~]$ mail
Heirloom Mail version 12.4 7/29/08.  Type ? for help.
"/var/spool/mail/pierce": 1 message 1 new
>N  1 John R Pierce Wed Apr 12 13:00  20/738   "Tornado Monday, 
03/27/2017 at 20:27:02. The Point BB.OBSURGRH is in Alarm at PRI3 with a 
value of 63.4 %.I"

& 1
Message  1:
From pie...@xxx.com  Wed Apr 12 13:00:09 2017
Return-Path: 
X-Original-To: pierce
Delivered-To: pie...@xxx.com
Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2017 13:00:09 -0700
To: pie...@new.freescruz.com
Subject: Tornado Monday, 03/27/2017 at 20:27:02. The Point BB.OBSURGRH is
 in Alarm at PRI3 with a value of 63.4 %.Informational Text:OB SURGERY
 HUMIDITY ALARM
User-Agent: Heirloom mailx 12.4 7/29/08
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
From: pie...@xxx.com (John R Pierce)
Status: R



&

--
john r pierce, recycling bits in santa cruz

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] email subject length issue

[Richard]

> Date: Wednesday, April 12, 2017 15:48:06 -0400
> From: Jerry Geis 
>
> So I am using sendmail on C7.
> 
> I added to the .procmailrc file VERBOSE and a log file.
> 
> procmail: Assigning "SUBJECT= Tornado Monday, 03/27/2017 at
> 20:27:02. The Point BB.OBSURGRH is"
> 
> This command:
> echo "" | mail -s "Tornado Monday, 03/27/2017 at 20:27:02. The Point
> BB.OBSURGRH is in Alarm at PRI3 with a value of 63.4
> %.Informational Text: OB SURGERY HUMIDITY ALARM" email_test
> 
> With email_test being a local account... clearly my subject is
> truncated. Is there a way to expand that?
> 

A "Subject:" line is just a structured text line in the message body
and MTAs (e.g., sendmail) don't do anything differently with it than
any other line in a message body. The max length is 998 "characters".

I suspect that your MUA or more likely procmail is where the
truncation is taking place. I just did:

   /bin/mailx -s"... 200+ character subject ..."

on a C6/sendmail machine and it worked fine.


___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] email subject length issue

[Jerry Geis]

So I am using sendmail on C7.

I added to the .procmailrc file VERBOSE and a log file.

procmail: Assigning "SUBJECT= Tornado Monday, 03/27/2017 at 20:27:02. The
Point BB.OBSURGRH is"

This command:
echo "" | mail -s "Tornado Monday, 03/27/2017 at 20:27:02. The Point
BB.OBSURGRH is in Alarm at PRI3 with a value of 63.4 %.Informational Text:
OB SURGERY HUMIDITY ALARM" email_test

With email_test being a local account... clearly my subject is truncated.
Is there a way to expand that?

Thanks,

Jerry
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] email subject length issue

[John R Pierce]

On 4/12/2017 12:38 PM, Jerry Geis wrote:

Sorry for the extra email. It send to quickly.

procmail: Assigning "SUBJECT= Tornado Monday, 03/27/2017 at 20:27:02. The
Point BB.OBSURGRH is"


sounds like your issue is procmail then...  I just used your exact 
command to send myself a message form a bone stock C6 system (sendmail 
as the email server) and recieved...


(domain munged because I don't want to recieve ANY email at this host)


From - Wed Apr 12 12:40:34 2017
X-Account-Key: account1
X-UIDL: 58ee82b10004
X-Mozilla-Status: 0001
X-Mozilla-Status2: 
X-Mozilla-Keys:
Return-Path: 
Received: from new.XXX.com (new.XXX.com [207.111.XXX.YY])
by hogranch.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id v3CJeKi25266
for ; Wed, 12 Apr 2017 12:40:20 -0700
Received: by new.freescruz.com (Postfix, from userid 500)
id 98C33606BE; Wed, 12 Apr 2017 12:40:20 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2017 12:40:20 -0700
To: pie...@hogranch.com
Subject: Tornado Monday, 03/27/2017 at 20:27:02. The Point BB.OBSURGRH is
 in Alarm at PRI3 with a value of 63.4 %.Informational Text:OB SURGERY
 HUMIDITY ALARM
User-Agent: Heirloom mailx 12.4 7/29/08
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <20170412194020.98c3360...@new.xxx.com>
From: pie...@xxx.com (John R Pierce)
  


--
john r pierce, recycling bits in santa cruz

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] email subject length issue

[Jerry Geis]

Sorry for the extra email. It send to quickly.

procmail: Assigning "SUBJECT= Tornado Monday, 03/27/2017 at 20:27:02. The
Point BB.OBSURGRH is"


jerry
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] email subject length issue

[John R Pierce]

On 4/12/2017 12:27 PM, Jerry Geis wrote:

I seem to be running into a subject length issue on email. Is there any way
to increase that ?


you'll need to be a whole lot more specific.   I've seen emails with 
stupidly long subjects, one message sent to a list recently had the 
entire message body pasted onto the subject.


Where are you running into this issue, how is it manifesting itself, 
what software is involved (email client, email server, email list server?)


I see you're using gmail, are you sure this problem isn't specific to gmail?


--
john r pierce, recycling bits in santa cruz

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] email subject length issue

[Jerry Geis]

Sure... Its local. I run this command:
echo "" | mail -s "Tornado Monday, 03/27/2017 at 20:27:02. The Point
BB.OBSURGRH is in Alarm at PRI3 with a value of 63.4 %.Informational Text:
OB SURGERY HUMIDITY ALARM" email_test

where email_test is my local machine account.

The subject gets truncated:


Jerry
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] email subject length issue

[Alexander Dalloz]

Am 12.04.2017 um 21:27 schrieb Jerry Geis:

Hello all

I seem to be running into a subject length issue on email. Is there any way
to increase that ?

Thanks,

jerry


There needs to be more context. Where and how do you face the limit? 
Client-side or on the mail transport? The RFC defines a limit for mail 
headers and the subject is one of them. Would be very strange to hit 
that though.


Alexander


___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[CentOS] email subject length issue

[Jerry Geis]

Hello all

I seem to be running into a subject length issue on email. Is there any way
to increase that ?

Thanks,

jerry
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[CentOS] (no subject)

[Latifa Benameur]

Sorry to late response
i wich you all a very happy and peaceful year
think you so much
i love you in god
God bless you
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[CentOS] (no subject)

[Jeremy Conklin]

jconklin7...@hotmail.com

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] (no subject)

[Fred Smith]

On Tue, Jun 09, 2015 at 05:07:44PM +1030, michael wright wrote:
 
  Hi Fred sounds like you know  what your doing for sure 

well, I've done this before.

  
 this is my harddrive My C: Dive NTFS 1.13TB Used 45.74GB Unused 1.09 TB 
 System Primary 
  
 do I need to to create two partitions one for the bootdual and the other for 
 centos just asking that's all. if I wish to use 500 GB how do I put that into 
 a volume mike

just make sure the installer doesn't touch your existing partitions... you
can explicitly exclude them during the partitioning phase, then let it
partition the empty space as it likes, or force it to do it your own way.
You don't NEED a separate boot partition, but it's not a bad idea to use
one.

  Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2015 21:24:17 -0400
  From: fre...@fcshome.stoneham.ma.us
  To: centos@centos.org
  Subject: Re: [CentOS] (no subject)
  
  On Mon, Jun 08, 2015 at 05:32:05PM -0700, John R Pierce wrote:
   On 6/8/2015 5:21 PM, michael wright wrote:
   Hi I am running windows 7 professional and the lastest centos7 x86 now 
   if I wish to partition the hard since I have 2TB harddrive what volume 
   would I need to set that at many thanks mike
   
   
   
   windows 7 defaults to creating a partition on the entire disk and
   leaving no free unpartitioned space.   that leaves you with nowhere
   to install anything else.
   
  
  that's not hard to fix with the gparted live CD. 
  1. boot windows, defrag the partition(s).
  2. shut down windows.
  3. boot gparted live
  4. in my experience the main windows partition is nearest the end,
 so using gparted, shrink it enough to leave adequate space for
 Centos. I won't go into how to use gparted, it's not hard, so you
 can surely figure it out (I did!:)
  5. boot windows and let it do its thing with repairing the disk.
  6. run your Centos installer, being sure NOT to let it mess with
 your windows partition(s).
  7. see my other note about how to get it to dual boot with windows.
  
  
  -- 
   Fred Smith -- fre...@fcshome.stoneham.ma.us 
  -
For him who is able to keep you from falling and to present you before 
  his 
   glorious presence without fault and with great joy--to the only God our 
  Savior
   be glory, majesty, power and authority, through Jesus Christ our Lord, 
  before
   all ages, now and forevermore! Amen.
  - Jude 1:24,25 (niv) 
  -
  ___
  CentOS mailing list
  CentOS@centos.org
  http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
 
 ___
 CentOS mailing list
 CentOS@centos.org
 http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

-- 
 Fred Smith -- fre...@fcshome.stoneham.ma.us 
Do you not know? Have you not heard? 
The LORD is the everlasting God, the Creator of the ends of the earth. 
  He will not grow tired or weary, and his understanding no one can fathom.
- Isaiah 40:28 (niv) -
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] (no subject)

[michael wright]

 Hi Fred sounds like you know  what your doing for sure 
 
this is my harddrive My C: Dive NTFS 1.13TB Used 45.74GB Unused 1.09 TB System 
Primary 
 
do I need to to create two partitions one for the bootdual and the other for 
centos just asking that's all. if I wish to use 500 GB how do I put that into a 
volume mike
 Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2015 21:24:17 -0400
 From: fre...@fcshome.stoneham.ma.us
 To: centos@centos.org
 Subject: Re: [CentOS] (no subject)
 
 On Mon, Jun 08, 2015 at 05:32:05PM -0700, John R Pierce wrote:
  On 6/8/2015 5:21 PM, michael wright wrote:
  Hi I am running windows 7 professional and the lastest centos7 x86 now if 
  I wish to partition the hard since I have 2TB harddrive what volume would 
  I need to set that at many thanks mike
  
  
  
  windows 7 defaults to creating a partition on the entire disk and
  leaving no free unpartitioned space.   that leaves you with nowhere
  to install anything else.
  
 
 that's not hard to fix with the gparted live CD. 
 1. boot windows, defrag the partition(s).
 2. shut down windows.
 3. boot gparted live
 4. in my experience the main windows partition is nearest the end,
so using gparted, shrink it enough to leave adequate space for
Centos. I won't go into how to use gparted, it's not hard, so you
can surely figure it out (I did!:)
 5. boot windows and let it do its thing with repairing the disk.
 6. run your Centos installer, being sure NOT to let it mess with
your windows partition(s).
 7. see my other note about how to get it to dual boot with windows.
 
 
 -- 
  Fred Smith -- fre...@fcshome.stoneham.ma.us -
   For him who is able to keep you from falling and to present you before his 
  glorious presence without fault and with great joy--to the only God our 
 Savior
  be glory, majesty, power and authority, through Jesus Christ our Lord, before
  all ages, now and forevermore! Amen.
 - Jude 1:24,25 (niv) -
 ___
 CentOS mailing list
 CentOS@centos.org
 http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
  
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] (no subject)

[g]

On 06/08/2015 08:24 PM, Fred Smith wrote:
 On Mon, Jun 08, 2015 at 05:32:05PM -0700, John R Pierce wrote:
 On 6/8/2015 5:21 PM, michael wright wrote:
 Hi I am running windows 7 professional and the lastest centos7 x86 now if I 
 wish to partition the hard since I have 2TB harddrive what volume would I 
 need to set that at many thanks mike

 windows 7 defaults to creating a partition on the entire disk and
 leaving no free unpartitioned space.   that leaves you with nowhere
 to install anything else.

 
 that's not hard to fix with the gparted live CD. 
 1. boot windows, defrag the partition(s).

problem with that step is that oos does not move _locked_ files
and directories. so when one goes to next steps, of shrinking,
if locked directories and files are not unlocked, one of 2 things
happen, shrinking can not shrink as much as needed, or locked
directories and files are lost.

 2. shut down windows.
 3. boot gparted live
 4. in my experience the main windows partition is nearest the end,
so using gparted, shrink it enough to leave adequate space for
Centos. I won't go into how to use gparted, it's not hard, so you
can surely figure it out (I did!:)
 5. boot windows and let it do its thing with repairing the disk.

such might work, but only if one has original oos install disk and
recovery disk.

 6. run your Centos installer, being sure NOT to let it mess with
your windows partition(s).
 7. see my other note about how to get it to dual boot with windows.

or so it is as i have found trying to set up a win7 laptop.

ymmv.


-- 

peace out.

If Bill Gates got a dime for every time Windows crashes...
 ...oh, wait. He does. THAT explains it!


in a world with out fences, who needs gates.

CentOS GNU/Linux 6.6

tc,hago.

g
.

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] (no subject)

[John R Pierce]

On 6/8/2015 4:46 PM, michael wright wrote:

Hello my name is Michael I am new to (CENTOS) what I would like to do is run 
the software as a dual boot  how can I do this I have a 2TB Harddrive  with 4GB 
DDR3 Memory Intel Core i5 processor 2300.


you would need unpartitioned space on the drive to hold the centos 
partitions.  you don't say what other OS you wish to dualboot with, so 
its hard to be more specific.



I would like to setup a shared hosting site I no I need to install php and 
MySQL as such I also would like to sell domain names when I put in my search 
bar on my site how can i have it search for domainnames


hosting and dual boot aren't exactly compatible, a webserver would 
typically be a server in a datacenter, with at least one static IP 
address, and it would be always on 24/7.


installing php and mysql is about as simple as...

# yum install mysql-server php php-mysql

and then configuring them per your application requirements.

that said,  the rest of your question, re: searching for domains, is 
outside the scope of this channel, and better would be addressed on a 
web application development forum.




--
john r pierce, recycling bits in santa cruz

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] (no subject)

[Jonathan Billings]

On Jun 8, 2015, at 7:46 PM, michael wright michael_j@hotmail.com wrote:
 Hello my name is Michael I am new to (CENTOS) what I would like to do is run 
 the software as a dual boot  how can I do this I have a 2TB Harddrive  with 
 4GB DDR3 Memory Intel Core i5 processor 2300.

I assume you’re setting up dual boot between Windows and CentOS?  Its generally 
easier to install Windows first, then set aside unpartioned space to install 
CentOS on after the windows install is complete.

 I would like to setup a shared hosting site I no I need to install php and 
 MySQL as such

I hope not on your dual-boot system — that’d be kinda an odd idea to have a 
shared hosting site run on a system that’s occasionally booted into Windows…

If you’re getting started with CentOS, lets just get you running it on a system 
before you start trying to run a business on it.

 I also would like to sell domain names when I put in my search bar on my site 
 how can i have it search for domainnames mike 
 

What?

--
Jonathan Billings billi...@negate.org


___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] (no subject)

[John R Pierce]

On 6/8/2015 5:21 PM, michael wright wrote:

Hi I am running windows 7 professional and the lastest centos7 x86 now if I 
wish to partition the hard since I have 2TB harddrive what volume would I need 
to set that at many thanks mike
  




windows 7 defaults to creating a partition on the entire disk and 
leaving no free unpartitioned space.   that leaves you with nowhere to 
install anything else.






--
john r pierce, recycling bits in santa cruz

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] (no subject)

[Fred Smith]

On Mon, Jun 08, 2015 at 05:32:05PM -0700, John R Pierce wrote:
 On 6/8/2015 5:21 PM, michael wright wrote:
 Hi I am running windows 7 professional and the lastest centos7 x86 now if I 
 wish to partition the hard since I have 2TB harddrive what volume would I 
 need to set that at many thanks mike
 
 
 
 windows 7 defaults to creating a partition on the entire disk and
 leaving no free unpartitioned space.   that leaves you with nowhere
 to install anything else.
 

that's not hard to fix with the gparted live CD. 
1. boot windows, defrag the partition(s).
2. shut down windows.
3. boot gparted live
4. in my experience the main windows partition is nearest the end,
   so using gparted, shrink it enough to leave adequate space for
   Centos. I won't go into how to use gparted, it's not hard, so you
   can surely figure it out (I did!:)
5. boot windows and let it do its thing with repairing the disk.
6. run your Centos installer, being sure NOT to let it mess with
   your windows partition(s).
7. see my other note about how to get it to dual boot with windows.


-- 
 Fred Smith -- fre...@fcshome.stoneham.ma.us -
  For him who is able to keep you from falling and to present you before his 
 glorious presence without fault and with great joy--to the only God our Savior
 be glory, majesty, power and authority, through Jesus Christ our Lord, before
 all ages, now and forevermore! Amen.
- Jude 1:24,25 (niv) -
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] (no subject)

[Fred Smith]

On Mon, Jun 08, 2015 at 08:03:29PM -0400, Jonathan Billings wrote:
 On Jun 8, 2015, at 7:46 PM, michael wright michael_j@hotmail.com wrote:
  Hello my name is Michael I am new to (CENTOS) what I would like to do is 
  run the software as a dual boot  how can I do this I have a 2TB Harddrive  
  with 4GB DDR3 Memory Intel Core i5 processor 2300.
 
 I assume you’re setting up dual boot between Windows and CentOS?  Its 
 generally easier to install Windows first, then set aside unpartioned space 
 to install CentOS on after the windows install is complete.

My other post in this thread tells you how to free up some space on the
drive (after a Windows install) into which  you can install Centos. This
one tells you how to install Centos-7 into that space AND make it
dual-boot with Windoze.

The default Centos installation(s) do not recognize the windows
installation as a bootable alternative (or at least mine didn't) and
therefore do not automatically give you dual-boot capability.

But here's how to solve that (I'm pretty sure this works only for Centos-7):

1. so the first step is to go ahead and install Centos in the free space.
2. boot it up, run yum update to update any packages that have been
   updated since your CD image was made.
3. install the epel repo for your version of  Centos (presumably you're
   going to install  Centos-7). yum install -y epel-release
4. Do yum install ntfs-3g ntfsprogs
5. Then run: grub2-mkconfig -o /boot/grub2/grub.cfg
and voila! you've now got a dual-boot Centos-7 and Windoze!

do not enter the quotes when typing in the recipes above. they are here
only to separate the commands from my blithering.

Note tat you'll need to be the root user for everything from step
2 onward.

-- 
 Fred Smith -- fre...@fcshome.stoneham.ma.us -
   For the word of God is living and active. Sharper than any double-edged 
   sword, it penetrates even to dividing soul and spirit, joints and marrow; 
  it judges the thoughts and attitudes of the heart.  
 Hebrews 4:12 (niv) --
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] (no subject)

[michael wright]

Hi I am running windows 7 professional and the lastest centos7 x86 now if I 
wish to partition the hard since I have 2TB harddrive what volume would I need 
to set that at many thanks mike
 
 Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2015 17:02:34 -0700
 From: pie...@hogranch.com
 To: centos@centos.org
 Subject: Re: [CentOS] (no subject)
 
 On 6/8/2015 4:46 PM, michael wright wrote:
  Hello my name is Michael I am new to (CENTOS) what I would like to do is 
  run the software as a dual boot  how can I do this I have a 2TB Harddrive  
  with 4GB DDR3 Memory Intel Core i5 processor 2300.
 
 you would need unpartitioned space on the drive to hold the centos 
 partitions.  you don't say what other OS you wish to dualboot with, so 
 its hard to be more specific.
 
  I would like to setup a shared hosting site I no I need to install php and 
  MySQL as such I also would like to sell domain names when I put in my 
  search bar on my site how can i have it search for domainnames
 
 hosting and dual boot aren't exactly compatible, a webserver would 
 typically be a server in a datacenter, with at least one static IP 
 address, and it would be always on 24/7.
 
 installing php and mysql is about as simple as...
 
  # yum install mysql-server php php-mysql
 
 and then configuring them per your application requirements.
 
 that said,  the rest of your question, re: searching for domains, is 
 outside the scope of this channel, and better would be addressed on a 
 web application development forum.
 
 
 
 -- 
 john r pierce, recycling bits in santa cruz
 
 ___
 CentOS mailing list
 CentOS@centos.org
 http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
  
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[CentOS] (no subject)

[michael wright]

Hello my name is Michael I am new to (CENTOS) what I would like to do is run 
the software as a dual boot  how can I do this I have a 2TB Harddrive  with 4GB 
DDR3 Memory Intel Core i5 processor 2300. I would like to setup a shared 
hosting site I no I need to install php and MySQL as such I also would like to 
sell domain names when I put in my search bar on my site how can i have it 
search for domainnames mike   
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] (no subject)

[Jonathan Billings]

On Jun 8, 2015, at 8:21 PM, michael wright michael_j@hotmail.com wrote:
 Hi I am running windows 7 professional and the lastest centos7 x86 now if I 
 wish to partition the hard since I have 2TB harddrive what volume would I 
 need to set that at many thanks mike

How much space you need is mostly up to your plans for the system.  The minimum 
space required to install CentOS 7 is 10 gigabytes[1], although you certainly 
will want more.  Windows 7 is going to need more space, but with 2TB, you’re 
could easily just split it down the middle and have plenty left over.  I would 
suggest a separate /home partition, to make upgrading easier (see other 
threads[2] on this list).  If you plan on running a service on the system, a 
separate partition for that data might also be prudent.

Also, you appear to have a broken keyboard. I suggest checking whether any of 
your punctuation keypresses are generating characters.


1. http://wiki.centos.org/About/Product
2. http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/2015-June/thread.html#152717

--
Jonathan Billings billi...@negate.org


___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] (no subject)

[Ashish Yadav]

Hi,

Please write the proper subject to the query.

On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 4:40 PM, Ravi Roy ravi.a...@gmail.com wrote:

 Hi Guys,

 i've CentOS 6.6 (Final) 64 bit version installed and I can not access the
 online repositories to install/update (pls see eror below the error),  I
 tried to google this error I get a lot of links but nothing I could  really
 solving this  issue. I've already disabled ipv6 and also defined proxy in
 /etc/yum.conf.

 [root@myhost ~]# yum update
 Loaded plugins: fastestmirror, security
 Setting up Update Process
 Determining fastest mirrors
  * c6-media:
 http://mirror.centos.org/centos/6/os/x86_64/repodata/repomd.xml: [Errno
 12]
 Timeout on http://mirror.centos.org/centos/6/os/x86_64/repodata/repomd.xml
 :
 (28, 'connect() timed out!')
 Trying other mirror.
 Error: Cannot retrieve repository metadata (repomd.xml) for repository:
 base. Please verify its path and try again


Have you tried yum clean all then yum update?



 If I try to use 'wget' to get 'repomd.xml' then it works fine.

 [root@myhost ~]# wget
 http://mirror.centos.org/centos/6/os/x86_64/repodata/repomd.xml
 --2015-03-09 20:05:03--
 http://mirror.centos.org/centos/6/os/x86_64/repodata/repomd.xml
 Connecting to xx.xx.xx.xx:80... connected.
 Proxy request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK
 Length: 3751 (3.7K) [text/xml]
 Saving to: “repomd.xml”


 100%[===]
 3,751   --.-K/s   in 0s

 2015-03-09 20:05:03 (14.6 MB/s) - “repomd.xml” saved [3751/3751]

 Has anybody experienced this kind of beahviour and got it working ?

 Thank you in advance for pointers.

 Regards
 Ravi.
 ___
 CentOS mailing list
 CentOS@centos.org
 http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos



--Regards
Ashishkumar S. Yadav
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[CentOS] (no subject)

[Ravi Roy]

Hi Guys,

i've CentOS 6.6 (Final) 64 bit version installed and I can not access the
online repositories to install/update (pls see eror below the error),  I
tried to google this error I get a lot of links but nothing I could  really
solving this  issue. I've already disabled ipv6 and also defined proxy in
/etc/yum.conf.

[root@myhost ~]# yum update
Loaded plugins: fastestmirror, security
Setting up Update Process
Determining fastest mirrors
 * c6-media:
http://mirror.centos.org/centos/6/os/x86_64/repodata/repomd.xml: [Errno 12]
Timeout on http://mirror.centos.org/centos/6/os/x86_64/repodata/repomd.xml:
(28, 'connect() timed out!')
Trying other mirror.
Error: Cannot retrieve repository metadata (repomd.xml) for repository:
base. Please verify its path and try again

If I try to use 'wget' to get 'repomd.xml' then it works fine.

[root@myhost ~]# wget
http://mirror.centos.org/centos/6/os/x86_64/repodata/repomd.xml
--2015-03-09 20:05:03--
http://mirror.centos.org/centos/6/os/x86_64/repodata/repomd.xml
Connecting to xx.xx.xx.xx:80... connected.
Proxy request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK
Length: 3751 (3.7K) [text/xml]
Saving to: “repomd.xml”

100%[===]
3,751   --.-K/s   in 0s

2015-03-09 20:05:03 (14.6 MB/s) - “repomd.xml” saved [3751/3751]

Has anybody experienced this kind of beahviour and got it working ?

Thank you in advance for pointers.

Regards
Ravi.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[CentOS] (no subject)

[elizabeth Benedict]

-- 
Sent from Gmail Mobile
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[CentOS] (no subject)

[elizabeth Benedict]

-- 
Sent from Gmail Mobile
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[CentOS] (no subject)

[ploboy584...@gmail.com]

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[CentOS] (no subject)

[John Doe]

Hey,

  kernel: rsync invoked oom-killer: gfp_mask=0x200da, order=0, oom_adj=0, 
oom_score_adj=0
  ...
  kernel: Out of memory: Kill process 27974 (mysqld) score 361 or sacrifice 
child
  kernel: Killed process 27974, UID 27, (mysqld) total-vm:3804672kB, 
anon-rss:2890828kB, file-rss:3324kB

rsync whines he wants more RAM and... mysql gets killed...
That makes me a bit sad!
And from my nagios graphs, at that time, ram usage was only 75% (4.5GB/6GB) and 
swap usage 0.3% (/2GB)!
I cannot believe an rsync suddenly needed 1.5GB+2GB and was not satisfied...
And even after the out of memory, the graphs show no swap usage change at all.
Anybody would have an idea about this fake out of memory?

Thx,
JD
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[CentOS] (no subject)

[Niharika Toppari]

niharika.topp...@gmail.com
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[CentOS] (no subject)

[Andrew Holway]

[root@ipa tftpboot]# semanage fcontext -l | grep tftp
/tftpboot  directory
system_u:object_r:tftpdir_t:s0
/tftpboot/.*   all files
system_u:object_r:tftpdir_t:s0
/usr/sbin/atftpd   regular file
system_u:object_r:tftpd_exec_t:s0
/usr/sbin/in\.tftpdregular file
system_u:object_r:tftpd_exec_t:s0
/var/lib/tftpboot(/.*)?all files
system_u:object_r:tftpdir_rw_t:s0
/var/lib/tftpboot/etc(/.*)?all files
system_u:object_r:cobbler_var_lib_t:s0
/var/lib/tftpboot/grub(/.*)?   all files
system_u:object_r:cobbler_var_lib_t:s0
/var/lib/tftpboot/images(/.*)? all files
system_u:object_r:cobbler_var_lib_t:s0
/var/lib/tftpboot/memdisk  regular file
system_u:object_r:cobbler_var_lib_t:s0
/var/lib/tftpboot/menu\.c32regular file
system_u:object_r:cobbler_var_lib_t:s0
/var/lib/tftpboot/ppc(/.*)?all files
system_u:object_r:cobbler_var_lib_t:s0
/var/lib/tftpboot/pxelinux\.0  regular file
system_u:object_r:cobbler_var_lib_t:s0
/var/lib/tftpboot/pxelinux\.cfg(/.*)?  all files
system_u:object_r:cobbler_var_lib_t:s0
/var/lib/tftpboot/s390x(/.*)?  all files
system_u:object_r:cobbler_var_lib_t:s0
/var/lib/tftpboot/yaboot   regular file
system_u:object_r:cobbler_var_lib_t:s0

Could someone tell me why:

/var/lib/tftpboot(/.*)? - is using (/.*)?

/tftpboot/.* - is using .*

Thanks,

Andrew
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[CentOS] (no subject)

[Kaplan, Andrew H.]

Hello --

We are running CentOS 6.3 64-bit distribution on one of our servers, and I am 
involved in upgrading the Apache and OpenSSL packages.
I completed an upgrade to both where the version of each that is installed on 
the server is the following:

httpd 2.2.15-29.el6.centos
httpd-manual 2.2.15-29.el6.centos
httpd-tools 2.2.15-29.el6.centos
openssl 1.0.0-27.el6_4.2
openssl-devel 1.0.0-27.el6_4.2

Are these the latest versions of Apache and OpenSSL that are available to 
CentOS in package format?
If not, what repository can I go to for the latest versions?

Thanks.




The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is
addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-mail
contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLine at
http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in error
but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and properly
dispose of the e-mail.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] (no subject)

[Les Mikesell]

On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 10:50 AM, Kaplan, Andrew H.
ahkap...@partners.org wrote:
 Hello --

 We are running CentOS 6.3 64-bit distribution on one of our servers, and I am 
 involved in upgrading the Apache and OpenSSL packages.
 I completed an upgrade to both where the version of each that is installed on 
 the server is the following:

 httpd 2.2.15-29.el6.centos
 httpd-manual 2.2.15-29.el6.centos
 httpd-tools 2.2.15-29.el6.centos
 openssl 1.0.0-27.el6_4.2
 openssl-devel 1.0.0-27.el6_4.2

 Are these the latest versions of Apache and OpenSSL that are available to 
 CentOS in package format?
 If not, what repository can I go to for the latest versions?

First, why aren't you doing a full 'yum update' to bring the whole
system up to 6.4?

Also, are you updating these packages to get new features or
bug/security fixes?   CentOS tracks the updates in RHEL exactly and
RHEL backports many security and bug fixes without changing the base
package version numbers.  You can see these with:
rpm -q --changelog package_name
where the CVE numbers will be mentioned, if you are checking for some
particular security issue.

If you need new features, you may have to go to newer versions found
elsewhere, but be very careful about replacing any base packages in
your system - it is almost always the wrong thing to do.  You need to
know more about Linux than the Red Hat engineers...

-- 
   Les Mikesell
lesmikes...@gmail.com
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] (no subject)

[Jake Shipton]

On Thu, 31 Oct 2013 11:26:52 -0500
Les Mikesell lesmikes...@gmail.com wrote:

 On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 10:50 AM, Kaplan, Andrew H.
 ahkap...@partners.org wrote:
  Hello --
 
  We are running CentOS 6.3 64-bit distribution on one of our
  servers, and I am involved in upgrading the Apache and OpenSSL
  packages. I completed an upgrade to both where the version of each
  that is installed on the server is the following:
 
  httpd 2.2.15-29.el6.centos
  httpd-manual 2.2.15-29.el6.centos
  httpd-tools 2.2.15-29.el6.centos
  openssl 1.0.0-27.el6_4.2
  openssl-devel 1.0.0-27.el6_4.2
 
  Are these the latest versions of Apache and OpenSSL that are
  available to CentOS in package format? If not, what repository can
  I go to for the latest versions?
 
 First, why aren't you doing a full 'yum update' to bring the whole
 system up to 6.4?
 
 Also, are you updating these packages to get new features or
 bug/security fixes?   CentOS tracks the updates in RHEL exactly and
 RHEL backports many security and bug fixes without changing the base
 package version numbers.  You can see these with:
 rpm -q --changelog package_name
 where the CVE numbers will be mentioned, if you are checking for some
 particular security issue.
 
 If you need new features, you may have to go to newer versions found
 elsewhere, but be very careful about replacing any base packages in
 your system - it is almost always the wrong thing to do.  You need to
 know more about Linux than the Red Hat engineers...
 

One other thing regarding the OpenSSL packages in 6.4, they do not
currently support TLS 1.2 and are stuck on TLS 1.0 so may be less
secure. [1]

However, Redhat is aware of this and 6.5 will be updating OpenSSL to a
more recent version which will support TLS 1.2 and solve most current
known security problems. [2]

So I'd suggest stick with the 6.4 packages for now, and once 6.5 is out
upgrade to those.

(For a while the last secure cipher in current OpenSSL in CentOS/RHEL
was RC4, however even that is now considered not so secure and should
be phased out. [1])

Also, may be worth doing a full upgrade to 6.4 then to 6.5 to ensure
any other hidden security issues are not lurking due to an out of date
package.

[1] 
https://community.qualys.com/blogs/securitylabs/2013/03/19/rc4-in-tls-is-broken-now-what
[2] 
https://www.redhat.com/about/news/archive/2013/10/latest-beta-release-of-red-hat-enterprise-linux-6-now-available

-- 
Jake Shipton (JakeMS)
GPG Key: 0xE3C31D8F
GPG Fingerprint: 7515 CC63 19BD 06F9 400A DE8A 1D0B A5CF E3C3 1D8F
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[CentOS] (no subject)

[Andreas Hanke]

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[CentOS] (no subject)

[Gene Poole]

Thanks,
Gene Poole
gene.po...@macys.com
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[CentOS] (no subject)

[nxbtch]

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[CentOS] (no subject)

[dfqm2008]

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[CentOS] (no subject)

[haply rong]

 http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[CentOS] (no subject)

[Bennett Haselton]

(Tried sending this before but it doesn't look like it went through;
apologies if you're seeing it twice.)

OK, a second machine hosted at the same hosting company has also apparently
been hacked.  Since 2 of out of 3 machines hosted at that company have now
been hacked, but this hasn't happened to any of the other 37 dedicated
servers that I've got hosted at other hosting companies (also CentOS, same
version or almost), this makes me wonder if there's a security breach at
this company, like if they store customers' passwords in a place that's
been hacked.  (Of course it could also be that whatever attacker found an
exploit, was just scanning that company's address space for hackable
machines, and didn't happen to scan the address space of the other hosting
companies.)

So, following people's suggestions, the machine is disconnected and hooked
up to a KVM so I can still examine the files.  I've found this file:
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1358 Oct 21 17:40 /home/file.pl
which appears to be a copy of this exploit script:
http://archive.cert.uni-stuttgart.de/bugtraq/2006/11/msg00302.html
Note the last-mod date of October 21.

No other files on the system were last modified on October 21st.  However
there was a security advisory dated October 20th which affected httpd:
http://mailinglist-archive.com/centos-announce/2011-10/00035-CentOSannounce+CESA20111392+Moderate+CentOS+5+i386+httpd+Update
https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2011-1392.html

and a large number of files on the machine, including lots of files in */
usr/lib64/httpd/modules/* and */lib/modules/2.6.18-274.7.1.el5/kernel/* ,
have a last-mod date of October 20th.  So I assume that these are files
which were updated automatically by yum as a result of the patch that goes
with this advisory -- does that sound right?

So a couple of questions that I could use some help with:

1) The last patch affecting httpd was released on October 20th, and the
earliest evidence I can find of the machine being hacked is a file dated
October 21st.  This could be just a coincidence, but could it also suggest
that the patch on October 20th introduced a new exploit, which the attacker
then used to get in on October 21st?
(Another possibility: I think that when yum installs updates, it
doesn't actually restart httpd.  So maybe even after the patch was
installed, my old httpd instance kept running and was still vulnerable? As
for why it got hacked the very next day, maybe the attacker looked at the
newly released patch and reverse-engineered it to figure out where the
vulnerabilities were, that the patch fixed?)

2) Since the */var/log/httpd/* and /var/log/secure* logs only go back 4-5
weeks by default, it looks like any log entries related to how the attacker
would have gotten in on or before October 21st, are gone.  (The secure*
logs do show multiple successful logins as root within the last 4 weeks,
mostly from IP addresses in Asia, but that's to be expected once the
machine was compromised -- it doesn't help track down how they originally
got in.)  Anywhere else that the logs would contain useful data?
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[CentOS] (no subject)

[Gagan Chohan]

i have tried a lot but not able to get wireless ...i am 
using dell 1470 14-r
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] (no subject)

[John R Pierce]

On 12/06/11 12:12 PM, Gagan Chohan wrote:
 i have tried a lot but not able to get wireless ...i am 
 using dell 1470 14-r

according to Dell's site, the Inspiron 14R is a N4010 or N4110, and the 
1470 is a 14Z


the 14Z (1470) can use any of...

  * Dell™ Wireless 365 Bluetooth Internal (2.0 + Enhanced Data Rate)
  * Dell™ Wireless 1397 802.11g Half mini-card (STD)
  * Intel® WiFi Link 5100 (802.11 a/g/draft-N) Half Mini card

while the 14R (N4010) uses

  * Standard Dell Wireless 1501 802.11 g/n

and the 14R (N4110) has your choice of...

  * Intel^® Centrino^® Wireless-N 1030 (1x2 bgn + Bluetooth)
  * Intel^® Centrino^® Wireless-N + WiMAX 6150 (1x2 bgn + WiMax


so... which wifi adapter do you have? thats a lot of choices.



-- 
john r pierceN 37, W 122
santa cruz ca mid-left coast


___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[CentOS] (no subject)

[Kevin Thorpe]

Hi all,
I've got a bit of an issue with reinstalling a server. I can
get the installer to boot off a memory stick
made with unetbootin, but I can't seem to find the installation files
on the stick. I have hda, sda and sdb
but none are acceptable install media.

How do I mount the USB stick while in the installer to install off it?
DVD isn't an option because it's been
removed for a tape drive.

It's probably something simple I'm missing.

Thanks
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] (no subject)

[Eero Volotinen]

2011/4/13 Kevin Thorpe kevin.tho...@pibenchmark.com:
 Hi all,
        I've got a bit of an issue with reinstalling a server. I can
 get the installer to boot off a memory stick
 made with unetbootin, but I can't seem to find the installation files
 on the stick. I have hda, sda and sdb
 but none are acceptable install media.

 How do I mount the USB stick while in the installer to install off it?
 DVD isn't an option because it's been
 removed for a tape drive.

how about usb cdrom drive?

--
Eero
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] (no subject)

[Les Mikesell]

On 4/13/2011 10:22 AM, Kevin Thorpe wrote:
 Hi all,
  I've got a bit of an issue with reinstalling a server. I can
 get the installer to boot off a memory stick
 made with unetbootin, but I can't seem to find the installation files
 on the stick. I have hda, sda and sdb
 but none are acceptable install media.

 How do I mount the USB stick while in the installer to install off it?
 DVD isn't an option because it's been
 removed for a tape drive.

 It's probably something simple I'm missing.

If you have, or can set up an NFS server, you can drop the CD or DVD iso 
images in a directory under it and do an nfs install.  If your USB boot 
setup lets you get a command prompt by hitting a key as it starts you 
may be able to use 'linux askmethod' to get the net install options to 
show.  Otherwise you can use the bootdisk.img.

-- 
Les Mikesell
 lesmikes...@gmail.com
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] (no subject)

[Phil Schaffner]

Kevin Thorpe wrote on 04/13/2011 11:22 AM:
...
 It's probably something simple I'm missing.

http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/InstallFromUSBkey
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] (no subject)

[Kevin Thorpe]

 It's probably something simple I'm missing.

 http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/InstallFromUSBkey

I started from there and used unetbootin which has always worked
for me before. The boot works but it can't find the RPMS which are
definitely on the stick. bah!
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] (no subject)

[Steven Vishoot]

Sorry, hopefully fixed account and computer that started this. 
Damn 




- Original Message 
 From: Ljubomir Ljubojevic off...@plnet.rs
 To: CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org
 Sent: Sun, April 10, 2011 6:29:15 AM
 Subject: Re: [CentOS] (no subject)
 
 Steven Vishoot wrote:
  http://us-andeville.fr/cool01.11.php?ID=006
 
 This is  SPAM
 
 Ljubomir
 ___
 CentOS  mailing list
 CentOS@centos.org
 http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
 
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] (no subject)

[Steven Vishoot]

http://us-andeville.fr/cool01.11.php?ID=006
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] (no subject)

[Ljubomir Ljubojevic]

Steven Vishoot wrote:
 http://us-andeville.fr/cool01.11.php?ID=006

This is SPAM

Ljubomir
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[CentOS] (no subject)

[清水大輔]

--
清水大輔 shimizu.dais...@mycom.co.jp


___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[CentOS] (no subject)

[mamwake]

http://equitation-accordee.com/to.php


  
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[CentOS] (no subject)

[Giuseppe Corazzin]

Spett.le Cliente,

dal 9 Agosto 2010 al 29 Agosto 2010UT non sarò in grado di leggere le email 
inviate a questo indirizzo.
Per urgenze  compilare il form sul nuovo sito della Computer srl  
http://www.computersrl.com/home/component/jforms/4/88.html
o chiamare il numero 0438.450500

Grazie

Giuseppe Corazzin
COMPUTER srl
Via Conegliano 94/b - 31058 SUSEGANA (TV)
Web: www.computersrl.com
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[CentOS] (no subject)

[Giuseppe Corazzin]

Spett.le Cliente,

dal 9 Agosto 2010 al 29 Agosto 2010UT non sarò in grado di leggere le email 
inviate a questo indirizzo.
Per urgenze  compilare il form sul nuovo sito della Computer srl  
http://www.computersrl.com/home/component/jforms/4/88.html
o chiamare il numero 0438.450500

Grazie

Giuseppe Corazzin
COMPUTER srl
Via Conegliano 94/b - 31058 SUSEGANA (TV)
Web: www.computersrl.com
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] (no subject)

[Rajagopal Swaminathan]

Greetings,

2010/8/9 Giuseppe Corazzin giuse...@computersrl.com:
 Spett.le Cliente,

 dal 9 Agosto 2010 al 29 Agosto 2010UT non sarò in grado di leggere le email 
 inviate a questo indirizzo.
 Per urgenze  compilare il form sul nuovo sito della Computer srl  
 http://www.computersrl.com/home/component/jforms/4/88.html
 o chiamare il numero 0438.450500



duh.. I cant understand a word of it. and won't bother with translation.

English please.Rest are irritating in a tech list.

Regards

Rajagopal
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] (no subject)

[John R Pierce]

  On 08/08/10 11:08 PM, Giuseppe Corazzin wrote:
 Spett.le Cliente,

 dal 9 Agosto 2010 al 29 Agosto 2010UT non sarò in grado di leggere le email 
 inviate a questo indirizzo.
 Per urgenze  compilare il form sul nuovo sito della Computer 
 srlhttp://www.computersrl.com/home/component/jforms/4/88.html
 o chiamare il numero 0438.450500

Dear Customer,

from 9 August 2010 to 29 August 2010UT not be able to read emails sent 
to this address.
For emergencies please fill the form on 



its an Out Of Office message :-/



___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] (no subject)

[Tom H]

2010/8/9 Rajagopal Swaminathan raju.rajs...@gmail.com:
 2010/8/9 Giuseppe Corazzin giuse...@computersrl.com:

 duh.. I cant understand a word of it. and won't bother with translation.

 English please.Rest are irritating in a tech list.

It's spam!
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] (no subject)

[lhecking]

Benjamin Franz writes:
 James Bensley wrote:
  What is this supposed to be Mike? I can't get to the site, eventually
  it times out?

 It isn't from Mike. It is some spambot using his forged mail ID to post 
 to the list. It is a common trick to by-pass member's only posting filters.

 It came from Google, unlike his usual emails. The account may have been
 compromised.



---
This message and any attachments may contain Cypress (or its
subsidiaries) confidential information. If it has been received
in error, please advise the sender and immediately delete this
message.
---

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[CentOS] (no subject)

[Les Mikesell]

http://NikoleLilly8355.co.cc
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[CentOS] (no subject)

[Les Mikesell]

http://EleaseDusen2292.co.cc
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] (no subject)

[James Bensley]

What is this supposed to be Mike? I can't get to the site, eventually
it times out?

--
Regards,
James.

http://www.jamesbensley.co.cc/
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] (no subject)

[Rudi Ahlers]

On Sat, Apr 10, 2010 at 10:14 PM, James Bensley jwbens...@gmail.com wrote:
 What is this supposed to be Mike? I can't get to the site, eventually
 it times out?

 --
 Regards,
 James.

 http://www.jamesbensley.co.cc/
 ___


It is spam.Either Mike spammed the list, or he has a virus.

-- 
Kind Regards
Rudi Ahlers
SoftDux

Website: http://www.SoftDux.com
Technical Blog: http://Blog.SoftDux.com
Office: 087 805 9573
Cell: 082 554 7532
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] (no subject)

[Akemi Yagi]

On Sat, Apr 10, 2010 at 1:19 PM, Rudi Ahlers rudiahl...@gmail.com wrote:
 On Sat, Apr 10, 2010 at 10:14 PM, James Bensley jwbens...@gmail.com wrote:
 What is this supposed to be Mike? I can't get to the site, eventually
 it times out?

 It is spam.Either Mike spammed the list, or he has a virus.

Or spammer used a forged 'From' address. Also, please do NOT copy the
URL that appeared in the spammer's post when replying to this thread.

Akemi
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] (no subject)

[aurfalien]

Yea, this same link hit another tech list I'm on, albeit redirected  
from a diff link to the exact same URL.

Its prolly meant to just drive traffic to the site, wether you buy any  
thing is irrelevant.

Some get paid just by you hitting the URL.

- aurf
On Apr 10, 2010, at 1:42 PM, Akemi Yagi wrote:

 On Sat, Apr 10, 2010 at 1:19 PM, Rudi Ahlers rudiahl...@gmail.com  
 wrote:
 On Sat, Apr 10, 2010 at 10:14 PM, James Bensley  
 jwbens...@gmail.com wrote:
 What is this supposed to be Mike? I can't get to the site,  
 eventually
 it times out?

 It is spam.Either Mike spammed the list, or he has a virus.

 Or spammer used a forged 'From' address. Also, please do NOT copy the
 URL that appeared in the spammer's post when replying to this thread.

 Akemi
 ___
 CentOS mailing list
 CentOS@centos.org
 http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] (no subject)

[Benjamin Franz]

James Bensley wrote:
 What is this supposed to be Mike? I can't get to the site, eventually
 it times out?
   
It isn't from Mike. It is some spambot using his forged mail ID to post 
to the list. It is a common trick to by-pass member's only posting filters.

-- 
Benjamin Franz
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] (no subject)

[aurfalien]

You can actually rent these bots so that ppl can click on your link,  
and you as the referrer get paid.

Getting several hundred thousand click thru's is a conservative number.

I'm sure this will hit some of the other lists I'm on and is claiming  
to be some online Canadian pharmacy (MyCanadianPharmacy) selling  
viagra, cialis, etc...

- aurf
On Apr 10, 2010, at 6:01 PM, Benjamin Franz wrote:

 James Bensley wrote:
 What is this supposed to be Mike? I can't get to the site, eventually
 it times out?

 It isn't from Mike. It is some spambot using his forged mail ID to  
 post
 to the list. It is a common trick to by-pass member's only posting  
 filters.

 -- 
 Benjamin Franz
 ___
 CentOS mailing list
 CentOS@centos.org
 http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[CentOS] (no subject)

[Elmozamil Elamir]

  
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[CentOS] (no subject)

[ferwis]

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[CentOS] (no subject)

[rray_1]

I have 2 video devices LML33 and PV155

$ lspci
06:00.0 Multimedia video controller: Zoran Corporation ZR36057PQC Video 
cutting chipset (rev 02)
07:08.0 Multimedia video controller: Brooktree Corporation Bt878 Video 
Capture (rev 11)
07:08.1 Multimedia controller: Brooktree Corporation Bt878 Audio Capture 
(rev 11)
07:09.0 Multimedia video controller: Brooktree Corporation Bt878 Video 
Capture (rev 11)
07:09.1 Multimedia controller: Brooktree Corporation Bt878 Audio Capture 
(rev 11)
07:0a.0 Multimedia video controller: Brooktree Corporation Bt878 Video 
Capture (rev 11)
07:0a.1 Multimedia controller: Brooktree Corporation Bt878 Audio Capture 
(rev 11)
07:0b.0 Multimedia video controller: Brooktree Corporation Bt878 Video 
Capture (rev 11)
07:0b.1 Multimedia controller: Brooktree Corporation Bt878 Audio Capture 
(rev 11)

$ udevinfo -q path -n /dev/video0
/class/video4linux/video0
$ udevinfo -a -p /class/video4linux/video0

Udevinfo starts with the device specified by the devpath and then
walks up the chain of parent devices. It prints for every device
found, all possible attributes in the udev rules key format.
A rule to match, can be composed by the attributes of the device
and the attributes from one single parent device.

   looking at device '/class/video4linux/video0':
 KERNEL==video0
 SUBSYSTEM==video4linux
 SYSFS{name}==LML33_0_
 SYSFS{dev}==81:0

$ udevinfo -q path -n /dev/video1
no record for 'video1' in database
$ udevinfo -q path -n /dev/video2
no record for 'video2' in database
$ udevinfo -q path -n /dev/video3
no record for 'video3' in database
$ udevinfo -q path -n /dev/video4
no record for 'video4' in database

The problem is sometimes when I boot the LML33 is /dev/video0 and 
sometimes /dev/video4
I tried a udev rule
SUBSYSTEM==video4linux, SYSFS{name}==LML33_0_,SYMLINK=lml33
but it doesn't work
What do I need to do to get consistant device naming?

I am using CentOS 5.3, kernel 2.6.18-92.1.22.el5.centos.plus, and
udev-095-14.20.el5_3 package

Thanks
Richard Ray
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[CentOS] (no subject)

[dani]

 

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[CentOS] (no subject)

[James Matthews]

Hi,
I am trying to install postfix but I am not able to get the config screen to
setup the base system. Is there a way to do it?

-- 

http://www.astorandblack.com
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[CentOS] (no subject)

[sumit agarwal]

hi ,
i have CentOs 4.4 x64 already up and running and i downloaded 5.2 x64 .do i
need to do a clean and reinstall , or i can install other ways.
my dvd has 7 independ iso..

thanks,
Sumit.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] (no subject)

[dnk]

On 3-Apr-09, at 9:01 AM, sumit agarwal wrote:

 hi ,

 i have CentOs 4.4 x64 already up and running and i downloaded 5.2  
 x64 .do i need to do a clean and reinstall , or i can install other  
 ways.
 my dvd has 7 independ iso..

 thanks,
 Sumit.



Major version jumps are recommended to backup/fresh install/ restore.

d


___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] (no subject)

[Victor Padro]

2009/3/21 Daniel Hays e664...@hotmail.co.uk

  Hi there,

 Could you please remove me from your mailing list?

 Thank you

 Daniel

 --
 Let ninemsn property help. Need a new place to rent, share or 
 buy?http://a.ninemsn.com.au/b.aspx?URL=http%3A%2F%2Fninemsn%2Edomain%2Ecom%2Eau%2F%3Fs%5Fcid%3DFDMedia%3ANineMSN%5FHotmail%5FTagline_t=774152450_r=Domain_tagline_m=EXT

 ___
 CentOS mailing list
 CentOS@centos.org
 http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


We can't do that...
you have to do it by yourself.
go here and give it a try:
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

-- 
It is human nature to think wisely and act in an absurd fashion.

Todo el desorden del mundo proviene de las profesiones mal o mediocremente
servidas
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] (no subject)

[Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams]

On Fri, 2009-03-13 at 20:54 +, wilson mitsui wrote:
 Please ignore this message, my previous atempt failed so i'm trying again.

I don't think this one worked either...

-- 
Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams ivazquez...@gmail.com


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[CentOS] (no subject)

[wilson mitsui]

Please ignore this message, my previous atempt failed so i'm trying again.


-- 
Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/mail/
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] (no subject)

[Lanny Marcus]

On Fri, Sep 12, 2008 at 3:46 PM, Bob Hoffman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Hi all..

 I have centos 5.2

 There is a cron file that is commented out to auto update the rules of
 spamassassin
 Location: /etc/cron.d/sa-update

 This file is chmod 600, should it not be 755? All the other crons are 755

 This line is commented.
 #10 4 * * * root /usr/share/spamassassin/sa-update.cron 21 | tee -a
 /var/log/sa-update.log


 Questions

 1- should I re chmod it to 600 or leave it at 755?

 Is anyone else using this? The cron file says to read a certain wiki page
 and do this cron at your own peril. Yet I find no warnings on that wiki page
 that would make me think this was bad.


 Thanks all

Bob: In the future, please include something in the Subject line, that
will give the list an idea of what your message is about. I think you
will get more replies if you do that.. Lanny
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[CentOS] (no subject)

[Bob Hoffman]

 
Hi all..

I have centos 5.2

There is a cron file that is commented out to auto update the rules of
spamassassin
Location: /etc/cron.d/sa-update

This file is chmod 600, should it not be 755? All the other crons are 755

This line is commented.
#10 4 * * * root /usr/share/spamassassin/sa-update.cron 21 | tee -a
/var/log/sa-update.log


Questions

1- should I re chmod it to 600 or leave it at 755?

Is anyone else using this? The cron file says to read a certain wiki page
and do this cron at your own peril. Yet I find no warnings on that wiki page
that would make me think this was bad.


Thanks all

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[CentOS] (no subject)

[Sadaruwan Samaraweera]

Hi Good People,

 I've created a blog to help newbies in the world of Linux. Can you
people see it and tell what departments that I've to improve more to help
the grate community of Linux.

Thank you
-- 
Sadaruwan Samaraweera
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] (no subject)

[Romeo Ninov]

Sadaruwan Samaraweera  wrote / napísal(a):


Hi Good People,

 I've created a blog to help newbies in the world of Linux. 
Can you people see it and tell what departments that I've to improve 
more to help the grate community of Linux.


Thank you
--
Sadaruwan Samaraweera


Sounds interest, but
1. how do you think - is it appropriate to post in the list with 
subject: (no subject)


2. Where is the link of blog?
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] (no subject)

[Sadaruwan Samaraweera]

On Wed, Sep 3, 2008 at 2:53 PM, Romeo Ninov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:



 Sadaruwan Samaraweera  wrote / napísal(a):


 Hi Good People,

 I've created a blog to help newbies in the world of Linux. Can you
 people see it and tell what departments that I've to improve more to help
 the grate community of Linux.

 Thank you
 --
 Sadaruwan Samaraweera


 Sounds interest, but
 1. how do you think - is it appropriate to post in the list with subject:
 (no subject)

 2. Where is the link of blog?
 ___
 CentOS mailing list
 CentOS@centos.org
 http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos



Sorry I made a mistake there and I did send in another mail right after that
with the link and the subject
Thank you
-- 
Sadaruwan Samaraweera
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] (no subject)

[Lanny Marcus]

Sadaruwan Samaraweera wrote:

Hi Good People,

 I've created a blog to help newbies in the world of Linux. Can you
people see it and tell what departments that I've to improve more to help
the grate community of Linux.

Thank you


In the future, please do not leave the Subject of your mailing list 
posts blank. Please give us some idea, in the Subject line, what your 
messages are about. If you have something to add about CentOS, please 
consider putting it on the CentOS Wiki. Probably many more people will 
see it there.

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Re: Subject: yum update did not update kernel on one box

[Ralph Angenendt]

Lanny Marcus wrote:
 Scott: Great! If I can locate kernel-headers-2.6.18-53.1.14.el5 and
 kernel-2.6.18-53.1.14.el5 I can use the rpm -e command to remove them
 and then yum update again and that should update the kernel in her box.
 How do I locate them? 

Why locate them? rpm -e takes the package *name*, not the package
itself.

Ralph


pgpnIwOUTFR22.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[CentOS] Re: Subject: yum update did not update kernel on one box

[Scott Silva]

on 5-6-2008 2:49 PM [EMAIL PROTECTED] spake the 
following:

On 5/6/08, Ralph Angenendt ra+centos AT br-online.de wrote:

Lanny Marcus wrote:

If there is some place I can check in a yum database or RPM database on
her box, to verify the kernel version that's really installed (probably
the original one), please let me know where that is. Thanks much! Lanny

rpm -qa kernel*


[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ rpm -qa kernel*
kernel-headers-2.6.18-53.1.14.el5
kernel-2.6.18-8.el5
kernel-2.6.18-53.1.14.el5
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ uname -a
Linux compaq1300.HOMELAN 2.6.18-8.el5 #1 SMP Thu Mar 15 19:57:35 EDT
2007 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$

Ralph: Thank you for the rpm command and the syntax! That confirms
what I have been seeing the past few days, that no updates are
available! The kernel-headers for the latest kernel is there, along
with the latest kernel. However, it is not shown in the GRUB menu when
I boot the box, and, the box boots the old kernel. My knowledge of
Linux, obviously, is very limited. How can I correct this, so the box
will boot the latest kernel? TIA! Lanny
It sounds like the last kernel upgrade didn't finish the %post% scripts. The 
easiest thing to try would be to rpm -e the new kernel and try a yum upgrade 
again.
Another thing to check... Is there a symlink from /boot/grub/menu.lst to 
/boot/grub/grub.conf?
I have had that on my systems since time began and maybe it is a requirement 
for things to work right. Just a guess.


--
MailScanner is like deodorant...
You hope everybody uses it, and
you notice quickly if they don't



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Re: Subject: yum update did not update kernel on one box

[Lanny Marcus]

On Tue, 2008-05-06 at 15:41 -0700, Scott Silva wrote:
 on 5-6-2008 2:49 PM [EMAIL PROTECTED] spake the 
 following:
snip
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ rpm -qa kernel*
  kernel-headers-2.6.18-53.1.14.el5
  kernel-2.6.18-8.el5
  kernel-2.6.18-53.1.14.el5
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ uname -a
  Linux compaq1300.HOMELAN 2.6.18-8.el5 #1 SMP Thu Mar 15 19:57:35 EDT
  2007 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$
snip
 It sounds like the last kernel upgrade didn't finish the %post% scripts. The 
 easiest thing to try would be to rpm -e the new kernel and try a yum upgrade 
 again.
 Another thing to check... Is there a symlink from /boot/grub/menu.lst to 
 /boot/grub/grub.conf?
 I have had that on my systems since time began and maybe it is a requirement 
 for things to work right. Just a guess.

Scott: Great! If I can locate kernel-headers-2.6.18-53.1.14.el5 and
kernel-2.6.18-53.1.14.el5 I can use the rpm -e command to remove them
and then yum update again and that should update the kernel in her box.
How do I locate them? Practicing on my box (wife is using her box) and
rpm -qi shows a lot of information about the files but doesn't show
where they are located. TIA, Lanny

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[CentOS] (no subject)

[Hari]

Hey can anyone help in finding the display driver for my laptop sony Vaio.
The details are as follows,

Mobile Intel(r) 945GM xpress chipset family.

Do send me the procedure for installation since I am new to cent OS.

Thank You 
Hari ms

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] (no subject)

[B.J. McClure]

On Sun, 2008-03-16 at 18:41 +0530, Hari wrote:

 Hey can anyone help in finding the display driver for my laptop sony Vaio.
 The details are as follows,
 
 Mobile Intel(r) 945GM xpress chipset family.
 
 Do send me the procedure for installation since I am new to cent OS.
 
 Thank You 
 Hari ms

Follow this link and install repo for your architecture.  Then do

yum install 915resolution

CentOS 5.0, Linux 2.6.18-53.1.14.el5 x86_64 08:36:26 up 1 day, 16:15, 0
users, load average: 0.13, 0.16, 0.09
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] (no subject)

[B.J. McClure]

On Sun, 2008-03-16 at 08:38 -0500, B.J. McClure wrote:

 On Sun, 2008-03-16 at 18:41 +0530, Hari wrote: 
 
  Hey can anyone help in finding the display driver for my laptop sony Vaio.
  The details are as follows,
  
  Mobile Intel(r) 945GM xpress chipset family.
  
  Do send me the procedure for installation since I am new to cent OS.
  
  Thank You 
  Hari ms
 
 Follow this link and install repo for your architecture.  Then do

http://dag.wieers.com/rpm/FAQ.php#B

 yum install 915resolution
 
 CentOS 5.0, Linux 2.6.18-53.1.14.el5 x86_64 08:36:26 up 1 day, 16:15,
 0 users, load average: 0.13, 0.16, 0.09
 
 ___
 CentOS mailing list
 CentOS@centos.org
 http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

CentOS 5.0, Linux 2.6.18-53.1.14.el5 x86_64 08:40:38 up 1 day, 16:19, 0
users, load average: 0.32, 0.15, 0.09
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[CentOS] (no subject)

[Ross S. W. Walker]

(I hope the ASCII art doesn't get mangled)
 
I have been working a while trying to get a big picture of how Linux
handles sound processing and after much work I have put together this
little representation of what I have learned.
 
Please send me any additional comments or components that I may have
missed.
 
I hope it helps somebody though who may be struggling in getting
sound to work and just needs some idea of how all the parts fit
together.
 
There really needs to be some concise, up-to-date Wiki on Linux
sound processing and how the different applications work and
work together (or not).
 
 
 Linux Sound Architecture
XX
XLinux Sound ApplicationsX
XX
XX
XX Sound Servers X
XX  ESD/Arts/NASD/Pulse  X
XX   X
X  X X
X  X Third Party APIs  X X
X  XGStreamer  X X
X  X   X X
XX
XX   OSS Compatibility API   X
X   ALSA Sound API   X
XX
XX
XSound Hardware  X
XX
 
 
 
 
Ross S. W. Walker
Information Systems Manager
Medallion Financial, Corp.
437 Madison Avenue
38th Floor
New York, NY 10022
Tel: (212) 328-2165
Fax: (212) 328-2125
WWW: http://www.medallion.com http://www.medallion.com/  
 

__
This e-mail, and any attachments thereto, is intended only for use by
the addressee(s) named herein and may contain legally privileged
and/or confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient
of this e-mail, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
distribution or copying of this e-mail, and any attachments thereto,
is strictly prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error,
please immediately notify the sender and permanently delete the
original and any copy or printout thereof.

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos