Re: [CentOS] CentOS9 Stream - boinc client??

2023-02-10 Thread Bill Gee

On 1/29/23 11:27, Philip Wyett wrote:

On Sun, 2023-01-29 at 09:58 -0600, Bill Gee wrote:

On 1/29/23 05:49, Philip Wyett wrote:

On Sun, 2023-01-29 at 09:16 +, Philip Wyett wrote:
Hi,

The ping comment on the bug report has be promptly dealt with by the maintainer 
and the build
for
EPEL9 has now been done and will in 7 days work through testing and then drop 
into EPEL9 for
all to
install.

I hope this is OK for you and dispels the concerns with regards community and 
how responsive
folks
within it are.

Regards

Phil


___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Oh, very nice!  Thank you Phil.  I appreciate random acts of senseless
kindness.  :-)

It will be interesting to see how dnf reacts when the el9 package for
boinc goes live.  Will dnf recognize it as an upgrade from the el8
package?  I will let the group know what happens.

Bill Gee
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Hi,

The EPEL 8 version is boinc-client-7.20.2-1.el8 and the version submitted to 
EPEL 9 is
boinc-client-7.20.2-4.el9, so yes it will be seen as an upgrade once it passes 
out of testing.

Regards

Phil


___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos




As promised, I am sending an update on this.  The EL9 package for boinc 
client has indeed appeared in the repositories.  I ran "dnf upgrade" on 
the system last night, and it successfully pulled in the package as an 
upgrade to the EL8 package I installed a few weeks ago.


That closes out this issue.  Thanks Phil for prodding the packaging 
process along.


Bill Gee
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] CentOS9 Stream - boinc client??

2023-01-29 Thread Philip Wyett
On Sun, 2023-01-29 at 09:58 -0600, Bill Gee wrote:
> On 1/29/23 05:49, Philip Wyett wrote:
> > On Sun, 2023-01-29 at 09:16 +, Philip Wyett wrote:
> > > On Sat, 2023-01-28 at 07:45 -0600, Bill Gee wrote:
> > > > On 1/26/23 20:25, Philip Wyett wrote:
> > > > > On Thu, 2023-01-26 at 13:16 -0600, Bill Gee wrote:
> > > > > > I have been running boinc client on CentOS7 hosts for some years.  
> > > > > > C7 is
> > > > > > getting close to end of life.  Time to upgrade to C9 ...
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > But I cannot find a package for the boinc client.  "dnf search 
> > > > > > boinc"
> > > > > > returns nothing.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > I have enabled both EPEL and RPMFusion repositories.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > Is there a boinc client package for CentOS9 Stream?
> > > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > Hi,
> > > > > 
> > > > > The client seems to have been built for EPEL 9 Next, but not as yet 
> > > > > for EPEL 9.
> > > > > 
> > > > > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/boinc-client
> > > > > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=5978
> > > > > 
> > > > > You can file an issue for the package to be branched and built for 
> > > > > EPEL9.
> > > > > 
> > > > > [1] https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/epel/epel-package-request/
> > > > > 
> > > > > Regards
> > > > > 
> > > > > Phil
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > ___
> > > > > CentOS mailing list
> > > > > CentOS@centos.org
> > > > > https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
> > > > 
> > > > H..  I figured out a temporary work-around.  I downloaded the
> > > > el8 rpm file from EPEL.  It installed with no issues on CentOS9.
> > > > 
> > > > I looked at turning in a bugzilla report.  That requires having an
> > > > account at bugzilla.  Nope, I do not need to add to the 400+ online
> > > > accounts I already have.  Besides, there is no guarantee that the
> > > > package would be built in any reasonable time frame.  It could be
> > > > months.  I can wait a bit, but not that long.
> > > > 
> > > > Is there a way to get dnf to install a "next" package?
> > > > 
> > > > It has been a year since CentOS9 came out.  The boinc-client package is
> > > > not yet ready for it.  Is there any assurance that it ever will be
> > > > ready?  Answer = no assurance whatever.
> > > > 
> > > > In the worst case I will go to SOD ...  Some Other Distribution.  Fedora
> > > > 38 can be installed in a text-only mode to run headless, and it has a
> > > > currently maintained package for boinc-client.
> > > > 
> > > > There are both Docker and flatpak packages for boinc-client.  I have
> > > > never been able to get any Docker, flatpak or snap package to work
> > > > correctly, and it is even worse when trying to run them inside a virtual
> > > > machine.  Those technologies seem to me to be an answer in search of a
> > > > non-existent question.
> > > > 
> > > > Bill Gee
> > > > ___
> > > > CentOS mailing list
> > > > CentOS@centos.org
> > > > https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
> > > 
> > > Hi,
> > > 
> > > I see what you mean and I made an error here. I should have checked 
> > > bugzilla for the request
> > > to
> > > see
> > > if it already existed, which it does.
> > > 
> > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2092636
> > > 
> > > I have added a comment to the bug to see if it can be moved forward.
> > > 
> > > Regards
> > > 
> > > Phil
> > > 
> > > ___
> > > CentOS mailing list
> > > CentOS@centos.org
> > > https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
> > 
> > Hi,
> > 
> > The ping comment on the bug report has be promptly dealt with by the 
> > maintainer and the build
> > for
> > EPEL9 has now been done and will in 7 days work through testing and then 
> > drop into EPEL9 for
> > all to
> > install.
> > 
> > I hope this is OK for you and dispels the concerns with regards community 
> > and how responsive
> > folks
> > within it are.
> > 
> > Regards
> > 
> > Phil
> > 
> > 
> > ___
> > CentOS mailing list
> > CentOS@centos.org
> > https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
> 
> Oh, very nice!  Thank you Phil.  I appreciate random acts of senseless 
> kindness.  :-)
> 
> It will be interesting to see how dnf reacts when the el9 package for 
> boinc goes live.  Will dnf recognize it as an upgrade from the el8 
> package?  I will let the group know what happens.
> 
> Bill Gee
> ___
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@centos.org
> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Hi,

The EPEL 8 version is boinc-client-7.20.2-1.el8 and the version submitted to 
EPEL 9 is 
boinc-client-7.20.2-4.el9, so yes it will be seen as an upgrade once it passes 
out of testing.

Regards

Phil

-- 
*** Playing the game for the games own sake. ***


Associations:

* Debian Maintainer (DM)
* Fedora/EPEL Maintainer.
* 

Re: [CentOS] CentOS9 Stream - boinc client??

2023-01-29 Thread Bill Gee



On 1/29/23 05:49, Philip Wyett wrote:

On Sun, 2023-01-29 at 09:16 +, Philip Wyett wrote:

On Sat, 2023-01-28 at 07:45 -0600, Bill Gee wrote:

On 1/26/23 20:25, Philip Wyett wrote:

On Thu, 2023-01-26 at 13:16 -0600, Bill Gee wrote:

I have been running boinc client on CentOS7 hosts for some years.  C7 is
getting close to end of life.  Time to upgrade to C9 ...

But I cannot find a package for the boinc client.  "dnf search boinc"
returns nothing.

I have enabled both EPEL and RPMFusion repositories.

Is there a boinc client package for CentOS9 Stream?



Hi,

The client seems to have been built for EPEL 9 Next, but not as yet for EPEL 9.

https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/boinc-client
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=5978

You can file an issue for the package to be branched and built for EPEL9.

[1] https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/epel/epel-package-request/

Regards

Phil


___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


H..  I figured out a temporary work-around.  I downloaded the
el8 rpm file from EPEL.  It installed with no issues on CentOS9.

I looked at turning in a bugzilla report.  That requires having an
account at bugzilla.  Nope, I do not need to add to the 400+ online
accounts I already have.  Besides, there is no guarantee that the
package would be built in any reasonable time frame.  It could be
months.  I can wait a bit, but not that long.

Is there a way to get dnf to install a "next" package?

It has been a year since CentOS9 came out.  The boinc-client package is
not yet ready for it.  Is there any assurance that it ever will be
ready?  Answer = no assurance whatever.

In the worst case I will go to SOD ...  Some Other Distribution.  Fedora
38 can be installed in a text-only mode to run headless, and it has a
currently maintained package for boinc-client.

There are both Docker and flatpak packages for boinc-client.  I have
never been able to get any Docker, flatpak or snap package to work
correctly, and it is even worse when trying to run them inside a virtual
machine.  Those technologies seem to me to be an answer in search of a
non-existent question.

Bill Gee
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Hi,

I see what you mean and I made an error here. I should have checked bugzilla 
for the request to
see
if it already existed, which it does.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2092636

I have added a comment to the bug to see if it can be moved forward.

Regards

Phil

___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Hi,

The ping comment on the bug report has be promptly dealt with by the maintainer 
and the build for
EPEL9 has now been done and will in 7 days work through testing and then drop 
into EPEL9 for all to
install.

I hope this is OK for you and dispels the concerns with regards community and 
how responsive folks
within it are.

Regards

Phil


___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Oh, very nice!  Thank you Phil.  I appreciate random acts of senseless 
kindness.  :-)


It will be interesting to see how dnf reacts when the el9 package for 
boinc goes live.  Will dnf recognize it as an upgrade from the el8 
package?  I will let the group know what happens.


Bill Gee
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] CentOS9 Stream - boinc client??

2023-01-29 Thread Philip Wyett
On Sun, 2023-01-29 at 09:16 +, Philip Wyett wrote:
> On Sat, 2023-01-28 at 07:45 -0600, Bill Gee wrote:
> > On 1/26/23 20:25, Philip Wyett wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2023-01-26 at 13:16 -0600, Bill Gee wrote:
> > > > I have been running boinc client on CentOS7 hosts for some years.  C7 is
> > > > getting close to end of life.  Time to upgrade to C9 ...
> > > > 
> > > > But I cannot find a package for the boinc client.  "dnf search boinc"
> > > > returns nothing.
> > > > 
> > > > I have enabled both EPEL and RPMFusion repositories.
> > > > 
> > > > Is there a boinc client package for CentOS9 Stream?
> > > > 
> > > 
> > > Hi,
> > > 
> > > The client seems to have been built for EPEL 9 Next, but not as yet for 
> > > EPEL 9.
> > > 
> > > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/boinc-client
> > > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=5978
> > > 
> > > You can file an issue for the package to be branched and built for EPEL9.
> > > 
> > > [1] https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/epel/epel-package-request/
> > > 
> > > Regards
> > > 
> > > Phil
> > > 
> > > 
> > > ___
> > > CentOS mailing list
> > > CentOS@centos.org
> > > https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
> > 
> > H..  I figured out a temporary work-around.  I downloaded the 
> > el8 rpm file from EPEL.  It installed with no issues on CentOS9.
> > 
> > I looked at turning in a bugzilla report.  That requires having an 
> > account at bugzilla.  Nope, I do not need to add to the 400+ online 
> > accounts I already have.  Besides, there is no guarantee that the 
> > package would be built in any reasonable time frame.  It could be 
> > months.  I can wait a bit, but not that long.
> > 
> > Is there a way to get dnf to install a "next" package?
> > 
> > It has been a year since CentOS9 came out.  The boinc-client package is 
> > not yet ready for it.  Is there any assurance that it ever will be 
> > ready?  Answer = no assurance whatever.
> > 
> > In the worst case I will go to SOD ...  Some Other Distribution.  Fedora 
> > 38 can be installed in a text-only mode to run headless, and it has a 
> > currently maintained package for boinc-client.
> > 
> > There are both Docker and flatpak packages for boinc-client.  I have 
> > never been able to get any Docker, flatpak or snap package to work 
> > correctly, and it is even worse when trying to run them inside a virtual 
> > machine.  Those technologies seem to me to be an answer in search of a 
> > non-existent question.
> > 
> > Bill Gee
> > ___
> > CentOS mailing list
> > CentOS@centos.org
> > https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
> 
> Hi,
> 
> I see what you mean and I made an error here. I should have checked bugzilla 
> for the request to
> see
> if it already existed, which it does.
> 
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2092636
> 
> I have added a comment to the bug to see if it can be moved forward.
> 
> Regards
> 
> Phil
> 
> ___
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@centos.org
> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Hi,

The ping comment on the bug report has be promptly dealt with by the maintainer 
and the build for
EPEL9 has now been done and will in 7 days work through testing and then drop 
into EPEL9 for all to
install.

I hope this is OK for you and dispels the concerns with regards community and 
how responsive folks
within it are.

Regards

Phil

-- 
*** Playing the game for the games own sake. ***


Associations:

* Debian Maintainer (DM)
* Fedora/EPEL Maintainer.
* Contributor member of the AlmaLinux foundation.

WWW: https://kathenas.org

Buy Me a Coffee: https://www.buymeacoffee.com/kathenasorg

Twitter: @kathenasorg

Instagram: @kathenasorg

IRC: kathenas

GPG: 724AA9B52F024C8B


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] CentOS9 Stream - boinc client??

2023-01-29 Thread Philip Wyett
On Sat, 2023-01-28 at 07:45 -0600, Bill Gee wrote:
> On 1/26/23 20:25, Philip Wyett wrote:
> > On Thu, 2023-01-26 at 13:16 -0600, Bill Gee wrote:
> > > I have been running boinc client on CentOS7 hosts for some years.  C7 is
> > > getting close to end of life.  Time to upgrade to C9 ...
> > > 
> > > But I cannot find a package for the boinc client.  "dnf search boinc"
> > > returns nothing.
> > > 
> > > I have enabled both EPEL and RPMFusion repositories.
> > > 
> > > Is there a boinc client package for CentOS9 Stream?
> > > 
> > 
> > Hi,
> > 
> > The client seems to have been built for EPEL 9 Next, but not as yet for 
> > EPEL 9.
> > 
> > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/boinc-client
> > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=5978
> > 
> > You can file an issue for the package to be branched and built for EPEL9.
> > 
> > [1] https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/epel/epel-package-request/
> > 
> > Regards
> > 
> > Phil
> > 
> > 
> > ___
> > CentOS mailing list
> > CentOS@centos.org
> > https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
> 
> H..  I figured out a temporary work-around.  I downloaded the 
> el8 rpm file from EPEL.  It installed with no issues on CentOS9.
> 
> I looked at turning in a bugzilla report.  That requires having an 
> account at bugzilla.  Nope, I do not need to add to the 400+ online 
> accounts I already have.  Besides, there is no guarantee that the 
> package would be built in any reasonable time frame.  It could be 
> months.  I can wait a bit, but not that long.
> 
> Is there a way to get dnf to install a "next" package?
> 
> It has been a year since CentOS9 came out.  The boinc-client package is 
> not yet ready for it.  Is there any assurance that it ever will be 
> ready?  Answer = no assurance whatever.
> 
> In the worst case I will go to SOD ...  Some Other Distribution.  Fedora 
> 38 can be installed in a text-only mode to run headless, and it has a 
> currently maintained package for boinc-client.
> 
> There are both Docker and flatpak packages for boinc-client.  I have 
> never been able to get any Docker, flatpak or snap package to work 
> correctly, and it is even worse when trying to run them inside a virtual 
> machine.  Those technologies seem to me to be an answer in search of a 
> non-existent question.
> 
> Bill Gee
> ___
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@centos.org
> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Hi,

I see what you mean and I made an error here. I should have checked bugzilla 
for the request to see
if it already existed, which it does.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2092636

I have added a comment to the bug to see if it can be moved forward.

Regards

Phil

-- 
*** Playing the game for the games own sake. ***


Associations:

* Debian Maintainer (DM)
* Fedora/EPEL Maintainer.
* Contributor member of the AlmaLinux foundation.

WWW: https://kathenas.org

Buy Me a Coffee: https://www.buymeacoffee.com/kathenasorg

Twitter: @kathenasorg

Instagram: @kathenasorg

IRC: kathenas

GPG: 724AA9B52F024C8B


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] CentOS9 Stream - boinc client??

2023-01-28 Thread Bill Gee



On 1/26/23 20:25, Philip Wyett wrote:

On Thu, 2023-01-26 at 13:16 -0600, Bill Gee wrote:

I have been running boinc client on CentOS7 hosts for some years.  C7 is
getting close to end of life.  Time to upgrade to C9 ...

But I cannot find a package for the boinc client.  "dnf search boinc"
returns nothing.

I have enabled both EPEL and RPMFusion repositories.

Is there a boinc client package for CentOS9 Stream?



Hi,

The client seems to have been built for EPEL 9 Next, but not as yet for EPEL 9.

https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/boinc-client
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=5978

You can file an issue for the package to be branched and built for EPEL9.

[1] https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/epel/epel-package-request/

Regards

Phil


___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos



H..  I figured out a temporary work-around.  I downloaded the 
el8 rpm file from EPEL.  It installed with no issues on CentOS9.


I looked at turning in a bugzilla report.  That requires having an 
account at bugzilla.  Nope, I do not need to add to the 400+ online 
accounts I already have.  Besides, there is no guarantee that the 
package would be built in any reasonable time frame.  It could be 
months.  I can wait a bit, but not that long.


Is there a way to get dnf to install a "next" package?

It has been a year since CentOS9 came out.  The boinc-client package is 
not yet ready for it.  Is there any assurance that it ever will be 
ready?  Answer = no assurance whatever.


In the worst case I will go to SOD ...  Some Other Distribution.  Fedora 
38 can be installed in a text-only mode to run headless, and it has a 
currently maintained package for boinc-client.


There are both Docker and flatpak packages for boinc-client.  I have 
never been able to get any Docker, flatpak or snap package to work 
correctly, and it is even worse when trying to run them inside a virtual 
machine.  Those technologies seem to me to be an answer in search of a 
non-existent question.


Bill Gee
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos


Re: [CentOS] CentOS9 Stream - boinc client??

2023-01-26 Thread Philip Wyett
On Thu, 2023-01-26 at 13:16 -0600, Bill Gee wrote:
> I have been running boinc client on CentOS7 hosts for some years.  C7 is 
> getting close to end of life.  Time to upgrade to C9 ...
> 
> But I cannot find a package for the boinc client.  "dnf search boinc" 
> returns nothing.
> 
> I have enabled both EPEL and RPMFusion repositories.
> 
> Is there a boinc client package for CentOS9 Stream?
> 

Hi,

The client seems to have been built for EPEL 9 Next, but not as yet for EPEL 9.

https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/boinc-client
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=5978

You can file an issue for the package to be branched and built for EPEL9.

[1] https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/epel/epel-package-request/

Regards

Phil

-- 
*** Playing the game for the games own sake. ***


Associations:

* Debian Maintainer (DM)
* Fedora/EPEL Maintainer.
* Contributor member of the AlmaLinux foundation.

WWW: https://kathenas.org

Buy Me a Coffee: https://www.buymeacoffee.com/kathenasorg

Twitter: @kathenasorg

Instagram: @kathenasorg

IRC: kathenas

GPG: 724AA9B52F024C8B


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos