Re: [CentOS] Firefox 60.0.1.0 ESR Progress?
On 07/12/2018 04:07 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote: > On 07/11/2018 04:51 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote: >> On 07/11/2018 01:36 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote: >>> On 07/11/2018 08:28 AM, Phil Wyett wrote: On Wed, 2018-07-11 at 06:31 -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote: > On 07/09/2018 09:38 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote: >> On 07/06/2018 10:30 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote: >>> On 07/05/2018 02:27 PM, Phil Wyett wrote: On Thu, 2018-07-05 at 06:16 -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote: > On 07/03/2018 09:04 AM, Sean wrote: >> > OK guys .. Firefox 60 is going to take some time .. likely more for > CentOS-6 than CentOS-7. > They both (C6 and C7 versions) require many non OS tools to build. > For CentOS-7 .. we need the rust-toolset, llvm-toolset, and > devtoolset-7, to get the firefox to build. My current issue building the latest firefox is the required rust version. In the [sclo-rh] section of the epel-7 mock config I change line: includepkgs=devtoolset* to includepkgs=devtoolset* llvm-toolset* rust-toolset* Current rust is 1.20 and configure will stop asking for 1.24. >>> >>> indeed .. that is one issue. I am working on it .. we also have to do >>> i386 as that is released in the base OS .. so I have to get a working >>> devtoolset-7 for i386, ppc64, ppc as well .. and the latest rust and the >>> latest llvm .. for i386, x86_64, ppc64le, ppc64, ppc, aarch64, armhfp >>> .. that is for C& >>> >>> I would just do x86_64 and i386 first, then the rest .. BUT .. since I >>> have to bootstrap the devtoolket and llvm and rust on c7 for i386 anyway >>> .. also doig ti for the other arches does nto really add any more time >>> as the compiles are in parallel on different machines. >>> >>> Hopefully for C7 I will have updates by Monday >>> >>> For C6 .. I am going to need to rework rust, etc. .. that will take >>> longer .. rust requires python27 not python26 .. so lots of patches are >>> going to be req'd for that. >>> >> >> This is a status update .. >> >> I now have the c7-devtoolkit-7 built for all arches (i386, x86_64, >> armhfp, aarch64, ppc64le, ppc64, ppc). >> >> I now have the c6-devtoolkit-7 built for all arches (i386. x86_64). >> >> I am in the process of building the latest llvm-toolkit and the >> rust-toolkit for CentOS 7 on all arches. (Both needed for firefox-60 on >> c7) >> >> I am in the process of figuring out all the changes needed to build the >> rust-toolkit for CentOS-6 as there is no released source code with the >> proper patches yet .. and it needs to be modified to build with the >> python used in EL6. >> >> So, hopefully very soon we will have all the required kits to build >> firefox for CentOS-7 .. CentOS-6 may be a bit longer. >> > Status currently is that I have a version built for CentOS-7 x86_64. > I am currently still building the require toolsets for i386 as > firefox.i686 is released as a multilib package in the x86_64 repo. > So, I can't release the x86_64 package without the i686 one. > You can download the x86_64 package manually if you don't want to wait > .. but I should have them both (i686 and x86_64) for CentOS-7 later today. The release of firefox will also include release of the scl toolsets for developers who modify and build for own needs? >>> >>> The SCL SIG releases SCLs and devtool sets // they are not part of the >>> OS, so no signed pieces will be released. >>> >>> I could put them on buildlogs for the el7 ones if there is interest. >>> >>> >> >> >> CentOS-7 x86_64 and i686 firefox packages are now signed and pushed to >> the master server. They should be available on mirror.centos.org within >> an hour. >> >> Expect the CentOS-6 firefox packages tomorrow before. >> >> And the other Centos-7 altarch packages (ppc64, ppc64le, aarch64, >> armhfp) on Friday. There is no longer a ppc (32) firefox package as >> some of the tool kits do not build in ppc (32) .. that is also the case >> in RHEL (no longer a ppc firefox). >> >> There is a possibility that the armhfp version could take longer than >> the other CentOS-7 AltAtch versions .. still workignon some technical >> issues on the rust-toolset for armhfp. >> > > CentOS-6 firefox-60 updates are built and in testing now. Should be > released within the next hour or so. > The CentOS-6 version has this bug: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1596852 There is a fix there if you upgrade to this version .. which is releasing now. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ CentOS mailing list
Re: [CentOS] Firefox 60.0.1.0 ESR Progress?
On 07/11/2018 04:51 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote: > On 07/11/2018 01:36 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote: >> On 07/11/2018 08:28 AM, Phil Wyett wrote: >>> On Wed, 2018-07-11 at 06:31 -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote: On 07/09/2018 09:38 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote: > On 07/06/2018 10:30 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote: >> On 07/05/2018 02:27 PM, Phil Wyett wrote: >>> On Thu, 2018-07-05 at 06:16 -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote: On 07/03/2018 09:04 AM, Sean wrote: > >>> >>> >>> >>> OK guys .. Firefox 60 is going to take some time .. likely more for CentOS-6 than CentOS-7. They both (C6 and C7 versions) require many non OS tools to build. For CentOS-7 .. we need the rust-toolset, llvm-toolset, and devtoolset-7, to get the firefox to build. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> My current issue building the latest firefox is the required rust >>> version. >>> >>> In the [sclo-rh] section of the epel-7 mock config I change line: >>> >>> includepkgs=devtoolset* >>> >>> to >>> >>> includepkgs=devtoolset* llvm-toolset* rust-toolset* >>> >>> Current rust is 1.20 and configure will stop asking for 1.24. >>> >> >> indeed .. that is one issue. I am working on it .. we also have to do >> i386 as that is released in the base OS .. so I have to get a working >> devtoolset-7 for i386, ppc64, ppc as well .. and the latest rust and the >> latest llvm .. for i386, x86_64, ppc64le, ppc64, ppc, aarch64, armhfp >> .. that is for C& >> >> I would just do x86_64 and i386 first, then the rest .. BUT .. since I >> have to bootstrap the devtoolket and llvm and rust on c7 for i386 anyway >> .. also doig ti for the other arches does nto really add any more time >> as the compiles are in parallel on different machines. >> >> Hopefully for C7 I will have updates by Monday >> >> For C6 .. I am going to need to rework rust, etc. .. that will take >> longer .. rust requires python27 not python26 .. so lots of patches are >> going to be req'd for that. >> > > This is a status update .. > > I now have the c7-devtoolkit-7 built for all arches (i386, x86_64, > armhfp, aarch64, ppc64le, ppc64, ppc). > > I now have the c6-devtoolkit-7 built for all arches (i386. x86_64). > > I am in the process of building the latest llvm-toolkit and the > rust-toolkit for CentOS 7 on all arches. (Both needed for firefox-60 on > c7) > > I am in the process of figuring out all the changes needed to build the > rust-toolkit for CentOS-6 as there is no released source code with the > proper patches yet .. and it needs to be modified to build with the > python used in EL6. > > So, hopefully very soon we will have all the required kits to build > firefox for CentOS-7 .. CentOS-6 may be a bit longer. > >>> Status currently is that I have a version built for CentOS-7 x86_64. >>> I am currently still building the require toolsets for i386 as firefox.i686 is released as a multilib package in the x86_64 repo. >>> So, I can't release the x86_64 package without the i686 one. >>> You can download the x86_64 package manually if you don't want to wait .. but I should have them both (i686 and x86_64) for CentOS-7 later today. >>> >>> >>> The release of firefox will also include release of the scl toolsets for >>> developers who modify and build for own needs? >> >> The SCL SIG releases SCLs and devtool sets // they are not part of the >> OS, so no signed pieces will be released. >> >> I could put them on buildlogs for the el7 ones if there is interest. >> >> > > > CentOS-7 x86_64 and i686 firefox packages are now signed and pushed to > the master server. They should be available on mirror.centos.org within > an hour. > > Expect the CentOS-6 firefox packages tomorrow before. > > And the other Centos-7 altarch packages (ppc64, ppc64le, aarch64, > armhfp) on Friday. There is no longer a ppc (32) firefox package as > some of the tool kits do not build in ppc (32) .. that is also the case > in RHEL (no longer a ppc firefox). > > There is a possibility that the armhfp version could take longer than > the other CentOS-7 AltAtch versions .. still workignon some technical > issues on the rust-toolset for armhfp. > CentOS-6 firefox-60 updates are built and in testing now. Should be released within the next hour or so. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Firefox 60.0.1.0 ESR Progress?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Wed, 2018-07-11 at 13:36 -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote: > On 07/11/2018 08:28 AM, Phil Wyett wrote: > > On Wed, 2018-07-11 at 06:31 -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote: > > > On 07/09/2018 09:38 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote: > > > > On 07/06/2018 10:30 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote: > > > > > On 07/05/2018 02:27 PM, Phil Wyett wrote: > > > > > > On Thu, 2018-07-05 at 06:16 -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote: > > > > > > > On 07/03/2018 09:04 AM, Sean wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > OK guys .. Firefox 60 is going to take some time .. likely more > > > > > > > for > > > > > > > CentOS-6 than CentOS-7. > > > > > > > They both (C6 and C7 versions) require many non OS tools to build. > > > > > > > For CentOS-7 .. we need the rust-toolset, llvm-toolset, and > > > > > > > devtoolset-7, to get the firefox to build. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > My current issue building the latest firefox is the required rust > > > > > > version. > > > > > > > > > > > > In the [sclo-rh] section of the epel-7 mock config I change line: > > > > > > > > > > > > includepkgs=devtoolset* > > > > > > > > > > > > to > > > > > > > > > > > > includepkgs=devtoolset* llvm-toolset* rust-toolset* > > > > > > > > > > > > Current rust is 1.20 and configure will stop asking for 1.24. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > indeed .. that is one issue. I am working on it .. we also have to do > > > > > i386 as that is released in the base OS .. so I have to get a working > > > > > devtoolset-7 for i386, ppc64, ppc as well .. and the latest rust and > > > > > the > > > > > latest llvm .. for i386, x86_64, ppc64le, ppc64, ppc, aarch64, armhfp > > > > > .. that is for C& > > > > > > > > > > I would just do x86_64 and i386 first, then the rest .. BUT .. since I > > > > > have to bootstrap the devtoolket and llvm and rust on c7 for i386 > > > > > anyway > > > > > .. also doig ti for the other arches does nto really add any more time > > > > > as the compiles are in parallel on different machines. > > > > > > > > > > Hopefully for C7 I will have updates by Monday > > > > > > > > > > For C6 .. I am going to need to rework rust, etc. .. that will take > > > > > longer .. rust requires python27 not python26 .. so lots of patches > > > > > are > > > > > going to be req'd for that. > > > > > > > > > > > > > This is a status update .. > > > > > > > > I now have the c7-devtoolkit-7 built for all arches (i386, x86_64, > > > > armhfp, aarch64, ppc64le, ppc64, ppc). > > > > > > > > I now have the c6-devtoolkit-7 built for all arches (i386. x86_64). > > > > > > > > I am in the process of building the latest llvm-toolkit and the > > > > rust-toolkit for CentOS 7 on all arches. (Both needed for firefox-60 on > > > > c7) > > > > > > > > I am in the process of figuring out all the changes needed to build the > > > > rust-toolkit for CentOS-6 as there is no released source code with the > > > > proper patches yet .. and it needs to be modified to build with the > > > > python used in EL6. > > > > > > > > So, hopefully very soon we will have all the required kits to build > > > > firefox for CentOS-7 .. CentOS-6 may be a bit longer. > > > > > > > Status currently is that I have a version built for CentOS-7 x86_64. > > > I am currently still building the require toolsets for i386 as > > > firefox.i686 is released as a multilib package in the x86_64 repo. > > > So, I can't release the x86_64 package without the i686 one. > > > You can download the x86_64 package manually if you don't want to wait > > > .. but I should have them both (i686 and x86_64) for CentOS-7 later today. > > > > > > The release of firefox will also include release of the scl toolsets for > > developers who modify and build for own needs? > > The SCL SIG releases SCLs and devtool sets // they are not part of the > OS, so no signed pieces will be released. > > I could put them on buildlogs for the el7 ones if there is interest. > > Hi Johnny, It would be good and appreciated if you could drop anything relevant on buildlogs. SCL Sig (on dev list), What is the ETA for releasing these updated packages by yourselves? Regards Phil - -- *** If this is a mailing list, I am subscribed, no need to CC me.*** Playing the game for the games sake. IRC: kathenas Web: https://kathenas.org Github: https://github.com/kathenas GitLab: https://gitlab.com/kathenas Twitter: kathenasorg GPG: A0C3 4C6A AC2B B8F4 F1E5 EDF4 333F 60DC B0B9 BB77 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJbRr/FAAoJEDM/YNywubt37ZAQAJZOzt/K0+wWoFh9dYXC/XDc 42+I1H8XLbZ1NbyXEowxFvz1dcgEG5kE4GOelm0ntxVIQShZwsSsnKUIAZ5zDqjE dy7jBIItVtnuy1cEup5mOcpbFsqNv2WVCc0DcUnttPbANj/Xuz6G+xOvB/haLm8X dfQIg5b6lRPp/dofezDlSod1IPTtri7gfV4HCsNldxY5pTzAwOfjP7Za8qOYHbzu oF9MV3P2LvFOLha9RqA7qUtvITIwmLwK49yknZ4LAo6thi6lzIyzsX4vZ93Ay6DE
Re: [CentOS] Firefox 60.0.1.0 ESR Progress?
On 07/11/2018 01:36 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote: > On 07/11/2018 08:28 AM, Phil Wyett wrote: >> On Wed, 2018-07-11 at 06:31 -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote: >>> On 07/09/2018 09:38 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote: On 07/06/2018 10:30 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote: > On 07/05/2018 02:27 PM, Phil Wyett wrote: >> On Thu, 2018-07-05 at 06:16 -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote: >>> On 07/03/2018 09:04 AM, Sean wrote: >> >> >> >> >>> OK guys .. Firefox 60 is going to take some time .. likely more for >>> CentOS-6 than CentOS-7. >>> They both (C6 and C7 versions) require many non OS tools to build. >>> For CentOS-7 .. we need the rust-toolset, llvm-toolset, and >>> devtoolset-7, to get the firefox to build. >> >> >> >> >> >> My current issue building the latest firefox is the required rust >> version. >> >> In the [sclo-rh] section of the epel-7 mock config I change line: >> >> includepkgs=devtoolset* >> >> to >> >> includepkgs=devtoolset* llvm-toolset* rust-toolset* >> >> Current rust is 1.20 and configure will stop asking for 1.24. >> > > indeed .. that is one issue. I am working on it .. we also have to do > i386 as that is released in the base OS .. so I have to get a working > devtoolset-7 for i386, ppc64, ppc as well .. and the latest rust and the > latest llvm .. for i386, x86_64, ppc64le, ppc64, ppc, aarch64, armhfp > .. that is for C& > > I would just do x86_64 and i386 first, then the rest .. BUT .. since I > have to bootstrap the devtoolket and llvm and rust on c7 for i386 anyway > .. also doig ti for the other arches does nto really add any more time > as the compiles are in parallel on different machines. > > Hopefully for C7 I will have updates by Monday > > For C6 .. I am going to need to rework rust, etc. .. that will take > longer .. rust requires python27 not python26 .. so lots of patches are > going to be req'd for that. > This is a status update .. I now have the c7-devtoolkit-7 built for all arches (i386, x86_64, armhfp, aarch64, ppc64le, ppc64, ppc). I now have the c6-devtoolkit-7 built for all arches (i386. x86_64). I am in the process of building the latest llvm-toolkit and the rust-toolkit for CentOS 7 on all arches. (Both needed for firefox-60 on c7) I am in the process of figuring out all the changes needed to build the rust-toolkit for CentOS-6 as there is no released source code with the proper patches yet .. and it needs to be modified to build with the python used in EL6. So, hopefully very soon we will have all the required kits to build firefox for CentOS-7 .. CentOS-6 may be a bit longer. >> >>> Status currently is that I have a version built for CentOS-7 x86_64. >> >>> I am currently still building the require toolsets for i386 as >>> firefox.i686 is released as a multilib package in the x86_64 repo. >> >>> So, I can't release the x86_64 package without the i686 one. >> >>> You can download the x86_64 package manually if you don't want to wait >>> .. but I should have them both (i686 and x86_64) for CentOS-7 later today. >> >> >> The release of firefox will also include release of the scl toolsets for >> developers who modify and build for own needs? > > The SCL SIG releases SCLs and devtool sets // they are not part of the > OS, so no signed pieces will be released. > > I could put them on buildlogs for the el7 ones if there is interest. > > CentOS-7 x86_64 and i686 firefox packages are now signed and pushed to the master server. They should be available on mirror.centos.org within an hour. Expect the CentOS-6 firefox packages tomorrow before. And the other Centos-7 altarch packages (ppc64, ppc64le, aarch64, armhfp) on Friday. There is no longer a ppc (32) firefox package as some of the tool kits do not build in ppc (32) .. that is also the case in RHEL (no longer a ppc firefox). There is a possibility that the armhfp version could take longer than the other CentOS-7 AltAtch versions .. still workignon some technical issues on the rust-toolset for armhfp. Thanks, Johnny Hughes signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Firefox 60.0.1.0 ESR Progress?
On 07/11/2018 08:28 AM, Phil Wyett wrote: > On Wed, 2018-07-11 at 06:31 -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote: >> On 07/09/2018 09:38 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote: >>> On 07/06/2018 10:30 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote: On 07/05/2018 02:27 PM, Phil Wyett wrote: > On Thu, 2018-07-05 at 06:16 -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote: >> On 07/03/2018 09:04 AM, Sean wrote: >>> > > > > >> OK guys .. Firefox 60 is going to take some time .. likely more for >> CentOS-6 than CentOS-7. >> They both (C6 and C7 versions) require many non OS tools to build. >> For CentOS-7 .. we need the rust-toolset, llvm-toolset, and >> devtoolset-7, to get the firefox to build. > > > > > > My current issue building the latest firefox is the required rust > version. > > In the [sclo-rh] section of the epel-7 mock config I change line: > > includepkgs=devtoolset* > > to > > includepkgs=devtoolset* llvm-toolset* rust-toolset* > > Current rust is 1.20 and configure will stop asking for 1.24. > indeed .. that is one issue. I am working on it .. we also have to do i386 as that is released in the base OS .. so I have to get a working devtoolset-7 for i386, ppc64, ppc as well .. and the latest rust and the latest llvm .. for i386, x86_64, ppc64le, ppc64, ppc, aarch64, armhfp .. that is for C& I would just do x86_64 and i386 first, then the rest .. BUT .. since I have to bootstrap the devtoolket and llvm and rust on c7 for i386 anyway .. also doig ti for the other arches does nto really add any more time as the compiles are in parallel on different machines. Hopefully for C7 I will have updates by Monday For C6 .. I am going to need to rework rust, etc. .. that will take longer .. rust requires python27 not python26 .. so lots of patches are going to be req'd for that. >>> >>> This is a status update .. >>> >>> I now have the c7-devtoolkit-7 built for all arches (i386, x86_64, >>> armhfp, aarch64, ppc64le, ppc64, ppc). >>> >>> I now have the c6-devtoolkit-7 built for all arches (i386. x86_64). >>> >>> I am in the process of building the latest llvm-toolkit and the >>> rust-toolkit for CentOS 7 on all arches. (Both needed for firefox-60 on c7) >>> >>> I am in the process of figuring out all the changes needed to build the >>> rust-toolkit for CentOS-6 as there is no released source code with the >>> proper patches yet .. and it needs to be modified to build with the >>> python used in EL6. >>> >>> So, hopefully very soon we will have all the required kits to build >>> firefox for CentOS-7 .. CentOS-6 may be a bit longer. >>> > >> Status currently is that I have a version built for CentOS-7 x86_64. > >> I am currently still building the require toolsets for i386 as >> firefox.i686 is released as a multilib package in the x86_64 repo. > >> So, I can't release the x86_64 package without the i686 one. > >> You can download the x86_64 package manually if you don't want to wait >> .. but I should have them both (i686 and x86_64) for CentOS-7 later today. > > > The release of firefox will also include release of the scl toolsets for > developers who modify and build for own needs? The SCL SIG releases SCLs and devtool sets // they are not part of the OS, so no signed pieces will be released. I could put them on buildlogs for the el7 ones if there is interest. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Firefox 60.0.1.0 ESR Progress?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Wed, 2018-07-11 at 06:31 -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote: > On 07/09/2018 09:38 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote: > > On 07/06/2018 10:30 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote: > > > On 07/05/2018 02:27 PM, Phil Wyett wrote: > > > > On Thu, 2018-07-05 at 06:16 -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote: > > > > > On 07/03/2018 09:04 AM, Sean wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > OK guys .. Firefox 60 is going to take some time .. likely more for > > > > > CentOS-6 than CentOS-7. > > > > > They both (C6 and C7 versions) require many non OS tools to build. > > > > > For CentOS-7 .. we need the rust-toolset, llvm-toolset, and > > > > > devtoolset-7, to get the firefox to build. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > My current issue building the latest firefox is the required rust > > > > version. > > > > > > > > In the [sclo-rh] section of the epel-7 mock config I change line: > > > > > > > > includepkgs=devtoolset* > > > > > > > > to > > > > > > > > includepkgs=devtoolset* llvm-toolset* rust-toolset* > > > > > > > > Current rust is 1.20 and configure will stop asking for 1.24. > > > > > > > > > > indeed .. that is one issue. I am working on it .. we also have to do > > > i386 as that is released in the base OS .. so I have to get a working > > > devtoolset-7 for i386, ppc64, ppc as well .. and the latest rust and the > > > latest llvm .. for i386, x86_64, ppc64le, ppc64, ppc, aarch64, armhfp > > > .. that is for C& > > > > > > I would just do x86_64 and i386 first, then the rest .. BUT .. since I > > > have to bootstrap the devtoolket and llvm and rust on c7 for i386 anyway > > > .. also doig ti for the other arches does nto really add any more time > > > as the compiles are in parallel on different machines. > > > > > > Hopefully for C7 I will have updates by Monday > > > > > > For C6 .. I am going to need to rework rust, etc. .. that will take > > > longer .. rust requires python27 not python26 .. so lots of patches are > > > going to be req'd for that. > > > > > > > This is a status update .. > > > > I now have the c7-devtoolkit-7 built for all arches (i386, x86_64, > > armhfp, aarch64, ppc64le, ppc64, ppc). > > > > I now have the c6-devtoolkit-7 built for all arches (i386. x86_64). > > > > I am in the process of building the latest llvm-toolkit and the > > rust-toolkit for CentOS 7 on all arches. (Both needed for firefox-60 on c7) > > > > I am in the process of figuring out all the changes needed to build the > > rust-toolkit for CentOS-6 as there is no released source code with the > > proper patches yet .. and it needs to be modified to build with the > > python used in EL6. > > > > So, hopefully very soon we will have all the required kits to build > > firefox for CentOS-7 .. CentOS-6 may be a bit longer. > > > > Status currently is that I have a version built for CentOS-7 x86_64. > > I am currently still building the require toolsets for i386 as > firefox.i686 is released as a multilib package in the x86_64 repo. > > So, I can't release the x86_64 package without the i686 one. > > You can download the x86_64 package manually if you don't want to wait > .. but I should have them both (i686 and x86_64) for CentOS-7 later today. > The release of firefox will also include release of the scl toolsets for developers who modify and build for own needs? Regards Phil - -- *** If this is a mailing list, I am subscribed, no need to CC me.*** Playing the game for the games sake. IRC: kathenas Web: https://kathenas.org Github: https://github.com/kathenas GitLab: https://gitlab.com/kathenas Twitter: kathenasorg GPG: A0C3 4C6A AC2B B8F4 F1E5 EDF4 333F 60DC B0B9 BB77 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJbRgYjAAoJEDM/YNywubt3UhIP/j6ouxViYZFvTggF1txayUMS dYXFGnX4o4irENgVi67Yj0O1jBGRB0eBNtks0pwni5HPddEsZJ0H0RlLB6BI355g yvTE0z36Tha7xIJrWUgCUq3Eyh76q3Vo4JMXWtHq00NRbMDDaQbiR910yMAlaxCQ uJtiXRB9FZhcVh9yxwO4F2X7Nqi3vCkEZhkBN+fOSbpOyXbl/L9Resz0fhsc0u8+ WpxeOkMIFHxVuV6AyNY4WaprLx09uYyBDIb9DlQCsFeOqN5GMaXEwiUH3e2j7YV7 mJe4QQXpM4nws7pBZmxG1qlaOwWCzocwqiLfgN1FMoVFWX9HMXHxzn3E8vFgQI5p mOGGHxPsSwZu/ZS0CEmRaLXFFYe5Thixg4fSyVOCVWZnhgFxdhniu3VguIHrVTK4 AihV/0g7qDXCgeyvFZZxIJe9nzRIQVTDU1diViPFLn50npKZmfBJFlJJQecZC4Gd MO1FN9a0VyqKwiWGNnSBR60uNRTcI2QZyEVnwt2PHVpkAfMPIQmNsXNumpIWtlI1 5BJY0wKcZYKlsttTex/vU5Rdu7zm7soRsjGbdxZL5/jjko2toJMzxu+wEdY1jKQJ wCy7lhBOvUA46yhlbvFKU2kOcSGXI8AMl9fqQBGfX0mYru6geGbsS8IQ483NXCAs 9HcLPI5fCpjIwb3MNNo+ =5BC/ -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Firefox 60.0.1.0 ESR Progress?
On 07/09/2018 09:38 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote: > On 07/06/2018 10:30 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote: >> On 07/05/2018 02:27 PM, Phil Wyett wrote: >>> On Thu, 2018-07-05 at 06:16 -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote: On 07/03/2018 09:04 AM, Sean wrote: > >>> >>> >>> >>> OK guys .. Firefox 60 is going to take some time .. likely more for CentOS-6 than CentOS-7. >>> They both (C6 and C7 versions) require many non OS tools to build. >>> For CentOS-7 .. we need the rust-toolset, llvm-toolset, and devtoolset-7, to get the firefox to build. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> My current issue building the latest firefox is the required rust version. >>> >>> In the [sclo-rh] section of the epel-7 mock config I change line: >>> >>> includepkgs=devtoolset* >>> >>> to >>> >>> includepkgs=devtoolset* llvm-toolset* rust-toolset* >>> >>> Current rust is 1.20 and configure will stop asking for 1.24. >>> >> >> indeed .. that is one issue. I am working on it .. we also have to do >> i386 as that is released in the base OS .. so I have to get a working >> devtoolset-7 for i386, ppc64, ppc as well .. and the latest rust and the >> latest llvm .. for i386, x86_64, ppc64le, ppc64, ppc, aarch64, armhfp >> .. that is for C& >> >> I would just do x86_64 and i386 first, then the rest .. BUT .. since I >> have to bootstrap the devtoolket and llvm and rust on c7 for i386 anyway >> .. also doig ti for the other arches does nto really add any more time >> as the compiles are in parallel on different machines. >> >> Hopefully for C7 I will have updates by Monday >> >> For C6 .. I am going to need to rework rust, etc. .. that will take >> longer .. rust requires python27 not python26 .. so lots of patches are >> going to be req'd for that. >> > > This is a status update .. > > I now have the c7-devtoolkit-7 built for all arches (i386, x86_64, > armhfp, aarch64, ppc64le, ppc64, ppc). > > I now have the c6-devtoolkit-7 built for all arches (i386. x86_64). > > I am in the process of building the latest llvm-toolkit and the > rust-toolkit for CentOS 7 on all arches. (Both needed for firefox-60 on c7) > > I am in the process of figuring out all the changes needed to build the > rust-toolkit for CentOS-6 as there is no released source code with the > proper patches yet .. and it needs to be modified to build with the > python used in EL6. > > So, hopefully very soon we will have all the required kits to build > firefox for CentOS-7 .. CentOS-6 may be a bit longer. > Status currently is that I have a version built for CentOS-7 x86_64. I am currently still building the require toolsets for i386 as firefox.i686 is released as a multilib package in the x86_64 repo. So, I can't release the x86_64 package without the i686 one. You can download the x86_64 package manually if you don't want to wait .. but I should have them both (i686 and x86_64) for CentOS-7 later today. Here is the built package for x86_64 (and the build logs, etc): https://buildlogs.centos.org/c7-firefox60.x86_64/firefox/20180711062841/60.1.0-4.el7.centos.x86_64/ For CentOS-6 .. still building the required toolkits for both x86_64 and i386. Should have everything there done i a couple of days as well. Thanks, Johnny Hughes signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Firefox 60.0.1.0 ESR Progress?
On 07/06/2018 10:30 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote: > On 07/05/2018 02:27 PM, Phil Wyett wrote: >> On Thu, 2018-07-05 at 06:16 -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote: >>> On 07/03/2018 09:04 AM, Sean wrote: >> >> >> >> >>> OK guys .. Firefox 60 is going to take some time .. likely more for >>> CentOS-6 than CentOS-7. >> >>> They both (C6 and C7 versions) require many non OS tools to build. >> >>> For CentOS-7 .. we need the rust-toolset, llvm-toolset, and >>> devtoolset-7, to get the firefox to build. >> >> >> >> >> >> My current issue building the latest firefox is the required rust version. >> >> In the [sclo-rh] section of the epel-7 mock config I change line: >> >> includepkgs=devtoolset* >> >> to >> >> includepkgs=devtoolset* llvm-toolset* rust-toolset* >> >> Current rust is 1.20 and configure will stop asking for 1.24. >> > > indeed .. that is one issue. I am working on it .. we also have to do > i386 as that is released in the base OS .. so I have to get a working > devtoolset-7 for i386, ppc64, ppc as well .. and the latest rust and the > latest llvm .. for i386, x86_64, ppc64le, ppc64, ppc, aarch64, armhfp > .. that is for C& > > I would just do x86_64 and i386 first, then the rest .. BUT .. since I > have to bootstrap the devtoolket and llvm and rust on c7 for i386 anyway > .. also doig ti for the other arches does nto really add any more time > as the compiles are in parallel on different machines. > > Hopefully for C7 I will have updates by Monday > > For C6 .. I am going to need to rework rust, etc. .. that will take > longer .. rust requires python27 not python26 .. so lots of patches are > going to be req'd for that. > This is a status update .. I now have the c7-devtoolkit-7 built for all arches (i386, x86_64, armhfp, aarch64, ppc64le, ppc64, ppc). I now have the c6-devtoolkit-7 built for all arches (i386. x86_64). I am in the process of building the latest llvm-toolkit and the rust-toolkit for CentOS 7 on all arches. (Both needed for firefox-60 on c7) I am in the process of figuring out all the changes needed to build the rust-toolkit for CentOS-6 as there is no released source code with the proper patches yet .. and it needs to be modified to build with the python used in EL6. So, hopefully very soon we will have all the required kits to build firefox for CentOS-7 .. CentOS-6 may be a bit longer. Thanks, Johnny Hughes signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Firefox 60.0.1.0 ESR Progress?
On 07/05/2018 02:27 PM, Phil Wyett wrote: > On Thu, 2018-07-05 at 06:16 -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote: >> On 07/03/2018 09:04 AM, Sean wrote: >>> > > > > >> OK guys .. Firefox 60 is going to take some time .. likely more for >> CentOS-6 than CentOS-7. > >> They both (C6 and C7 versions) require many non OS tools to build. > >> For CentOS-7 .. we need the rust-toolset, llvm-toolset, and >> devtoolset-7, to get the firefox to build. > > > > > > My current issue building the latest firefox is the required rust version. > > In the [sclo-rh] section of the epel-7 mock config I change line: > > includepkgs=devtoolset* > > to > > includepkgs=devtoolset* llvm-toolset* rust-toolset* > > Current rust is 1.20 and configure will stop asking for 1.24. > indeed .. that is one issue. I am working on it .. we also have to do i386 as that is released in the base OS .. so I have to get a working devtoolset-7 for i386, ppc64, ppc as well .. and the latest rust and the latest llvm .. for i386, x86_64, ppc64le, ppc64, ppc, aarch64, armhfp .. that is for C& I would just do x86_64 and i386 first, then the rest .. BUT .. since I have to bootstrap the devtoolket and llvm and rust on c7 for i386 anyway .. also doig ti for the other arches does nto really add any more time as the compiles are in parallel on different machines. Hopefully for C7 I will have updates by Monday For C6 .. I am going to need to rework rust, etc. .. that will take longer .. rust requires python27 not python26 .. so lots of patches are going to be req'd for that. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Firefox 60.0.1.0 ESR Progress?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Thu, 2018-07-05 at 06:16 -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote: > On 07/03/2018 09:04 AM, Sean wrote: > > > > OK guys .. Firefox 60 is going to take some time .. likely more for > CentOS-6 than CentOS-7. > > They both (C6 and C7 versions) require many non OS tools to build. > > For CentOS-7 .. we need the rust-toolset, llvm-toolset, and > devtoolset-7, to get the firefox to build. > > My current issue building the latest firefox is the required rust version. In the [sclo-rh] section of the epel-7 mock config I change line: includepkgs=devtoolset* to includepkgs=devtoolset* llvm-toolset* rust-toolset* Current rust is 1.20 and configure will stop asking for 1.24. Regards Phil - -- *** If this is a mailing list, I am subscribed, no need to CC me.*** Playing the game for the games sake. IRC: kathenas Web: https://kathenas.org Github: https://github.com/kathenas GitLab: https://gitlab.com/kathenas Twitter: kathenasorg GPG: A0C3 4C6A AC2B B8F4 F1E5 EDF4 333F 60DC B0B9 BB77 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJbPnFIAAoJEDM/YNywubt3NXMP/0YGfjySiKn32hGwA/TdS+yg ivmQR8hBXz4arFXSeOz3X4ZnkgEtY9q3K0/w+L5P1kE62nVsnh4emJOvE9rOqBNA oYrE7FponWFYtB8xOR9EtkFUD2zeooE8Wo0w7qzh4AvWu3awR0u8QtvXWo4IhGC3 N2VFK86jVuKO1ym3UKWaJCL9vwmuoA7qPuRe3US9bzp4vLEBgXWFwG3j59XDOZWU NeZJd1YU+UpPNW1L7g+lQvNwV658krIpQl5KKgSozwFhiIXw48nmlJM1/5ZikSZx rTEHn8siW98jNWqdVskHjOZWbHHH7P++pKPF7cpuO9j3nc7ZhnH/MxxWUvH+agy+ sYoIYiHZECfBBYNmMKLLwSq9PdDr1i45amnUXqfjGZ0xagUoRsMotKC5Wrv1y/4h zqWc/vsoNeowo9ZI+1z0Xr63jBlzV5Glhz4TLz1iVrh2ORrWfVT0d2Dj+Gy4f9MF nUvf6YLsXOXrG3GwR0wFVCv+dm88sktDqbMbihBEN2GC132PkUz0pc2SVK2g1uXp KK8uQOjijqrt1ASJnoPbMi5YF7rU5Oz6RMw73htS/4ydgYzTCC6OSebpYpGy1Wtn cvp8p3PN57Trf9eWgnT4elmqezhYj7QoBHG6tkWkGM988FqNqpgpVq3vRZWDatqm f+l9tQ9+dcBCX7AVfRuV =kdRU -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Firefox 60.0.1.0 ESR Progress?
Mr. Hughes, Thank very much for the update! That's the kind of info I was looking for, if an ETA isn't reasonable to ask for. I can report a summary of your note to my upstream authorities. I support both SL7 and C7 workstations, but had not yet seen the update on the sl-devel list. I appreciate you taking the time to answer this thread! Thanks for your hard work! From: Johnny Hughes To: centos@centos.org Cc: Bcc: Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2018 06:16:14 -0500 Subject: Re: [CentOS] Firefox 60.0.1.0 ESR Progress? On 07/03/2018 09:04 AM, Sean wrote: > Thanks for the idea, I'm not in a hurry and don't have a desire to > hand-jam upstream versions of firefox onto desktops. I just need to > track progress on the patch release and report an ETA to our cyber > security team. > > I just figured CentOS had a fancy devops CI/CD system somewhere that I > could keep tabs on to watch what's going on as patches get built, > tested and published. Seems like all the cool kids are doing that > kind of stuff these days. > > OK guys .. Firefox 60 is going to take some time .. likely more for CentOS-6 than CentOS-7. They both (C6 and C7 versions) require many non OS tools to build. For CentOS-7 .. we need the rust-toolset, llvm-toolset, and devtoolset-7, to get the firefox to build. For CentOS-6, we need less items (no llvm-toolset required .. all the rest is required). But, there is no released source code for the EL6 version of rust-devtoolset upstream. I am working on this now .. but we had the 6.10 release and the also 32 other items that dropped for CentOS-7 (both of which are now done). I am not the only one having issues with Firefox-60 (see this thread on the Scientific Linux list): https://listserv.fnal.gov/scripts/wa.exe?A2=ind1807=scientific-linux-devel=0=74 I hope to have this working soon .. but. it is not just a build and release kind of package. Thanks, Johnny Hughes ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Firefox 60.0.1.0 ESR Progress?
On 07/03/2018 09:04 AM, Sean wrote:
> Thanks for the idea, I'm not in a hurry and don't have a desire to
> hand-jam upstream versions of firefox onto desktops. I just need to
> track progress on the patch release and report an ETA to our cyber
> security team.
>
> I just figured CentOS had a fancy devops CI/CD system somewhere that I
> could keep tabs on to watch what's going on as patches get built,
> tested and published. Seems like all the cool kids are doing that
> kind of stuff these days.
>
>
OK guys .. Firefox 60 is going to take some time .. likely more for
CentOS-6 than CentOS-7.
They both (C6 and C7 versions) require many non OS tools to build.
For CentOS-7 .. we need the rust-toolset, llvm-toolset, and
devtoolset-7, to get the firefox to build.
For CentOS-6, we need less items (no llvm-toolset required .. all the
rest is required). But, there is no released source code for the EL6
version of rust-devtoolset upstream.
I am working on this now .. but we had the 6.10 release and the also 32
other items that dropped for CentOS-7 (both of which are now done).
I am not the only one having issues with Firefox-60 (see this thread on
the Scientific Linux list):
https://listserv.fnal.gov/scripts/wa.exe?A2=ind1807=scientific-linux-devel=0=74
I hope to have this working soon .. but. it is not just a build and
release kind of package.
Thanks,
Johnny Hughes
>> From: Alice Wonder
>> To: centos@centos.org
>> Cc:
>> Bcc:
>> Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2018 07:31:20 -0700
>> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Firefox 60.0.1.0 ESR Progress?
>> On 07/02/2018 06:57 AM, Sean wrote:
>>> Is there a way to track CentOS's progress on RHSA-2018-2113?
>>>
>>> https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:2113
>>>
>>> Thanks!
>>> ___
>>> CentOS mailing list
>>> CentOS@centos.org
>>> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
>>>
>>
>> This is what I do and it works well, script run as root after
>> downloading compiled tarball from upstream.
>>
>> --
>> #!/bin/bash
>>
>> TMP=`mktemp -d /tmp/ff.`
>> mv $1 ${TMP}/
>>
>> pushd ${TMP}
>>
>> FFOX=`echo $1 |sed -e s?"\.tar\.bz2"?""?`
>>
>> tar -jxf ${1}
>>
>> chown -R root:root firefox
>>
>> mv firefox /usr/local/${FFOX}
>>
>> popd
>>
>> pushd /usr/local
>>
>> rm -f firefox && ln -s ${FFOX} firefox
>>
>> popd
>>
>> rm -rf ${TMP}
>> -
>>
>> $1 is the FireFox downloaded from upstream (compiled)
>>
>> Installing it as root means I am safe from malware over-writing bits of
>> it, but I do have to manually download.
>>
>> /usr/local/firefox/firefox then starts it - and old versions are
>> preserved in case something breaks (I just change which one the
>> /usr/local/firefox link points to - though I almost never have to revert)
>>
>> It's not RPM but there are too many advantages to newer FireFox for me
>> to wait.
>>
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Firefox 60.0.1.0 ESR Progress?
Thanks for the idea, I'm not in a hurry and don't have a desire to
hand-jam upstream versions of firefox onto desktops. I just need to
track progress on the patch release and report an ETA to our cyber
security team.
I just figured CentOS had a fancy devops CI/CD system somewhere that I
could keep tabs on to watch what's going on as patches get built,
tested and published. Seems like all the cool kids are doing that
kind of stuff these days.
> From: Alice Wonder
> To: centos@centos.org
> Cc:
> Bcc:
> Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2018 07:31:20 -0700
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Firefox 60.0.1.0 ESR Progress?
> On 07/02/2018 06:57 AM, Sean wrote:
> > Is there a way to track CentOS's progress on RHSA-2018-2113?
> >
> > https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:2113
> >
> > Thanks!
> > ___
> > CentOS mailing list
> > CentOS@centos.org
> > https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
> >
>
> This is what I do and it works well, script run as root after
> downloading compiled tarball from upstream.
>
> --
> #!/bin/bash
>
> TMP=`mktemp -d /tmp/ff.`
> mv $1 ${TMP}/
>
> pushd ${TMP}
>
> FFOX=`echo $1 |sed -e s?"\.tar\.bz2"?""?`
>
> tar -jxf ${1}
>
> chown -R root:root firefox
>
> mv firefox /usr/local/${FFOX}
>
> popd
>
> pushd /usr/local
>
> rm -f firefox && ln -s ${FFOX} firefox
>
> popd
>
> rm -rf ${TMP}
> -
>
> $1 is the FireFox downloaded from upstream (compiled)
>
> Installing it as root means I am safe from malware over-writing bits of
> it, but I do have to manually download.
>
> /usr/local/firefox/firefox then starts it - and old versions are
> preserved in case something breaks (I just change which one the
> /usr/local/firefox link points to - though I almost never have to revert)
>
> It's not RPM but there are too many advantages to newer FireFox for me
> to wait.
>
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Re: [CentOS] Firefox 60.0.1.0 ESR Progress?
On 07/02/2018 06:57 AM, Sean wrote:
Is there a way to track CentOS's progress on RHSA-2018-2113?
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:2113
Thanks!
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
This is what I do and it works well, script run as root after
downloading compiled tarball from upstream.
--
#!/bin/bash
TMP=`mktemp -d /tmp/ff.`
mv $1 ${TMP}/
pushd ${TMP}
FFOX=`echo $1 |sed -e s?"\.tar\.bz2"?""?`
tar -jxf ${1}
chown -R root:root firefox
mv firefox /usr/local/${FFOX}
popd
pushd /usr/local
rm -f firefox && ln -s ${FFOX} firefox
popd
rm -rf ${TMP}
-
$1 is the FireFox downloaded from upstream (compiled)
Installing it as root means I am safe from malware over-writing bits of
it, but I do have to manually download.
/usr/local/firefox/firefox then starts it - and old versions are
preserved in case something breaks (I just change which one the
/usr/local/firefox link points to - though I almost never have to revert)
It's not RPM but there are too many advantages to newer FireFox for me
to wait.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
