Re: [ceph-devel] patch: update object mapping calculation

2009-11-02 Thread Sage Weil
On Mon, 2 Nov 2009, Noah Watkins wrote: > Sage > > How do you prefer patches being sent? It looks like you are cherry-picking out > of my tree to apply your signed-off-by? Rebasing my for-sage tree means that I > can't fast-forward the public branch, but forcing the fast-forward is probably > eas

Re: [ceph-devel] patch: update object mapping calculation

2009-11-02 Thread Noah Watkins
Sage How do you prefer patches being sent? It looks like you are cherry- picking out of my tree to apply your signed-off-by? Rebasing my for- sage tree means that I can't fast-forward the public branch, but forcing the fast-forward is probably easiest if you aren't ever pulling from it. Tho

Re: [ceph-devel] patch: update object mapping calculation

2009-11-02 Thread Sage Weil
On Fri, 30 Oct 2009, Noah Watkins wrote: > > > Actually, it looks like that calculation is wrong.. I also added > > > > *oxoff += (stripeno % su_per_object) * su; > > Looks like this update fixes the object offset for multiple stripes > per object, but 'oxlen' needs adjusted. With the curr