Re: ping_pong test of ceph

2011-10-30 Thread mowang da
hi all, this bug has been fixed yet? i can't find any information of it. thanks for your help. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe ceph-devel in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Re: ping_pong test of ceph

2011-10-30 Thread Gregory Farnum
On Sun, Oct 30, 2011 at 6:21 PM, mowang da whooya@gmail.com wrote: hi all, this bug has been fixed yet? i can't find any information of it. thanks for your help. Yes, it was fixed a while ago in our master branch and is fixed in our last couple of releases. (Our newest is v0.37.) As the

Re: ping_pong test of ceph

2011-10-30 Thread mowang da
thanks , if there is only one client, can we use local flock to replace flock mds? 2011/10/31 Gregory Farnum gregory.far...@dreamhost.com: On Sun, Oct 30, 2011 at 6:21 PM, mowang da whooya@gmail.com wrote: hi all, this bug has been fixed yet? i can't find any information of it. thanks for

profiling ceph

2011-10-30 Thread sheng qiu
hi, is there any way to see how much time spend on each part of ceph when running it. i just want to see which part of ceph codes spend more time or have larger cost. i tried to config ceph adding -pg, but when i use gprof command, it said no gmon.out. i also checked the ceph wiki, the profiling

Re: ping_pong test of ceph

2011-10-30 Thread Gregory Farnum
Not unless you want to hack the code to remove its flock implementation. I'm not sure why you'd want to, though -- flock is unlikely to be in the critical path for applications. (If it is important, you can also use the userspace client -- unlike the kernel client, it doesn't yet implement