Re: Repeated messages of heartbeat_check: no heartbeat from

2012-02-23 Thread Wido den Hollander
Hi, On 02/22/2012 07:08 PM, Gregory Farnum wrote: Wido, Sorry we lost track of this last week — we were all distracted by FAST 12! :) No problem! So it looks like they're both on the same map and osd.4 is sending pings to osd.19, but osd.19 is just ignoring them? Or do you really have on

Re: Which SSD method is better for performance?

2012-02-23 Thread Wido den Hollander
On 02/21/2012 10:35 PM, Sage Weil wrote: On Tue, 21 Feb 2012, Paul Pettigrew wrote: G'day Greg, thanks for the fast response. Yes, I forgot to explicitly state the Journal would go to SATA Journals in CASE1, and it is easy to appreciate the performance impact of this case as you documented

Re: Performance test on Ceph cluster

2012-02-23 Thread Tommi Virtanen
On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 23:12, madhusudhana madhusudhana.u.acha...@gmail.com wrote: 1. can you please let me know how I can make only 1 MDS active ? You can see that in ceph -s output, the mds line should have just one entry like 0=a=up:active with the word active. You can control that with the

Re: Stale NFS file handle

2012-02-23 Thread Tommi Virtanen
2012/2/13 Székelyi Szabolcs szeke...@niif.hu: Okay, that sounds like a bug then.  The two interesting things would be a ceph-fuse log (--debug-client 10 --debug-ms 1 --log-file /path/to/log) and an mds log (debug mds = 20, debug ms = 1 in [mds] section of ceph.conf). Thanks, I've set it up,

Re: I found some problem in CRUSH code

2012-02-23 Thread Sage Weil
Hi, Yes, that's a bug... Those ='s should be -, as with the straw bucket type. Opened http://tracker.newdream.net/issues/2096 Thanks! This'll be fixed in v0.43. sage On Wed, 15 Feb 2012, ZhuRongze wrote: Hi, The function crush_adjust_tree_bucket_item_weight in

Re: ceph does not work

2012-02-23 Thread Gregory Farnum
On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 11:00 AM, Tommi Virtanen tommi.virta...@dreamhost.com wrote: On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 01:15, Дениска-редиска s...@inbox.lv wrote: ehllo here, i have tried to setup ceph .41 in simple configuration: 3 nodes, each running mon, mds osd with replication level 3 for data

Re: ceph does not work

2012-02-23 Thread Sage Weil
On Thu, 23 Feb 2012, Tommi Virtanen wrote: On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 01:15, ÿÿ-ÿÿ s...@inbox.lv wrote: ehllo here, i have tried to setup ceph .41 in simple configuration: 3 nodes, each running mon, mds osd with replication level 3 for data metadata pools.

Re: ceph does not work

2012-02-23 Thread Tommi Virtanen
On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 11:07, Gregory Farnum gregory.far...@dreamhost.com wrote: 3 nodes, each running mon, mds osd with replication level 3 for data metadata pools. ... Actually the OSDs will happily (well, not happily; the will complain. But they will run) run in degraded mode. However,

Re: Failure to run rbd commands

2012-02-23 Thread Sage Weil
On Tue, 21 Feb 2012, Sage Weil wrote: On Wed, 22 Feb 2012, Paul Pettigrew wrote: G'day all Today's testing was on having a client (i.e. Ubuntu 12.04 server running KVM to be virtualisation host, named server) connect to the 3x node v0.42 Ceph Cluster (names ceph1, ceph2 ceph3).

Re: [PATCH] Package ceph-dencoder

2012-02-23 Thread Sage Weil
On Wed, 22 Feb 2012, Sage Weil wrote: A patch to add this is in the wip-decoder branch, including a man page and adding it to the .deb as well. Should be merged shortly. Now in master. Thanks! sage s On Tue, 21 Feb 2012, Alexandre Oliva wrote: Signed-off-by: Alexandre Oliva

Re: Problems after crash yesterday

2012-02-23 Thread Gregory Farnum
On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 12:25 PM, Jens Rehpöhler jens.rehpoeh...@filoo.de wrote: Hi Gregory, On 22.02.2012 18:12, Gregory Farnum wrote: On Feb 22, 2012, at 1:53 AM, Jens Rehpöhler jens.rehpoeh...@filoo.de wrote: Some Additios: meanwhile we are at the state: 2012-02-22 10:38:49.587403