On Tuesday 03 July 2012 wrote Sage Weil:
On Tue, 3 Jul 2012, Amon Ott wrote:
just found out that some Debian binary packages do not get stripped - a
53MB ceph-mds does look a bit weird.
Identified packages ceph-mds and gceph and added these lines:
dh_strip -pceph-mds
Le 03/07/2012 23:38, Tommi Virtanen a écrit :
On Tue, Jul 3, 2012 at 1:54 PM, Yann Dupont yann.dup...@univ-nantes.fr wrote:
In the case I could repair, do you think a crashed FS as it is right now is
valuable for you, for future reference , as I saw you can't reproduce the
problem ? I can make
Hi,
On 03-07-12 20:22, Ross Turk wrote:
Hey Wido! This is really cool.
I think it'd be useful to have a guide that people can follow to stand up
CloudStack with Ceph. Even though it's still in active development, I'd like to
encourage people to try it out. Would you be willing to work
Hi List,
i today upgraded from 0.43 to 0.48 and now i have one monitor which does not
want to start up anymore:
ceph version 0.48argonaut-125-g4e774fb
(commit:4e774fbcb38fd6883232b72352512a5f8e4a66e8)
1: /usr/bin/ceph-mon() [0x52f9c9]
2: (()+0xeff0) [0x7fb08dd11ff0]
3: (gsignal()+0x35)
Signed-off-by: Wido den Hollander w...@widodh.nl
---
src/include/rados/librados.h |2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/src/include/rados/librados.h b/src/include/rados/librados.h
index 9f723f7..4870b0f 100644
--- a/src/include/rados/librados.h
+++
On Wed, 4 Jul 2012, Wido den Hollander wrote:
By using this we prevent scenarios where cephx keys are not accepted
in various situations.
Replacing the + and / by - and _ we generate URL-safe base64 keys
Signed-off-by: Wido den Hollander w...@widodh.nl
Do already properly decode URL-sage
- Oorspronkelijk bericht -
On Wed, 4 Jul 2012, Wido den Hollander wrote:
By using this we prevent scenarios where cephx keys are not accepted
in various situations.
Replacing the + and / by - and _ we generate URL-safe base64 keys
Signed-off-by: Wido den Hollander
On Wed, 4 Jul 2012, Wido den Hollander wrote:
On Wed, 4 Jul 2012, Wido den Hollander wrote:
By using this we prevent scenarios where cephx keys are not accepted
in various situations.
Replacing the + and / by - and _ we generate URL-safe base64 keys
Signed-off-by: Wido den
On Wednesday, July 4, 2012 at 1:06 AM, Yann Dupont wrote:
Le 03/07/2012 23:38, Tommi Virtanen a écrit :
On Tue, Jul 3, 2012 at 1:54 PM, Yann Dupont yann.dup...@univ-nantes.fr
(mailto:yann.dup...@univ-nantes.fr) wrote:
In the case I could repair, do you think a crashed FS as it is right
On Wednesday, July 4, 2012 at 4:45 AM, Smart Weblications GmbH - Florian
Wiessner wrote:
Hi List,
i today upgraded from 0.43 to 0.48 and now i have one monitor which does not
want to start up anymore:
ceph version 0.48argonaut-125-g4e774fb
Hmmm — we generally try to modify these versions when the API changes, not on
every sprint. It looks to me like Sage added one function in 0.45 where we
maybe should have bumped it, but that was a long time ago and at this point we
should maybe just eat it?
-Greg
On Wednesday, July 4, 2012 at
On Wed, 4 Jul 2012, Gregory Farnum wrote:
Hmmm ÿÿ we generally try to modify these versions when the API changes,
not on every sprint. It looks to me like Sage added one function in 0.45
where we maybe should have bumped it, but that was a long time ago and
at this point we should maybe
Le 04/07/2012 18:21, Gregory Farnum a écrit :
On Wednesday, July 4, 2012 at 1:06 AM, Yann Dupont wrote:
Le 03/07/2012 23:38, Tommi Virtanen a écrit :
On Tue, Jul 3, 2012 at 1:54 PM, Yann Dupont yann.dup...@univ-nantes.fr
(mailto:yann.dup...@univ-nantes.fr) wrote:
In the case I could repair,
On Wednesday, July 4, 2012 at 10:02 AM, Smart Weblications GmbH - Florian
Wiessner wrote:
Am 04.07.2012 18:25, schrieb Gregory Farnum:
On Wednesday, July 4, 2012 at 4:45 AM, Smart Weblications GmbH - Florian
Wiessner wrote:
Hi List,
i today upgraded from 0.43 to
On Wednesday, July 4, 2012 at 11:29 AM, Mitsue Acosta Murakami wrote:
Hello,
We are examining Ceph to use as email storage. In our current system,
several clients servers with different services (imap, smtp, etc) access
a NFS storage server. The mailboxes are stored in Maildir format, with
On 4 Jul 2012, at 19:59, Gregory Farnum wrote:
That's odd — there isn't too much that went into the OSD between 0.47 and
0.48 that I can think of, and most of that only impact OSDs when they go
through bootup. What does ceph -s display — are all the PGs healthy?
-Greg
Hi Greg,
The
Hi, all:
Just want to make sure one thing.
If I set replica size as 2, that means one data with 2 copies, right?
Therefore, if I measure the performance of rbd is 100MB/s,
I can imagine the actually io throughputs on hard disk is over 100MB/s *3 = 300
MB/s.
Am I correct?
Thanks!
--
To
On Thu, 5 Jul 2012, eric_yh_c...@wiwynn.com wrote:
Hi, all:
Just want to make sure one thing.
If I set replica size as 2, that means one data with 2 copies, right?
Therefore, if I measure the performance of rbd is 100MB/s,
I can imagine the actually io throughputs on hard disk is over
On Thu, 5 Jul 2012, Mark Kirkwood wrote:
Hi,
I am experimenting with ceph (rbd only for now), and have a few questions
about what is possible via placement rules.
For example I am looking at a setup with a local datacenter (datacenter0) and
a remote one (datacenter1). I'm using a
On 05/07/12 15:57, Sage Weil wrote:
On Thu, 5 Jul 2012, Mark Kirkwood wrote:
2/ Also I would like to be able to say make my number of copies 3, but if I
lose datacenter0 (where 2 copies are), don't try to have 3 copies at
datacenter1 (so run degraded in that case). Is that possible?
That is
20 matches
Mail list logo
