Hi Sage,
This patch is buggy, please drop it from wip-mds.
On 11/23/2012 12:52 AM, Yan, Zheng wrote:
From: Yan, Zheng zheng.z@intel.com
When a null dentry is encountered, CDir::_commit_partial() adds
a OSD_TMAP_RM command to delete the dentry. But if the dentry is
new, the osd will not
On Sat, Dec 1, 2012 at 9:07 AM, Samuel Just sam.j...@inktank.com wrote:
Just pushed a fix to next, 49f32cee647c5bd09f36ba7c9fd4f481a697b9d7.
Let me know if it persists. Thanks for the logs!
-Sam
Very nice, thanks!
There is one corner case - ``on-the-fly'' upgrade works well only if
your
Hello list,
today i was trying to look what happens if i remove an osd.
I've executed:
ceph osd 21 out
Cluster Details:
- XFS FS for OSDs
- Software version: latest next from today 12/01/2012
- 6 Nodes with 4 OSDs only SSDs each
I have just 8 GB of data so i thought removing an OSD should be
Hi Dan,
Am 27.11.2012 10:16, schrieb Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG:
Am 26.11.2012 21:00, schrieb Dan Mick:
It writes zeros; there's no way for it to know how many zeros are
coming. It could make a half-hearted attempt depending on its buffer
size and the amount of data the source is willing to
Is ready to merge, after a final look. There is one additional patch that
handles the connection fault and reconnect cases that hasn't been reviewed
yet. Passed the rados suite, although when we add it to the night suite
we'll want lower probabilities because most of the runs took hours to
On Sat, 1 Dec 2012, Yan, Zheng wrote:
Hi Sage,
This patch is buggy, please drop it from wip-mds.
Done.
On 11/23/2012 12:52 AM, Yan, Zheng wrote:
From: Yan, Zheng zheng.z@intel.com
When a null dentry is encountered, CDir::_commit_partial() adds
a OSD_TMAP_RM command to delete
On 11/28/2012 6:53 AM, Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG wrote:
Hi Dan,
thanks for your update / new import-export branch.
The import seems to work now. What i'm wondering is that it is really
slow.
I see around 10% CPU Usage on importing host (host where rbd import is
started) and just 4MB
On 12/1/2012 12:23 PM, Stefan Priebe wrote:
Hi Dan,
Am 27.11.2012 10:16, schrieb Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG:
Am 26.11.2012 21:00, schrieb Dan Mick:
It writes zeros; there's no way for it to know how many zeros are
coming. It could make a half-hearted attempt depending on its buffer
size
I pushed another fix that plugs a leak when requests race with peering
that fixed the 'slow request' for osd_sub_op messages for me. It's in
wip-osd-leak.
Sam, when you get a chance, can you take a look and push it to next if it
looks okay?
Thanks!
sage
On Fri, 30 Nov 2012, Samuel Just
Unfortunately the hangs happen with the new set of patches. Here's
some debug info:
https://gist.github.com/raw/4187123/90194ce172130244a9c1c968ed185eee7282d809/gistfile1.txt
On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 3:22 PM, Alex Elder el...@inktank.com wrote:
On 11/29/2012 02:37 PM, Alex Elder wrote:
On
10 matches
Mail list logo