Hi,
All osds in the dev cluster died shortly after upgrade (packet-only,
i.e. binary upgrade, even without restart running processes), please
see attached file.
Was: 0.55.1-356-g850d1d5
Upgraded to: 0.56 tag
The only one difference is a version of the gcc corresponding
libstdc++ - 4.6 on the
OK thanks! Will change that.
Am 31.12.2012 20:21, schrieb Samuel Just:
The ceph-osd relies on fs barriers for correctness. You will want to
remove the nobarrier option to prevent future corruption.
-Sam
On Mon, Dec 31, 2012 at 3:59 AM, Stefan Priebe s.pri...@profihost.ag wrote:
Am 31.12.2012
On Tue, Jan 1, 2013 at 9:49 PM, Andrey Korolyov and...@xdel.ru wrote:
Hi,
All osds in the dev cluster died shortly after upgrade (packet-only,
i.e. binary upgrade, even without restart running processes), please
see attached file.
Was: 0.55.1-356-g850d1d5
Upgraded to: 0.56 tag
The only
On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 12:16 AM, Andrey Korolyov and...@xdel.ru wrote:
On Tue, Jan 1, 2013 at 9:49 PM, Andrey Korolyov and...@xdel.ru wrote:
Hi,
All osds in the dev cluster died shortly after upgrade (packet-only,
i.e. binary upgrade, even without restart running processes), please
see
Doh! Sorry about that. It looks like they are still in rpm-testing:
http://www.ceph.com/rpm-testing/el6/x86_64/
I imagine Gary will have them in the non-testing repo some time tomorrow.
Mark
On 01/01/2013 08:24 PM, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote:
Hi,
apparently the RPM link points to version