0.55 crashed during upgrade to bobtail

2013-01-01 Thread Andrey Korolyov
Hi, All osds in the dev cluster died shortly after upgrade (packet-only, i.e. binary upgrade, even without restart running processes), please see attached file. Was: 0.55.1-356-g850d1d5 Upgraded to: 0.56 tag The only one difference is a version of the gcc corresponding libstdc++ - 4.6 on the

Re: automatic repair of inconsistent pg?

2013-01-01 Thread Stefan Priebe
OK thanks! Will change that. Am 31.12.2012 20:21, schrieb Samuel Just: The ceph-osd relies on fs barriers for correctness. You will want to remove the nobarrier option to prevent future corruption. -Sam On Mon, Dec 31, 2012 at 3:59 AM, Stefan Priebe s.pri...@profihost.ag wrote: Am 31.12.2012

Re: 0.55 crashed during upgrade to bobtail

2013-01-01 Thread Andrey Korolyov
On Tue, Jan 1, 2013 at 9:49 PM, Andrey Korolyov and...@xdel.ru wrote: Hi, All osds in the dev cluster died shortly after upgrade (packet-only, i.e. binary upgrade, even without restart running processes), please see attached file. Was: 0.55.1-356-g850d1d5 Upgraded to: 0.56 tag The only

Re: 0.55 crashed during upgrade to bobtail

2013-01-01 Thread Andrey Korolyov
On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 12:16 AM, Andrey Korolyov and...@xdel.ru wrote: On Tue, Jan 1, 2013 at 9:49 PM, Andrey Korolyov and...@xdel.ru wrote: Hi, All osds in the dev cluster died shortly after upgrade (packet-only, i.e. binary upgrade, even without restart running processes), please see

Re: v0.56 released

2013-01-01 Thread Mark Nelson
Doh! Sorry about that. It looks like they are still in rpm-testing: http://www.ceph.com/rpm-testing/el6/x86_64/ I imagine Gary will have them in the non-testing repo some time tomorrow. Mark On 01/01/2013 08:24 PM, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote: Hi, apparently the RPM link points to version