It looks the same for Debian packages, 0.56.1 is on testing branch.
http://ceph.com/debian-testing/dists/precise/main/binary-amd64/Packages
If someone can fix this, thanks in advance ;-)
--
Regards,
Sébastien Han.
On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 3:28 AM, Mark Nelson mark.nel...@inktank.com wrote:
Doh!
On 01/01/2013 01:13 AM, Matthew Roy wrote:
On Mon, Dec 31, 2012 at 9:14 AM, Miles Fidelman
mfidel...@meetinghouse.net wrote:
Which raises another question: how are you combining drives within each OSD
(raid, lvm, ?).
I'm not combining them, just running an OSD per data disk. On this
Hi all,
I've been struggling with Ceph logging.
As far as I saw we can log to syslog but we can't specify any
facility. So my question is: which facility does ceph use by default?
Second thing is, I'm sick of all those log [INF] messages from the
ceph-mon, like:
Jan 2 13:27:07 ceph02
Hi all,
I just noticed that the sync process for eu.ceph.com didn't work properly.
The problem seems to be a faulty rsync script on my side which caused
the debian directory not to be synced properly.
I corrected the issue, but it has to re-sync again now, that will take
some time.
The
On 01/02/2013 04:05 PM, Ugis wrote:
Hi all,
I am planning to set up monitoring of ceph cluster relying on output
of commands:
#ceph health
#ceph -s
The need is to retrieve certain values, for example %degraded;
proportion X GB / Y GB avail to calculate available space%. I plan
to graph those
I have just observed that ceph-mon process, at least bobtail one, has
an extremely high density of writes - times above _overall_ cluster
amount of writes, measured by qemu driver(and they are very close to
be fair). For example, test cluster of 32 osds have 7.5 MByte/s of
writes on each mon node
On 01/02/2013 03:08 PM, Wido den Hollander wrote:
On 01/02/2013 04:05 PM, Ugis wrote:
Hi all,
I am planning to set up monitoring of ceph cluster relying on output
of commands:
#ceph health
#ceph -s
The need is to retrieve certain values, for example %degraded;
proportion X GB / Y GB avail to
On 01/02/2013 03:40 PM, Andrey Korolyov wrote:
I have just observed that ceph-mon process, at least bobtail one, has
an extremely high density of writes - times above _overall_ cluster
amount of writes, measured by qemu driver(and they are very close to
be fair). For example, test cluster of 32
On Wed, 2 Jan 2013, S?bastien Han wrote:
Hi all,
I've been struggling with Ceph logging.
As far as I saw we can log to syslog but we can't specify any
facility. So my question is: which facility does ceph use by default?
LOG_USER is currently hard-coded. It would be pretty easy to make
On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 8:00 PM, Joao Eduardo Luis joao.l...@inktank.com wrote:
On 01/02/2013 03:40 PM, Andrey Korolyov wrote:
I have just observed that ceph-mon process, at least bobtail one, has
an extremely high density of writes - times above _overall_ cluster
amount of writes, measured by
On 01/02/2013 04:58 PM, Joao Eduardo Luis wrote:
On 01/02/2013 03:08 PM, Wido den Hollander wrote:
On 01/02/2013 04:05 PM, Ugis wrote:
Hi all,
I am planning to set up monitoring of ceph cluster relying on output
of commands:
#ceph health
#ceph -s
The need is to retrieve certain values,
On Wed, 2 Jan 2013, Andrey Korolyov wrote:
On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 8:00 PM, Joao Eduardo Luis joao.l...@inktank.com
wrote:
On 01/02/2013 03:40 PM, Andrey Korolyov wrote:
I have just observed that ceph-mon process, at least bobtail one, has
an extremely high density of writes - times
Hi Sage,
Thanks for your answer.
LOG_USER is currently hard-coded. It would be pretty easy to make this
configurable... LOG_DAEMON may also be a better default choice.
LOG_DAEMON will be a better choice and even better using a different
facility to isolate ceph logs from other services that
On Wed, 2 Jan 2013, S?bastien Han wrote:
It looks the same for Debian packages, 0.56.1 is on testing branch.
http://ceph.com/debian-testing/dists/precise/main/binary-amd64/Packages
If someone can fix this, thanks in advance ;-)
The repo has 0.56-1, which is correct... maybe you just
On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 10:59:55AM -0800, Sage Weil wrote:
On Fri, 21 Dec 2012, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 01:29:49PM -0800, Sage Weil wrote:
Hi Linus,
Please pull the following Ceph updates for 3.8 from
Hi Linus,
Please pull these Ceph fixes from
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/sage/ceph-client.git for-linus
Two of Alex's patches deal with a race when reseting server connections
for open RBD images, one demotes some non-fatal BUGs to WARNs, and my
patch fixes a protocol
On 01/02/2013 07:11 PM, Sage Weil wrote:
On Wed, 2 Jan 2013, S?bastien Han wrote:
Debian-testing shows the version 0.56-1, maybe I misunderstood but I
thought that 0.56-1 bobtail was the new version of the stable branch.
So I was expecting to see it here
On Wed, 2 Jan 2013, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote:
On 01/02/2013 07:11 PM, Sage Weil wrote:
On Wed, 2 Jan 2013, S?bastien Han wrote:
Debian-testing shows the version 0.56-1, maybe I misunderstood but I
thought that 0.56-1 bobtail was the new version of the stable branch.
So I was expecting
(and of course it makes sense to build those on libraries that could
serve other access methods)
On 01/02/2013 03:02 PM, Dan Mick wrote:
There are plans being discussed for RESTful interfaces for configuration
and monitoring; no timetable yet but it's definitely on our radar, and
we'll discuss
Happy new year all
Over the past year, our company has written an extensive guide on how we
monitor ceph using Zabbix.
I would rather contribute it as a HOWTO or Guide into the Ceph wiki, rather
than just this email thread. It is written in wiki format, and email would lose
that formatting.
On 01/02/2013 09:46 PM, Sage Weil wrote:
On Wed, 2 Jan 2013, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote:
On 01/02/2013 07:11 PM, Sage Weil wrote:
On Wed, 2 Jan 2013, S?bastien Han wrote:
Debian-testing shows the version 0.56-1, maybe I misunderstood but I
thought that 0.56-1 bobtail was the new version of
On 01/02/2013 08:00 PM, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote:
On 01/02/2013 09:46 PM, Sage Weil wrote:
On Wed, 2 Jan 2013, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote:
On 01/02/2013 07:11 PM, Sage Weil wrote:
On Wed, 2 Jan 2013, S?bastien Han wrote:
Debian-testing shows the version 0.56-1, maybe I misunderstood
22 matches
Mail list logo
