Re: radosgw segfault in 0.56

2013-01-07 Thread Sylvain Munaut
Hi, happened to me using ubuntu packages. usually when you upgrade a package it calls all its dependencies, for ceph you have to update one by one. did you try that ? All ceph packages are up to date. Same happens with a custom compiled radosgw from git Cheers, Sylvain -- To

Re: radosgw segfault in 0.56

2013-01-07 Thread Sylvain Munaut
Ok, I tracked this down ... I'm using lighttpd as a FastCGI front end and it doesn't set SCRIPT_URI environment. So the line 1123 in rgw/rgw_rest.cc : s-script_uri = s-env-get(SCRIPT_URI); Tries to assign NULL to s-script_uri which crashes with the particularly unhelpful stack trace I pasted

Re: radosgw segfault in 0.56

2013-01-07 Thread Wido den Hollander
On 01/07/2013 12:04 PM, Sylvain Munaut wrote: Ok, I tracked this down ... I'm using lighttpd as a FastCGI front end and it doesn't set SCRIPT_URI environment. So the line 1123 in rgw/rgw_rest.cc : s-script_uri = s-env-get(SCRIPT_URI); Tries to assign NULL to s-script_uri which crashes with

Re: radosgw segfault in 0.56

2013-01-07 Thread Sylvain Munaut
Hi, As far as I know relying on SCRIPT_URI is rather dangerous since it's not always there. There better should be an if/else-satement surrounding that code having it defaulting to something else if SCRIPT_URI isn't available. I've opened a bug and proposed a patch setting the default value

Re: radosgw segfault in 0.56

2013-01-07 Thread Caleb Miles
Hi all, Created branch wip-3735 to capture Sylvain's patch. On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 7:21 AM, Sylvain Munaut s.mun...@whatever-company.com wrote: Hi, As far as I know relying on SCRIPT_URI is rather dangerous since it's not always there. There better should be an if/else-satement surrounding

Re: [PATCH 0/2] Librados aio stat

2013-01-07 Thread Filippos Giannakos
Hi Josh, On 01/05/2013 02:08 AM, Josh Durgin wrote: On 01/04/2013 05:01 AM, Filippos Giannakos wrote: Hi Team, Is there any progress or any comments regarding the librados aio stat patch ? They look good to me. I put them in the wip-librados-aio-stat branch. Can we add your signed-off-by to

Re: radosgw segfault in 0.56

2013-01-07 Thread Sylvain Munaut
Hi, Yeah, it's missing a guard here. Strange, I remember fixing this and others, but I can't find any trace of that. I think setting it to empty string is ok, though we may want to explore other fixes (configurable?) -- it affects the Location field in S3 POST response. Yes, I've seen it's

Re: radosgw segfault in 0.56

2013-01-07 Thread Yehuda Sadeh
On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 1:04 PM, Sylvain Munaut s.mun...@whatever-company.com wrote: Ok, I tracked this down ... I'm using lighttpd as a FastCGI front end and it doesn't set SCRIPT_URI environment. So the line 1123 in rgw/rgw_rest.cc : s-script_uri = s-env-get(SCRIPT_URI); Tries to

Re: Is Ceph recovery able to handle massive crash

2013-01-07 Thread Denis Fondras
Hello all, I'm using Ceph 0.55.1 on a Debian Wheezy (1 mon, 1 mds et 3 osd over btrfs) and every once in a while, an OSD process crashes (almost never the same osd crashes). This time I had 2 osd crash in a row and so I only had one replicate. I could bring the 2 crashed osd up and it started

Fwd: Interfaces proposed changes

2013-01-07 Thread David Zafman
I sent this proposal out to the developers that own the FSAL CEPH portion of Nfs-Ganesha. They have changes to Ceph that expose additional interfaces for this. This is our initial cut at improving the interfaces. David Zafman Senior Developer david.zaf...@inktank.com Begin forwarded

Re: OSD memory leaks?

2013-01-07 Thread Samuel Just
Awesome! What version are you running (ceph-osd -v, include the hash)? -Sam On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 11:03 AM, Dave Spano dsp...@optogenics.com wrote: This failed the first time I sent it, so I'm resending in plain text. Dave Spano Optogenics Systems Administrator - Original Message

Re: osd down (for 2 about 2 minutes) error after adding a new host to my cluster

2013-01-07 Thread Gregory Farnum
On Monday, January 7, 2013 at 1:00 PM, Isaac Otsiabah wrote: When i add a new host (with osd's) to my existing cluster, 1 or 2 previous osd(s) goes down for about 2 minutes and then they come back up. [root@h1ct ~]# ceph osd tree # id weight type name up/down reweight -1 3 root

Re: Is Ceph recovery able to handle massive crash

2013-01-07 Thread Gregory Farnum
On Monday, January 7, 2013 at 9:25 AM, Denis Fondras wrote: Hello all, I'm using Ceph 0.55.1 on a Debian Wheezy (1 mon, 1 mds et 3 osd over btrfs) and every once in a while, an OSD process crashes (almost never the same osd crashes). This time I had 2 osd crash in a row and so I only

Re: v0.56.1 released

2013-01-07 Thread Dennis Jacobfeuerborn
FYI I just updated from 0.56 to 0.56.1 using the RPMs for CentOS 6 (osd and mon only) and everything went perfectly fine. Thanks! Regards, Dennis On 01/08/2013 05:53 AM, Sage Weil wrote: We found a few critical problems with v0.56, and fixed a few outstanding problems. v0.56.1 is ready, and

Re: Windows port

2013-01-07 Thread Cesar Mello
Hi, I have been playing with ceph and reading the docs/thesis the last couple of nights just to learn something during my vacation. I was not expecting to find such an awesome and state of the art project. Congratulations for the great work! Please I would like to know if a Windows port is

Re: v0.56.1 released

2013-01-07 Thread Sage Weil
On Tue, 8 Jan 2013, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote: FYI I just updated from 0.56 to 0.56.1 using the RPMs for CentOS 6 (osd and mon only) and everything went perfectly fine. Thanks! Great! Make sure the client-side libraries (librbd, librados) are not v0.56 or you will likely have problems.

Re: v0.56.1 released

2013-01-07 Thread Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG
Hi, i cannot see any git tag or branch claming to be 0.56.1? Which commit id is this? Greets Stefan Am 08.01.2013 05:53, schrieb Sage Weil: We found a few critical problems with v0.56, and fixed a few outstanding problems. v0.56.1 is ready, and we're pretty pleased with it! There are

Re: v0.56.1 released

2013-01-07 Thread Andrey Korolyov
On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 11:30 AM, Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG s.pri...@profihost.ag wrote: Hi, i cannot see any git tag or branch claming to be 0.56.1? Which commit id is this? Greets Stefan Same for me, github simply does not sent a new tag in the pull to local tree by some reason.

Re: v0.56.1 released

2013-01-07 Thread Amon Ott
Am 08.01.2013 08:40, schrieb Andrey Korolyov: On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 11:30 AM, Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG s.pri...@profihost.ag wrote: Hi, i cannot see any git tag or branch claming to be 0.56.1? Which commit id is this? Greets Stefan Same for me, github simply does not sent a new