On 02/26/2013 01:00 PM, Sage Weil wrote:
On Tue, 26 Feb 2013, Yan, Zheng wrote:
It looks to me like truncates can get queued for later, so that's not the
case?
And how could the client receive a truncate while in the middle of
writing? Either it's got the write caps (in which case nobody
Hi list,
how can i do a short maintanance like a kernel upgrade on an osd host?
Right now ceph starts to backfill immediatly if i say:
ceph osd out 41
...
Without ceph osd out command all clients hang for the time ceph does not
know that the host was rebootet.
I tried
ceph osd set nodown and
On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 6:56 PM, Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG
s.pri...@profihost.ag wrote:
Hi list,
how can i do a short maintanance like a kernel upgrade on an osd host?
Right now ceph starts to backfill immediatly if i say:
ceph osd out 41
...
Without ceph osd out command all clients
It's been an embryonic internal Inktank conversation and Nick Barcet
at eNovance mentioned some ideas when we last met. Will try and put
together a blueprint soon.
Neil
On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 2:04 AM, Loic Dachary l...@dachary.org wrote:
Hi Neil,
I've added RBD backups secondary clusters
On Tue, 26 Feb 2013, Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG wrote:
Hi list,
how can i do a short maintanance like a kernel upgrade on an osd host?
Right now ceph starts to backfill immediatly if i say:
ceph osd out 41
...
Without ceph osd out command all clients hang for the time ceph does not
But that redults in a 1-3s hickup for all KVM vms. This is not what I want.
Stefan
Am 26.02.2013 um 18:06 schrieb Sage Weil s...@inktank.com:
On Tue, 26 Feb 2013, Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG wrote:
Hi list,
how can i do a short maintanance like a kernel upgrade on an osd host?
Right now
On Tue, 26 Feb 2013, Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG wrote:
But that redults in a 1-3s hickup for all KVM vms. This is not what I want.
You can do
kill $pid
ceph osd down $osdid
(or even reverse the order, if the sequence is quick enough) to avoid
waiting for the failure detection delay. But
On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 05:09:30PM -0800, Gregory Farnum wrote:
On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 5:00 PM, Kevin Decherf ke...@kdecherf.com wrote:
On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 10:15:48AM -0800, Gregory Farnum wrote:
Looks like you've got ~424k dentries pinned, and it's trying to keep
400k inodes in cache.
On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 9:57 AM, Kevin Decherf ke...@kdecherf.com wrote:
On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 05:09:30PM -0800, Gregory Farnum wrote:
On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 5:00 PM, Kevin Decherf ke...@kdecherf.com wrote:
On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 10:15:48AM -0800, Gregory Farnum wrote:
Looks like you've
Reviewed-by: Josh Durgin josh.dur...@inktank.com
On 02/25/2013 02:36 PM, Alex Elder wrote:
If an invalid layout is provided to ceph_osdc_new_request(), its
call to calc_layout() might return an error. At that point in the
function we've already allocated an osd request structure, so we
need to
Reviewed-by: Josh Durgin josh.dur...@inktank.com
On 02/25/2013 02:40 PM, Alex Elder wrote:
The bio_seg field is used by the ceph messenger in iterating through
a bio. It should never have a negative value, so make it an
unsigned.
Change variables used to hold bio_seg values to all be unsigned
On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 4:01 PM, Gregory Farnum g...@inktank.com wrote:
On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 8:31 PM, Yan, Zheng zheng.z@intel.com wrote:
On 02/23/2013 02:54 AM, Gregory Farnum wrote:
I haven't spent that much time in the kernel client, but this patch
isn't working out for me. In
On 02/25/2013 03:09 PM, Alex Elder wrote:
This series refactors the code involved with identifying the
details of the name, offset, and length of an object involved
with an osd request based on a file layout. It makes the focus
of calc_layout() be filling in an osd op structure based on the
On 02/25/2013 03:40 PM, Alex Elder wrote:
This series makes the fields related to the data portion of
a ceph message not get manipulated by code outside the ceph
messenger. It implements some interface functions that can
be used to assign data-related fields. Doing this will allow
the way
Hi Sage,
On 02/20/2013 05:12 PM, Sage Weil wrote:
Hi Jim,
I'm resurrecting an ancient thread here, but: we've just observed this on
another big cluster and remembered that this hasn't actually been fixed.
Sorry for the delayed reply - I missed this in a backlog
of unread email...
I
On Tue, 26 Feb 2013, Jim Schutt wrote:
I think the right solution is to make an option that will setsockopt on
SO_RECVBUF to some value (say, 256KB). I pushed a branch that does this,
wip-tcp. Do you mind checking to see if this addresses the issue (without
manually adjusting things
Hi Sage,
Am 26.02.2013 18:24, schrieb Sage Weil:
On Tue, 26 Feb 2013, Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG wrote:
But that redults in a 1-3s hickup for all KVM vms. This is not what I want.
You can do
kill $pid
ceph osd down $osdid
(or even reverse the order, if the sequence is quick enough)
On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 10:10:06AM -0800, Gregory Farnum wrote:
On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 9:57 AM, Kevin Decherf ke...@kdecherf.com wrote:
On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 05:09:30PM -0800, Gregory Farnum wrote:
On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 5:00 PM, Kevin Decherf ke...@kdecherf.com wrote:
On Tue, Feb 19,
On Tue, 26 Feb 2013, Stefan Priebe wrote:
Hi Sage,
Am 26.02.2013 18:24, schrieb Sage Weil:
On Tue, 26 Feb 2013, Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG wrote:
But that redults in a 1-3s hickup for all KVM vms. This is not what I
want.
You can do
kill $pid
ceph osd down $osdid
On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 11:58 AM, Kevin Decherf ke...@kdecherf.com wrote:
We have one folder per application (php, java, ruby). Every application has
small (1M) files. The folder is mounted by only one client by default.
In case of overload, another clients spawn to mount the same folder and
On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 11:44 AM, Stefan Priebe s.pri...@profihost.ag wrote:
Hi Sage,
Am 26.02.2013 18:24, schrieb Sage Weil:
On Tue, 26 Feb 2013, Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG wrote:
But that redults in a 1-3s hickup for all KVM vms. This is not what I
want.
You can do
kill $pid
On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 12:26:17PM -0800, Gregory Farnum wrote:
On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 11:58 AM, Kevin Decherf ke...@kdecherf.com wrote:
We have one folder per application (php, java, ruby). Every application has
small (1M) files. The folder is mounted by only one client by default.
In
On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 1:57 PM, Kevin Decherf ke...@kdecherf.com wrote:
On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 12:26:17PM -0800, Gregory Farnum wrote:
On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 11:58 AM, Kevin Decherf ke...@kdecherf.com wrote:
We have one folder per application (php, java, ruby). Every application has
small
On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 5:58 AM, Gregory Farnum g...@inktank.com wrote:
On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 1:57 PM, Kevin Decherf ke...@kdecherf.com wrote:
On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 12:26:17PM -0800, Gregory Farnum wrote:
On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 11:58 AM, Kevin Decherf ke...@kdecherf.com wrote:
We have
On Wed, 27 Feb 2013, Yan, Zheng wrote:
On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 5:58 AM, Gregory Farnum g...@inktank.com wrote:
On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 1:57 PM, Kevin Decherf ke...@kdecherf.com wrote:
On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 12:26:17PM -0800, Gregory Farnum wrote:
On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 11:58 AM, Kevin
Hi Linus,
Please pull the following Ceph updates from
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/sage/ceph-client.git for-linus
A few groups of patches here. Alex has been hard at work improving the
RBD code, layout groundwork for understanding the new formats and doing
layering. Most
Hi Greg,
Hi Sage,
Am 26.02.2013 21:27, schrieb Gregory Farnum:
On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 11:44 AM, Stefan Priebe s.pri...@profihost.ag wrote:
out and down are quite different — are you sure you tried down
and not out? (You reference out in your first email, rather than
down.)
-Greg
sorry
27 matches
Mail list logo
