Re: [PATCH v4] ceph: add acl for cephfs

Hi, It seems to me there are three issues, you can take a look below if they are really there, On 11/08/2013 01:23 PM, Guangliang Zhao wrote: v4: check the validity before set/get_cached_acl() v3: handle the attr change in ceph_set_acl() v2: remove some redundant code in ceph_setattr()

[PATCH] MAINTAINERS: update an e-mail address

I no longer have direct access to my Inktank e-mail. I still pay attention to rbd, so update its entry in MAINTAINERS accordingly. Signed-off-by: Alex Elder el...@linaro.org --- MAINTAINERS |2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS index

Re: xfs Warnings in syslog

I'm sorry for reporting back only now, but I did not get to try it out earlier. I upgraded one of my nodes to kernel 3.10 and the messages did not come up yet. It seems the kernel upgrade did the job. Thank you very much for your help! On Tue, 22 Oct 2013 13:36:56 +0100, Andrey Korolyov

Re: zero size file on cephfs

sounds like caused by the file recover bug. The fix (https://github.com/ceph/ceph/commit/eb381ffc8db14f13a7c5e3528a109bf89a7c5b31) is included in the 0.72 release. Regards Yan, Zheng On Fri, Nov 8, 2013 at 10:36 AM, Drunkard Zhang gongfan...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I'm using cephfs for a

Re: writing a ceph cliente for MS windows

Hello malcom and matt thank you for apporting some more information source. OpenAFS is sure interesting httpfs too. I hope it will help us on deciding the best path to follow in our interface with window. Actually I still trying to isolate the needed client code in the shortest way possible.

Re: cache tier blueprint (part 2)

On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 6:56 AM, Sage Weil s...@inktank.com wrote: I typed up what I think is remaining for the cache tier work for firefly. Greg, can you take a look? I'm most likely missing a bunch of stuff here.

[PATCH] Ceph: allocate non-zero page to fscache in readpage()

ceph_osdc_readpages() returns number of bytes read, currently, the code only allocate full-zero page into fscache, this patch fixes this. Signed-off-by: Li Wang liw...@ubuntukylin.com --- fs/ceph/addr.c |2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/fs/ceph/addr.c

v0.72 Emperor released

This is the fifth major release of Ceph, the fourth since adopting a 3-month development cycle. This release brings several new features, including multi-datacenter replication for the radosgw, improved usability, and lands a lot of incremental performance and internal refactoring work to support

Re: Fwd: Waiters on OSD operations will hang if replies invalid?

On Sat, 9 Nov 2013, Li Wang wrote: Hi Sage, I am wondering if this issue is there. My understanding is that, for OSD requests, if replies get lost, each request will get re-sent, even to different OSDs, if the Monitor tells the client corresponding OSD error. Then each request will finally

libuuid vs boost uuid

Just out of curiosity (recent thread about windows port) I just had a quick go at compiling librados under mingw (win32 cross compile), and one of the errors that popped up was the lack of libuuid under mingw. Ceph appears to use libuuid, but I notice boost appears to include a uuid class too,

Re: cache tier blueprint (part 2)

On Fri, 8 Nov 2013, Gregory Farnum wrote: On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 6:56 AM, Sage Weil s...@inktank.com wrote: I typed up what I think is remaining for the cache tier work for firefly. Greg, can you take a look? I'm most likely missing a bunch of stuff here.

Re: libuuid vs boost uuid

On Sat, 9 Nov 2013, James Harper wrote: Just out of curiosity (recent thread about windows port) I just had a quick go at compiling librados under mingw (win32 cross compile), and one of the errors that popped up was the lack of libuuid under mingw. Ceph appears to use libuuid, but I notice