Limiting specific to specific directory, client separation

Hi, We would liked to migrate from gluster to ceph in environment where multiple servers can access one directory, where some should be unavailable. Basically we need per directory access list for multiple users. I've found some overdue tickets on tracker http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/1401 and

[PATCH] ceph: don't include ceph.{file,dir}.layout vxattr in listxattr()

This avoids 'cp -a' modifying layout of new files/directories. Signed-off-by: Yan, Zheng zheng.z@intel.com --- fs/ceph/xattr.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/ceph/xattr.c b/fs/ceph/xattr.c index 28549d5..c9c2b88 100644 --- a/fs/ceph/xattr.c +++

[librbd] Add interface of get the snapshot size?

Hi all, As we know, snapshot is a lightweight resource in librbd and we doesn't have any statistic informations about it. But it causes some problems to the cloud management. We can't measure the size of snapshot, different snapshot will occur different space. So we don't have way to estimate

Re: [librbd] Add interface of get the snapshot size?

On 03/24/2014 02:30 PM, Haomai Wang wrote: Hi all, As we know, snapshot is a lightweight resource in librbd and we doesn't have any statistic informations about it. But it causes some problems to the cloud management. We can't measure the size of snapshot, different snapshot will occur

Re: [librbd] Add interface of get the snapshot size?

On 03/24/2014 05:30 PM, Haomai Wang wrote: Hi all, As we know, snapshot is a lightweight resource in librbd and we doesn't have any statistic informations about it. But it causes some problems to the cloud management. We can't measure the size of snapshot, different snapshot will occur

ceph branch status

-- All Branches -- Alfredo Deza alfredo.d...@inktank.com 2013-09-27 10:33:52 -0400 wip-5900 2014-01-21 16:29:22 -0500 wip-6465 Dan Mick dan.m...@inktank.com 2013-07-16 23:00:06 -0700 wip-5634 2014-03-18 21:56:03 -0700 wip-7577 Danny Al-Gaaf

Re: [ceph-users] poor data distribution

Hi, FWIW the tunable that fixes this was just merged today but won't appear in a release for another 3 weeks or so. This is vary_r tunable ? Can I use this in production? -- Regards Dominik 2014-02-12 3:24 GMT+01:00 Sage Weil s...@inktank.com: On Wed, 12 Feb 2014, Dominik Mostowiec wrote:

Re: Limiting specific to specific directory, client separation

This is not currently a priority in Inktank's roadmap for the MDS. :( But we discussed client security in more detail than those tickets during the Dumpling Ceph Developer Summit: http://wiki.ceph.com/Planning/CDS/Dumpling (search for 1G: Client Security for CephFS -- there's a blueprint, an

Re: GCC -msse2 portability question

On 23/03/2014 23:34, Laurent GUERBY wrote: On Sun, 2014-03-23 at 20:50 +0100, Loic Dachary wrote: Hi Laurent, In the context of optimizing erasure code functions implemented by Kevin Greenan (cc'ed) and James Plank at https://bitbucket.org/jimplank/gf-complete/ we ran accross a question