Re: [Ceph-Dokan] A Windows CephFS Client Project

2015-01-06 Thread Dong Yuan
It is awesome! I think CephFS may be the next Big Thing of ceph, since many many companies are about to use NAS on cloud. On 7 January 2015 at 12:09, Ketor D wrote: > Hi everyone, > > A new project ceph-dokan (https://github.com/ceph/ceph-dokan) is > open-source to all now. > You can access the

RE: Ceph data consistency

2015-01-06 Thread Ma, Jianpeng
Hi Sage, Pull request is https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/3305. Thanks! Jianpeng Ma > -Original Message- > From: Sage Weil [mailto:sw...@redhat.com] > Sent: Wednesday, January 7, 2015 10:18 AM > To: Ma, Jianpeng > Cc: c...@sadziu.pl; vijayendra.shama...@sandisk.com; > ceph-devel@vger.

[Ceph-Dokan] A Windows CephFS Client Project

2015-01-06 Thread Ketor D
Hi everyone, A new project ceph-dokan (https://github.com/ceph/ceph-dokan) is open-source to all now. You can access the cephfs on Windows directly using ceph-dokan, not by smb or whatever. And you will get the full experience and performance of cephfs on Windows now. Here is something about this

ERROR: assert(last_e.version.version < e.version.version)

2015-01-06 Thread Nicheal
Hi all, I cannot restart some osds when after a flipping of all 54 osds. The log is show below: -9> 2015-01-06 10:53:07.976997 7f35695177a0 20 read_log 31150'2273018 (31150'2273012) modify 4a8b7974/rb.0.bc58e8.6b8b4567.3e37/head//2 by client.16829289.1:720306459 2015-01-05 21:57:54.65

Re: ceph-deploy osd destroy feature

2015-01-06 Thread Wei-Chung Cheng
2015-01-07 0:30 GMT+08:00 Travis Rhoden : > On Tue, Jan 6, 2015 at 11:23 AM, Sage Weil wrote: >> On Tue, 6 Jan 2015, Travis Rhoden wrote: >>> On Tue, Jan 6, 2015 at 9:28 AM, Sage Weil wrote: >>> > On Tue, 6 Jan 2015, Wei-Chung Cheng wrote: >>> >> 2015-01-06 13:08 GMT+08:00 Sage Weil : >>> >> > On

RE: Ceph data consistency

2015-01-06 Thread Sage Weil
On Wed, 7 Jan 2015, Ma, Jianpeng wrote: > > -- Forwarded message -- > > From: Pawe? Sadowski > > Date: 2014-12-30 21:40 GMT+08:00 > > Subject: Re: Ceph data consistency > > To: Vijayendra Shamanna , > > "ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org" > > > > > > On 12/30/2014 01:40 PM, Vijayendra

RE: Ceph data consistency

2015-01-06 Thread Ma, Jianpeng
> -- Forwarded message -- > From: Paweł Sadowski > Date: 2014-12-30 21:40 GMT+08:00 > Subject: Re: Ceph data consistency > To: Vijayendra Shamanna , > "ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org" > > > On 12/30/2014 01:40 PM, Vijayendra Shamanna wrote: > > Hi, > > > > There is a sync thread (sy

RGW's apache and mod_fastcgi

2015-01-06 Thread Ken Dreyer
As background for people who are not familiar with this situation: for a long time Ceph has used some forked copies of Apache and mod_fastcgi to power the RADOS Gateway. >From discussions with Dan Mick and Yehuda, Ceph's changes to Apache were mainly cosmetic, and it's ok to use the distro-supplie

deprecated rbd functions and warnings

2015-01-06 Thread Gregory Farnum
So last month a bunch of librados functions around watch-notify were marked as deprecated, and because RBD still uses them everything went yellow on the gitbuilders. I believe we're expecting a patch series to move to the new APIs pretty soon, but was wondering when. In particular, a spot check de

Re: Ceph backports

2015-01-06 Thread Loic Dachary
On 06/01/2015 19:21, Gregory Farnum wrote: > On Tue, Jan 6, 2015 at 12:39 AM, Loic Dachary wrote: >> >> >> On 06/01/2015 01:22, Gregory Farnum wrote: >>> On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 4:12 PM, Loic Dachary wrote: :-) This process is helpful if it allows me to help a little more than I curre

Re: Ceph backports

2015-01-06 Thread Gregory Farnum
On Tue, Jan 6, 2015 at 12:39 AM, Loic Dachary wrote: > > > On 06/01/2015 01:22, Gregory Farnum wrote: >> On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 4:12 PM, Loic Dachary wrote: >>> :-) This process is helpful if it allows me to help a little more than I >>> currently do with the backport process. It would be a loss

Re: replace fiemap with seek_data/seek_hole?

2015-01-06 Thread Sage Weil
On Tue, 6 Jan 2015, Gregory Farnum wrote: > On Tue, Jan 6, 2015 at 8:44 AM, Sage Weil wrote: > > Hey, > > > > In an exchange on linux-fsdevel yesterday it became clear that even when > > FIEMAP isn't buggy it's not a good interface to build a map of sparse > > files. For example, XFS defrag or ot

Re: [ceph-users] What to do when a parent RBD clone becomes corrupted

2015-01-06 Thread Robert LeBlanc
On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 6:01 PM, Gregory Farnum wrote: > On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 1:21 PM, Robert LeBlanc wrote: >> Before we base thousands of VM image clones off of one or more snapshots, I >> want to test what happens when the snapshot becomes corrupted. I don't >> believe the snapshot will beco

Re: replace fiemap with seek_data/seek_hole?

2015-01-06 Thread Gregory Farnum
On Tue, Jan 6, 2015 at 8:44 AM, Sage Weil wrote: > Hey, > > In an exchange on linux-fsdevel yesterday it became clear that even when > FIEMAP isn't buggy it's not a good interface to build a map of sparse > files. For example, XFS defrag or other future fs features may muck with > fiemap results.

hammer timing

2015-01-06 Thread Sage Weil
Things were pretty slow over the holidays, so here's the current plan. - Extend the current sprint (v0.92) until the end of this week (1/11). At that time the already-frozen v0.91 will get released and v0.92 will freeze. - Do one more two week sprint (v0.93) from 1/12 to 1/25. v0.92 will rel

replace fiemap with seek_data/seek_hole?

2015-01-06 Thread Sage Weil
Hey, In an exchange on linux-fsdevel yesterday it became clear that even when FIEMAP isn't buggy it's not a good interface to build a map of sparse files. For example, XFS defrag or other future fs features may muck with fiemap results. One wouldn't expect those things to change whether a fil

Re: ceph-deploy osd destroy feature

2015-01-06 Thread Travis Rhoden
On Tue, Jan 6, 2015 at 11:23 AM, Sage Weil wrote: > On Tue, 6 Jan 2015, Travis Rhoden wrote: >> On Tue, Jan 6, 2015 at 9:28 AM, Sage Weil wrote: >> > On Tue, 6 Jan 2015, Wei-Chung Cheng wrote: >> >> 2015-01-06 13:08 GMT+08:00 Sage Weil : >> >> > On Tue, 6 Jan 2015, Wei-Chung Cheng wrote: >> >> >>

Re: ceph-deploy osd destroy feature

2015-01-06 Thread Sage Weil
On Tue, 6 Jan 2015, Travis Rhoden wrote: > On Tue, Jan 6, 2015 at 9:28 AM, Sage Weil wrote: > > On Tue, 6 Jan 2015, Wei-Chung Cheng wrote: > >> 2015-01-06 13:08 GMT+08:00 Sage Weil : > >> > On Tue, 6 Jan 2015, Wei-Chung Cheng wrote: > >> >> Dear all: > >> >> > >> >> I agree Robert opinion because

Re: ceph-deploy osd destroy feature

2015-01-06 Thread Travis Rhoden
On Tue, Jan 6, 2015 at 9:28 AM, Sage Weil wrote: > On Tue, 6 Jan 2015, Wei-Chung Cheng wrote: >> 2015-01-06 13:08 GMT+08:00 Sage Weil : >> > On Tue, 6 Jan 2015, Wei-Chung Cheng wrote: >> >> Dear all: >> >> >> >> I agree Robert opinion because I hit the similar problem once. >> >> I think that how

Re: Deadline of Github pull request for Hammer release (question)

2015-01-06 Thread Loic Dachary
Hi, On 06/01/2015 12:49, Miyamae, Takeshi wrote: > Dear Loic, > > I'm Takeshi Miyamae, one of the authors of SHEC's blueprint. > > Shingled Erasure Code (SHEC) > https://wiki.ceph.com/Planning/Blueprints/Hammer/Shingled_Erasure_Code_(SHEC) The work you have done is quite impressive :-) > We ha

Ceph backports status report

2015-01-06 Thread Loic Dachary
Dear Ceph co-developers, Here is a list of the pending backports. If your name shows on an issue that needs to be backported to a stable release, it would be great if you could update the corresponding issue and/or create a pull request to cherry-pick the relevant commits. If you would like he

Re: ceph-deploy osd destroy feature

2015-01-06 Thread Sage Weil
On Tue, 6 Jan 2015, Wei-Chung Cheng wrote: > 2015-01-06 13:08 GMT+08:00 Sage Weil : > > On Tue, 6 Jan 2015, Wei-Chung Cheng wrote: > >> Dear all: > >> > >> I agree Robert opinion because I hit the similar problem once. > >> I think that how to handle journal partition is another problem about > >>

Re: Ceph-client branch for Ubuntu 14.04.1 LTS (3.13.0-x kernels)

2015-01-06 Thread Ilya Dryomov
On Tue, Jan 6, 2015 at 3:31 PM, Chaitanya Huilgol wrote: > Hi Ilya, > > The RBD crash on OSD nodes going away is routinely hit in our setups. > We have not been able to get a good stack trace for this one due to our > console capture issues and these don't end up in the syslogs either after the

RE: Ceph-client branch for Ubuntu 14.04.1 LTS (3.13.0-x kernels)

2015-01-06 Thread Chaitanya Huilgol
Hi Ilya, The RBD crash on OSD nodes going away is routinely hit in our setups. We have not been able to get a good stack trace for this one due to our console capture issues and these don't end up in the syslogs either after the crash. Will get you the traces soon. Most of the times this happens

Deadline of Github pull request for Hammer release (question)

2015-01-06 Thread Miyamae, Takeshi
Dear Loic, I'm Takeshi Miyamae, one of the authors of SHEC's blueprint. Shingled Erasure Code (SHEC) https://wiki.ceph.com/Planning/Blueprints/Hammer/Shingled_Erasure_Code_(SHEC) We have revised our blueprint shown in the last CDS to extend our erasure code layouts and describe the guideline for

tracker.ceph.com API

2015-01-06 Thread Loic Dachary
Hi, I tried various things to update tracker.ceph.com from the command line but failed. The best result I have is the following: cat /tmp/a.xml 10281 firefly: make check fails on fedora 20 (1) firefly curl --http1.0 --verbose -T /tmp/a.xml http://tracker.ceph.com/i

Re: full osdmaps in mon txns

2015-01-06 Thread Dan van der Ster
On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 10:12 AM, Dan van der Ster wrote: > Hi Sage, > > On Tue, Dec 23, 2014 at 10:10 PM, Sage Weil wrote: >> >> This fun issue came up again in the form of 10422: >> >> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/10422 >> >> I think we have 3 main options: >> >> 1. Ask users to do a m

Re: Ceph backports

2015-01-06 Thread Loic Dachary
On 06/01/2015 01:22, Gregory Farnum wrote: > On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 4:12 PM, Loic Dachary wrote: >> :-) This process is helpful if it allows me to help a little more than I >> currently do with the backport process. It would be a loss if the end result >> is that everyone cares less about back