On 2015/6/15 22:27, Ilya Dryomov wrote:
On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 4:23 PM, juncheng bai
wrote:
On 2015/6/15 21:03, Ilya Dryomov wrote:
On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 2:18 PM, juncheng bai
wrote:
From 6213215bd19926d1063d4e01a248107dab8a899b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: juncheng bai
Date: M
Change config fopen to binary mode, allowing LF and CRLF EOL characters so
ceph-dokan can work with native windows configuration files going forward.
The carriage return is ignored and trimmed as whitespace during parsing via
isspace().
Signed-off-by: James Devine
---
src/common/ConfUtils.cc | 2
On Sun, Jun 14, 2015 at 11:00:23AM +0530, Abhishek L wrote:
>
> Wido den Hollander writes:
>
> > On 06/13/2015 01:29 AM, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> >> On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 07:13:48PM -0400, Yehuda Sadeh-Weinraub wrote:
> >>> Whatever we end up doing, we need to make it configurable, and also
Hi, according to the inputs from the thread, I have included following
changes for adding more restrictions to the RGW bucket name :
1. removed previous boolean flag for specifying bucket naming rule and
added a int option with values 0,1,2
-OPTION(rgw_relaxed_s3_bucket_names, OPT_BOOL, false) //
I do not consider 11914 to be a blocker.
-Sam
- Original Message -
From: "Yuri Weinstein"
To: "Ceph Development"
Cc: "Loic Dachary" , "Xinxin Shu"
Sent: Monday, June 15, 2015 9:37:20 AM
Subject: firefly v0.80.10 QE validation status 6/15/2015
QE validation is almost completed (there ar
On 15/06/2015 17:10, Robert LeBlanc wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
John, let me see if I understand what you are saying...
When a person runs `rbd top`, each OSD would receive a message saying
please capture all the performance, grouped by RBD and limit it to
'X'. That
QE validation is almost completed (there are a couple of jobs that are still
running)
All statis details were summarized in http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/11090
Highlights (by suite/issue):
rados #11914 needs Sam's approval
kcephfs n/a needs Greg's approval
samba #6613 needs Greg's approval
Ni
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 7:52 AM, Sage Weil wrote:
> On Mon, 15 Jun 2015, Gregory Farnum wrote:
>> On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 12:33 PM, Robert LeBlanc wrote:
>> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> > Hash: SHA256
>> >
>> > One feature we would like
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
John, let me see if I understand what you are saying...
When a person runs `rbd top`, each OSD would receive a message saying
please capture all the performance, grouped by RBD and limit it to
'X'. That way the OSD doesn't have to constantly update
On 15/06/2015 14:52, Sage Weil wrote:
I seem to remember having a short conversation about something like this a
few CDS's back... although I think it was 'rados top'. IIRC the basic
idea we had was for each OSD to track it's top clients (using some
approximate LRU type algorithm) and then ei
-- All Branches --
Abhishek Lekshmanan
2015-06-13 10:30:09 +0530 hammer-backports
Adam Crume
2014-12-01 20:45:58 -0800 wip-doc-rbd-replay
Alfredo Deza
2015-03-23 16:39:48 -0400 wip-11212
2015-03-25 10:10:43 -0400 wip-11065
Alfredo Deza
2014-07
On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 4:23 PM, juncheng bai
wrote:
>
>
> On 2015/6/15 21:03, Ilya Dryomov wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 2:18 PM, juncheng bai
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> From 6213215bd19926d1063d4e01a248107dab8a899b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>>> From: juncheng bai
>>> Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2015 18:34
On Mon, 15 Jun 2015, Gregory Farnum wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 12:33 PM, Robert LeBlanc wrote:
> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > Hash: SHA256
> >
> > One feature we would like is an "rbd top" command that would be like
> > top, but show usage of RBD volumes so that we can quickly id
On 2015/6/15 21:03, Ilya Dryomov wrote:
On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 2:18 PM, juncheng bai
wrote:
From 6213215bd19926d1063d4e01a248107dab8a899b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: juncheng bai
Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2015 18:34:00 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] storage:rbd: make the size of request is equal to the
On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 2:18 PM, juncheng bai
wrote:
> From 6213215bd19926d1063d4e01a248107dab8a899b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: juncheng bai
> Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2015 18:34:00 +0800
> Subject: [PATCH] storage:rbd: make the size of request is equal to the
> size of the object
>
> ensures tha
Hi Sage and Samuel,
We have updated the status of our design and implementation of
multi-object transaction support at
http://tracker.ceph.com/projects/ceph/wiki/Rados_-_multi-object_transaction_support,
your comments
are appreciated.
Cheers,
Li Wang
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send th
On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 12:33 PM, Robert LeBlanc wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
> One feature we would like is an "rbd top" command that would be like
> top, but show usage of RBD volumes so that we can quickly identify
> high demand RBDs.
>
> Since I haven't done any
From 6213215bd19926d1063d4e01a248107dab8a899b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: juncheng bai
Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2015 18:34:00 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] storage:rbd: make the size of request is equal to the
size of the object
ensures that the merged size of request can achieve the size of
the object.
w
[adding ceph-devel for other backporters benefit]
Hi Nathan,
On 15/06/2015 11:34, Nathan Cutler wrote:
> Hi Loic:
>
> I went over the list of old untriaged backports at
>
> http://tracker.ceph.com/projects/ceph/issues?utf8=%E2%9C%93&set_filter=1&f[]=status_id&op[status_id]=%3D&v[status_id][]=14
hi, all:
when I use ec poll, I see there are some object history for object xx.
Such as: xx__head_610951D6__2_fe1_2,
xx__head_610951D6__2_fe2_2
xx__head_610951D6__2__2
I think this object is used for roll_back when not all shards have
written object to
On Sun, Jun 14, 2015 at 12:05 PM, Fabian Frederick wrote:
>
>
>> On 08 June 2015 at 09:49 Ilya Dryomov wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Jun 5, 2015 at 10:12 PM, Fabian Frederick wrote:
>> > ceph used -1 for the last match_table_t option.
>> > Use Opt_err enum like other FS
>> >
>> > match_token() is base
21 matches
Mail list logo
