to fix http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/10534.
Is there any better solution?
On 20 January 2015 at 10:19, Dong Yuan yuandong1...@gmail.com wrote:
On 20 January 2015 at 09:43, Sage Weil sw...@redhat.com wrote:
When I first looked at the append() function I started working on a branch
that would
, if it doesn't make sense. I will go down that path.
Is that OK?
sage
On Tue, 20 Jan 2015, Dong Yuan wrote:
If we must keep the order of local_t and op_t, I think the current
impl of append is not appropriate.
Maybe I must provide something like clone_append to avoid the modify
of existing data
contains the create_collection) and op_t (which
contains all of the operations on the object in the temp collection).
We need the operations in localt to precede the operations in op_t.
How do we do this?
-Sam
On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 8:07 AM, Dong Yuan yuandong1...@gmail.com wrote:
Yes, I am
to get access to the test cluster. Haomai has
access, and you can get the logs via http (linked from pulpito.ceph.com),
but it is less convenient.
Thanks!
sage
--
Dong Yuan
Email:yuandong1...@gmail.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe ceph-devel in
the body
::WorkThreadSharded::entry()+0x10) [0xb98170]
10: (()+0x8182) [0x7f6a90246182]
Do you mind taking a look?
Thanks!
sage
--
Dong Yuan
Email:yuandong1...@gmail.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe ceph-devel in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info
majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
Dong Yuan
Email:yuandong1...@gmail.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe ceph-devel in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
: send the line unsubscribe ceph-devel in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
Dong Yuan
Email:yuandong1...@gmail.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe ceph-devel in
the body
Sorry, I mean YOU can have a BP first.
On 27 December 2014 at 13:14, Dong Yuan yuandong1...@gmail.com wrote:
Why don't you push your impl? Maybe I can have a BP first.
On 27 December 2014 at 01:10, Ketor D d.ke...@gmail.com wrote:
Is here any progress on Cephfs Windows Client ?
2013-11-08
from this list: send the line unsubscribe ceph-devel in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
Dong Yuan
Email:yuandong1...@gmail.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe ceph-devel
use any alignment value to build
logical bufferlist.
Can you give me some explanation? Thank you.
--
Dong Yuan
UnitedStack
Room 302, Block C, Building. 4, Zongguancun Software Park, 100193
Haidian Dist. Beijing. China
yuand...@unitedstack.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line
--
Best Regards,
Wheat
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe ceph-devel in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
Dong Yuan
Email:yuandong1...@gmail.com
--
To unsubscribe from
,
there you should be seeing more contention and as a result more latency.
Thanks Regards
Somnath
-Original Message-
From: ceph-devel-ow...@vger.kernel.org
[mailto:ceph-devel-ow...@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Dong Yuan
Sent: Saturday, September 27, 2014 8:45 PM
To: ceph-devel
enqeueue and dequeue of OpWQ.
Start: PG::enqueue_op before osd-op_wq.equeue call
End: OSD::dequeue_op.entry
= Test Result =
Traditional OpWQ: 109us(AVG), 40us(MIN)
ShardedOpWQ: 97us(AVG), 32us(MIN)
= Test Conclusion =
No Remarkably Improvement for Latency
--
Dong Yuan
Regards,
Wheat
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe ceph-devel in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
Dong Yuan
Email:yuandong1...@gmail.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send
-Original Message-
From: Dong Yuan [mailto:yuandong1...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, September 25, 2014 11:31 PM
To: Haomai Wang
Cc: Sage Weil; ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org; Somnath Roy; Allen Samuels;
dieter.kas...@ts.fujitsu.com; pvonstamw...@us.fujitsu.com; Shu, Xinxin;
Stefan Priebe
to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
Dong Yuan
Email:yuandong1...@gmail.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe ceph-devel in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http
. Looks like PG copies all are incomplete.
sage
(Somebody hit similar issue here:
http://lists.ceph.com/pipermail/ceph-users-ceph.com/2014-February/007948.html)
--
Alexey Kurnosov
--
Alexey Kurnosov
--
Dong Yuan
Email:yuandong1...@gmail.com
Sorry, the last sentence should be You can NOT remove PG, except you
remove the whole Pool.
On 10 June 2014 08:57, Dong Yuan yuandong1...@gmail.com wrote:
InComplete PG means this PG can't get enough metadata (PG logs) to
enter Active state. This may be because some unrepairable data damage
is
required for any safety at all, even when it's fronted by a cache
pool.
I'm not fully agree with it. Why we can't call fdatasync() during
each transaction to
ensure consistent if exists cache in the front of.
On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 7:08 PM, Dong Yuan yuandong1...@gmail.com wrote
at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
Best Regards,
Wheat
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe ceph-devel in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
Dong Yuan
be negative
and how those buckets were added into this array. Thanks.
Best,
L. Wan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe ceph-devel in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
Dong Yuan
In my opinion, w[i] is less than -1.
On 2 December 2013 11:53, Lipeng Wan lipengwa...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Dong,
Thanks for your reply. Then is it valid to access the memory space
specified by that negative id?
L Wan
On Sun, Dec 1, 2013 at 10:31 PM, Dong Yuan yuandong1...@gmail.com wrote
the line unsubscribe ceph-devel in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
Dong Yuan
Email:yuandong1...@gmail.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe ceph-devel in
the body of a message
://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
Dong Yuan
Email:yuandong1...@gmail.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe ceph-devel in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
= 1
debug journaler = 20
to your mds config, restart, and then search through/post that log
somewhere we can check it out? (It will be large.)
-Greg
Software Engineer #42 @ http://inktank.com | http://ceph.com
On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 10:21 PM, Dong Yuan yuandong1...@gmail.com wrote:
I think
from the MDCache.
There is any one has some idea about these problem?
I can give more details if needed. I have the core dump but it is too
big (300MB+) to upload.
Thanks for any help.
--
Dong Yuan
Email:yuandong1...@gmail.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe ceph
and DispatchQueue.entry, But I am not
sure.
Maybe you can give me more details.
Thank you very much.
--
Dong Yuan
Email:yuandong1...@gmail.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe ceph-devel in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org
to understand everything about it.
-Greg
Software Engineer #42 @ http://inktank.com | http://ceph.com
Thank you for your help again!
--
Dong Yuan
Email:yuandong1...@gmail.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe ceph-devel in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
28 matches
Mail list logo
