Hi Sage,
sorry to be late to this thread; I just caught this one as I was
reviewing the Giant release notes. A few questions below:
On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 8:16 PM, Sage Weil s...@newdream.net wrote:
[...]
* ACLs: implemented, tested for kernel client. not implemented for
ceph-fuse.
[...]
Hi Sage,
On Tue, Oct 7, 2014 at 9:20 PM, Sage Weil s...@inktank.com wrote:
This is a release candidate for Giant, which will hopefully be out in
another week or two (s v0.86). We did a feature freeze about a month ago
and since then have been doing only stabilization and bug fixing (and a
On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 5:25 PM, Sage Weil sw...@redhat.com wrote:
On Fri, 19 Sep 2014, Florian Haas wrote:
Hello everyone,
Just thought I'd circle back on some discussions I've had with people
earlier in the year:
Shortly before firefly, snapshot support for CephFS clients was
effectively
On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 5:25 PM, Sage Weil sw...@redhat.com wrote:
On Fri, 19 Sep 2014, Florian Haas wrote:
Hello everyone,
Just thought I'd circle back on some discussions I've had with people
earlier in the year:
Shortly before firefly, snapshot support for CephFS clients was
effectively
On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 1:05 AM, Sage Weil sw...@redhat.com wrote:
Sam and I discussed this on IRC and have we think two simpler patches that
solve the problem more directly. See wip-9487.
So I understand this makes Dan's patch (and the config parameter that
it introduces) unnecessary, but is
On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 7:06 PM, Florian Haas flor...@hastexo.com wrote:
On Sun, Sep 21, 2014 at 9:52 PM, Sage Weil sw...@redhat.com wrote:
On Sun, 21 Sep 2014, Florian Haas wrote:
So yes, I think your patch absolutely still has merit, as would any
means of reducing the number of snapshots
On Sun, Sep 21, 2014 at 9:52 PM, Sage Weil sw...@redhat.com wrote:
On Sun, 21 Sep 2014, Florian Haas wrote:
So yes, I think your patch absolutely still has merit, as would any
means of reducing the number of snapshots an OSD will trim in one go.
As it is, the situation looks really really bad
On Sat, Sep 20, 2014 at 9:08 PM, Alphe Salas asa...@kepler.cl wrote:
Real field testings and proof workout are better than any unit testing ... I
would follow Dan s notice of resolution because it based on real problem and
not fony style test ground.
That statement is almost an insult to the
On Sun, Sep 21, 2014 at 4:26 PM, Dan van der Ster
daniel.vanders...@cern.ch wrote:
Hi Florian,
September 21 2014 3:33 PM, Florian Haas flor...@hastexo.com wrote:
That said, I'm not sure that wip-9487-dumpling is the final fix to the
issue. On the system where I am seeing the issue, even
On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 12:27 AM, Sage Weil sw...@redhat.com wrote:
On Fri, 19 Sep 2014, Florian Haas wrote:
Hi Sage,
was the off-list reply intentional?
Whoops! Nope :)
On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 11:47 PM, Sage Weil sw...@redhat.com wrote:
So, disaster is a pretty good description. Would
Hi Dan,
saw the pull request, and can confirm your observations, at least
partially. Comments inline.
On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 2:50 PM, Dan Van Der Ster
daniel.vanders...@cern.ch wrote:
Do I understand your issue report correctly in that you have found
setting osd_snap_trim_sleep to be
On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 8:56 PM, Mango Thirtyfour
daniel.vanders...@cern.ch wrote:
Hi Florian,
On Sep 18, 2014 7:03 PM, Florian Haas flor...@hastexo.com wrote:
Hi Dan,
saw the pull request, and can confirm your observations, at least
partially. Comments inline.
On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 2
On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 9:12 PM, Dan van der Ster
daniel.vanders...@cern.ch wrote:
Hi,
September 18 2014 9:03 PM, Florian Haas flor...@hastexo.com wrote:
On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 8:56 PM, Dan van der Ster
daniel.vanders...@cern.ch wrote:
Hi Florian,
On Sep 18, 2014 7:03 PM, Florian Haas
Hi,
Somehow I'm thinking I'm opening a can of worms, but here it goes
anyway. I saw some discussion about this here on this list last
(Northern Hemisphere) autumn, but not much since.
I'd like to ask for some clarification on the current state of the
Ceph Puppet modules. Currently there are
On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 7:27 PM, Loic Dachary l...@dachary.org wrote:
Hi Florian,
New efforts should be directed to
https://github.com/stackforge/puppet-ceph (mirrored at
https://github.com/ceph/puppet-ceph) and evolving at
On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 12:15 AM, Gregory Farnum g...@inktank.com wrote:
I'm not sure that we handle enough incoming yet that the extra process
weight of something like Gerrit or Launchpad is necessary over Github.
What are you looking for in that system which Github doesn't provide?
-Greg
Hi everyone,
we ran into an interesting performance issue on Friday that we were
able to troubleshoot with some help from Greg and Sam (thanks guys),
and in the process realized that there's little guidance around for
how to optimize performance in OSD nodes with lots of spinning disks
(and
Hi Tom,
On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 2:28 PM, Tom Lanyon t...@netspot.com.au wrote:
On 14/01/2013, at 10:47 PM, Florian Haas flor...@hastexo.com wrote:
snip
http://www.hastexo.com/resources/hints-and-kinks/solid-state-drives-and-ceph-osd-journals
It's probably easiest to comment directly
Hi Mark,
thanks for the comments.
On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 2:46 PM, Mark Nelson mark.nel...@inktank.com wrote:
Hi Florian,
Couple of comments:
OSDs use a write-ahead mode for local operations: a write hits the journal
first, and from there is then being copied into the backing filestore.
On 01/14/2013 06:34 PM, Gregory Farnum wrote:
On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 6:09 AM, Florian Haas flor...@hastexo.com wrote:
Hi Mark,
thanks for the comments.
On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 2:46 PM, Mark Nelson mark.nel...@inktank.com wrote:
Hi Florian,
Couple of comments:
OSDs use a write-ahead
On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 3:00 PM, Dino Yancey dino2...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I am also curious if a Windows port, specifically the client-side, is
on the roadmap.
This is somewhat OT from the original post, but if all you're
interested is using RBD block storage from Windows, you can already do
On 08/28/2012 11:32 AM, Plaetinck, Dieter wrote:
On Tue, 28 Aug 2012 11:12:16 -0700
Ross Turk r...@inktank.com wrote:
Hi, ceph-devel! It's me, your friendly community guy.
Inktank has an engineering team dedicated to Ceph, and we want to work
on the right stuff. From time to time, I'd
On 08/22/2012 03:10 AM, Sage Weil wrote:
I pushed a branch that changes some of the crush terminology. Instead of
having a crush type called pool that requires you to say things like
pool=default in the ceph osd crush set ... command, it uses root
instead. That hopefully reinforces that
On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 6:19 PM, Tommi Virtanen t...@inktank.com wrote:
On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 8:55 AM, Mark Nelson mark.nel...@inktank.com wrote:
personally I think it's fine to have it on the wiki. I do want to stress
that performance is going to be (hopefully!) improving over the next
Hi Mehdi,
great work! A few questions (for you, Mark, and anyone else watching
this thread) regarding the content of that wiki page:
For the OSD tests, which OSD filesystem are you testing on? Are you
using a separate journal device? If yes, what type?
For the RADOS benchmarks:
# rados bench
On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 9:33 AM, François Charlier
francois.charl...@enovance.com wrote:
Hello,
Readinghttp://ceph.com/docs/master/ops/manage/grow/placement-groups/
and thinking to build a ceph cluster with potentially 1000 OSDs.
Using the recommandations on the previously cited link, it
Hi everyone,
For those of you attending OSCON in Portland next week, there will be
a birds-of-a-feather session on Ceph Monday night. All OSCON attendees
interested in Ceph are very welcome.
Details about the BoF are in this blog post:
On Mon, Jul 9, 2012 at 4:57 PM, Travis Rhoden trho...@gmail.com wrote:
Hey folks,
I had a bit of unexpected trouble today using the rbd map command to
map an RBD to a kernel object. I had previously been using the echo
... /sys/bus/rbd... method of manipulating RBDs.
I was looking at the
On 07/09/12 12:29, Vladimir Bashkirtsev wrote:
On 09/07/12 18:33, Dan Mick wrote:
Vladimir: you can do some investigation with the rados command. What
does
rados -p rbd ls show you?
Rather long list of:
rb.0.11.2786
rb.0.d.54a2
rb.0.6.2eb5
rb.0.d.8294
Hi guys,
Someone I worked with today pointed me to a quick and easy way to
bring down an entire cluster, by making all mons kill themselves in
mass suicide:
ceph osd setmaxosd 2147483647
2012-07-05 16:29:41.893862 b5962b70 0 monclient: hunting for new mon
I don't know what the actual threshold
Hi everyone,
please enlighten me if I'm misinterpreting something, but I think the
Ceph FS layer could handle the following situation better.
How to reproduce (this is on a 3.2.0 kernel):
1. Create a client, mine is named test, with the following capabilities:
client.test
key: key
And one more issue report for today... :)
Really easy to reproduce on my 3.2.0 Debian squeeze-backports kernel:
mount a Ceph FS, create a directory in it. Then run cephfs dir
show_location.
dmesg stacktrace:
[ 7153.714260] libceph: mon2 192.168.42.116:6789 session established
[ 7308.584193]
On Thu, Jul 5, 2012 at 10:04 PM, Gregory Farnum g...@inktank.com wrote:
But I have a few more queries while this is fresh. If you create a
directory, unmount and remount, and get the location, does that work?
Nope, same error.
(actually, just flushing caches would probably do it.)
Idem.
If
On Thu, Jul 5, 2012 at 10:01 PM, Gregory Farnum g...@inktank.com wrote:
Also, going down the rabbit hole, how would this behavior change if I
used cephfs to set the default layout on some directory to use a
different pool?
I'm not sure what you're asking here — if you have access to the
On Tue, Jul 3, 2012 at 2:22 PM, Wido den Hollander w...@widodh.nl wrote:
Hi,
With my CloudStack integration I'm running into a problem with the cephx
keys due to '/' being possible in the cephx keys.
CloudStack's API expects a URI to be passed when adding a storage pool,
e.g.:
On Tue, Jul 3, 2012 at 5:04 PM, Yehuda Sadeh yeh...@inktank.com wrote:
FWIW (only semi-related), some S3 clients -- s3cmd from s3tools, for
example -- seem to choke on the forward slash in radosgw
auto-generated secret keys, as well.
With radosgw we actually switch a while back to use the
Hi everyone,
just wanted to check if this was the expected behavior -- it doesn't
look like it would be, to me.
What I do is create a 1G RBD, and just for the heck of it, make an XFS on it:
root@alice:~# rbd create xfsdev --size 1024
root@alice:~# rbd map xfsdev
root@alice:~# rbd showmapped
id
On Sun, Jul 1, 2012 at 10:22 PM, Chuanyu chua...@cs.nctu.edu.tw wrote:
Hi Yehuda, Florian,
I follow the wiki, and steps which you discussed,
construct my ceph system with rados gateway,
and I can use libs3 to upload file via radosgw, (thanks a lot!)
but got 405 Method Not Allowed when I use
Hi everyone,
radosgw(8) states that the following capabilities must be granted to
the user that radosgw uses to connect to RADOS.
ceph-authtool -n client.radosgw.gateway --cap mon 'allow r' --cap osd
'allow rwx' --cap mds 'allow' /etc/ceph/keyring.radosgw.gateway
Could someone explain why we
Hi,
in cephx enabled clusters (0.47.x), authentication failures from
radosgw seem to lead to an uncaught assertion failure:
2012-07-02 11:26:46.559830 b69c5730 0 librados:
client.radosgw.charlie authentication error (1) Operation not
permitted
2012-07-02 11:26:46.560093 b69c5730 -1 Couldn't
On Mon, Jul 2, 2012 at 1:44 PM, Wido den Hollander w...@widodh.nl wrote:
You are not allowing the RADOS Gateway to do anything on the MDS.
There is no 'r', 'w' or 'x' permission which you are allowing. So there is
nothing the rgw has access to on the MDS.
Yep, so we might as well leave off
Hi everyone,
I wonder if this is intentional: when I create a new Swift key for an
existing subuser, which has previously been assigned full control
permissions, those permissions appear to get lost upon key creation.
# radosgw-admin subuser create --uid=johndoe --subuser=johndoe:swift
On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 6:03 PM, Tommi Virtanen t...@inktank.com wrote:
On Sat, Jun 23, 2012 at 11:42 AM, Igor Laskovy igor.lask...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all from hot Kiev))
Does anybody use Ceph as a backend storage for NOVA-INST-DIR/instances/ ?
Yes.
On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 7:43 AM, James Page james.p...@ubuntu.com wrote:
You can type faster than I can... I'm working on getting this
resolved in the current dev release of Ubuntu in the next few
days after which it will go through the normal SRU process for
Ubuntu 12.04.
Sweet, thanks!
On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 1:41 AM, Greg Farnum g...@inktank.com wrote:
On Wednesday, June 13, 2012 at 1:37 PM, Florian Haas wrote:
Greg,
My understanding of Ceph code internals is far too limited to comment on
your specific points, but allow me to ask a naive question.
Couldn't you
Hi everyone,
it occurred to me this afternoon that admin/build-doc unconditionally
tries to fetch some updates from GitHub, which breaks building docs when
you don't have a network connection. Would there be any reasonably
simple way to make it support offline build, provided the various pip
bits
Greg,
My understanding of Ceph code internals is far too limited to comment on
your specific points, but allow me to ask a naive question.
Couldn't you be stealing a lot of ideas from SCSI-3 Persistent
Reservations? If you had server-side (OSD) persistence of information of
the this device is in
Hi everyone,
I have a long flight ahead of me later this week and plan to be
spending some time on http://ceph.com/docs/master/ops/radosgw/ -- which
currently happens to be a bit, ahem, sparse.
There's currently not a lot of documentation on radosgw, and some of it
is inconsistent, so if one of
Hi Yehuda,
thanks, that resolved a lot of questions for me. A few follow-up
comments below:
On 06/12/12 18:47, Yehuda Sadeh wrote:
On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 3:44 AM, Florian Haas flor...@hastexo.com wrote:
Hi everyone,
I have a long flight ahead of me later this week and plan to be
spending
Hi,
just noticed that radosgw-admin comes with a bit of confusing content in
its man page and usage message:
EXAMPLES
Generate a new user:
$ radosgw-admin user gen --display-name=johnny rotten
--email=joh...@rotten.com
As far as I remember user gen is gone, and it's now user
On 06/11/12 23:39, Yehuda Sadeh wrote:
If one of the Ceph guys could provide a quick comment on this, I can
send a patch to the man page RST. Thanks.
Minimum required to create a user:
radosgw-admin user create --uid=user id --display-name=display name
The user id is actually a user
On 06/10/12 23:32, Sébastien Han wrote:
Hello everyone,
I recently posted on my website an introduction to ceph and the
integration of Ceph in OpenStack.
It could be really helpful since the OpenStack documentation has not
dealt with it so far.
Feel free to comment, express your opinions
Hi everyone,
apologies for the cross-post, and not sure if this is new information.
I did do a cursory check of both list archives and didn't find
anything pertinent, so here goes. Feel free to point me to an existing
thread if I'm merely regurgitating something that's already known.
Either I'm
On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 8:47 AM, Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG
s.pri...@profihost.ag wrote:
Am 24.05.2012 16:19, schrieb Florian Haas:
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 4:09 PM, Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG
s.pri...@profihost.ag wrote:
Take a look at these to see if anything looks familiar:
http
Stefan,
On 05/24/12 13:07, Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG wrote:
Hi list,
i'm still testing ceph rbd with kvm. Right now i'm testing a rbd block
device within a network booted kvm.
Sequential write/reads and random reads are fine. No problems so far.
But when i trigger lots of 4k random
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 4:09 PM, Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG
s.pri...@profihost.ag wrote:
Take a look at these to see if anything looks familiar:
http://oss.sgi.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=922
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/979498
Creating a snapshot requires using rbd snap create,
as opposed to just rbd create. Also for purposes of
clarification, add note that removing a snapshot similarly
requires rbd snap rm.
Thanks to Josh Durgin for the explanation on IRC.
---
man/rbd.8 | 10 +-
1 files changed, 9
On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 8:01 PM, Mandell Degerness
mand...@pistoncloud.com wrote:
Can anyone point me in the right direction for setting up Nova so that
it allocates disk space on RBD device(s) rather than on local disk as
defined in the --instances_path flag?
I've already got nova-volume
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 10:15 AM, Tomasz Paszkowski ss7...@gmail.com wrote:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FegjLbCnoBw
I sat in that talk at LCA and can highly recommend it. Jon Corbet
wrote a piece on LWN about it too (currently subscribers only):
https://lwn.net/Articles/476263/
Cheers,
Hi,
please consider two follow-up patches to the OCF resource agents: the
first adds them to the Debian build, as a separate package
ceph-resource-agents that depends on resource-agents, the second
fixes a trivial (and embarassing, however harmless) cut and paste
error. Thanks!
Cheers,
Florian
---
debian/ceph-resource-agents.install |1 +
debian/control | 13 +
debian/rules|2 ++
3 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 debian/ceph-resource-agents.install
diff --git
-ra
Florian Haas (3):
init script: be LSB compliant for exit code on status
Add OCF-compliant resource agent for Ceph daemons
Spec: conditionally build ceph-resource-agents package
ceph.spec.in| 22 ++
configure.ac|8 ++
src/Makefile.am |4
Put OCF resource agents in a separate subpackage,
to be enabled with a separate build conditional
(--with ocf).
Make the subpackage depend on the resource-agents
package, which provides the ocf-shellfuncs library
that the Ceph RAs use.
Signed-off-by: Florian Haas flor...@hastexo.com
, configure --with-ocf to enable.
Signed-off-by: Florian Haas flor...@hastexo.com
---
configure.ac|8 ++
src/Makefile.am |4 +-
src/ocf/Makefile.am | 23 +++
src/ocf/ceph.in | 177 +++
4 files changed, 210 insertions(+), 2
Hi everyone,
please consider merging the following trivial patch that makes the
ceph init script return the proper LSB exit code (3) for the status
action if the service is gracefully stopped, and only return 1 (as
before) if the service has died and left its PID file hanging around.
Who cares
65 matches
Mail list logo
