Re: deb/rpm package purge

2013-03-20 Thread Laszlo Boszormenyi (GCS)
On Wed, 2013-03-20 at 05:48 -0700, Sage Weil wrote: > On Wed, 20 Mar 2013, Laszlo Boszormenyi (GCS) wrote: > > On Tue, 2013-03-19 at 15:59 -0700, Sage Weil wrote: > > > As a point of comparison, mysql removes the config files but not > > > /var/lib/mysql. > >

Re: deb/rpm package purge

2013-03-19 Thread Laszlo Boszormenyi (GCS)
On Tue, 2013-03-19 at 15:59 -0700, Sage Weil wrote: > On Tue, 19 Mar 2013, Laszlo Boszormenyi (GCS) wrote: > > On the other hand, 'dpkg --purge' is to remove everything the package > > has installed and/or generated. This includes debconf answers as well. > > Wit

Re: deb/rpm package purge

2013-03-19 Thread Laszlo Boszormenyi (GCS)
On Tue, 2013-03-19 at 15:29 -0700, Sage Weil wrote: > On Tue, 19 Mar 2013, Laszlo Boszormenyi (GCS) wrote: > > In short, if user asks to purge the package, then the keys have to be > > removed as well. If someone thinks about a reinstallation, s/he should > > use remove inste

Re: deb/rpm package purge

2013-03-19 Thread Laszlo Boszormenyi (GCS)
On Tue, 2013-03-19 at 13:51 -0700, Sage Weil wrote: > On Tue, 19 Mar 2013, Dan Mick wrote: > > Is there a way out if you remove the keyrings? > > Yeah; you can use the keyring in the mon data dir to refetch any keyrings > you deleted from /etc/ceph/. But if packages are purged on mon as well...

Re: [GIT PULL v5] java: add libcephfs Java bindings

2012-10-10 Thread Laszlo Boszormenyi (GCS)
Hi Noah, On Wed, 2012-10-10 at 15:00 -0700, Noah Watkins wrote: > Laszlo, James: > > Changes based on your previous feedback are ready for review. I pushed the > changes here: > > git://github.com/noahdesu/ceph.git wip-java-cephfs Checking only the diff, as it's 3 am here. It looks quite OK.

Re: [GIT PULL v5] java: add libcephfs Java bindings

2012-10-04 Thread Laszlo Boszormenyi (GCS)
On Thu, 2012-10-04 at 21:24 +0100, James Page wrote: > On 03/10/12 20:39, Sage Weil wrote: > > Laszlo, do you have a minute to take a look? > > Laszlo - hope you don't mind me jumping in but Java packaging is > something I have quite a bit of experience with. No problem, I second your overview. S

Re: [GIT PULL v5] java: add libcephfs Java bindings

2012-10-03 Thread Laszlo Boszormenyi (GCS)
On Wed, 2012-10-03 at 12:39 -0700, Sage Weil wrote: > On Wed, 3 Oct 2012, Noah Watkins wrote: > > I wanted to touch base on this Java bindings patch series to make sure > > this can become a solid foundation for the Hadoop shim clean-up. Were > > there any specific issues with this, other than not

Re: Ceph exception for wheezy

2012-08-09 Thread Laszlo Boszormenyi (GCS)
Hi James, On Tue, 2012-07-17 at 13:14 +0100, James Page wrote: > Laszlo - are you looking at this? I can find some time if you need a hand. Ups, missed this mail. I think the symbols fix is in place[1], but I need someone to test its buildability on archs other than i386 and amd64. Anyone with mi

Re: Ceph Upstream Tarball + Re: Ceph status for Wheezy

2012-07-11 Thread Laszlo Boszormenyi (GCS)
Hi James, Sage, Let me answer you both at once. On Wed, 2012-07-11 at 10:01 +0100, James Page wrote: > On 11/07/12 01:30, Laszlo Boszormenyi (GCS) wrote: > > You are right, the watch file is outdated. An updated watch file is attached. Please commit it Sage. It goes for numbers

Re: Ceph status for Wheezy

2012-07-11 Thread Laszlo Boszormenyi (GCS)
On Sun, 2012-07-08 at 21:39 -0700, Sage Weil wrote: > On Sun, 8 Jul 2012, Laszlo Boszormenyi (GCS) wrote: > > It was released since then. But there are several files that I don't > > know where to install. First are some headers under /usr/include/crush : > > crush

Re: Ceph status for Wheezy

2012-07-08 Thread Laszlo Boszormenyi (GCS)
Hi Sage, On Sat, 2012-06-30 at 23:12 -0700, Sage Weil wrote: > Fingers crossed! It may go into Wheezy, but I need some information. > Barring any last-minute catastrophies, 0.48 should be released Monday. It was released since then. But there are several files that I don't know where to install

Ceph status for Wheezy

2012-06-30 Thread Laszlo Boszormenyi (GCS)
Hi Sage, As previously noted, using leveldb caused some trouble with Ceph could be included in Wheezy or not. I've proposed that the supported architectures should be limited in Ceph and leveldb to the ones the latter supports. I got a release critical bugreport[1] that it should be reversed. Ales

Re: sync Ceph packaging efforts for Debian/Ubuntu

2012-06-27 Thread Laszlo Boszormenyi (GCS)
Hi all, On Mon, 2012-06-18 at 09:44 -0700, Sage Weil wrote: > On Mon, 18 Jun 2012, James Page wrote: > > Laszlo - thanks for sending the original email - I'd like to get > > everything as closely in-sync as possible between the three packaging > > sources as well. It seems I could sync with Ubunt

sync Ceph packaging efforts for Debian/Ubuntu

2012-06-15 Thread Laszlo Boszormenyi (GCS)
et/ -Vcs-Git: git://github.com/NewDreamNetwork/ceph.git -Vcs-Browser: https://github.com/NewDreamNetwork/ceph +Homepage: http://ceph.com/ +Vcs-Git: git://github.com/ceph/ceph.git +Vcs-Browser: https://github.com/ceph/ceph Maintainer: Ubuntu Developers XSBC-Original-Maintainer: Laszlo Boszormenyi

Re: debian updates

2012-06-12 Thread Laszlo Boszormenyi (GCS)
On Tue, 2012-06-12 at 10:06 -0700, Sage Weil wrote: > On Tue, 12 Jun 2012, Laszlo Boszormenyi (GCS) wrote: > > I can package it if > > you want. Now my fingers are crossed to accept libs3 soon, it's freeze > > for Wheezy soon[1]. Ceph 0.47.2 is waiting for that to be in W

Re: debian updates

2012-06-11 Thread Laszlo Boszormenyi (GCS)
Hi Sage, On Mon, 2012-06-11 at 19:41 -0700, Sage Weil wrote: > Can you take a look at the last 4 commits of > https://github.com/ceph/ceph/commits/debian > and let me know if they address the issues you mentioned? Yes, they fixes those issues I've mentioned. However you could keep ceph-kdum