On Tue, 2013-03-19 at 15:59 -0700, Sage Weil wrote:
On Tue, 19 Mar 2013, Laszlo Boszormenyi (GCS) wrote:
On the other hand, 'dpkg --purge' is to remove everything the package
has installed and/or generated. This includes debconf answers as well.
With other words, purge is used to make
On Wed, 2013-03-20 at 05:48 -0700, Sage Weil wrote:
On Wed, 20 Mar 2013, Laszlo Boszormenyi (GCS) wrote:
On Tue, 2013-03-19 at 15:59 -0700, Sage Weil wrote:
As a point of comparison, mysql removes the config files but not
/var/lib/mysql.
The question is, is that okay/typical
On Tue, 2013-03-19 at 13:51 -0700, Sage Weil wrote:
On Tue, 19 Mar 2013, Dan Mick wrote:
Is there a way out if you remove the keyrings?
Yeah; you can use the keyring in the mon data dir to refetch any keyrings
you deleted from /etc/ceph/.
But if packages are purged on mon as well...
I
On Tue, 2013-03-19 at 15:29 -0700, Sage Weil wrote:
On Tue, 19 Mar 2013, Laszlo Boszormenyi (GCS) wrote:
In short, if user asks to purge the package, then the keys have to be
removed as well. If someone thinks about a reinstallation, s/he should
use remove instead.
The keys aren't
Hi Noah,
On Wed, 2012-10-10 at 15:00 -0700, Noah Watkins wrote:
Laszlo, James:
Changes based on your previous feedback are ready for review. I pushed the
changes here:
git://github.com/noahdesu/ceph.git wip-java-cephfs
Checking only the diff, as it's 3 am here. It looks quite OK. But
On Thu, 2012-10-04 at 21:24 +0100, James Page wrote:
On 03/10/12 20:39, Sage Weil wrote:
Laszlo, do you have a minute to take a look?
Laszlo - hope you don't mind me jumping in but Java packaging is
something I have quite a bit of experience with.
No problem, I second your overview.
Sage,
On Wed, 2012-10-03 at 12:39 -0700, Sage Weil wrote:
On Wed, 3 Oct 2012, Noah Watkins wrote:
I wanted to touch base on this Java bindings patch series to make sure
this can become a solid foundation for the Hadoop shim clean-up. Were
there any specific issues with this, other than not yet
Hi James, Sage,
Let me answer you both at once.
On Wed, 2012-07-11 at 10:01 +0100, James Page wrote:
On 11/07/12 01:30, Laszlo Boszormenyi (GCS) wrote:
You are right, the watch file is outdated.
An updated watch file is attached. Please commit it Sage. It goes for
numbers only, so
Hi Sage,
As previously noted, using leveldb caused some trouble with Ceph could
be included in Wheezy or not.
I've proposed that the supported architectures should be limited in Ceph
and leveldb to the ones the latter supports. I got a release critical
bugreport[1] that it should be reversed.
Hi all,
On Mon, 2012-06-18 at 09:44 -0700, Sage Weil wrote:
On Mon, 18 Jun 2012, James Page wrote:
Laszlo - thanks for sending the original email - I'd like to get
everything as closely in-sync as possible between the three packaging
sources as well.
It seems I could sync with Ubuntu a
/ceph
+Homepage: http://ceph.com/
+Vcs-Git: git://github.com/ceph/ceph.git
+Vcs-Browser: https://github.com/ceph/ceph
Maintainer: Ubuntu Developers ubuntu-devel-disc...@lists.ubuntu.com
XSBC-Original-Maintainer: Laszlo Boszormenyi (GCS) g...@debian.hu
Uploaders: Sage Weil s...@newdream.net
diff --git
On Tue, 2012-06-12 at 10:06 -0700, Sage Weil wrote:
On Tue, 12 Jun 2012, Laszlo Boszormenyi (GCS) wrote:
I can package it if
you want. Now my fingers are crossed to accept libs3 soon, it's freeze
for Wheezy soon[1]. Ceph 0.47.2 is waiting for that to be in Wheezy.
libs3 got accepted
Hi Sage,
On Mon, 2012-06-11 at 19:41 -0700, Sage Weil wrote:
Can you take a look at the last 4 commits of
https://github.com/ceph/ceph/commits/debian
and let me know if they address the issues you mentioned?
Yes, they fixes those issues I've mentioned. However you could keep
13 matches
Mail list logo
