Hi, Stefan
On wed, 14 Nov 2012 14:42:07 +0100, Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG wrote:
Hello list,
i wanted to try out ceph with latest vanilla kernel 3.7-rc5. I was seeing a
massive performance degration. I see around 22x btrfs-endio-write processes
every 10-20 seconds and they run a long
Hi Josef,
On fri, 18 May 2012 15:01:05 -0400, Josef Bacik wrote:
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/btrfs_inode.h b/fs/btrfs/btrfs_inode.h
index 9b9b15f..492c74f 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/btrfs_inode.h
+++ b/fs/btrfs/btrfs_inode.h
@@ -57,9 +57,6 @@ struct btrfs_inode {
/* used to order data wrt
On Tue, 21 Jun 2011 02:08:54 +0200, David Sterba wrote:
On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 06:12:10PM +0800, Miao Xie wrote:
From 457f39393b2e3d475fbba029b90b6a4e17b94d43 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Miao Xie mi...@cn.fujitsu.com
Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 17:21:51 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] btrfs: fix
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
From 457f39393b2e3d475fbba029b90b6a4e17b94d43 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Miao Xie mi...@cn.fujitsu.com
Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 17:21:51 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] btrfs: fix inconsonant inode information
When iputting the inode, We
On fri, 17 Jun 2011 10:10:31 -0600, Jim Schutt wrote:
I've hit this delayed-inode BUG several times. I'm using btrfs
as the data store for Ceph OSDs, and testing a heavy write load.
The kernel I'm running is a recent commit (f8f44f09eaa) from
Linus' tree with the for-chris branch (commit
