Re: [ceph-users] Initial performance cluster SimpleMessenger vs AsyncMessenger results

2015-10-14 Thread Mark Nelson
itial performance cluster SimpleMessenger vs AsyncMessenger results Hi Haomai, Great! I haven't had a chance to dig in and look at it with valgrind yet, but if I get a chance after I'm done with newstore fragment testing and somnath's writepath work I'll try to go back and di

RE: [ceph-users] Initial performance cluster SimpleMessenger vs AsyncMessenger results

2015-10-14 Thread Chen, Xiaoxi
? -Xiaoxi > -Original Message- > From: ceph-users [mailto:ceph-users-boun...@lists.ceph.com] On Behalf Of > Mark Nelson > Sent: Tuesday, October 13, 2015 9:03 PM > To: Haomai Wang > Cc: ceph-devel; ceph-us...@lists.ceph.com > Subject: Re: [ceph-users] Initial performance clust

Re: [ceph-users] Initial performance cluster SimpleMessenger vs AsyncMessenger results

2015-10-13 Thread Mark Nelson
Hi Haomai, Great! I haven't had a chance to dig in and look at it with valgrind yet, but if I get a chance after I'm done with newstore fragment testing and somnath's writepath work I'll try to go back and dig in if you haven't had a chance yet. Mark On 10/12/2015 09:56 PM, Haomai Wang wro

Re: [ceph-users] Initial performance cluster SimpleMessenger vs AsyncMessenger results

2015-10-13 Thread Sage Weil
On Tue, 13 Oct 2015, Haomai Wang wrote: > resend > > On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 10:56 AM, Haomai Wang wrote: > > COOL > > > > Interesting that async messenger will consume more memory than simple, in my > > mind I always think async should use less memory. I will give a look at this Yeah.. I was su

RE: [ceph-users] Initial performance cluster SimpleMessenger vs AsyncMessenger results

2015-10-13 Thread Dałek , Piotr
> -Original Message- > From: ceph-devel-ow...@vger.kernel.org [mailto:ceph-devel- > ow...@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Somnath Roy > Sent: Tuesday, October 13, 2015 8:46 AM > > Thanks Haomai.. > Since Async messenger is always using a constant number of threads , there > could be a potent

Re: [ceph-users] Initial performance cluster SimpleMessenger vs AsyncMessenger results

2015-10-12 Thread Haomai Wang
gt; > Regards > Somnath > > > -Original Message- > From: Haomai Wang [mailto:haomaiw...@gmail.com] > Sent: Monday, October 12, 2015 11:35 PM > To: Somnath Roy > Cc: Mark Nelson; ceph-devel; ceph-us...@lists.ceph.com > Subject: Re: [ceph-users] Initial performance cluste

RE: [ceph-users] Initial performance cluster SimpleMessenger vs AsyncMessenger results

2015-10-12 Thread Somnath Roy
aomai Wang [mailto:haomaiw...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, October 12, 2015 11:35 PM To: Somnath Roy Cc: Mark Nelson; ceph-devel; ceph-us...@lists.ceph.com Subject: Re: [ceph-users] Initial performance cluster SimpleMessenger vs AsyncMessenger results On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 12:18 PM, Somnath Roy

Re: [ceph-users] Initial performance cluster SimpleMessenger vs AsyncMessenger results

2015-10-12 Thread Haomai Wang
.ceph.com] On Behalf Of > Haomai Wang > Sent: Monday, October 12, 2015 7:57 PM > To: Mark Nelson > Cc: ceph-devel; ceph-us...@lists.ceph.com > Subject: Re: [ceph-users] Initial performance cluster SimpleMessenger vs > AsyncMessenger results > > > > COOL > > &g

Re: [ceph-users] Initial performance cluster SimpleMessenger vs AsyncMessenger results

2015-10-12 Thread Haomai Wang
resend On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 10:56 AM, Haomai Wang wrote: > COOL > > Interesting that async messenger will consume more memory than simple, in my > mind I always think async should use less memory. I will give a look at this > > On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 12:50 AM, Mark Nelson wrote: >> >> Hi Guy