17:58:12
Objet: Re: [ceph-users] dropping old distros: el6, precise 12.04, debian
wheezy?
Sage Weil sw...@redhat.com 2015-07-30 06:54:
As time marches on it becomes increasingly difficult to maintain proper
builds and packages for older distros. For example, as we make the
systemd
On 31/07/2015, Mariusz Gronczewski wrote:
Well, Centos 6 will be supported to 2020, and centos 7 was released a
year ago so I'd imagine a lot of people haven't migrated yet and
migration process is nontrivial if you already did some modificiations
to c6 (read: fix broken as fuck init scripts
-users
ceph-us...@ceph.com
Envoyé: Jeudi 30 Juillet 2015 17:58:12
Objet: Re: [ceph-users] dropping old distros: el6, precise 12.04, debian wheezy?
Sage Weil sw...@redhat.com 2015-07-30 06:54:
As time marches on it becomes increasingly difficult to maintain proper
builds and packages for older
-
De: Brian Kroth bpkr...@gmail.com
À: Sage Weil sw...@redhat.com
Cc: ceph-devel ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org, ceph-users
ceph-us...@ceph.com
Envoyé: Jeudi 30 Juillet 2015 17:58:12
Objet: Re: [ceph-users] dropping old distros: el6, precise 12.04, debian wheezy?
Sage Weil sw...@redhat.com 2015-07-30
On Thu, 30 Jul 2015 06:54:13 -0700 (PDT), Sage Weil sw...@redhat.com
wrote:
So... given that, I'd like to gauge user interest in these old distros.
Specifically,
CentOS6 / RHEL6
Ubuntu precise 12.04
Debian wheezy
Would anyone miss them?
Well, Centos 6 will be supported to 2020,
I understand your reasons, but dropping support for LTS release like this
is not right.
You should lege artis support every distribution the LTS release could have
ever been installed on - that’s what the LTS label is for and what we rely on
once we build a project on top of it
CentOS 6 in
I understand your reasons, but dropping support for LTS release like this
is not right.
You should lege artis support every distribution the LTS release could have
ever been installed on - that’s what the LTS label is for and what we rely on
once we build a project on top of it
CentOS 6 in
So, essentially, you'd vote that all LTS/enterprise releases be supported until
their vendor's (canonical, Suse, red hat) designated EOL date? Not voting
either way, just trying to put a date stamp on some of this.
Joe
On Jul 30, 2015, at 9:30 AM, Jan “Zviratko” Schermer zvira...@zviratko.net
Not at all.
We have this: http://ceph.com/docs/master/releases/
I would expect that whatever distribution I install Ceph LTS release on will
be supported for the time specified.
That means if I install Hammer on CentOS 6 now it will stay supported
until 3Q/2016.
Of course if in the meantime the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
I agree that for the distros and version in question, Ceph releases
already released on them should provide bug support until EoL of Ceph
or the distro version, whichever is shorter.
Since we are so far into Infernalis and Jewel development cycle,
Sage Weil sw...@redhat.com 2015-07-30 06:54:
As time marches on it becomes increasingly difficult to maintain proper
builds and packages for older distros. For example, as we make the
systemd transition, maintaining the kludgey sysvinit and udev support for
centos6/rhel6 is a pain in the butt
11 matches
Mail list logo
